The physical identity of DNA helixes in a given individual is a proof that the counter-matter of DNA is the carrier of software "programs of life and fate"

4 views
Skip to first unread message

JP3

unread,
Nov 26, 2010, 9:27:51 PM11/26/10
to
Motto: "If two physically identical computers work in a drastically
different manner, then it means that (1) their work is controlled by
software stored in their memories, and that (2) this software is
composed of very different programs."

In item #A2 of the web page named "immortality.htm" I explained the
principle of operation of "time vehicles". This principle reveals,
that time travel, construction of "time vehicles", and the access to
immortality through the repetitive shifting people back to years of
their youth each time they accomplish their old age, are possible
because double DNA helixes are most elementary forms of natural
computers. These helixes run the software so-called "programs of life
and fate" stored in memory of the "counter-matter", which control the
elapse of time in every living creature. Unfortunately, my discoveries
of the work of time, manner of shifting back in time, and principles
of operation of "time vehicles" - which open for the humanity the
access to immortality through allowing people to repeatedly shift back
in time to years of their youth each time they arrive to an old age,
encountered reception which is rather tragic for our civilisation. Not
only that they are ignored by well-paid professional scientists, but
in addition are persecuted with rude and noisy criticism of internet
mob, which is completely deprived of ability for rational thinking and
for civilised debating. Clearly, the most hostile inclined persecutors
of myself and my research are not discourages even by these numerous
examples of evidence discussed in items #D1 to #D6 of the web page
named "immortality.htm", nor by my postulates based on facts and logic
which are so easily verifiable by everyone. Therefore, in this post I
decided to provide still another proof which is based on commonly
known facts, and which also unambiguously confirms that DNA helixes
are actually miniature natural computers which run software "programs
of life and fate" contained in the memory of their "counter-matter".

The proof described here, which confirms that "helixes of DNA in fact
are simplest natural computers that run the software codes of
'programs of life and fate' stores in their memories", is based on a
sequence of very elementary empirical findings. The first out of these
findings is obvious for everyone. It states, that "every cell of the
body displays a different development, function, work, changes, fate,
etc." In other words, the "passage through time" for every single cell
of living body of a given individual is different from passages
through time of remaining cells from the body of the same individual.
The second commonly known empirical finding about DNA, is that "the
double helixes of DNA can only be used by criminology for identifying
an individual from which they originate, because independently from
which cell of this individual they are retrieved, their hardware
(atomic) structure is still exactly the same". For example, when soon
after formulating the proof described here, on 23 November 2010 I
checked what about the use of DNA in criminology is described on
internet web pages devoted to this subject, then e.g. on then
available web page with the address " http://www.exploredna.co.uk/dna-and-criminology.html
" I found the following statements expressing the above (commonly
known) empirical finding - quote from the abovementioned web page: "a
person's DNA is the same in all areas of their body, it can't be
altered or modified in any way"; and also "DNA is found in blood, skin
cells, hair and all around the human body".

Of course, my findings and knowledge on the topic of "counter-matter"
- which I described and supported with wide evidence in volumes 1, 4,
5 and 11 of my newest monograph [1/5], provide an unambiguous
explanation for the empirical findings described above, that the
passage through time and fate of completely different cells of body is
controlled by DNA which has the same hardware (atomic) structures.
This explanation states, "DNA must contain software 'control programs'
written into the intelligent memory of 'counter-matter' that forms the
hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA". In other words, double
helixes of DNA are actually equivalents of these computers described
in the "motto" from this post (which "motto" reminds us the obvious
truth that "if exist two physically identical computers which carry
out drastically different activities, then this is a proof that such
computers (1) contains inside some software that controls their
activities, and (2) this software is different in each one of these
computers"). After all, as we know it from the use of DNA in
criminology, from the physical point of view DNA helixes in a given
individual look identical, no matter from which cell they were taken.
On the other hand, in each of these cells, the same looking DNA
extends the control over a completely different course of the
development, function, work, changes, fate, etc. - for a given cell.
This in turn would be impossible if the "control program" which these
DNA must contain inside, was written in a hardware manner by being
"permanently hardwired" into the hardware (atomic) structure of these
DNA. In other words, to be that way, DNA must store inside some
"programs of live and fate" which have the purely software character.

