The 2012 Deception Who benefits?

[Noah's Dove]

http://the2012deception.net/?p=1

#
The 2012 Deception
Who benefits? find out here.

The 2012 Debunked Video

2012 theories are a lot like snowflakes. No two are alike. There are a
multitude of reasons as to why there is so much disagreement amongst
theorists and researchers regarding events purportedly to happen in
2012, and more specifically, why they believe these events are going
to happen.

Let us first examine what may likely be the most common 2012 theory,
which claims that on December 21, 2012 there will be some form of
mystical astronomical alignment with the center of our galaxy.

There are two main versions of this part of the theory, the first of
which states that the alignment occur when the sun rises above the
horizon on December 21st 2012 (the winter solstice) at which point the
sun will rise in the middle of the milky way, thus causing an
alignment between the earth sun and the galactic center

This does appear accurate and can be verified this with an astronomy
program. However, there are at least two problems with this concept,
the first of which is that this event is only significant from the
earth’s point of view.

The precession cycle or the 26,000 year wobble of the earth only
causes the EFFECT of the stars changing position on the horizon. The
visual effect only occurs from the earth’s perspective, so that if you
were viewing this “precession” from anywhere else in the solar system
it would be completely insignificant and uneventful.

There is no gravitational force or radiation to be expected from this
event because other than the tilt of the earth, nothing will be any
different than the last few thousand solstices and as such, the Earth
will be no closer to the galactic center than any other day.

If the Mayans did in fact point to this event with their calendar
(which we will look into later) it should be noted how the overall
event is harmless and seemingly insignificant beyond its role in time
keeping and/or for religious purposes. But there is no reason to
believe it will be an event of a magnitude so great that there will be
a pole shift or any other cataclysms, as in reality it is a visual
illusion and not an “Earth changing” event of any true physical power.

Another issue with the December 21, 2012 date is that because the
precession is so slow there is almost no difference between say,
December 21, 2008 and , and December 21, 2012. This is because
technically, the sun will “rise in galactic center” for this year’s
winter solstice, just as it will in 2012.

In fact here is a quote from John Major Jenkins one of the major
proponents of the 2012 theories from a part of his website called
“Response to Counter arguments ” he says:
“In the interest of clarity, I will mention that it would be more
accurate to say that the alignment occurs in the ERA of A.D. 2012;
because precession is such a slow phenomenon, fifty years on either
side of 2012 might be appropriate.”
by John Major Jenkins

The second camp of belief surrounding the 2012 alignment issue is
probably the more significant of the two because it is dealing with
the solar system’s actual location in relation to galactic center.
This is the idea that our little solar system is moving around the
center of the galaxy every 225 years or so million years or so, and
while doing so it is moving up and down in a cycle crossing the plane
every 33 million years.

So are we going to cross that galactic plane in 2012?

Absolutely not! According to the journal Nature, as well as many
others, there is evidence of crossing this plane 3 million years ago.
This would mean that we are moving away from the galactic plane and
won’t be due to cross it for another 30 million years and that’s
failing to mention that the margin of error in these calculations in
at least 2.1 parsecs or about 6.5 light years making images like these
and statements like this: completely meaningless.

What about a Pole Shift?
Although many theorists disagree on whether this pole shift will be
magnetic or a physical shifting of the crust of the earth the reason
for this happening in or around 2012 is usually cited as one of the
following:

- Planetary alignment
- Planet X or Nibiru and its comets tail
- A tremendous sun flare
- An asteroid

The first one is easy enough, there is no planetary alignment on Dec
21st 2012, this is what the planets will look like on that date. There
is a link on the screen to an online program that you can check for
yourself too.

Lets look at Planet X
The idea of Nibiru is traced back to Zecheriah Sitchin and his
translations of Sumerian texts.
and specifically to his interpretation of the VA 243 cylinder seal
which he says shows that the Sumerians knew of 12 planets (minus the
sun and the moon which they considered planets) and as such, this
would mean there is another planet.

