Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Holographics and Astrology

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Edmond Wollmann

unread,
Jan 19, 2005, 8:35:06 PM1/19/05
to
In support of the idea of creating one's reality and that the horoscope
makes
sense from the holographic view, I here present an excerpt from the
Holographic
Universe by Michael Talbot.


In order for the horoscope to be a reflection to the senses of another
aspect
that is not necessarily physical, we must acknowledge the current
theories of
reality being IMPLICATE and enfolded. In other words as in experiments
where
photons were shown to act as if they were connected even though no
physical
connection could be made, (Alain Aspect, Jean Dalibard, Gerard Roger of
University of paris -Optics) this aspect known as a "nonlocal"
implication
reveals all particles are continually interacting and separating so
that this
evidence of the interconnectedness of "All That Is" "the nonlocal
aspects of
quantum systems is therefore a general property of nature."(Paul Davis,
"Superforce", New York, 1984, page 48).


This nonlocal aspect reflects the idea that although physically
untestable
(which by the way MANY theories still are and may be for many
years-such as
superstring theories etc.) are never- the-less supported by these
studies with
some evidence of the interconnectedness of the universe. This just
makes sense
to me intuitively and I am quite sure it will not be long when science
will
validate what astrologers have known for a long time. That our
consciousness is
reflected in and is a part of the surrounding cosmos. As above so
below.


The main architects of this astonishing idea are two of the world's
most eminent thinkers: University of London physicist David Bohm,
a protege of Einstein's and one of the world's most respected quantum
physicists; and Karl Pribram, a neurophysiologist at Stanford Univer-
sity and author of the classic neuropsychological textbook Languages
of the Brain.


Pribram and Bohm Together
Considered together, Bohm and Pribram's theories provide a profound
new way of looking at the world: Our brains mathematically con-
struct objective reality by interpreting frequencies that are ulti-
mately projections from another dimension, a deeper order of exis-
tence that is beyond both space and time: The brain is a hologram
enfolded in a holographic universe.
For Pribram, this synthesis made him realize that the objective
world does not exist, at least not in the way we are accustomed to
believing. What is "out there" is a vast ocean of waves and frequen-
cies, and reality looks concrete to us only because our brains are able
to take this holographic blur and convert it into the sticks and stones
and
other familiar objects that make up our world. How is the brain (which
itself
is composed of frequencies of matter) able to take
something as insubstantial as a blur of frequencies and make it seem
solid to the touch? "The kind of mathematical process that Bekesy
simulated with his vibrators is basic to how our brains construct our
image of a world out there," Pribram states.' In other words, the
smoothness of a piece of fine china and the feel of beach sand be-
neath our feet are really just elaborate versions of the phantom limb
syndrome.
According to Pribram this does not mean there aren't china cups and
grains of beach sand out there. It simply means that a china cup has
two very different aspects to its reality. When it is filtered through
the lens
of our brain it manifests as a cup. But if we could get rid of our
lenses, we'd
experience it as an interference pattern. Which one is real and which
is
illusion? "Both are real to me," says Pribram, "or, if you want to say,
neither
of them are real." a This state of affairs is not limited to china
cups. We,
too, have two very different aspects to our reality. We can view
ourselves as
physical bodies moving through space. Or we can view ourselves as a
blur of
interference patterns enfolded throughout the cosmic hologram.
Bohm believes this second point of view might even be the more
correct, for to think of ourselves as a holographic mind/brain looking
at a holographic universe is again an abstraction, an attempt to sepa-
rate two things that ultimately cannot be separated.
Do not be troubled if this is difficult to grasp. It is relatively easy
to
understand the idea of holism in something that is external to us, like
an
apple in a hologram. What makes it difficult is that in this case we
are not
looking at the hologram. We are part of the hologram.
The difficulty is also another indication of how radical a revision
Bohm and Pribram are trying to make in our way of thinking. But it
is not the only radical revision. Pribram's assertion that our brains
construct objects pales beside another of Bohm's conclusions: that we
even construct space and time. The implications of this view are
just one of the subjects that will be examined as we explore the effect
Bohm and Pribram's ideas have had on the work of researchers in other
fields.


Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
(c) 2005 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/info.htm

Beep

unread,
Jan 19, 2005, 8:54:38 PM1/19/05
to
On 19 Jan 2005 17:35:06 -0800, "Edmond Wollmann"
<alcha...@yahoo.com> wrote:

I wish I knew any physics and could discuss this intelligently...

got a short sentences, small words version? :)


--
email address: beep at west dot net
Rheumatic Disease info: http://www.sblupus.org
blog: http://www.livejournal.com/users/beepbeep/
Peak Oil: http://www.livejournal.com/community/peak_oil
Яллю

wollma...@spam.free

unread,
Jan 19, 2005, 3:35:06 PM1/19/05
to
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
http://www.nocem.org/
http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefs.html#W

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://www.smbtech.com/ed/

@@BEGIN NCM HEADERS
Version: 0.9
Issuer: wollma...@spam.free
Type: spew
Action: hide
Count: 1
Notice-ID: Wollmannizer03299
@BEGIN NCM BODY
<1106184906.5...@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> alt.astrology
alt.astrology.metapsych alt.psychology talk.religion.newage alt.paranormal
@END NCM BODY

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8

iQA/AwUBQe8XlVIcW5ONdL49EQL/hACgrlMc58VCciYlTzVgYAOZYgRqI2oAnR/C
U/dEdR0rhReWAq5HtsMA4ap0
=yVDq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Cujo DeSockpuppet

unread,
Jan 19, 2005, 10:04:42 PM1/19/05
to
"Edmond Wollmann" <alcha...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1106184906.5...@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

> In support of the sccred Ed steals from others Ed will screed more.

Fixed.

Edmond Wollmann is a Convicted Criminal

unread,
Jan 20, 2005, 1:58:02 AM1/20/05
to
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> In support of the idea of creating one's reality


you fail to make yours any better, after trying for FIFTY-FIVE FUCKING
YEARS NOW!

John Griffin

unread,
Jan 20, 2005, 6:14:39 AM1/20/05
to
"Edmond Wollmann" <alcha...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> In support of the idea of creating one's reality and that the horoscope
> makes
> sense from the holographic view, I here present an excerpt from the
> Holographic
> Universe by Michael Talbot.

Why? You obviously have no idea what he said.

Besides that, he's a superstitious weenie:

>yapyapyapyapyap I am quite sure it will not be long when science


> will
> validate what astrologers have known for a long time. That our
> consciousness is
> reflected in and is a part of the surrounding cosmos. As above so
> below.

That's hilarious.

Science has known for a long time that naked speculation is just naked
speculation until someone comes up with some supporting evidence, fool.

Edmond Wollmann

unread,
Jan 20, 2005, 1:17:56 PM1/20/05
to

We create our reality utterly as the product of what we believe or have
been taught to believe is "true."

Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2005 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://www.e-wollmann.com/pleiadian1/

Dan Baldwin

unread,
Jan 20, 2005, 1:31:40 PM1/20/05
to
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>
>
> We create our reality utterly as the product of what we believe or have
> been taught to believe is "true."

And you'll be proving this meaningless assertion ... when? And if your
correct, then why do you believe that you are deserving of all the scorn
heaped upon you?

After all, it stands to reason that if you create your own reality
utterly, then you yourself created all the people calling you out for
the specious, bilious prick you are.

--
Dan Baldwin, unethical *by design*

I am a minion of Satan, but my powers are mainly administrative.

Hail the un-alive

Cujo DeSockpuppet

unread,
Jan 20, 2005, 6:30:46 PM1/20/05
to
"Edmond Wollmann" <alcha...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1106245076.9...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
<snip>
> We create our reality utterly as the product of what we believe or have
> been taught to believe is "true."

Who taught you that you will sue me, fuckwad?

Your .sig is also off topic for AAMeta, dipshit.

wollma...@spam.free

unread,
Jan 20, 2005, 8:17:56 AM1/20/05
to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://www.smbtech.com/ed/

@@BEGIN NCM HEADERS
Version: 0.9
Issuer: wollma...@spam.free
Type: spew
Action: hide
Count: 1

Notice-ID: Wollmannizer03320
@BEGIN NCM BODY
<1106245076.9...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> alt.astrology


alt.astrology.metapsych alt.psychology talk.religion.newage alt.paranormal
@END NCM BODY

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8

iQA/AwUBQfBuWFIcW5ONdL49EQLBqgCeJkov3Mcb86s7M81/lUmNl1qmfEwAn2NZ
VgZRStTPPwrxepOJKBuc0n7q
=NujP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Edmond Wollmann is a Convicted Criminal

unread,
Jan 20, 2005, 10:49:43 PM1/20/05
to
Edmond Wollmann wrote:

> Beep wrote:
>
>>
>>I wish I knew any physics and could discuss this intelligently...
>>
>>got a short sentences, small words version? :)
>
>
> We create our reality utterly as the product of what we believe or have
> been taught to believe is "true."


Why did you choose to create a reality in which "spinics" laugh at your
kookery?

Message has been deleted

Mr. 4X

unread,
Jan 24, 2005, 6:16:23 PM1/24/05
to
Beep <spa...@spamsux.net> wrote in message
news:6p3uu01ajo8evrepf...@4ax.com:

> On 19 Jan 2005 17:35:06 -0800, "Edmond Wollmann"
> <alcha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

<Wollkook's screed sacrificed on the altar of Bandwidth>

>
> I wish I knew any physics and could discuss this intelligently...

I'm sure you know more about physics than Edmo.

0 new messages