The proof described here is immensely important. After all, in
addition to the evidence provided before in this post, it also
confirms the correctness of the principle of operation of "time
vehicles" described on the web page named "immortality.htm", which
provide people with access to immortality. Furthermore, it also
confirms that the "counter-matter" displays attributes of a liquid
computer hardware, in memory of which are stored software control
programs. In this way it confirms the truth and correctness of
everything that about the "counter-matter" (and thus also about e.g.
the self-evolution of God from chaotically behaving counter-matter)
was explained, e.g. in item #E1 of a separate web page named
"will.htm" and in item A1.1 from volume 1 of the monograph [1/5], and
it also confirms the truth of whatever about the creation of the
physical world and man by God was explained and supported with
evidence in items #C3 and #C4 of the separate web page named
"god_proof.htm". In addition, the proof discussed here is also helpful
in illustrating how thoughtless and how deprived of inquisitiveness
are present users of empirical findings about DNA. After all, these
users know jolly well, that in every cell from the body of a given
individual, DNA controls over a different development, function, work,
changes, fate, etc., for this cell. Simultaneously they also know that
in a given individual the hardware (atomic) structure of this DNA is
sufficiently identical for all cells of the body, that on the basis of
the DNA taken from any cell, it is possible to identify the entire
given individual. In spite of this, none amongst users of DNA to-date
come to a conclusion, that such facts confirm that DNA helixes in fact
must be kinds of miniature control computers which run software
programs stored in their memories. None of them was also noticing,
that in order codes contained in DNA could control the development,
function, work, changes, fate, etc., of individual cells, there must
exist some mechanism of carrying the control commands into cells -
while our science to-date has NOT identified such a mechanism yet. In
face of such a lack of thinking and inquisitiveness on part of other
scientists, is it really in interest of the humanity to still
officially ignore my discoveries and outcomes of my research? Is it
really worth to take seriously these noisy attacks of internet mob
which not only is similarly blind, but which in addition is also
deprived of the specialised knowledge that is required to understand
ideas described here?

In order to emphasize the immense significance of the proof described
here, and also to formally introduce this proof into a permanent
accomplishment of human knowledge, below I am going to repeat this
proof in the form that is customary for formal scientific proving
according to principles of mathematical logic. So here is the formal
scientific proof, stating that "the hardware entities known as DNA
double helixes are the most simple forms of natural computers that
control the passage of their cells through the time by using software
'programs of life and fate' stored in the memory of 'counter-matter'
that constitutes the physical structure of these DNA", completed with
the use of methods of mathematical logic:

Theorem:

"The hardware entities known as DNA double helixes are the most simple
forms of natural computers that control the passage of their cells
through the time with the use of software 'programs of life and fate'
stored in the memory of 'counter-matter' that constitutes the physical
structure of these DNA".

Basis proposition:

(') The control of development, function, work, changes, fate, etc.,
of subsequent cells in a living organism, which represents the passage
of these cells through time, can occur only if (1) DNA from these
cells contain either appropriate programs stored in a software manner
(i.e. DNA contain some forms of natural "programs of life and fate"
stored in the memory of the "counter-matter" that constitutes these
DNA), or if (2) these DNA contain programs stored in a hardware manner
(i.e. programs which are "permanently hardwired" into the hardware
(atomic) structure of these DNA). The fact that present criminology is
able to identify given individuals on the basis of the hardware
(atomic) structure of DNA of these individuals taken from any cells of
their bodies, proves that the hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA
cannot be a carrier of the hardwired code of such a program, because
(a) this hardware (atomic) structure is identical in all cells of a
given individual - and thus it CANNOT reflect the diversities of
development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., of subsequent cells
in a given organism, and also because (b) there is no outside
mechanism which would read and implement such a hardwired program.
This way the above facts completely exclude the possibility that such
controlling programs are "hardwired permanently" into the hardware
(atomic) structure of DNA.

(") The above basis proposition can also be expressed in a slightly
different manner, for example with words: Control over the
development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., of a given cell,
which must have a different course for every cell of a given
individual, and thus which represents the passage of a given cell
through time, may be accomplished either (1) by DNA helixes which are
kinds of most elementary natural computers that run appropriate
"programs of life and fate" written in a software manner into the
memory of "counter-matter" that constitutes these DNA, or can be
accomplished (2) by the DNA which are kinds of "permanently hardwired"
programs written into the hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA in
a hardware manner, and which are later read and implemented by a
different mechanism located outside of these DNA. The fact that
present criminology is able to identify every individual on the basis
of hardware (atomic) structure of the DNA of that individual taken
form any cells of his or her body - no matter what is the development,
function, work changes, fate, etc., of this cell, proves that the
hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA cannot be a carrier of such a
"hardware coded program", because (a) this hardware (atomic) structure
is identical in all cells of a given individual - and thus it does NOT
reflect the diversity that is required for expressing the differences
in development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., of every single
cell from a body, and also because (b) for such a "permanently
hardwired program" would need to exist a mechanism outside of the DNA
which would implement this program - but the science to-date has NOT
encountered any trace of it. Thus, the above facts completely
eliminate the possibility that such a control program is "hardwired in
a hardware manner" into the hardware (atomic) structure of DNA.