Sitchin’s interpretation of the seal is wrong. The Sumerians have an
unambiguous symbol for the Sun: a circle with four triangles around it
like rays, and squiggly lines between the triangles. That is
emphatically not the symbol in the seal. The symbol used in the seal
is that of a bright star, this symbol for stars is very commonly used,
and this is the symbol we have in the seal so even Sitchin’s basic
premise is wrong. for details on this and what the seal actually means
see Dr. Michael Heiser paper The Myth of a 12th Planet: A Brief
Analysis of Cylinder Seal VA 243 available at sitchin is wrong .com

Sitchin claims that the picture shows Uranus, Neptune and Pluto, but
since the Sumerians didn’t have telescopes, they could therefore only
have known of those planets had aliens told them of their existence.
But if aliens told them about those planets, why did they fail to
mention the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, or Saturn’s rings? The seal
doesn’t show any of these features.

Also note that the Sumerians thought the Moon and Sun were planets,
when they aren’t. Certainly aliens would know that the Sun and Moon
are not planets! Sitchin is picking and choosing things in the picture
to support his arguments and ignoring things that don’t support it
like the inscription on the seal itself which has nothing do with his
theory. This isn’t science, its fantasy. It’s also wrong. If Sitchin
does know about a incoming planet he didn’t learn about it from this
seal

Another argument against Planet X and its supposed 3,600 year orbit is
the absence of any evidence for it.

For Planet X to be here in less than a decade, it can’t be farther
than a billion or so kilometers away. Even at that distance, it would
be one of the brightest objects in the sky. Even if it were too faint
to be seen with the naked eye, remember, Pluto is 5 billion kilometers
out, and although tiny, can be easily detected using modern equipment.
Pluto is way smaller than Planet X is supposed to be.

There is simply no way a big planet so close to Earth could have
escaped astronomers’ detection– even amateur astronomers.

Some will claim it is because it is hiding behind the sun and that’s
why we can’t detect it. If it was behind the sun it would be moving at
its fastest point considering its projected orbit and it would only be
behind the sun for a very short time.

There are a lot of claims about planet X out there like that
observatories are being closed to keep the information from the public
which is not true at all, besides that fact that they would need to
confiscate every telescope in the world to keep this secret hidden,
also there have been postings of pictures and other so called evidence
all of which have been shown to be a hoax.

There are actual pole shifts that do occur. Both magnetic pole shifts
and physical pole shifts. We are in fact the middle of a long process
of a magnetic pole shift, the biggest effect of which is that we will
have to realign our compasses in a few hundred years, here is an
excerpt from an article from NASA

Reversals take a few thousand years to complete, and during that time-
contrary to popular belief-the magnetic field does not vanish. “It
just gets more complicated,” says Glatzmaier. Magnetic lines of force
near Earth’s surface become twisted and tangled, and magnetic poles
pop up in unaccustomed places. A south magnetic pole might emerge over
Africa, for instance, or a north pole over Tahiti. Weird. But it’s
still a planetary magnetic field, and it still protects us from space
radiation and solar storms.

And I might add that it is ridiculous to pinpoint a specific date such
as Dec 21 2012 for this happening not just because it’s such a slow
process but because the proposed reasons such as galactic alignment
aren’t even true thus making it a non issue.

The other kind of pole shift is a physical pole shift.

Lets first set the record straight that this would require an event of
tremendous energy and that it is not part of any cycle or natural
occurrence and no increasing of solar energy would be enough to cause
this.

We have actually had a few degree shift of the poles in the past, but
not a reversal by any means. It is what is called a true polar
wanderer.

William Sager in an article entitled Texas A&M Oceanographer
Challenges Plate Tectonics As Reason For Poles’ Shift says “Our data
set indicates that this polar shift took place at a rate between 5 and
10 degrees per million years,” he said. “Essentially it happens within
the blink of an eye, in terms of geological time.”

What this is saying is that scientists who call this event fast, call
5-10 million years “fast” and that predicting a specific date for this
to happen is ridiculous. As discussed earlier, that that claim the
Mayans predicted the event using the understanding of precession fell
into the same trap as the galactic center theory couldn’t have any
less significance in the shifting of poles because the precession only
changes our perception on the sky it doesn’t actually tell us where we
are in the sky.

Let’s take a look at what supposedly got this whole thing started the
Mayan calendar.

The first question is did the Mayan long count calendar predict the
end of the world? No. there is no reference to this idea in Mayan
culture; these ideas are imposed by us and not the Mayans.

