Re: Is accepting fat enabling obesity?

[healingline]

On Aug 21, 12:44 am, kachina <a...@b.c> wrote:
> Ragnar <rapierfen...@live.com> said stuff on 20 Aug 2010:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 20, 3:54 pm, "  Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregh...@home.fake>
> > wrote:
> >> "Checkmate" <LunaticFri...@The.Edge> wrote in message
>
> >>news:MPG.26d87c693...@news.alt.net...
>
> >> > Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> > posts
> >  by
> >> > Checkmate.  Oh, yeah... I should also mention that   Sir Gregory Ha
> > ll,
> >> > Esq.
> >> > said the following:
>
> >> >> "Ragnar" <rapierfen...@live.com> wrote in message
> >> >>news:b3d6a552-e59a-40f0...@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.c
> >> >>om.
> > ..
> >> >> <snip>
>
> >> >> :: ?Defective brain?, lol the irony that you spew is astounding.
> >> >> ::
> >> >> :: Let?s do it this way; when you provide one shred of evidence
> >> >> :: that i
> > s
> >> >> :: backed scientifically to support your theory then we can
> >> >> :: continue t
> > his
> >> >> :: conversation. Until then I?ll just regard you as just another
> >> >> :: Usene
> > t
> >> >> :: troll and bestow upon you all the privileges and accolades in
> >> >> :: accordance with what you deserve. So please provide a citation
> >> >> :: pointing to a qualified scientific study, report, theory,
> >> >> :: research, etc in support of your assertions and then I will
> >> >> :: gladly debate the merits of said data with you until the cows
> >> >> :: come home. But until yo
> > u
> >> >> :: put up I suggest you shut up because you aren?t doing yourself
> >> >> :: any favors by making unsubstantiated claims based solely on
> >> >> :: opinion pul
> > led
> >> >> :: straight out of your ass.
>
> >> >> You're the J.R. Puffinstuff whose making unsubstantiated claims
> >> >> that f
> > ly
> >> >> in
> >> >> the face of the most elementary of logic. I call on you to prove
> >> >> what
> > I
> >> >> say
> >> >> is not true using scientifici evidence. IOW I will not cede you
> >> >> the up
> > per
> >> >> hand via a lame trick. <check>
>
> >> >> :: As W. suggested I have a low tolerance for troll bullshit and
> >> >> :: some people may view this as sensitivity but don?t mistake my
> >> >> :: intoleranc
> > e
> >> >> :: for your dog shit opinion based musings as a sensitive
> >> >> :: reaction. In reality I view your trolling here as an
> >> >> :: interesting study in the lo
> > wer
> >> >> :: rungs of Usenet society. So if I appear to be angry or
> >> >> :: combative it
> >  is
> >> >> :: not the case as most times my responses are meant to goad you
> >> >> :: into perpetration of further idiocy. That way WE all can have a
> >> >> :: good lau
> > gh
> >> >> :: at your expense.
>
> >> >> What you can or cannot tolerate is your problem and your problem
> >> >> alone
> >  so
> >> >> don't try to burden me with your shortcomings. It is well-known
> >> >> that people
> >> >> like you have one resort and one resort only - calling somebody a
> >> >> trol
> > l.
> >> >> This is beyond ignorant and just another form of turning tail and
> >> >> running.
>
> >> >> I shall now expand my observation that an obese body is a symptom
> >> >> of a defective mind. Not only is an obese body a symptom of a
> >> >> defective min
> > d
> >> >> but
> >> >> those who defend the obese body of their loved ones also have
> >> >> defectiv
> > e
> >> >> minds because they allow their loved ones to not only look ugly
> >> >> but to
> >  be
> >> >> unhealthy and to die young. It takes a defective mind to allow a
> >> >> loved one
> >> >> to remain obese. Your's is a defective mind because you have an
> >> >> obese wife
> >> >> and you couldn't care less if she dies young. If you would but
> >> >> recogni
> > ze
> >> >> that obesity is a symptom of a defective mind you would thne be
> >> >> able t
> > o
> >> >> take
> >> >> the necessary steps to affect a cure of whatever psychological
> >> >> problem your
> >> >> wife suffers from. Instead, you enable her symptomatic obesity by
> >> >> refusing
> >> >> to recognize that the problem is some defect in her brain - most
> >> >> like
> > a
> >> >> psychological defect that can be corrected with therapy.
>
> >> > I suspect that Ragnar's wife has resorted to overeating to deal
> >> > with th
> > e
> >> > unpleasantries of being married to an asshole like Rags.  I would
> >> > als
> > o add
> >> > that
> >> > it's an exercise in futility to attempt to debate him, because he
> >> > just drops
> >> > the thread when he doesn't have any answers.  The rest of the time,
> >> > h
> > e
> >> > resorts
> >> > to "yer stupid" lames.
>
> >> Right you are Checkmate. I have already discovered and exposed Rube
> >> Ragna
> > r's
> >> faulty debating. He doesn't wish to debate at all because he won't
> >> take t
> > he
> >> time to refute an assertion but expects the asserter to prove the
> >> asserti
> > on
> >> when it's his responsibility as a debater to disprove the assertion.
> >> IOW
> > he
> >> abdicates the debate process.
>
> >> And, he's apparently been getting away with his crap - but no more.
> >> Grego
> > ry
> >> Hall has seen to that.
>
> > Gregory Hall refers to himself in the third person (like Napoleon or
> > Bob Dole), Gregory Hall is full of himself, Gregory Hall expects his
> > critics to prove wrong theories that exist only in his OWN head.
> > Gregory Hall makes claims that can't be substantiated. (And he knows
> > it), Gregory Hall uses logic that can only be discribed as fucked.
>
> > Gregory Hall is full of shit, Gregory Hall is a lunatic.
>
> > Ragnar
>
> ooooooooh, dagmar is on the rag.
>
> --
> @}`-,--   *in memoriam, KotAGoR XXXV*

Fat is fuel. Pave on and let your fat grease our gears.

healingline