Proof:

The above basis proposition is to be transformed with the use of
tautological form of the method known under the name of "disjunctive
syllogism". This form can be written as [(p || q) && !p] => q, in
which the assertion "p" says "the control of development, function,
work, changes, fate, etc., of subsequent cells in a living organism,
can be so diversified only if the DNA of these cells contain
appropriate programs stored in a hardware manner (i.e. the atomic
structure of these DNA contains 'permanently hardwired programs of
life and fate' )", while the assertion "q" says "the control of
development, function, changes, and fate of subsequent cells in a
living organism, can be so diversified only if the DNA of these cells
contain appropriate programs stored in a software manner (i.e. contain
in memories some forms of natural 'programs of life and fate' stored
in memory of the 'counter-matter' that constitutes these DNA), while
the atomic structure of these DNA is just a simplest form of computer
hardware that executes the run of these program". In turn the
assertion "!p" states "the fact that present criminology is able to
base the identification of individuals on DNA taken from any cells of
their bodies, which proves the identical hardware structure of DNA in
cells with drastically different development, functions, work,
changes, fates, etc., completely eliminates the possibility that
programs contained in these DNA are written in a hardware manner by
being 'permanently hardwired ' into the hardware (atomic) structure of
these DNA". The transformation of these propositions implies the
conclusion that "the development, functions, changes, and fates of
individual cells of a body are so diversified because their DNA
contain software programs that describe the passage of a given cell
through the time (i.e. DNA double helixes contain natural programs
stored in memories of the 'counter-matter' that form their atomic
structure)".

Conclusion:

The above inference chain unambiguously and conclusively proves the
truth of the theorem that "the hardware entities known as DNA double
helixes are the most simple forms of natural computers that control
the passage of their cells through the time with the use of software
'programs of life and fate' stored in the memory of 'counter-matter'
that constitutes the physical structure of these DNA".

* * *

For the use of these readers who are NOT familiar with the notation
that is applied in the above proof, I would like to explain that
symbols "p", "q", and "r" mark subsequent "assertions" utilized in
this proof as logical variables. In turn symbols "!", "&&", "||", and
"=>" mark logical operators "not", "and", "inclusive or", and
"implies" (if ... => then ...").

The above proof is just one amongst a series of formal scientific
proofs formulated with the methods of mathematical logic, which prove,
amongst others, that:(1) "the counter-world does exist" (this counter-
world is filled with the continually moving substance called 'counter-
matter' - having attributes of liquid computer hardware) - see item
#D3 of the web page named "dipolar_gravity.htm", (2) "God does exist"
- see item #G2 of the web page "god_proof.htm", (3) "God created the
first pair of people" - see item #B6.2 of the web page
"evolution.htm", (4) "people have immortal souls" - see item #C1.1 of
the web page named "nirvana.htm", (5) "DNA are most simple forms of
natural computers which control the passage through time of cells in
which these DNA reside, while this control of the passage of cells
through time they accomplish by a sequential running of software
'programs of life and fate' contained in memories of these DNA" - see
item #D7 of the web page "immortality.htm" or see subsection M1.6 from
volume 11 of monograph marked "[1/5]", and also proving that (6) "God
authorised the Bible" - see item #B1 of the web page named
"bible.htm". I would really encourage readers that for their own good
they consider the existence and validity of these proofs in everything
that they do in their lives. As I explain this e.g. in item #I3 of the
web page named "day26.htm", such consideration can turn out decisive
in many life situations and sometimes may even translate into life
(instead of death).

The proof presented above was subjected to the public discussion on
internet discussion forums of "Google" at addresses indicated in item
#E2 of the web page named "faq.htm". Furthermore, this proof is also
included into subsection M1.6 from my newest monograph marked
"[1/5]".

* * *

This post summarises the essence of item #D7 from the totaliztic web
page named "immortality.htm" (updated on 23 November 2010, or later).
Thus, reading the above descriptions would be even more effective from
that web page "immortality.htm" than from this post, as on the web
page are working all (green) links to other related web pages with
additional explanations, it is printed in colour, it is supported with
illustrations, the content of it is updated regularly, etc. The latest
update of the web page "immortality.htm" can be viewed, amongst
others, at addresses:
http://members.fortunecity.com/timevehicle/immortality.htm
http://malbork.20megsfree.com/immortality.htm
http://pigs.20megsfree.com/immortality.htm
http://totalizm.20fr.com/immortality.htm
http://prawda.20fr.com/immortality.htm
http://prism.20fr.com/immortality.htm
http://energia.sl.pl/immortality.htm
http://propulsion.250free.com/immortality.htm (this last address has
a very low "monthly bandwidth" and thus it is active only at
beginnings of each month until its "monthly bandwidth" is exhausted).
Notice that every above web site contains all totaliztic web pages,
including pages "text_1_5.htm" with free copies of monograph [1/5].
However, volumes 1, 4, 5, and 11 of monograph [1/5] I would recommend
to download from the address http://energia.sl.pl/text_1_5.htm where
this monograph is updated the most frequently.

Each topic which I am subjecting to a public discussion, including
this one, is placed on all blogs of totalizm still in existence after
the discussion is concluded (so that interested readers can find it
fast in there). At the moment two blogs of totalizm still remain
operational, which can be viewed at following internet addresses:
http://totalizm.wordpress.com
http://totalizm.blox.pl/html
It is also worth to have look in there at related posts, e.g. at posts
number #E175, #E163, or #E161 which also concern "time vehicles" and
the evidence which confirms that the time travel is possible.

With the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak

P.S. I should add here, that my previous post was also discussing
evidence on the feasibility of "time travel". It was an old film of
1928 (distributed as a video) which captured a "time traveller" who
used a modern hand-phone as long ago as in 1928. The discussion of
that video (or old film) is available at the address:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/b87cee7b56b3dde3#
.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages