alt.pets.parrots.jardines
Este...@alt.pets.parrots.jardines
delivering raunchy porn or just nude pictures,
the government threat included prosecuting the person's wife too. Just like
it could in the private home raid scenario above. Only now with a new club
to swing. It was the main reason the husband agreed to plead guilty. He
wouldn't risk his wife to a trial just to protect his own rights.
The government will use every available tool to menace crypto users.
NYT, quoting a Supreme Court member on police use of legislative language:
"They will take it as far as they can."
They have absolutely no scruples, often.
In the AA BBS case, the Feds PURPOSELY PULLED graphics legal in California
into hick Tennessee, and succeeded in jailing the CA owner.
Wow. The Feds must have been drooling when Congress passed the CDA.
In addition, they sent UNSOLICITED real child porno to the owner, and charged
him with possession of child porno.
No code of ethics or conduct.
No scruples.
Predatory pinheads.
----
* "WHITE HOUSE IS SET TO EASE ITS STANCE ON INTERNET SMUT"
* The New York Times, By John M. Broder, June 16 1997
*
* Administration officials, in a draft report dated June 4 1997, have been
* quietly fashioning a new communications policy that leaves most regulation
* of the Internet to industry and people themselves, due to an expected
* repudiation of the Communications Decency Act by the Supreme Court.
*
* Reno's people, [beating the Drum of War] told the Supreme Court "the
* Internet was a revolutionary threat to children rendering irrelevant all
* prior efforts" to protect them from pornography.
*
* "We all knew at the time it was passed that the Communications Decency Act
* WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL," said an anonymous senior government offici
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 3.2.4
PqBRIqGLM51HoeogCKck1vV3EfPngQIDtuQ7wTkFwe7XDdpMCEVz6etyh1oRuPze
BaA6mYkOa4F3pPg82EFuodFzfhg08ARzT2ZgBGtUIT1HNpAsJiuoUTwzpLK0sDj7
6rC/wlmrZYu6qROLiyxBBYuxlpLAVrTGykGGPqNJHwUIvbOkGHteUMSR9VfK7Gm8
GrfXUG1/w6oZFsiDQIUFcFBLCuXxR0YbnZ==
=8fob
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Ja...@alt.pets.parrots.jardines
software to shield
us from endlessly intrusive government computer monitoring.
These categories of War are the big lie (propaganda technique) used by law
enforcement to discredit any and all privacy concerns. These are the reasons
why we can't use cryptography to give us the beginnings of privacy from the
Government.
That the dangers of it protecting someone involved in these activities
outweighs right to privacy of everyone else in the United States.
That our communications must be compromised by Government "Key Recovery".
What a bunch of hooey.
******************************************************************************
War #1 - Drugs
--- -- -----
* The New York Times
*
* December 7 1995. A&E Investigative Reports "Seized by the Law" draws
* attention to a recent embellishment of the criminal law that permits
* Federal agents and the state and local police to confiscate cash and
* property on the suspicion that their owners are involved in drug
* trafficking.
*
* Just suspicion.
*
* No arrest or indictment, much less conviction, is required.
The Dark Ages in America.
* And the fact that most of the proceeds stay with
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 0.6.3
hwlcX3R1dCmyTyYHMsGIHQ4pKzYHgJhd+A+qBoMrZ1hMpM0VgRJURoezCNcfTUMt
L49P1iebIcl9WTZg08oCwvCgzuvfY8C2jpwB2KbcPLb8a7LDpnd/a9iV0aQEKSyp
bdLkarEsDNnonJPCOY5DkWZIVThB+cz6K06jA2S8XzbdNoDkcf1Dg7rB4MUC3E2L
M8Y9yWcjv3UJyKLkvLS3foiVy8mROqmPoMC9UZrAy9MviHJkvOAfUk==
=MZDg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Mor...@alt.pets.parrots.jardines
292 basis/include/AppUI.h
71 basis/include/Customization.h
[large snip here]
131 basis/include/Date.h
77 basis/include/DateEntryPad.h
54 basis/include/DateIOField.h
33 basis/include/DefaultButton.h
63 basis/include/DocLayout.h
1144 basis/lib/base/basis_ios.cc
398 basis/lib/base/AmountFormat.cc
157 basis/lib/base/TemplateField.cc
136 basis/lib/base/AssocArry.cc
18184 total
His last day was XXXXXX 1996.
His new job and responsibilities:
> Project management of a new XXXXX project is what I'll be
> doing at XXXXX XXXXX (a bank from <country> ranked in the top 20).
> I'll start by consulting ($$/hour plus 1.5*OT) for TTTTTTTT.
> After that we talk about them invoking their right-to-hire clause.
> I might make VP. The project is great inasmuch as I'm starting it
> from scratch; it's not only not burdened by legacy code, but I
> can even pick the hardware. I'm "up" but also worried about the
> responsibility.
>
> The application is X risk analysis and XX for investors. It connects
> to a front end for a trading system.
>
> I put a lot of working into talking my new boss into me giving the
> normal 2 weeks notice at Salomon (they wanted me yesterday), because
> my current project is nearing a critical point. But my Salomon boss
> said just do a handoff now and leave.
>
> I am upset. I was trying to be profe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.9.2
SMZiFUMkIbJ+h7PH23D4WsPjK/bXiA7A7jtLz9uiTqA+2t+ZTiOFS54ZNnX4NEfh
Ot8ZEqEYRxfki8YTEOPzL+WBGxONR01GXPU3hy3pB0oQQ8IrPvSYUNPP8F2usiek
/Wt2VPWiXjdNQ8PAmuDwbEsEaOGT9asmawqcTeS7eGIFYFeJl0A5rSPqr1MsMUxK
yC/p+wEunBuwizFQf4z4uvg952CwgjdfiM==
=29jH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----