Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Pluto

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Edmond Wollmann

unread,
Oct 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/23/00
to
As the inconjuncts reflect (Virgo/Scorpio 150 degree aspect) with
regard to the natural template first house and sign (Aries), it is the
adjustment of perspective and mental view or transcendence of the self
(please see my self awareness and conviction post) that is being
adjusted in the inconjunct.

The ruling planets of these signs also reflect this "adjustment" and
alteration of view from their orbital tilt. Mercury has a 7 degree
tilt and Pluto 17!

This allows them to "look down" at the plane of planetary orbits within
the solar system and therefore reflect the idea of "adjusted thinking
and perspective" that allows for seeing things in a new and expanded
way.

This occurs in preparation analytically (Virgo) to meet the self and
its projections (Libra) and the transformation of perspective after it
has been encountered (Scorpio).

Pluto therefore reflects and represents the alteration of perspective
necessary in physical reality to transcend simple ego limitations
(Aries) and express the ego in the higher self format (Sagittarius).
This is why the E-MOTION or energy-motion of the BELIEFS held may be so
powerful at Scorpio. A strong momentum of BELIEF that cannot be
transcended results in OBSESSION.

Diagnostic criteria for 300.3 Obsessive~Compulsive Disorder
A. Either obsessions or compulsions:
Obsessions as defined by (1), (2), (3), and (4):
(1) recurrent and persistent thoughts, impulses, or images that
are experienced, at some time during the disturbance, as intrusive and
inappropriate and that cause marked anxiety or distress
(2) the thoughts, impulses, or images are not simply excessive
worries about real-life problems
(3) the person attempts to ignore or suppress such thoughts,
impulses, or images, or to neutralize them with some other thought or
action
(4) the person recognizes that the obsessional thoughts,
impulses, or images are a product of his or her own mind (not imposed
from without as in thought insertion)
Compulsions as defined by (1) and (2):
(1) repetitive behaviors (e.g., hand washing, ordering, checking)
or mental acts (e.g., praying, counting, repeating words silently that
the person feels driven to perform in response to an obsession, or
according to rules that must be applied rigidly
(2) the behaviors or mental acts are aimed at preventing or
reducing distress or preventing some dreaded event or situation;
however, these behaviors or mental acts either are not connected in a
realistic way with what they are designed to neutralize or prevent or
are clearly excessive
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
B. At some point during the course of the disorder, the person has
recognized that the obsessions or compulsions are excessive or
unreasonable. Note: This does not apply to children.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
C. The obsessions or compulsions cause marked distress, are time
consuming (take more than 1 hour a day), or significantly interfere
with the person's normal routine, occupational (or academic
functioning, or usual social activities or relationships.
D. If another Axis I disorder is present, the content of the
obsessions or compulsions is not restricted to it (e.g., preoccupation
with food in the presence of an Eating Disorder; hair pulling in the
presence of Trichotillomania; concern with appearance in the presence
of Body Dysmorphic Disorder; preoccupation with drugs in the presence
of a Substance Use Disorder; preoccupation with having a serious
illness in the presence of Hypochondriasis; preoccupation with sexual
urges or fantasies in the presence of a Paraphilia; or guilty
ruminations in the presence of Major Depressive Disorder).
E. The disturbance is not due to the direct physiological
effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, a medication) or a
general medical condition.

Specify if:
With Poor Insight: if, for most of the time during the current
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
episode, the person does not recognize that the obsessions and
compulsions are excessive or unreasonable.

Because these momentums that are unconscious BELIEFS are being PURGED
from the selfish orientation of the physical self to allow for
transcendence and expression of the higher self. This is reflected and
was reflected in the Christ consciousness, the idea of resurrection and
the power of the self over the limits of physicality (Saturn).

What's our name-the combined idea?

It can be generally referred to as any one of the names that
represent the overall collective consciousness within each and
every civilization. Thus for Sirius it would be Siskeen, and for us,
Shakana. For you it is the Christ consciousness. In general any
alignment with Arcturus is simply a representation of another
threshold and a doorway that you are going through. You will
find that in your cosmology your moon specifically represents
many of the ideas of your sub- and unconscious awareness now
coming to the surface. Also your Pluto alignment is generally
representative of the transformation across a threshold that you
previously would have considered to be the idea you call death-
but which now represents a transformation into a new type of life.