Even JMJ openly states, ” I do not concur with the Neo-Atlantean pole-
shift cataclysmologists on the idea that the world will literally end
in 2012. With this distinction in mind, I admit that I still
occasionally write, as a shorthand note, “end-date” or “end-date in
2012.” This does not mean that I believe the Maya calendar or the
world will end in A.D. 2012.” John Major Jenkins

Often times, video presentations covering these topics, be it a source
such as the History Channel, a 2012 YouTube video, or even an internet
article will make the jump from the resetting of the calendar to it
must mean a major cataclysmic event in a very slick way usually not
dwelling on this important transition.

Those that do mention the transition usually cite one of the following
reasons to tie it together.

1.) That a Mayan ball game was actually symbolism that told us about
galactic alignment
2.) That certain pictorials of the sacred tree also speak of galactic
alignment.

While I don’t agree with the logic used to make these connections, and
believe them to be farfetched and in most cases frivolous, for the
sake of the argument I will say that the Mayans did, for whatever
reason choose to end their calendar on this 2012 solstice because of
the visual effect of the sun rising in the galactic center on that
date.

They fully knew of this effect, which again is only a visual one as
viewed from earth. It would only be of local religious or mathematical
significance, that is to say if the Mayans believed it was a symbol of
rebirth when the sun appeared in the milky way galaxy it would be
their prerogative, but it wouldn’t have any galactic merit. It would
only make sense from the earth point of view. i would also suggest
that this viewpoint of rebirth has undertones which I find disturbing
because it seems that we are being taught to believe the same religion
using fairly obvious deceptive techniques.

There is also this idea that it that they were able to miraculously
determine these events, but it should be noted that western society
discovered the precession of the equinoxes at least 100 years BEFORE
the Mayans it wasn’t exactly a new concept the calculations to
determine these events are not magical, but a matter of mathematics
and astronomical observances,
Their culture remained stable for centuries, And they kept
records. So, it is entirely possible for an astronomer to plot the
positions of
some stars at midnight, at the equinox, and his grandson to plot the
same stars 72
years later and realize that the stars have all shifted one degree in
that time.
Multiply by 360, and you get the precession cycle of 26,000 years.
Almost certainly, this is how they did it. Because that’s all it
takes.

So were the Mayans predicting the end of the world …definitely not.
‘in fact the entire reason as far as I can tell for this hype is that
the Mayans restart their calendar , much like we do on December 31st
on a solstice. which they had the mathematical skill to do fairly
easily.

We are the ones responsible for this 2012 fever we have put a lot of
words in the Mayans mouths we have thrown pole shifts and planet x and
solar flares and everything else into this mix all of which have no
connections and not only weren’t suggested by the Mayans it would be
impossible to predict any of these things using the any of the methods
we are told they used to make such predictions.

I think there could be many reasons why this idea is so actively being
promoted to the world I encourage you to draw your own conclusions.
However, while doing the research on this I think finally found why I
think it’s being done, the following is my personal view, and it may
be extreme if you don’t agree with it I encourage you not to throw the
baby out with the bath water, because the 2012 theories are still
wrong no matter what, if you don’t want to hear my analysis feel free
to shut the video off at this point.

Many 2012 researchers are quick to point out how things will be
getting much worse upon the approach to 2012 and we will see many
cataclysms
and earth changes on the way to our promised “enlightenment”.
I think that this has to be promoted as much as possible to people so
that when they see these kinds of things happening in the next few
years, which I agree will happen but for different reasons, everyone
will try to endure these things thinking it’s a natural cycle never
realizing the obvious fact, which is that The bible clearly prophesied
what the days before the return of Jesus and so called birth pangs
would look like and even why they were happening and what to do about
it. This 2012 thing is both the proverbial carrot on a string which
keeps us looking for our “illumination” while simultaneously gives us
pride that we know that all these terrible things are a result of
“science” thus there is no reason to pay attention to anything else.

I hear a lot of criticism of the bible, I’m not too impressed with
most of them, but surprisingly the one that could really have an
impact is never used, even by the fiercest critics.
Which is challenging the fact that the bible has never missed in
regards to prophecy that is, it is 100% accurate and the Bible itself
is full of prophecies almost 25% prophecy at and because of the
Septuagint it can be demonstrated easily that it was written before
the events it prophesied happened, these are not vague prophecies
either, they all talking about specific kingdoms, people, places
times, even names. all of which came true.
Considering its track record it should be the most important book on
our bookshelf.

