As I am deemed to be crazy i will just be Expanding Einsteins Relatvivity Equation

[Venus as a Boy]

As I lay in bed and ruminated about black holes light speed and
relativity of also lightspeed, i came to the idea that energy for
example of lightquants can’t solely be defined by their mass and
lightspeed because the frequency in which they are vibrating also adds
to their energy so i will take the vibration equation of harmonous
oscillators and add that to the relatvivty equation even if there seems
to be some new form of energy:

Oscillation: Deflection y ( t ), Amplitude y0 und der Periodduration T.

Periodduration T is the Frequenz f: f = 1 / T.

Instead f the greek letter ν (Ny) is used. The unit of frequency is
Hertz (1 Hz = 1 s−1).

A harmonic Oscillation vibration is described through : y ( t ) = y 0 ⋅
sin ⁡ ( 2 π f t + φ 0 )

with y 0 = Amplitude und φ 0 = zero phase angle of the oscillation

Now i’ll rape Einsteins Equation and multiplicate the amplitude times
two (negative amplitude as well thoug there maybe is some kind of
antimatter energy in it?) with mass and energy:

y0 = y(t) / sin ⁡ ( 2 π f t + φ 0 ), so follows:

e = m ⋅ c^2 ⋅ 2y0 <-> e = m ⋅ c^2 ⋅ 2(y(t) / sin ⁡ ( 2 π f t + φ 0 ))


--
https://slowtemplelovecozmicpurplehealing.wordpress.com

[Venus as a Boy]

Am 25.11.2022 um 13:25 schrieb Venus as a Boy:

> Now i’ll rape Einsteins Equation and multiplicate the amplitude times
> two (negative amplitude as well thoug there maybe is some kind of
> antimatter energy in it?) with mass and energy:
>
> y0 = y(t) / sin ⁡ ( 2 π f t + φ 0 ), so follows:
>
> e = m ⋅ c^2 ⋅ 2y0 <-> e = m ⋅ c^2 ⋅ 2(y(t) / sin ⁡ ( 2 π f t + φ 0 ))

A little mistake i owe to the cheap beer, this is right:

Now i'll rape Einsteins Equation and multiplicate the frequency with
mass and energy:

e = m ⋅ c^2 ⋅ f

--
https://slowtemplelovecozmicpurplehealing.wordpress.com

[Venus as a Boy]

Am 25.11.2022 um 14:42 schrieb Venus as a Boy:
> Am 25.11.2022 um 13:25 schrieb Venus as a Boy:
>
>> Now i’ll rape Einsteins Equation and multiplicate the amplitude times
>> two (negative amplitude as well thoug there maybe is some kind of
>> antimatter energy in it?) with mass and energy:
>>
>> y0 = y(t) / sin ⁡ ( 2 π f t + φ 0 ), so follows:
>>
>> e = m ⋅ c^2 ⋅ 2y0 <-> e = m ⋅ c^2 ⋅ 2(y(t) / sin ⁡ ( 2 π f t + φ 0 ))
>
>
> A little mistake i owe to the cheap beer, this is right:
>
> Now i'll rape Einsteins Equation and multiplicate the frequency with
> mass and energy:
>
> e = m ⋅ c^2 ⋅ f
>

but i seen a possibility to keep it in the actual physics

e = m ⋅ c ⋅ 2y0 ⋅ f

--
https://slowtemplelovecozmicpurplehealing.wordpress.com

[Jeffrey Rubard]

"This is a hoax, right?"

[Venus as a Boy]

Am 26.11.2022 um 00:11 schrieb Jeffrey Rubard:

>> e = m ⋅ c ⋅ 2y0 ⋅ f
>>
>> --
>> https://slowtemplelovecozmicpurplehealing.wordpress.com
>
> "This is a hoax, right?"

actually not, i replaced the lighspeed to the power of two, with
lightspeed multiplicated with vibration speed = vibration amplitude
times frequency!

--
https://slowtemplelovecozmicpurplehealing.wordpress.com

[Venus as a Boy]

[Venus as a Boy]

Am 26.11.2022 um 01:08 schrieb Venus as a Boy:
> Am 26.11.2022 um 00:22 schrieb Venus as a Boy:
>> Am 26.11.2022 um 00:11 schrieb Jeffrey Rubard:
>>
>>>> e = m ⋅ c ⋅ 2y0 ⋅ f
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> https://slowtemplelovecozmicpurplehealing.wordpress.com
>>>
>>> "This is a hoax, right?"
>>
>> actually not, i replaced the lighspeed to the power of two, with
>> lightspeed multiplicated with vibration speed = vibration amplitude
>> times frequency!
>>
>

or is maybe:

e = m*c^2 + m*(2y0*f)^2 this seems more logically

--
https://slowtemplelovecozmicpurplehealing.wordpress.com

[Jeffrey Rubard]

"This is a hoax, right? You are not in earnest about this stuff?"

[Noah Sombrero]

On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 14:21:17 -0800 (PST), Jeffrey Rubard
<jeffreyda...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:13:55 PM UTC-8, Venus as a Boy wrote:
>> Am 26.11.2022 um 01:08 schrieb Venus as a Boy:
>> > Am 26.11.2022 um 00:22 schrieb Venus as a Boy:
>> >> Am 26.11.2022 um 00:11 schrieb Jeffrey Rubard:
>> >>

>> >>>> e = m ? c ? 2y0 ? f

>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> https://slowtemplelovecozmicpurplehealing.wordpress.com
>> >>>
>> >>> "This is a hoax, right?"
>> >>
>> >> actually not, i replaced the lighspeed to the power of two, with
>> >> lightspeed multiplicated with vibration speed = vibration amplitude
>> >> times frequency!
>> >>
>> >
>> or is maybe:
>>
>> e = m*c^2 + m*(2y0*f)^2 this seems more logically
>>
>> --
>> https://slowtemplelovecozmicpurplehealing.wordpress.com
>
>"This is a hoax, right? You are not in earnest about this stuff?"

Lesson 1 in dealing with rg, yes he is in earnest.
--
Noah Sombrero

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Again, I would really tend to believe very little of what I heard from someone stupid and foolhardy enough to adopt the nickname "Noah Sombrero"...

[Jeffrey Rubard]

It's even a worse read of Latino culture than "Beto O'Rourke", tbh.

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Explanation: In Mexican-American culture generally, "Beto" is a character sort of like "Oscar" on the Office, a touchy body-builder type who turns out
"on closer inspection" to be gay. (He just doesn't have Oscar's politics.) An "O'Rourke" is an antinomian who "shows you the devil", i.e. will run you
to the end of a folly to teach you the error of your ways; in modern parlance, a "beast".

Though the slang translation of the German *Hyäne* using the words was not yet common, it would be a little weird for his parents to have named
him "Whore Beast". (Eine Hyäne is a chick, too, there's that.)