I understand the concept, but could you give us an example
of the threshold?

The threshold we are referring to is the transformation taking
place on your planet from third to fourth density. That is the
overall threshold. Every single symbol within your reality that has
any relationship to transformation is all generally a part of that.
The specifics are up to you to determine for yourselves, although
as we have said, the idea of your moon does to some degree repre-
sent the idea of your subconscious and unconscious awareness
coming to the surface. The idea of Pluto is the actual journey
involved across the threshold itself.
In this same archetypical manner you have described the myth
you call the crossing of the River Styx. This puts you in touch
with what you previously assumed to be the darker regions of
your consciousness. It is another way of saying that you enter the
blending of your positive and negative polarities, and therefore
allow yourselves, in the crossing of that threshold, to glean only
a positive effect out of the blending of the positive and the nega-
tive. This is why you have intuitively labeled Pluto's moon with
the same name as the ferryboat driver that drives you across the
mythological river Styx . . . Charon.

Bashar "Blueprint for Change"


--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2000 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
SDSU http://www.astroconsulting.com/SDSU/


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Spamster

unread,
Oct 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/23/00
to

Edmond Wollmann wrote:

> As the inconjuncts reflect (Virgo/Scorpio 150 degree aspect) with
> regard to the natural template first house and sign (Aries), it is the
> adjustment of perspective and mental view or transcendence of the self

That turns you into a screed spamming kook.

Cujo

unread,
Oct 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/23/00
to

"Edmond Wollmann" <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8t1i65$vrb$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> As the
screed fest continues, it is obvious what a kook Eddieeee is. He has sunk to
new lows as evidenced by the incident where he fished out disgarded pieces
of picture frames from a dumpster and gave them out as Xmas presents.

el...@no.spam

unread,
Oct 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/23/00
to
In article <8t1i65$vrb$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Edmond Wollmann <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:

> As the inconjuncts reflect (Virgo/Scorpio 150 degree aspect) with
>regard to the natural template first house and sign (Aries), it is the
>adjustment of perspective and mental view or transcendence of the self
>(please see my self awareness and conviction post) that is being
>adjusted in the inconjunct.

Translation: no content

Sam I Am

unread,
Oct 26, 2000, 7:42:01 PM10/26/00
to

"Edmond Wollmann" <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8t1i65$vrb$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

Ed, I thought Pluto was the dog in the Mickey Mouse cartoons. And if Goofy's
a dog, how come he can talk but Pluto can't?

Sam I Am
President, Pantoozlers Inc.


ImDanielaM

unread,
Oct 26, 2000, 7:53:44 PM10/26/00
to
>Ed, I thought Pluto was the dog in the Mickey Mouse cartoons. And if Goofy's
>a dog, how come he can talk but Pluto can't?

Uhmm... excuse me... You don't know? Goofy is an alien, a genetically mutated
version of Pluto....

:o)

Edmond Wollmann

unread,
Oct 27, 2000, 1:43:00 AM10/27/00
to
In article <1ej4pe1.1etwnmv1epwsdN%Lady....@myself.online.no>,
Lady....@myself.online.no (Lady Archer) wrote:
> indigocoatl <qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:37:03 GMT, bobof...@earthlink.net (Bob
> > Officer) wrote:
> >
> > >On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:14:33 GMT, in alt.astrology
> > >qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net (indigocoatl) wrote:
> > >
> > >>On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 06:39:38 -0500, "Gwynne Sonnen-Mayer"
> > >><gwynn...@prodigy.net> wrote:
>
> Stuff needing deciphering.
>
> > >I wonder if she offers any charts to back her the
> > >claim? Or is she just another Psych Major trying to use Psychology
and
> > >astrology, and doing badly at it?
> >
> > Actually, I've met her. She's a drunk.
>
> I never even bothered to consider reading Gwynne's piece; the
formatting
> is too overwhelming for me. But I sure got a good laugh out of the
> *conclusion*!

You should see the how hard I laugh reading your conclusions.

"He who thinks he knows--doesn't, but he who knows he doesn't know,
does." Joseph Campbell "The Power of The Myth"

--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.

