Book Review - Hacking: The art of exploitation
Lord Shaolin
unconventional solution to a difficult problem or to exploit holes in sloppy
programming. Many people call themselves hackers, but few have the strong
technical foundation that a hacker needs to be successful. Hacking: The Art
of Exploitation explains things that every real hacker should know. While
many hacking books show you how to run other people's exploits without
really explaining the technical details, Hacking: The Art of Exploitation
introduces you to the spirit and theory of hacking as well as the science
behind it all.
Review for this book has now been published:
http://www.security-forums.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10568
Enjoy
ST
--
Get your Geek Goodies!
http://shop.security-forums.com
.: http://www.security-forums.com :.
Share your knowledge
It's a way to achieve
Immortality.
-=Be4U=-
a lime green crayon and scribbling in
news:XBNAb.18416$lm1.1...@wards.force9.net, on the hallowed day
of Sun 07 Dec 2003 02:11:33p:
> Hacking is the art of creative problem solving, whether used to
> find an unconventional solution to a difficult problem or to
> exploit holes in sloppy programming. Many people call
> themselves hackers, but few have the strong technical
> foundation that a hacker needs to be successful. Hacking: The
> Art of Exploitation explains things that every real hacker
> should know. While many hacking books show you how to run other
> people's exploits without really explaining the technical
> details, Hacking: The Art of Exploitation introduces you to the
> spirit and theory of hacking as well as the science behind it
> all.
>
> Review for this book has now been published:
>
> http://www.security-forums.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10568
>
> Enjoy
>
> ST
>
who did the review? Or are you going to make me log in to find out?
lol
--
-=Mara=-
"All it takes for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing."
Mimic
news:XBNAb.18416$lm1.1...@wards.force9.net...
> Hacking is the art of creative problem solving, whether used to find an
> unconventional solution to a difficult problem or to exploit holes in
sloppy
> programming. Many people call themselves hackers, but few have the strong
> technical foundation that a hacker needs to be successful. Hacking: The
Art
> of Exploitation explains things that every real hacker should know. While
> many hacking books show you how to run other people's exploits without
> really explaining the technical details, Hacking: The Art of Exploitation
> introduces you to the spirit and theory of hacking as well as the science
> behind it all.
>
> Review for this book has now been published:
>
> http://www.security-forums.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10568
>
> Enjoy
>
> ST
>
> --
I love what youve done for the xmas theme :D
--
Mimic
"Without Knowledge you have fear, With fear you create your own nightmares."
"There are 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand Binary,
and those that dont."
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but
when you do, it blows away your whole leg"
tracker
Lord Shaolin wrote:
"NO ONE" in this world can claim what myself and "The Trackers" have performed
dealing with Windows, the Internet and Hacking. We lived our lives with "Elite"
hackers for over two years and we played stupid games and recorded their
malicious movements. This babe has written a book about this and "NO ONE" in
their right mind would have done so and taken all the legal responsibilites
which were encountered. What to learn the how, why and who, go to:
www.geocities.com/hacking_internet_secrets.
Tracker
Iceman
LOL, you one funny sumptin. Already what might have been true at one time
is wrong, the rest of it is a total hoot.
Now you are spamming your site to sell a cd for *cough* 40 bucks? And since
you have been breached so many times you don't even guarantee that it is
virus or trojan horse free.
But heh! You're right! No one and I do mean *NO ONE* in their right mind
would have done what you did!
*snicker*
Mimic
news:3FD47260...@yahoo.com...
sensible answer, but nm aye.
1: You said I was in your book, which chapter ?
2: Not a question, but i agree, no one in their right mind would do the shit
you do.
3: Why in gods name do you use word 95 to make youre webpages ?
4: Why do you still use win95 ? Dont you think its ab it dated and
irrelevant as most people now use 98 or XP ?
Final note, you claim you have a copyright now, where ? Theres no record of
your book at the US Copyrights Office.
http://www.copyright.gov/records/cohs.html
Mimic
LMFAO!!
I take that back.
1. Registration Number: TXu-1-115-341
Title: Security minds versus malicious minds.
Description: Compact disc.
Claimant: [Author and claimant] Debbie M. Gambriell
Created: 2003
Registered: 11Jun03
Special Codes: 1/B
30 bucks, is that all it cost. lol.
Out of interest, did you use the Form TX or the Short Form TX ?
One more thing, what is special code 1/B ?
Ilena Ayala
"Mimic" <nu...@void.net> wrote in message
news:0_KdnY9huvX...@brightview.com...
