Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

141 BEFORE THERE NUMBER

8 views
Skip to first unread message

HITMAN9384

unread,
Jan 4, 2002, 9:38:43 AM1/4/02
to
cOULD SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW TO TELL EVEN IF SOMEONES PUT 141 BEFORE THERE
NUMBER HOW TOO GET THERE NUMBER

Michael

unread,
Jan 5, 2002, 4:33:07 AM1/5/02
to

"HITMAN9384" <hitma...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20020104093843...@mb-mn.aol.com...

> cOULD SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW TO TELL EVEN IF SOMEONES PUT 141 BEFORE
THERE
> NUMBER HOW TOO GET THERE NUMBER

You could try asking them.
Or you can ask BT or what ever telco you're on to ban calls with no CLID.
That way, they'd have to enable CLID to make your phone ring, there is no
other way cause their CLID is discarded at the switch.

regards
Michael


onemancrimewave

unread,
Jan 5, 2002, 6:47:47 PM1/5/02
to
"Michael" <omic...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:<a16h8i$ov2$1...@paris.btinternet.com>...


<AHEM>

Far be it for me to hose your chips in steaming piss, but I just have
to stamp on this thread before it vomits out of control.

> other way cause their CLID is discarded at the switch.

Do you have a fucking *clue*? Besides which, to provide CLIP based call
blocking requires ISUP (ISDN to you you *mong*) based call processing
facilities.

Now get back to reading f41th you loser.

Here's a tip - own the loser's switch, and sit on a SLC monitor, or
surf the AMA for the numbers your looking for. Do we have to spoon
feed you fuckers *forever*???

---

onemancrimewave - party till you puke

Mark Brookfield

unread,
Jan 5, 2002, 8:55:07 PM1/5/02
to
Mate,

Why have you got to be so bloody horrible? Can't you get you point across
without insulting the other guy?

Moron. Go back to school and learn some manners.

Regards,

Mark.

"onemancrimewave" <onemanc...@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:736a2855.02010...@posting.google.com...

Guinness

unread,
Jan 5, 2002, 9:10:25 PM1/5/02
to
onemanc...@hushmail.com (onemancrimewave) wrote in message news:<736a2855.02010...@posting.google.com>...
[snip]

Hello onemancrimewave,

Very nice to see you back in ph.uk at last. I hope your protracted
absence was not due to circumstances beyond your control.

Guinness

Mark Brookfield

unread,
Jan 5, 2002, 9:16:27 PM1/5/02
to
He was probably locked up for verbally abusing people for no good reason...

Regards,

Mark.

"Guinness" <xp...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cc7fb242.02010...@posting.google.com...

Guinness

unread,
Jan 6, 2002, 12:41:05 AM1/6/02
to
"Mark Brookfield" <bro...@netcomuk.co.uk> wrote in message news:<YrOZ7.3091$vn1.28810@NewsReader>...

> He was probably locked up for verbally abusing people for no good reason...
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark.

Well, to the best of my knowledge verbally abusing someone (especially
where it is warranted) is not a convictable offence. Unfortunately
neither is top posting or talking crap.

Guinness

bro conductor

unread,
Jan 6, 2002, 2:09:43 PM1/6/02
to

onemancrimewave <onemanc...@hushmail.com> shook his lonely braincell
and wrote in message

> <AHEM>
>
> Far be it for me to hose your chips in steaming piss, but I just have
> to stamp on this thread before it vomits out of control.
>
> > other way cause their CLID is discarded at the switch.
>
> Do you have a fucking *clue*? Besides which, to provide CLIP based call
> blocking requires ISUP (ISDN to you you *mong*) based call processing
> facilities.
>
> Now get back to reading f41th you loser.
>
> Here's a tip - own the loser's switch, and sit on a SLC monitor, or
> surf the AMA for the numbers your looking for. Do we have to spoon
> feed you fuckers *forever*???
>
> ---
>
> onemancrimewave - party till you puke
-----------------------------------------
Dear Mr "onemancrimewave",

You're knowledge of telecomms features and principles is stunningly inept.
CLIP is indeed an ISDN, and therefore ISUP, related feature, however for
ordinary PSTN ( BTUP, incase you have never come across it ), we have the
ability for a marvellous feature called "Anonymous Call Reject ".
This blocks all anonymous calls at the exchange, with a simple anouncement.