© 2000 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/

SDSU http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~wollmann/

el...@no.spam

unread,
Oct 27, 2000, 2:02:53 AM10/27/00
to
In article <8tb4l4$t6n$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,

Crybaby Edmond Wollmann <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:

>You should see the how hard I laugh reading your conclusions.

That's believable. An insane laugh fits you well.

What part of your chart represents your being listed as abusive?


--
"Its [sic] irrelevant, I am a professional astrologer."
"Poisting [sic] a lot is not spamming."

-Edmond Wollmann, a$trologer, liar, spammer, hypocrite, censor, Jan. '98 KoTM,
convicted criminal, asshole, bully, Kook of the Year 1998,
the Ted Kennedy of astrologers, Village Idiot Award winner,
dumpster diver

http://lart.com/ed/
http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefs.html#wollman

Spamster

unread,
Oct 27, 2000, 7:40:52 AM10/27/00
to

Edmond Wollmann wrote:

> In article <1ej4pe1.1etwnmv1epwsdN%Lady....@myself.online.no>,
> Lady....@myself.online.no (Lady Archer) wrote:
> > indigocoatl <qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:37:03 GMT, bobof...@earthlink.net (Bob
> > > Officer) wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:14:33 GMT, in alt.astrology
> > > >qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net (indigocoatl) wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 06:39:38 -0500, "Gwynne Sonnen-Mayer"
> > > >><gwynn...@prodigy.net> wrote:
> >
> > Stuff needing deciphering.
> >
> > > >I wonder if she offers any charts to back her the
> > > >claim? Or is she just another Psych Major trying to use Psychology
> and
> > > >astrology, and doing badly at it?
> > >
> > > Actually, I've met her. She's a drunk.
> >
> > I never even bothered to consider reading Gwynne's piece; the
> formatting
> > is too overwhelming for me. But I sure got a good laugh out of the
> > *conclusion*!
>
> You should see the how hard I laugh reading your conclusions.
>

Not as hard as everyone on Usenet laughs at your screedfests.


Mr. Sweetness & Light.

unread,
Oct 27, 2000, 11:57:39 AM10/27/00
to

Edmond Wollmann wrote in message <8tb4l4$t6n$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...

>In article <1ej4pe1.1etwnmv1epwsdN%Lady....@myself.online.no>,
> Lady....@myself.online.no (Lady Archer) wrote:
>> indigocoatl <qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:37:03 GMT, bobof...@earthlink.net (Bob
>> > Officer) wrote:
>> >
>> > >On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:14:33 GMT, in alt.astrology
>> > >qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net (indigocoatl) wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 06:39:38 -0500, "Gwynne Sonnen-Mayer"
>> > >><gwynn...@prodigy.net> wrote:
>>
>> Stuff needing deciphering.
>>
>> > >I wonder if she offers any charts to back her the
>> > >claim? Or is she just another Psych Major trying to use Psychology
>and
>> > >astrology, and doing badly at it?
>> >
>> > Actually, I've met her. She's a drunk.
>>
>> I never even bothered to consider reading Gwynne's piece; the
>formatting
>> is too overwhelming for me. But I sure got a good laugh out of the
>> *conclusion*!
>
>You should see the how hard I laugh reading your conclusions.
>
Not as hard as everyone did when we heard about you dumpster diving for
pieces of picture frames to give as Xmas presents. That was even funnier
than you not showing up at Chang's with a police escort to effect a citizens
arrest. How does it serve you to be such a loser?


T

unread,
Oct 27, 2000, 12:53:15 PM10/27/00
to

Mr. Sweetness & Light. wrote in message ...
EHW= ineffectual dumpster diver.

el...@no.spam

unread,
Oct 27, 2000, 1:08:23 PM10/27/00
to
In article <TBhK5.262$UO3....@newsfeed.intelenet.net>,

Mr. Sweetness & Light. <kfr...@lspamart.com> wrote:

>>You should see the how hard I laugh reading your conclusions.

>Not as hard as everyone did when we heard about you dumpster diving for
>pieces of picture frames to give as Xmas presents. That was even funnier
>than you not showing up at Chang's with a police escort to effect a citizens
>arrest. How does it serve you to be such a loser?

I laughed even harder when then *bragged* about still dumpster
diving.

