Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: linuxgirl, a question

1 view
Skip to first unread message

linuxgal

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 3:56:54 PM4/21/12
to
Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article <j0n5p7tsva8pclsnh...@4ax.com>,
> Don Kresch <spam...@spamcatch.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:54:55 -0700 (PDT), Billy-Bob Thorton
>> <agamem...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:
>>
>>> You appear to hold conservative values along with an unusual
>>> skepticism about religious faith.
>>>
>>> Please explain. It does not compute.
>> It doesn't compute only if you erroneously believe that
>> atheism requires a specific political view.
>
> It doesn't compute in the current US political arena.
>
> That's not the same, of course, as saying it doesn't work as a personal
> philosophy.
>

My personal philosophy is daojia, which is remarkably compatible with a
preference for limited government.

TTC 61

If a great country gives way to a smaller country,
It will conquer the smaller country.
And if a small country submits to a great country,
It can conquer the great country.
Therefore those that would conquer must yield,
And those that conquer do so because they yield.

mind

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 10:04:38 AM4/22/12
to
linuxgal wrote:
>Kenny McCormack wrote:
>> Don Kresch wrote:
>>> agamemnon48a scrawled in blood:
>>>
>>>> You appear to hold conservative values along with an unusual
>>>> skepticism about religious faith.
>>>>
>>>> Please explain. It does not compute.
>>>
>>> It doesn't compute only if you erroneously believe that
>>> atheism requires a specific political view.
>>
>> It doesn't compute in the current US political arena.
>>
>> That's not the same, of course, as saying it doesn't work as a personal
>> philosophy.
>>
>
>My personal philosophy is daojia, which is remarkably compatible with a
>preference for limited government.
>
>TTC 61
>
>If a great country gives way to a smaller country,
>It will conquer the smaller country.
>And if a small country submits to a great country,
>It can conquer the great country.
>Therefore those that would conquer must yield,
>And those that conquer do so because they yield.

To concur and conquer
how an accent may be grave
or a goo en passant.

Atheists can be as fundamental
in their proselytizing as any other religionist.
They may or may not think of thems elves
as having any fun in their mental
processes in terms of how
an other side is
kneaded.

Recently, tanks to the monkey-dude,
there was discovered to be an apatheism too.

As with most middle of The Dao folk,
they remain within the bounds of the unbounded
and are invisible to media.

Sage-like,
they are so much sewn
into the fabric of their being
they are unaware of being any sort
of Sage to speak of.

Down to earth
they dwell without dwelling
on the surface of Earth.

With roots deep
they return without returning
to the depth of Being in their being.

As people,
they do people stuff.
As if their lives depended on it.
They can be entrusted with the world.
And so their children are as well.

Refreshing.
The may be concerned or unconcerned
as if crossing a frozen bridge in winter
from the southland to the northland
from the eastern to the western
seas and notions they move
without leaving home.

Known as the future generations
they may even escape the Red Giant.

- in mind

TeeJay

unread,
May 12, 2012, 3:13:06 AM5/12/12
to
On Apr 21, 12:56 pm, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
> Kenny McCormack wrote:
> > In article <j0n5p7tsva8pclsnhqhjn27jgh3t9oj...@4ax.com>,
> > Don Kresch  <spamca...@spamcatch.org> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:54:55 -0700 (PDT), Billy-Bob Thorton
> >> <agamemnon...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:
>
> >>> You appear to hold conservative values along with an unusual
> >>> skepticism about religious faith.
>
> >>> Please explain.   It does not compute.
> >>        It doesn't compute only if you erroneously believe that
> >> atheism requires a specific political view.
>
> > It doesn't compute in the current US political arena.
>
> > That's not the same, of course, as saying it doesn't work as a personal
> > philosophy.
>
> My personal philosophy is daojia, which is remarkably compatible with a
> preference for limited government.
>
> TTC 61
>
> If a great country gives way to a smaller country,
> It will conquer the smaller country.
> And if a small country submits to a great country,
> It can conquer the great country.
> Therefore those that would conquer must yield,
> And those that conquer do so because they yield.


"61. A Great Nation Flows Downward


A great nation flows downward

into intercourse with the world.

The female of the world

always prevails over the male by stillness.

Because stillness is considered lower,

by lowering itself to a small nation

a great nation takes a small nation;

by being lower than a great nation

a small nation takes a great nation.

So one takes by lowering itself,

another takes by being lower.

A great nation wants no more

than to include and nurture people;

a small nation wants no more

than to admit and serve people.

Both get what they want,

so the great should be below."

Also try the Chuang-tzu "Autumn Floods"

Unknown

unread,
May 14, 2012, 6:31:33 PM5/14/12
to

"TeeJay" <pegu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:256b0e17-095b-48a9...@pr7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
0 new messages