Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"What Darwin Never Knew" (Must Watch)

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Sir Frederick

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 1:23:18 PM12/31/09
to
What every philosopher should see, including you!
----------------------------------------------------------------
What Darwin Never Knew :

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/beta/evolution/darwin-never-knew.html

Click on : Watch What Darwin Never Knew

One hundred and fifty years later,
scientists decode nature's greatest mysteries
a two-hour special.
Excellent program. I watched it twice!

tg

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 4:09:08 PM12/31/09
to

Evolution is a hoax. Biologists made it up to get grant money.

It is just too complicated to model, so we can't believe their
predictions.

If evolution is real, where are the transitional fossils?

If man came from apes, how come there are still apes?

.....

Michael Gordge

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 5:45:52 PM12/31/09
to
On Jan 1, 6:09 am, tg <tgdenn...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> If evolution is real, where are the transitional fossils?

A plant prior to evolving to become resistant to herbicide didn't look
any different.

> If man came from apes, how come there are still apes?

Man didn't "come from" apes, man is still an ape, indeed, some much
more so than others, oh and there is no missing link, the missinlg
link is an idea invented by the religionists for further state funding
to keep their nightmare alive.

Just as there are different species of fish sooo too are there
different species of apes.

MG

Sir Frederick

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 6:13:10 PM12/31/09
to

You are a hoax. A hubris laden true believing, hoax.
You have found that deceit works, even self deceit.

Immortalist

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 9:55:44 PM12/31/09
to
On Dec 31, 10:23 am, Sir Frederick <mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> What every philosopher should see, including you!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> What Darwin Never Knew :
>

Bad title if you were to ask me. It would be more like the state of
science and research methods at the time; Darwin doesn't represent all
of science back then. Plus these people at that media dump junkyard
really are dishonest. There is an official title to what Darwin and
other scientists could only guess at, it is called the Modern
Evolutionary Synthesis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_evolutionary_synthesis

bigfl...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 11:53:47 PM12/31/09
to
On Jan 1, 10:55 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 31, 10:23 am, Sir Frederick <mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote:
>
> > What every philosopher should see, including you!
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > What Darwin Never Knew :
>
> Bad title if you were to ask me. It would be more like the state of
> science and research methods at the time; Darwin doesn't represent all
> of science back then.

Thats self evident, and the intro of the video pays appropriate homage
to the brilliance of Darwin.

In the world of modern science, Darwins theories will and have been
subject to another predictable sort of evolution, as is happening.In
the mean time, the believers can and will continue with their battle
(ironically part of the 'energy' propagated to fuel evolution).

Id look forward to someone writing a book entitled "Charles Darwin
meets Schrodinger's Cat"

BOfL


> Plus these people at that media dump junkyard
> really are dishonest. There is an official title to what Darwin and
> other scientists could only guess at, it is called the Modern
> Evolutionary Synthesis
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_evolutionary_synthesis
>
>
>
> >http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/beta/evolution/darwin-never-knew.html
>
> > Click on : Watch What Darwin Never Knew
>
> > One hundred and fifty years later,
> > scientists decode nature's greatest mysteries
> > a two-hour special.

> > Excellent program. I watched it twice!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Sir Frederick

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 12:26:44 AM1/1/10
to

The program is to celebrate several significant anniversaries
in the Darwin saga. It goes beyond "Modern Evolutionary Synthesis"
into more recent genetic and DNA exploration. It gets into
a genetic hierarchy that I had not studied. It actually discusses
three or four hierarchical levels that are very recent stuff.
Really worth watching, with all the example cases, even transitory
fossils, and embryo development. The 'talking heads' are very good.

Monsieur Turtoni

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 1:10:09 AM1/1/10
to

"Sir Frederick" <mmcn...@fuzzysys.com> wrote in message
news:4fqpj5t2bjt8qsna7...@4ax.com...

Thanks for sharing; great stuff!

And a happy new year too you Sir Frederick.

Sir Frederick

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 1:10:36 AM1/1/10
to
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:53:47 -0800 (PST), "bigfl...@gmail.com" <bigfl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Jan 1, 10:55�am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 31, 10:23�am, Sir Frederick <mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote:
>>
>> > What every philosopher should see, including you!
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > What Darwin Never Knew :
>>
>> Bad title if you were to ask me. It would be more like the state of
>> science and research methods at the time; Darwin doesn't represent all
>> of science back then.
>
>Thats self evident, and the intro of the video pays appropriate homage
>to the brilliance of Darwin.
>
>In the world of modern science, Darwins theories will and have been
>subject to another predictable sort of evolution, as is happening.In
>the mean time, the believers can and will continue with their battle
>(ironically part of the 'energy' propagated to fuel evolution).
>
>Id look forward to someone writing a book entitled "Charles Darwin
>meets Schrodinger's Cat"
>
>BOfL
>

You can watch the whole thing by clicking on the 'chapters'
below the video feed.
The DVD goes for $25 so the online is much cheaper, assuming
you have high bandwidth Internet.

Monsieur Turtoni

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 1:12:15 AM1/1/10
to
> to(o)

typo

0 new messages