--
"I am the richest, most successful person on the planet! Yeeeeeehaaaaaw!!!"


-Edmond Wollmann, a$trologer, liar, spammer, hypocrite, censor, Jan. '98 KoTM,
convicted criminal, asshole, bully, Kook of the Year 1998,
the Ted Kennedy of astrologers, Village Idiot Award winner,
dumpster diver

http://lart.com/ed/
http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefs.html#wollman
http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm

Jo Mazzotta

unread,
Oct 27, 2000, 5:07:13 PM10/27/00
to

"Mr. Sweetness & Light." <kfr...@lspamart.com> wrote in message
news:TBhK5.262$UO3....@newsfeed.intelenet.net...

Yeah, now put that in your toilet paper and publish it.

John Griffin

unread,
Oct 28, 2000, 4:48:55 AM10/28/00
to
In alt.paranormal Edmond Wollmann <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>In article <1ej4pe1.1etwnmv1epwsdN%Lady....@myself.online.no>,
> Lady....@myself.online.no (Lady Archer) wrote:
>> indigocoatl <qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:37:03 GMT, bobof...@earthlink.net (Bob
>> > Officer) wrote:
>> >
>> > >On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:14:33 GMT, in alt.astrology
>> > >qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net (indigocoatl) wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 06:39:38 -0500, "Gwynne Sonnen-Mayer"
>> > >><gwynn...@prodigy.net> wrote:
>>
>> Stuff needing deciphering.
>>
>> > >I wonder if she offers any charts to back her the
>> > >claim? Or is she just another Psych Major trying to use Psychology
>and
>> > >astrology, and doing badly at it?
>> >
>> > Actually, I've met her. She's a drunk.
>>
>> I never even bothered to consider reading Gwynne's piece; the
>formatting
>> is too overwhelming for me. But I sure got a good laugh out of the
>> *conclusion*!

>You should see the how hard I laugh reading your conclusions.

I don't think so. The drool and the strain you'd show in your effort
to force that sort of laughter wouldn't be a pretty sight.

It's always fun to check in here occasionally to see if you've
accepted a cure for your condition. I'm glad to see it's still
worsening at the usual rate.

Cujo

unread,
Oct 28, 2000, 10:48:03 AM10/28/00
to

John Griffin wrote in message <39faa107$1...@huge.aa.net>...

>In alt.paranormal Edmond Wollmann <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>In article <1ej4pe1.1etwnmv1epwsdN%Lady....@myself.online.no>,
>> Lady....@myself.online.no (Lady Archer) wrote:
>>> indigocoatl <qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:37:03 GMT, bobof...@earthlink.net (Bob
>>> > Officer) wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:14:33 GMT, in alt.astrology
>>> > >qtzc...@nospamearthlink.net (indigocoatl) wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >>On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 06:39:38 -0500, "Gwynne Sonnen-Mayer"
>>> > >><gwynn...@prodigy.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stuff needing deciphering.
>>>
>>> > >I wonder if she offers any charts to back her the
>>> > >claim? Or is she just another Psych Major trying to use Psychology
>>and
>>> > >astrology, and doing badly at it?
>>> >
>>> > Actually, I've met her. She's a drunk.


Another ad hominem argument noted. Eddieee isn't doing too well at this.

>>> I never even bothered to consider reading Gwynne's piece; the
>>formatting
>>> is too overwhelming for me. But I sure got a good laugh out of the
>>> *conclusion*!
>
>>You should see the how hard I laugh reading your conclusions.
>
>I don't think so. The drool and the strain you'd show in your effort
>to force that sort of laughter wouldn't be a pretty sight.


Eddieeee has created a reality where he's a bankrupt kook and a
dumpster-diving trashpicker. I suppose he has a lot to laugh about.

>It's always fun to check in here occasionally to see if you've
>accepted a cure for your condition. I'm glad to see it's still
>worsening at the usual rate.


That's not a condition, that's a *reality*. I'm sure the next published
collection of screed will make clear the *abundance* of kookiness that is
Edmo.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
Winner of the August, 2000 HL&S award. Hail Petitmorte!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
Did you have a question about how the ALL THAT IS is reflected through
astrology? I was an astrologer 1000 times in Babylon.
- Ed Wollmann, THE #1 delusional kook explains his past.

0 new messages