Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Livestock and pet food
3 views
Skip to first unread message
George Plimpton
Dec 8, 2012, 12:44:19 AM12/8/12
to
Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food. That's a
fact.
fact.
Mr.Smartypants
Dec 8, 2012, 1:03:51 AM12/8/12
to
On Dec 7, 10:44 pm, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food. That's a
> fact.
are some of them raised for TWELVE years for no other purpose than to
> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food. That's a
> fact.
be pet food as YOU claimed?
dh
Dec 10, 2012, 4:47:39 PM12/10/12
to
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 22:03:51 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>On Dec 7, 10:44 pm, Goo wrote:
>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food. That's a
>> fact.
>
>are some of them raised for TWELVE years for no other purpose than to
>be pet food as YOU claimed?
"Exactly. That's exactly what the AP story said." - Goo
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>On Dec 7, 10:44 pm, Goo wrote:
>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food. That's a
>> fact.
>
>are some of them raised for TWELVE years for no other purpose than to
>be pet food as YOU claimed?
dh
Dec 10, 2012, 4:50:42 PM12/10/12
to
On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, Goo wrote:
>Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo
George Plimpton
Dec 10, 2012, 5:13:19 PM12/10/12
to
On 12/10/2012 1:50 PM, dh@. wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>
>
Some livestock animals really do end up being used solely for pet food.
>
>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>
>
dh
Dec 12, 2012, 3:41:17 PM12/12/12
to
10 Dec 2012, Goo puled dishonestly trying to wuss away from himself:
>On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:42 -0500, dh@. wrote:
you stupid dishonest Goober. Also Goob, I challenge you to give an example of
how a livestock animal could "end up being used solely for pet food." I can, but
predict that you can't even make an attempt. I challenge you to try Goo. Go:
>On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:42 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>
>>On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>
>>"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo
>
>>food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo
>
>Some livestock animals really do end up being used solely for pet food.
That's not the same as being specifically bred for it as you claimed before
you stupid dishonest Goober. Also Goob, I challenge you to give an example of
how a livestock animal could "end up being used solely for pet food." I can, but
predict that you can't even make an attempt. I challenge you to try Goo. Go:
George Plimpton
Dec 12, 2012, 4:55:09 PM12/12/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of
futility alive with:
> 10 Dec 2012, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:42 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with:
futility alive with:
> 10 Dec 2012, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:42 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with:
>>
>>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>
>>> "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>> food. There have been several citations to support this."
>>
>>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>
>>> "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>> food. There have been several citations to support this."
>>
>> Some livestock animals really do end up being used solely for pet food.
>
> That's not the same as
Some livestock are used entirely as pet food. That's a fact.
>
> That's not the same as
dh
Dec 13, 2012, 3:01:41 PM12/13/12
to
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:55:09 -0800, Goo failed again:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:41:17 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>10 Dec 2012, Goo puled dishonestly trying to wuss away from himself:
>>
>>>On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:42 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:41:17 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>10 Dec 2012, Goo puled dishonestly trying to wuss away from himself:
>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>>
>>>>"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>>>food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo
>>>>On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>>
>>>>"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>>
>>>Some livestock animals really do end up being used solely for pet food.
>>
>>>Some livestock animals really do end up being used solely for pet food.
>>
>> That's not the same as being specifically bred for it as you claimed before
>>you stupid dishonest Goober. Also Goob, I challenge you to give an example of
>>how a livestock animal could "end up being used solely for pet food." I can, but
>>predict that you can't even make an attempt. I challenge you to try Goo. Go:
>
>>you stupid dishonest Goober. Also Goob, I challenge you to give an example of
>>how a livestock animal could "end up being used solely for pet food." I can, but
>>predict that you can't even make an attempt. I challenge you to try Goo. Go:
>
>Some livestock are used entirely as pet food. That's a fact.
You couldn't do it Goob. You lose again, Goo.
George Plimpton
Dec 13, 2012, 5:12:43 PM12/13/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of
futility alive with:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:55:09 -0800, George Plimpton beat Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - senseless again:
futility alive with:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:41:17 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with: :
>>
>>> 10 Dec 2012, George Plimpton beat Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - senseless again:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:42 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with: :
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, George Plimpton beat Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - senseless again:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>>>> food. There have been several citations to support this."
>>>>
>>>>>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>>>> food. There have been several citations to support this."
>>>>
>>>> Some livestock animals really do end up being used solely for pet food.
>>>
>>> That's not the same as
>>
>>>
>>> That's not the same as
>>
>> Some livestock are used entirely as pet food. That's a fact.
>
> You couldn't do it
I did it, *Goo*. I win, *Goo* - again, as always.
>
> You couldn't do it
George Plimpton
Dec 13, 2012, 5:19:35 PM12/13/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of
futility alive with:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:55:09 -0800, George Plimpton beat Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - senseless again:
futility alive with:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:41:17 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with: :
>>
>>> 10 Dec 2012, George Plimpton beat Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - senseless again:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:42 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with: :
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, George Plimpton beat Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - senseless again:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>>>> food. There have been several citations to support this."
>>>>
>>>>>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>>>> food. There have been several citations to support this."
>>>>
>>>> Some livestock animals really do end up being used solely for pet food.
>>>
>>> That's not the same as
>>
>>>
>>> That's not the same as
>>
>> Some livestock are used entirely as pet food. That's a fact.
>
> You couldn't do it
>
> You couldn't do it
George Plimpton
Dec 17, 2012, 9:56:45 PM12/17/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of
futility alive with:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:55:09 -0800, George Plimpton beat Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - senseless again:
futility alive with:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:41:17 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with: :
>>
>>> 10 Dec 2012, George Plimpton beat Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - senseless again:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:42 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with: :
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:19 -0800, George Plimpton beat Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - senseless again:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>>>> food. There have been several citations to support this."
>>>>
>>>>>> Some livestock animals become pet food - and *only* pet food.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
>>>>> food. There have been several citations to support this."
>>>>
>>>> Some livestock animals really do end up being used solely for pet food.
>>>
>>> That's not the same as
>>
>>>
>>> That's not the same as
>>
>> Some livestock are used entirely as pet food. That's a fact.
>
> You couldn't do it
>
> You couldn't do it
0 new messages