My Three Stooges Meet GOD(D)-Thriller :-)
Jack Sarfatti
working with us on multimedia on the WEB when the cable
modems arrive and ISEP starts becoming like the CNN of the
mind. We have big long-range plans in terms of memetic
engineering of cyberspace. The bandwidth is not there yet.
NRQ...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Hello, Jack. Trying to follow what you've been sending into my machine has
> been quite a challenge. I haven't much to contribute to the discussion aside
> from this tip for any couch potatoes on your list.
>
> Last night ( Monday 7/6/98) A&E's "American Justice" broadcast its show about
> Ira Einhorn. I unfortunately missed the first half, but I am looking forward
> to seeing the re-run this coming Sunday a.m. . "Check your local listings",
> as they say.
>
> Norman
Bob Jones also saw that show. He says that they claim that
Ira tried to get some friends to move the large steamer
trunk, but they refused because of the foul odor. So this
report, if true, does not look good for Ira and he needs to
give his version. The parallel of Einhorn's case with O.J.
Simpson's is striking. Lot's of damning circumstantial
evidence for sure. But the forensics in Ira's case seem
weaker than in O. J. Simpson's. Can't they get DNA? Or is it
too late? Is Ira like the character played by Anthony
Hopkins in Silence of the Lambs, or is he the innocent
victim of a frame? What Ira needs to make very clear,
especially with Connie Chung on the ABC Special is who would
have a motive to do this to him? Ira's past pattern with
women provides the motive if he is guilty and apparently he
had the opportunity. On the other hand, we have an alleged
report from CIA's Kit Green MD who has forensics expertise
that Holly was not killed in Ira's apartment. This needs to
be confirmed however. So far it is hearsay from Eldin Byrd.
To change the subject. I have started to read Schnabel's
book on remote-viewing. Interesting quote by General Ed
Thompson (I am in the Palazzo of the Princessa and do not
have the book in front of me) Asst Chief of Staff of Army
Intelligence some years back. Thompson says they were not so
much interested in the explanation as in whether the RV
could be used practically. Deutsch's essay on "Taking
Science Seriously" shows why that is a major policy error in
the long run. See what Deutsch says about "disease". I will
get back to this later.
The point is that RV, taken at face value, shows that the
mind is able to time and space travel as Shamans claim.
Harold Chipman of CIA did tell me that RV was an effective
tool in actual covert operations. Schnabel's book supports
Chipman's remarks to me. I know Stephen Schwartz has a low
opinion of Chipman who he regards as some kind of con-man
renegade from CIA I think. Nevertheless Chipman's claim is
now backed up by Schnabel's book as well as Russell Targ's
book and Dean Radin's book.
So, IF RV is a fact, then we have a clear violation of both
classical relativity and quantum mechanics. It is nothing
short of a major revolution in physics. This is why I am
interested. My post-quantum mechanics is the only scientific
explanation which seamlessly limits to quantum mechanics and
which explains both ordinary consciousness and RV in a
unified way in terms of nonlocal communication beyond
space-time.
Go to http://www.stardrive.org
and
http://www.hia.com/pcr/vigier/slides/Vigier.HTM