Here is a link to download this video in one part in WMV format.
http://conspiracyclothes.com/nowheretorun/ra/movie/2012_final_cut.wmv

The Sun’s motion perpendicular to the galactic plane
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v316/n6030/abs/316706a0.html

Earth’s Inconstant Magnetic Field
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html

The Planet X Saga: The Scientific Arguments in a Nutshell
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/nutshell.html

Response to Counterarguments Appendix 5 to Maya Cosmogenesis 2012 by
John Major Jenkins
http://www.alignment2012.com/app5.htm

Texas A&M Oceanographer Challenges Plate Tectonics As Reason For
Poles’ Shift
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/01/000125053438.htm

What is that pole shift thing?
http://www.dailycommonsense.com/what-is-that-polar-shift-thing/

The Myth of a 12th Planet:
A Brief Analysis of Cylinder Seal VA 243
www.sitchiniswrong.com/VA243seal.pdf

precession of the equinoxes
http://www.answers.com/topic/precession-1

Our Galactic Plane
http://hypography.com/forums/astronomy-and-cosmology/10192-our-galactic-plane.html

MEANING OF THE BALL GAME IN MAYAN MYTHOLOGY
http://www.siloam.net/jenkins/5thsun4.html

Great Celestial Conjunction Crosses
http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/great%20celestial%20conjunction%20crosses.html

The World Age cosmology of the Maya calendar end-date in A.D.2012 and
its basis in a rare astronomical alignment of the solstice sun with
the Milky Way Galaxy
http://www.grahamhancock.com/forum/JenkinsJM2-p1.htm

Planetary Alignments: Fact or Fiction?
http://www.etsu.edu/physics/etsuobs/starprty/22099dgl/planalign.htm

The Platonic Year & the
Maya Long Count: Fractal
http://www.earthmatrix.com/platonic/extrac18.htm

Confused about 2012 (yes, another one!)
http://www.bautforum.com/conspiracy-theories/79817-confused-about-2012-yes-another-one.html

Planet X? Nope, an admitted hoax!
http://www.zetatalk.com/teams/rogue/nancy30.htm

positon on galactic plane
http://hypography.com/forums/members/turtle.html#vmessage712

music from http://rapitflybeats.net

Posted in 2012, 2012 movie, David Wilcok, Galactic alignment, Nibiru,
Planet X, Solar Flares, Uncategorized, Zecharia Sitchin, michael
heiser, pole shift, real science
6 Responses to “The 2012 Debunked Video”

