On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:11:33 -0400, Anglo Saxon <inv...@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>> <
https://www.chesterton.org/lecture-36/>
>> ========================================
>> Lecture 36: Eugenics and Other Evils
>> by DALE AHLQUIST
>> Eugenics is a nice-sounding word, combining as it does the Greek words
>> for "good" and "birth". And Francis Galton, who made up the word and
>> the idea, proposed Eugenics "for the betterment of mankind". But
>> that's as far as the nice-sounding stuff goes. The actual definition
>> is rather horrible: the controlled and selective breeding of the human
>> race. Galton based his ideas on the theories of his cousin: Charles
>> Darwin. By the beginning of the 20th century, when Darwin's theory was
>> safely embraced by the scientific establishment, Eugenics was getting
>> good press. The New York Times gave it constant and positive coverage.
>> Luther Burbank and other scientists promoted Eugenics. George Bernard
>> Shaw said that nothing but a Eugenic religion could save civilization.
>>
>> Only one writer wrote a book against Eugenics. G.K. Chesterton.
>> Eugenics and Other Evils may be his most prophetic book.
>>
>> Eugenics led directly to the birth control movement. All the same
>> players were involved, such as Margaret Sanger, who was a member of
>> the American Eugenics Society and was the editor of the Birth Control
>> Review. The primary philosophy was trumpeted on the cover of the Birth
>> Control Review: "More Children for the Fit. Less for the Unfit". She
>> made it clear whom she considered unfit:. "Hebrews, Slavs, Catholics,
>> and Negroes". She set up her Birth Control clinics only in their
>> neighborhoods. She openly advocated the idea that such people should
>> apply for official permission to have babies "as immigrants have to
>> apply for visas".
>>
>> Why don't we hear of this connection between Margaret Sanger, the
>> founder of Planned Parenthood, and Eugenics?
>>
>> Two words: Adolf Hitler. He officially instituted Eugenics, leading an
>> entire country in carrying out its principles, not only to breed what
>> he believed to be a superior race but to eliminate everyone whom he
>> considered to be inferior. Where did Hitler find early support for his
>> Eugenic ideas? From Margaret Sanger and her circle. Eugenic Scientists
>> from Nazi Germany wrote articles for Sanger’s Birth Control Review,
>> and members of Sanger's American Birth Control League visited Nazi
>> Germany, sat in on sessions of the Supreme Eugenics Court, and
>> returned with glowing reports of how the Sterilization Law was
>> "weeding out the worst strains in the Germanic stock in a scientific
>> and truly humanitarian way".
>>
>> After World War II, when the world learned of the horrors of the
>> Holocaust and the death camps, the term Eugenics was utterly
>> discredited. Margaret Sanger was quick to distance herself from
>> Eugenics and began to emphasize Birth Control as supposedly a feminist
>> issue. We don't hear about Eugenics at all any more.
>> ========================================
>>
>> We don't hear about Eugenics at all anymore because the libtards, who
>> still support the underlying tenets of eugenics, have wrapped their
>> racist murderous eugenicistic intentions in philanthropic-sounding
>> verbiage and institutionalized their racism in Planned Parenthood and
>> similar abortion mills cum organ harvesting operations (the
>> overwhelming majority of which are in minority neighborhoods, the rest
>> in poor neighborhoods... the stated goal of the eugenicists is to rid
>> the world of minorities and the poor, after all); in vaccination
>> programs (often utilizing forced vaccinations in third world
>> countries, sometimes at gunpoint) with vaccines that are adulterated
>> with sterilization agents (those sterilization agents couldn't get
>> into the vaccines accidentally, and wouldn't survive in those vaccines
>> unless they were specifically crafted for that vaccine) that have
>> killed as many as 50,000 people per year; the handing out of welfare
>> and other goodies to minorities to keep them subjugated and dependent
>> in return for votes (what the libtards call "The Farm" because calling
>> it "The Plantation" would be too blatantly obvious even for the
>> libtards to keep a straight face); government-sponsored segregation
>> via government housing; libtard policies that keep minority children
>> trapped in poorly-performing schools; libtard policies that prevent
>> minority entrepreneurs from starting or make it more difficult for
>> minority entrepreneurs to start their own businesses; libtard-promoted
>> laws that drive up unemployment amongst minorities; the entire concept
>> of keeping minorities dependent upon government (and specifically upon
>> the libtards, who happily act as their nannies in return for votes, a
>> lopsided quid pro quo that perpetuates the minority struggle for
>> equality); and by continually race-baiting and playing the race card
>> for political purposes.
>>
>> But now that blacks across the US are waking up to the endemic racism,
>> oppression, eugenics and tyranny that the Democrat party has embodied
>> for more than 150 years and continues to embody today, they're
>> rejecting Democrats for the party that has historically been their
>> savior, the Republicans. Eventually the libtard kooks in the Democrat
>> party will be an historical footnote, a sad racist blot on this good
>> nation's history.
>>
>
> Excellent background summary.
if birth control and curing STDs is now considered "eugenics", imagine
what "going to the doctor" says about someone's politics!
aren't you and fakey just two peas in a "religious whacko pea pod"?
www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/08/14/432080520/fact-check-was-planned-parenthood-started-to-control-the-black-population
"That Sanger was enamored and supported some eugenicists' ideas is
certainly true," said Susan Reverby, a health care historian and professor
at Wellesley College. But, Reverby added, Sanger's main argument was not
eugenics — it was that "Sanger thought people should have the children
they wanted."
which brings us back to one of fakey's favorite most-cherished types of
logical fallacy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy
the same one that he stupidly employs in order to try to "prove" that
democrats of today (ie: the "librul" racial minorities and queers that he
vocally hates so) would vote against the civil rights act in 1964 and join
the KKK in jim crow alabama (or similarly, the republican party of today),
just as slaveowner democrats had in the past when the democratic party was
a conservative party compared to republicans.
i wonder if there are any other ashamed anonymous fucktards who can chime
in on this?
--
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "
ro...@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)