.
.
~George E Hammond MS physics~
~Hyannis, Cape Cod MA USA~
July 31, 2023
.
Hello Matt Faunce – I have read all 3 of your recent posts.
.
Not only are the Chinese symbols for man and God similar,
they are both similar to the cross of Christianity which is the
most widely known symbol in world history!
.
The reason for this is the "Cartesian Coordinate System"
of 3-dimensional space – the human body is a living, walking,
talking "Cartesian coordinate system"..
.
The body has 3 orthogonal axes
1 – the left right symmetry of the body is the "X" axis
2 – the dorso ventral symmetry is the "Y" axis
3 – the spinal axis column is the "Z" axis
4 – hence "XYZ geometry"
.
It is the same symmetry which causes all higher animals,
including man to have "4 feet".
.
The cross of Christianity is symbolic of this Cartesian,
Human Body, geometry. Hence It Is Symbolic of Man.
.
The Cross of Christianity is in fact identically the
Cartesian Coordinate System. !
.
THE POINT IS MATT: – you cannot "explain God" or
"explain reality" by simply using "Philosophy"
.
EXPLAINING GOD requires at a minimum: –
1. Physics
2. Mathematics
3. Biology
4. Psychology
5. Philosophy
6. History
7. And Theology
.
In order to explain or "prove" God you need all 7
of the above disciplines – and then some !
.
Most recently I posted the above letter entitled
"EINSTEIN V-R GLASSES" to sci.physics.research
which is the most sophisticated scientific discussion
list on USENET, and is a moderated list.
.
Within a few days I received the following message: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Your posting is inappropriate for sci.physics.research
since it's overly speculative.
.
With kindest regards,
.
(Prof. of Physics) Hendrik van Hees.
sci.physics.research co-moderator.
Goethe University (Institute for Theoretical Physics)
D-60438 Frankfurt am Main
http://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
So as you can see from this and my above remarks,
publishing my theory in the peer-reviewed academic
literature – is absolutely out of the question – there isn't
anyone in academia educated enough or intelligent enough
to REVIEW THE THEORY !. (I'm 81 years old by the way,
and have been researching this theory around-the-clock,
nonstop, for 40 years !)
.
I'M SIMPLY GOING TO HAVE TO WRITE A BOOK and
publish it myself, at my own expense.
.
I'm not going to WASTE MY TIME arguing with academic
nincompoops !
.
Okay Matt Faunce – I appreciate your attention to all this,
and don't waste your time beating your head against the wall
trying to solve THE WORLD'S BIGGEST PROBLEM only with
PHILOSOPHY – it can't be done – it takes a knowledge of
EVERYTHING to do that !.
.
George
.