I suggest that you find a spoon from somewhere and start feeding yourself,
as you obviously have very little knowledge of telecoms / C7 apart from
miniscule DMS exposure.

Please keep your rants for something you may have an idea about instead of
pretending that you have thorough telecoms knowledge because you've seen the
term "ISUP".

Luv


Nick

unread,
Jan 6, 2002, 2:42:19 PM1/6/02
to
onemanc...@hushmail.com (onemancrimewave) wrote:

>onemancrimewave - party till you puke

So who was it that certified that you were ready for the outside world
again ?.


Michael

unread,
Jan 6, 2002, 9:04:55 PM1/6/02
to

"onemancrimewave" <onemanc...@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:736a2855.02010...@posting.google.com...
> "Michael" <omic...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:<a16h8i$ov2$1...@paris.btinternet.com>...
> > "HITMAN9384" <hitma...@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:20020104093843...@mb-mn.aol.com...
> > > cOULD SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW TO TELL EVEN IF SOMEONES PUT 141
BEFORE
> > THERE
> > > NUMBER HOW TOO GET THERE NUMBER
> >
> > You could try asking them.
> > Or you can ask BT or what ever telco you're on to ban calls with no
CLID.
> > That way, they'd have to enable CLID to make your phone ring, there is
no
> > other way cause their CLID is discarded at the switch.
> >
> > regards
> > Michael
>
>
> <AHEM>
>
> Far be it for me to hose your chips in steaming piss, but I just have
> to stamp on this thread before it vomits out of control.
>
> > other way cause their CLID is discarded at the switch.
>
> Do you have a fucking *clue*? Besides which, to provide CLIP based call
> blocking requires ISUP (ISDN to you you *mong*) based call processing
> facilities.

Obversly I don't have a clue to this out of context, misleading bullshit you
talk of.

>
> Now get back to reading f41th you loser.
>
> Here's a tip - own the loser's switch, and sit on a SLC monitor, or

Yeah, He'll just hack in to the 'loser's switch' if at all possible and even
though he does'nt know which one it is.

> surf the AMA for the numbers your looking for.

Yeah that's right, lets search the automatic message accounting system to
see all the nubers thats called him, It doen't show numbers that 's called
him, you *monk*

Do we have to spoon
> feed you fuckers *forever*???

Obversly you can't spoon feed yourself.

It's a piece of piss to flame someone. Any loser can do it. It takes skill,
intelligents and hard work to have knowledge that you can share with people,
in a perlite and sensable manner. Instead you're trying to act like some
kind of elite hacker/phreaker by flaming and putting me down, but this only
shows your true self.

I don't have the time or effort to deal with the likes of you, flaming,
putting me down and questioning my intellgents only goes to show me you're
not worth shit. Maybe when you grow up you'll understand what it's like to
have real skills and good knowledge. For now please don't prove me right by
bothering me any further.

Goodbye.

Jon Thompson

unread,
Jan 7, 2002, 11:33:55 AM1/7/02
to
The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
(Guinness) started to type:

>
>Well, to the best of my knowledge verbally abusing someone (especially
>where it is warranted) is not a convictable offence.

Inciting a breach of the peace?

--

Raise her likeness on the mast: Caroline 452.

Denis Mcmahon

unread,
Jan 7, 2002, 3:46:09 PM1/7/02
to
"Michael" <omic...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

If you're on an AXE:

Hack into the exchange dialup[1]

SUSCP:SNB=your-telno[2];
SUSCC:SNB=your-telno,SCL=ANT-2;

Rgds
Denis

[1] Your problem, not mine
[2] in the right format, of course, "exnsp:hu=all;" might help
--
Denis McMahon / +44 7802 468949 / de...@pickaxe.demon.co.uk
Top-posters, posters of adverts & binaries are scum. Killfile!
Block [a.b.*.*] of any UC/BE relay. Posts > 100 lines ignored.
sulfnbk is not a virus, see the symantec virus encyclopaedia!

