info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Einstein's Constancy of the Speed of Light and Big Brother's 2+2=5
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Pentcho Valev
Sep 14, 2022, 4:15:24 AM9/14/22
to
Einstein's constancy of the speed of light is just as obviously absurd as Big Brother's 2+2=5. Consider Doppler (moving observer):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE
The speed of the light pulses relative to the stationary observer is
c = df
where d is the distance between subsequent pulses and f is the frequency at the stationary observer. The speed of the pulses relative to the moving observer is
c'= df' > c
where f' > f is the frequency at the moving observer.
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE
The speed of the light pulses relative to the stationary observer is
c = df
where d is the distance between subsequent pulses and f is the frequency at the stationary observer. The speed of the pulses relative to the moving observer is
c'= df' > c
where f' > f is the frequency at the moving observer.
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
Pentcho Valev
Sep 14, 2022, 4:55:18 PM9/14/22
to
If Einstein's constancy of the speed of light is just as obviously absurd as Big Brother's 2+2=5, why do physicists worship it? George Orwell explains:
George Orwell: "In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?"
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
George Orwell: "In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?"
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
0 new messages