Our children are growing in a Christian world --fat and stupid
ComandanteBanana
wrote:
> "ComandanteBanana" wrote .....
>
> >> > Their voting pattern is simple, yet negative, always minding other
> >> > people's lives: NO abortion, NO gay rights... It sounds to me like
> >> > "Banana Republic" politics, corrupt politicians and all.
>
> >> If you promote gay rights, whats next rapist rights? pedophile rights?
> >> Where do you draw the line?
>
> > Well, you draw the line at "consenting adults." Gays fit that
> > definition, but the other two don't.
>
> Somehow I don't think that abortion concerns two consenting adults.
You know what the solution could be? That you Christians intead of
meddling in other people's lives, step forward and adopt those
children that you want to be born. At least you could save some of
them.
I think that you draw pleasure from having kids be born, and then have
them suffer from lack of healthcare, and preventive care, for example.
You know children in Sweden are kept from predatory advertisers that
push junkfood and dangerous toys? Do you know that a very Christian
Congress has moved to ban suits to deny obese children justice? And
our children are growing in a Christian world --fat and stupid.
HYPOCRITES!!!
WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE
http://webspawner.com/users/donquijote
ComandanteBanana
civilized, HUMANISTIC nations have found that advertising confuses the
child's mind --probably just as much as the story of Adam and Eve...
Sweden has an explicit ban on TV advertising targeted at children
The argument is that children do not fully understand what advertising
is. Any advertising directed at them therefore breaches the
advertising industry's own standards.
According to the study some children can understand the purpose of TV
commercials early. But there is much evidence that this ability is
purely perceptual for younger children. They notice that something
happens when a commercial break interrupts or follows a programme, but
they are hardly aware that they are watching a presentation with a
different purpose. It is only by the age of 8 to10 that most children
have developed a basic understanding of the purpose of advertising.
Furthermore research results indicate that it is only around or after
the age of 12 that we can be more certain that most children have
developed a more complete understanding.
Laurie L Guidry
> , "Laurie L Guidry" <MA-PsychDept@sexual abuse.com>> wrote:
>> "ComandanteBanana" wrote .....
>>
>> >> > Their voting pattern is simple, yet negative, always minding other
>> >> > people's lives: NO abortion, NO gay rights... It sounds to me like
>> >> > "Banana Republic" politics, corrupt politicians and all.
>>
>> >> If you promote gay rights, whats next rapist rights? pedophile rights?
>> >> Where do you draw the line?
>>
>> > Well, you draw the line at "consenting adults." Gays fit that
>> > definition, but the other two don't.
>>
>> Somehow I don't think that abortion concerns two consenting adults.
>
> You know what the solution could be? That you Christians intead of
> meddling in other people's lives, step forward and adopt those
> children that you want to be born. At least you could save some of
> them.
Do you have any sense of following a discussion at all?
Or do you just jump-jump around all of the time?
There is a long waiting period for adoption now.
Check out your facts before you embarrass yourself.
> I think that you draw pleasure from having kids be born, and then have
> them suffer from lack of healthcare, and preventive care, for example.
Healthcare - another discussion topic.
Would you like to discuss this next?
> You know children in Sweden are kept from predatory advertisers that
> push junkfood and dangerous toys?
Predatory advertisers?
Would you like to discuss this?
> Do you know that a very Christian
> Congress has moved to ban suits to deny obese children justice?
Which congress is that?
How did they ban suits? When?
Would you like to discuss this?
>And
> our children are growing in a Christian world --fat and stupid.
Do you really think there are more Christians in this world than Muslims?
Would you like to discuss this?
> HYPOCRITES!!!
> WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE
Which jungle?
ComandanteBanana
On Mar 23, 5:31 pm, "Laurie L Guidry" <MA-PsychDept@sexual abuse.com>
wrote:
> "ComandanteBanana" <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>
>
>
>
> > , "Laurie L Guidry" <MA-PsychDept@sexual abuse.com>> wrote:
> >> "ComandanteBanana" wrote .....
>
> >> >> > Their voting pattern is simple, yet negative, always minding other
> >> >> > people's lives: NO abortion, NO gay rights... It sounds to me like
> >> >> > "Banana Republic" politics, corrupt politicians and all.
>
> >> >> If you promote gay rights, whats next rapist rights? pedophile rights?
> >> >> Where do you draw the line?
>
> >> > Well, you draw the line at "consenting adults." Gays fit that
> >> > definition, but the other two don't.
>
> >> Somehow I don't think that abortion concerns two consenting adults.
