reading paul ricoeur at the moo and...
sirb...@hotmail.com
greimas part?
Leon Hoeneveld
> time and narration 2 and can some1 explain this to me? especially the
> greimas part?
Maybe this link is usefull: http://folk.uio.no/geira/thesis/thesis.pdf
sirb...@hotmail.com
> sirbl...@hotmail.com schreef:
>
> > time and narration 2 and can some1 explain this to me? especially the
> > greimas part?
>
> Maybe this link is usefull:http://folk.uio.no/geira/thesis/thesis.pdf
nah. it isnt. if i read it i'd just be more anxious.
Leon Hoeneveld
that's intended all the way
philosophy is thinking until you don't have to do it.
sirb...@hotmail.com
> sirbl...@hotmail.com schreef:
>
> > On 2 jul, 10:00, Leon Hoeneveld <leonh...@antispam.zonnet.nl> wrote:
> >> sirbl...@hotmail.com schreef:
>
> >>> time and narration 2 and can some1 explain this to me? especially the
> >>> greimas part?
> >> Maybe this link is usefull:http://folk.uio.no/geira/thesis/thesis.pdf
>
> > nah. it isnt. if i read it i'd just be more anxious.
>
> that's intended all the way
>
> philosophy is thinking until you don't have to do it.
all i can do these days is mumbly splagoogle something along the lines
of 'less goethe, more spinoza' and in capital letters...
Leon Hoeneveld
I wonder if you ever get to Gadamer then. In a thesis from a friend of
mine Gadamer is compared with Wittgenstein, with the main theme the
hermeneutics.
Through Gadamer we get in the process of judging prejudices,as a result
of hemeneutics. Judging predjudices is done with prejudices, but you get
closer to understanding your individuality and so also closer to an
understanding of commonality. It is this explaining what is individual
(knowledge) and what is not that lets you make a full hermeneutic
circle. Any depth in a story is what divides individual point of views
with collective points of view.
sirb...@hotmail.com
> sirbl...@hotmail.com schreef:
>
> > On 2 jul, 11:31, Leon Hoeneveld <leonh...@antispam.zonnet.nl> wrote:
> >> sirbl...@hotmail.com schreef:
>
> >>> On 2 jul, 10:00, Leon Hoeneveld <leonh...@antispam.zonnet.nl> wrote:
> >>>> sirbl...@hotmail.com schreef:
> >>>>> time and narration 2 and can some1 explain this to me? especially the
> >>>>> greimas part?
> >>>> Maybe this link is usefull:http://folk.uio.no/geira/thesis/thesis.pdf
> >>> nah. it isnt. if i read it i'd just be more anxious.
> >> that's intended all the way
>
> >> philosophy is thinking until you don't have to do it.
>
> > all i can do these days is mumbly splagoogle something along the lines
> > of 'less goethe, more spinoza' and in capital letters...
>
> I wonder if you ever get to Gadamer then. In a thesis from a friend of
> mine Gadamer is compared with Wittgenstein, with the main theme the
> hermeneutics.
>
mine are keeping it safe, doing theses on, say, ONE pynchon book.
> Through Gadamer we get in the process of judging prejudices,as a result
> of hemeneutics. Judging predjudices is done with prejudices, but you get
> closer to understanding your individuality and so also closer to an
> understanding of commonality. It is this explaining what is individual
> (knowledge) and what is not that lets you make a full hermeneutic
> circle. Any depth in a story is what divides individual point of views
> with collective points of view.
the circle's a laugh and as funny as harold bloom.
Leon Hoeneveld
> the circle's a laugh and as funny as harold bloom.
And now judge your prejudice.