I guess it takes awhile for their database to get updated. I know you
checked it a few months or so ago. I checked too.
*adds info to the profile on Debbie*
-Ilena Ayala
Mimic
news:br319i$ig7$2...@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
Of course the thing is now that is has a legal stamp on it, theres the issue
of her defamatory, and libellous remarks, as well as spreading known
misinformation as fact (ok not fact cuz i read somewhere 'it is a "legal
fact" that "facts" cannot be copyrighted' ) heh
Ilena Ayala
<snip>
> Of course the thing is now that is has a legal stamp on it, theres the
issue
> of her defamatory, and libellous remarks, as well as spreading known
> misinformation as fact (ok not fact cuz i read somewhere 'it is a "legal
> fact" that "facts" cannot be copyrighted' ) heh
U.S. Copyright law protects *original* literary works and pictorial or
musical expression. It does not cover things like short phrases, or
information which contains no original authorship (such as a short statement
of fact).
In some cases, a copyrighted work may have sections within it that are not
protected. For example, a listing of common port uses included in her work
would probably not be protected. (*Especially* since she most likely did
not AUTHOR it, but instead took it from somewhere else.)
A rambling, misinformative section on how to tell if your system is hacked
could be covered by the copyright law (if she indeed is the original author,
and I know of noone else who could express ideas in quite that manner....).
However, the registration of a work with the Copyright Office does NOT:
a) Establish a particular work as *being* original. It establishes it as
being *claimed* as original at a particular time, and in a particular form,
by a particular claimant. The Copyright Office does not normally compare a
work being registered to other works already registered. They just file and
stamp it.
b) Endorse said work as containing worthwhile content. It's not their job
to edit, test or proofread. The only check they are going to do is to see
if the work qualifies for a copyright per their rules.
-Ilena Ayala
Iceman
I think they did us all a service. Since it is copyrighted it prevents
other stupids from propagating the same bs. :)
Ilena Ayala
"Iceman" <1c3...@chi-mafia.org> wrote in message
news:17t317ff...@icepick.org...
Well, not really. Technically, it legally protects the rights of the owner.
It doesn't actually *prevent* copyright infringement-it makes it illegal.
However, another individual could propagate substantially similar nonsense
by rewriting it somewhat.
Unfortunately, there's more than enough idiocy to go around.
-Ilena Ayala
Iceman
You're right. :(
Seems she should have a disclaimer on her CD 'bout something like created
by Debbie acting stupid.
Rev Turd Fredericks
it's no doubt it is a 100% original work, nobody else is even remotely
cabable of producing such a pile of shit and calling it a hacking
text. I feel sorry for the people in the copyright office that had to
read it.
tracker
Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:
Sorry your a bit jealous but determination to fuck up the ferret owners was this
babes main goal. What was discovered in the hacking world made me the woman I am
today.
Tracker
Mimic
Uhuh, what I was getting at that, what was it i heard, in OK women cant do
their own hair as its against the law, and somewhere else its illegal to
carry an ice cream cone in your pocket, anyway I digress. What I was getting
at that I imagine there is some law prohibiting people distributing
information that isnt to the best of their knowledge correct. Given the
discussions with tracker about the info, I think its safe to say that there
is enough evidence to prove her info is wrong and it as been presented to
her. I think I was going to keep speaking, but I just got up and have gone
braindead :P
Mimic
> > it's no doubt it is a 100% original work, nobody else is even remotely
> > cabable of producing such a pile of shit and calling it a hacking
> > text. I feel sorry for the people in the copyright office that had to
> > read it.
>
> Sorry your a bit jealous but determination to fuck up the ferret owners
was this
> babes main goal. What was discovered in the hacking world made me the
woman I am
> today.
>
> Tracker
>
You do realise tracker, you havent fucked up anyones life. That means your
main goal was a complete failure.
aleeya
> Sorry your a bit jealous but determination to fuck up the ferret owners was this
> babes main goal. What was discovered in the hacking world made me the woman I am
> today.
>
> Tracker
You might be female as of today, but you are sure no woman.
lensman
:
>Sorry your a bit jealous but determination to fuck up the ferret owners was this
>babes main goal. What was discovered in the hacking world made me the woman I am
>today.
>
>Tracker
Huh ? where in the 'hacking world' did you discover those drugs that
have so obviously addled your feeble brain ?
And er, what kind of woman are you ? A fucked up mess of one ?
track off, spacca
Iceman
No hag, your were born pure ugly and stupid.