Guinness

unread,
Jan 8, 2002, 5:18:01 PM1/8/02
to
Jon Thompson <amu...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<2gjj3uo586ar6rb7q...@4ax.com>...

> The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
> (Guinness) started to type:
>
> >
> >Well, to the best of my knowledge verbally abusing someone (especially
> >where it is warranted) is not a convictable offence.
>
> Inciting a breach of the peace?

Is that possible on usenet?

Anyhow, shouldn't you be busy laying your laminate flooring? ;)

Guinness

Jon Thompson

unread,
Jan 8, 2002, 6:45:25 PM1/8/02
to
The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
(Guinness) started to type:

>Jon Thompson <amu...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<2gjj3uo586ar6rb7q...@4ax.com>...
>> The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
>> (Guinness) started to type:
>>
>> >
>> >Well, to the best of my knowledge verbally abusing someone (especially
>> >where it is warranted) is not a convictable offence.
>>
>> Inciting a breach of the peace?
>
>Is that possible on usenet?
>
>Anyhow, shouldn't you be busy laying your laminate flooring? ;)

Oh, that's long done, but full marks for observation.

Still looks extremely fabulous, thobut.

Guinness

unread,
Jan 8, 2002, 8:34:23 PM1/8/02
to
Jon Thompson <amu...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<h41n3ucfgkpq6ahvq...@4ax.com>...

> The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
> (Guinness) started to type:
>
> >Jon Thompson <amu...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<2gjj3uo586ar6rb7q...@4ax.com>...
> >> The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
> >> (Guinness) started to type:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Well, to the best of my knowledge verbally abusing someone (especially
> >> >where it is warranted) is not a convictable offence.
> >>
> >> Inciting a breach of the peace?
> >
> >Is that possible on usenet?
> >
> >Anyhow, shouldn't you be busy laying your laminate flooring? ;)
>
> Oh, that's long done, but full marks for observation.
>
> Still looks extremely fabulous, thobut.

Mee bee ewe wood liek to heelp mee laai mieen (clickey kind). I
woood've heleped you for beer.

Guinness

Jon Thompson

unread,
Jan 9, 2002, 4:10:53 AM1/9/02
to
The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
(Guinness) started to type:

>Jon Thompson <amu...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<h41n3ucfgkpq6ahvq...@4ax.com>...
>> The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
>> (Guinness) started to type:
>>
>> >Jon Thompson <amu...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<2gjj3uo586ar6rb7q...@4ax.com>...
>> >> The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
>> >> (Guinness) started to type:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Well, to the best of my knowledge verbally abusing someone (especially
>> >> >where it is warranted) is not a convictable offence.
>> >>
>> >> Inciting a breach of the peace?
>> >
>> >Is that possible on usenet?
>> >
>> >Anyhow, shouldn't you be busy laying your laminate flooring? ;)
>>
>> Oh, that's long done, but full marks for observation.
>>
>> Still looks extremely fabulous, thobut.
>
>Mee bee ewe wood liek to heelp mee laai mieen (clickey kind). I
>woood've heleped you for beer.

IRTA cricket.

Guinness

unread,
Jan 10, 2002, 7:33:26 PM1/10/02
to
Jon Thompson <amu...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<j92o3u8kt84a9raje...@4ax.com>...

> IRTA cricket.

Hey, wanna play indoor cricket? I better warn you, I know some
extremely fast bowlers...could play havoc with your IKEA. :(

Guinness

Jon Thompson

unread,
Jan 11, 2002, 11:18:30 AM1/11/02
to
The old glass TTY flickered and words appeared when xp...@hotmail.com
(Guinness) started to type:

>Jon Thompson <amu...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<j92o3u8kt84a9raje...@4ax.com>...

The floor's more suited to an indoor ice rink at the minute. Curling,
perhaps?

0 new messages