>
> > You know what the solution could be? That you Christians intead of
> > meddling in other people's lives, step forward and adopt those
> > children that you want to be born. At least you could save some of
> > them.
>
> Do you have any sense of following a discussion at all?
> Or do you just jump-jump around all of the time?
Part of being a monkey. Jumping from tree to tree. A good strategy not
to be caught by lions.
> There is a long waiting period for adoption now.
> Check out your facts before you embarrass yourself.
Do have any stats on the issue? And you don't think atheists adopt
too?
>
> > I think that you draw pleasure from having kids be born, and then have
> > them suffer from lack of healthcare, and preventive care, for example.
>
> Healthcare - another discussion topic.
> Would you like to discuss this next?
Yes.
>
> > You know children in Sweden are kept from predatory advertisers that
> > push junkfood and dangerous toys?
>
> Predatory advertisers?
> Would you like to discuss this?
That's the theme of the revolution: jungle, predator and prey. The
kids are the prey, the junkfood companies are the predators... Very
appropriate metaphors, no?
>
> > Do you know that a very Christian
> > Congress has moved to ban suits to deny obese children justice?
>
> Which congress is that?
> How did they ban suits? When?
> Would you like to discuss this?
Watched "Supersize Me"? Maybe you should before we debate.
>
> >And
> > our children are growing in a Christian world --fat and stupid.
>
> Do you really think there are more Christians in this world than Muslims?
> Would you like to discuss this?
Nothing to do with the issue. But Muslim's way of life ain't expanding
to the world.
>
> > HYPOCRITES!!!
> > WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE
>
> Which jungle?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
This is the jungle...
ComandanteBanana
> On Mar 23, 9:01 am, mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > If one had to come up with just two words to describe the present and
> > probably the future situation in America, the words I would choose are
> > corporatism and fundamentalism.
>
> Or fat and stupid for short.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yep, America is as strong as her kids... ;)
Omniqueryous
> > >> Where do you draw the line?
At legality, or at least at harm to others (injuring others is
generally illegal). One who is minding his own business is on one
side of the line, while those who molest or rape are on the other
side. If we try to draw the line at discomfort (to spare others the
discomfort of knowing someone is living peacefully a certain way),
then we will have as many lines as there are people or beliefs -- a
mazework, and it will be impossible to legislate with consistency or
with neutral objectivity.
For example, if, in the future, a man wishes to keep the company of an
android or AI program (rather than a woman), then it should be legal,
as long as no harm is done. One should at least have the right to
have a computer in one's room, or a robot in the garage, etc.
On Mar 23, 7:44 pm, ComandanteBanana <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Michael Gordge
wrote:
> One who is minding his own business is on one
> side of the line,
e.g. on the side of the individual's liberty.
> while those who molest or rape are on the other
> side.
e.g. the tax man in the democratic society which ewe propose.
> One should at least have the right to
> have a computer in one's room, or a robot in the
> garage, etc.
Historically and the evidence is over-whelming, the man who talks
about what rights a man ought have, is the man never to turn your back
on, because he's also the same man who wants to violate them.
Man has only one fundamental basic right, the right to life, all other
rights are a corollary of the right to life.
e.g. Man has a natural right to the results of only his energy, which
is a right required to give his fundamental right any meaning.
e.g. Man has a right to be the sole benefactor and the sole decider of
the results of only HIS energy, which in turn gives his fundamental
right its meaning.
Michael Gordge
ComandanteBanana
> If ewe want to propose a revolution, then ewe are required to defend
> or explain what ewe believe is so fucking revolutional about your
> alternative, surely?
>
> Or are ewe going to continue being a fucking idiot?
>
> Michael Gordge
You seem to be slow to get metaphors, don't you?
The stupid sheep...
http://www.pdatoday.com/images/uploads/sheep240307_486x386.jpg
deny evolution to the smart monkeys...
http://www.free-slideshow.com/screens/cheerful_monkeys/clever-monkeys.jpg
so the monkeys are launching a r-evolution.
Sheep and monkeys don't believe in the same things. Sheep follow the
leader into a cliff, but monkeys have a mind of their own. Monkeys
question everything, and have a positive outllook of life. They
believe in COOPERATION and in living as one with Nature. Oh, they also
believe in 'MAKE LOVE NOT WAR' while sheep believe in 'MAKE WAR NOT
LOVE.' Sheep meddle into monkey business, so to speak, while serving
the interests of the big predators. They even want monkey kids to be
raised like fat, stupid sheep...
http://johnsmilitaryhistory.com/sheep.gif
You get it now?