Rusty Says:
March 29th, 2009 at 11:21 pm
I just happened to stumble across your site as I was looking through
some other blogs and after reading this entry I felt the need to
comment. Personally, I give some merit to the 2012 idea in a general
sense. Now I don’t expect fireworks, or the end of the world, or
instantaneous enlightenment but I do feel that we will be in a
position for a spiritual catalyst. Let me explain. I guess it really
starts with my perception of the mayan people. A lot of modern
westerners perceive the world through science and materialism
(physicality of reality) and seem to think we’ve got the picture all
figured out. Some have a degree of spirituality but they express it
through someone else’s idea of religion instead of their own. It seems
from the essay that you are a Christian and I don’t want to offend you
in any way, so please don’t take my beliefs as an attack on you, I
just want to express my perspective. I feel that religion is general
is an expression of spirituality that takes the spirit out of the
equation. For me, spirituality is about self-discovery and
imagination. It’s about discovering the divine consciousness within
and figuring out reality for yourself. From that perspective, religion
holds people into a dogmatic system that makes them feel afraid,
guilty, insecure, and helpless. What comes out of that is a view of
reality that just doesn’t have room for the unexplainable. Now I know
that is a very stereotypical statement, not all followers of religion
are like that. But I feel that overall, religions like Christianity
close down people’s imagination and from that we get things like
modern science and a perspective that we are the pinnacle of
development and therefore any culture older than us must have been
more primitive and just plain “dumb” compared to us. (perhaps
superstitious would be a better word than dumb) My point is that while
the mayans may not have had the technology that we have but they had a
deep spiritual connection that we don’t have. Their shamans and
sorcerers could peer into the depths of reality and step into
different states of awareness that put them in contact with the
divine, much like the prophets of the Bible who drank soma and had
divine visions. These mayan shamans had sacred plants that would allow
them to transcend the physical and experience a reality that we just
can’t comprehend. Modern humans sacrificed that ability for our
impressive technical ability. Personally I don’t know that we’re
better off this way, but it may have been a choice that we had to make
in order to evolve spiritually. I believe that the mayan shamans were
aware of natural cycles that we don’t know anything about. One of
those cycles was the evolution of consciousness. So, for me, 2012
means the completion of a cycle that signifies an evolutionary leap in
consciousness, but its not just all cut and dry, we’re homo sapiens
one moment and homo spiritus the next. What we’re coming into is an
era of enhanced spiritual energy that will act as a catalyst for those
who choose to use it. So for the people who utilize divine energy in
their own self development, this coming era will be one of faster,
easier development. Basically, it will be easier to bypass the ego to
access the true self, the divine within. If you’re not one of those
people then what you’re empowering is the ego and all of its
narcissistic ways. This is why people expect the end of the world. All
of our worst qualities will take over in the people who choose to
ignore their spirit. Our reality is a mirror for our inner selves, it
reflects what we are in our souls. If you see the world from a
different perspective you might see this as the return of christ. With
all of that said, I need to address some of your counter-evidence.
Zecharia Sitchien doesn’t base everything in his books on that on
seal. He is a respected archeologist, aliens aside. He also has a
number of books that span from sumeria, to egypt, to south america, to
india and more. I don’t really think he would base his entire premise
on one cylinder seal, so I don’t think you can discredit his whole
theory by disproving one tiny piece of evidence. And the sitchien is
wrong site is maintained by a guy who has a personal vendetta against
Z.S., that guy also does believe that aliens came to earth and
genetically engineered humans, he just has a slightly different theory
than Z.S. You should read his books, they’re good. As for the Bible,
just because people say their is a Septuagint doesn’t mean that there
was. You’re putting an awful lot of faith in a book that was written
by….wait, who was it written by? Oh yea, no one knows. It was written
over 1500 years ago by men. Even if it were at one time a divine
document, there was a council held to decide what books were good for
the religion and which ones didn’t fit into what they wanted
christianity to be. If these books were divine then they should have
all be included. Plus, think of how many times its been re-written, re-
translated, or re-worked to fit whatever was needed socially and
politically at the time. I’m a lot more prone to have faith in a
personal experience of the divine within than in a book that, lets be
honest, has nothing backing it up besides the word of men. As for us
putting these words into the mouths of mayans, I agree. However, that
doesn’t mean that they didn’t see this event as something important
(more than just an aesthetically pleasing celestial event). You have
to understand that we have a drastically different perception of
reality than they did and there are a lot of writings of theirs that
support the idea that the end of this particular calender is
significant. You should check out some books by Jose Arguelles who was
one of the first to start talking about 2012 and the mayans.
There’s one more aspect that I want to include. That is that I agree
that this is mostly just hype. Its being abused and misinterpreted
intentionally to distract us from our self-development. But thats a
whole different road that I’m not gonna go down.
There are some more aspects that could go mentioned but to be honest,
I’m tired and its late so I’ll stop now.
Remember, i don’t mean to offend or say that I’m right and you’re
wrong. Neither of us knows whats right or wrong in this world. The
only thing we really know is that we don’t know anything. Reality and
God are so far beyond our comprehension that whatever speculations we
make are just irrelevant.
thank you for your time, bless you and again, don’t be offended by
anything I say. And for that matter just forget everything I say, it
doesn’t really matter anyway. What matters is your experience and your
reality.
admin Says:
March 31st, 2009 at 12:54 am
Thanks for the comment. I will do an audio response to it tomorrow and
post it here.
thanks for your time
Chris
admin Says:
March 31st, 2009 at 1:19 pm
Here is a response (its about 20 mins long)
http://the2012deception.net/audio/response1.mp3
cyops Says:
May 19th, 2009 at 10:36 pm
if you can help it. what do you care what people say
he is not a main stream reporter Phurget that why dont you go after
Ked Kopple or some sports caster that has some real sway on the
peoples fears and hopes///// like who wins the next stuper bowl
The 2012 Deception » Blog Archive » 2012 theories handled on the Bad
Astronomy forum Says:
June 9th, 2009 at 12:15 pm
[...] quoted from this forum when doing my movie 2012 debunked but I
dont agree with everything said here, this is mainly because of the
discussion forum [...]
The 2012 Deception » Blog Archive » The 2012 Galactic Alignment Hoax
Says:
June 9th, 2009 at 9:57 pm
[...] shift as well as any number of cataclysms. I discovered recently
while doing the research for the 2012 debunked video that this was
very [...]