Besides O-Borg

[Sir Arthur Wholeflaffer A.S.A.]

----------
In article <Bkmh5.35775$B33....@dfw-read.news.verio.net>, "dogpatch"
<dogp...@advnet.net> wrote:

> Has anyone read Cooper's new book besides James Oberg?
>

Not yet, I have to read David Jacobs new one first.
I'm still plowing through "UFOs and the National
Security State-An Unclassified History. Volume
One: 1941-1973.

A special note to spOOks who have to read
every post on this newsgroup (Borsch, Echelon et. al.)
see if you can get your Agency to get you a copy.
ISBN# 0-96779950-3

Will give a book review on both Coopers and Jacobs
sometime in the future.

Art

[E. L.]

Anything written by David Jacobs is a worthless, time-wasting read. He
is no better than Hopkins, screwing with people's mind and not qualified
to do so. If you know ANYTHING about hypnosis you'll notice that Jacobs
is about as big a violator as Hopkins. Read something more interesting,
more worthwhile, something you'll learn from.

Edward
------------------------------------------------------
Group: alt.alien.visitors Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2000, 10:59pm (EDT-3) From:
smcq...@cyberhighway.net (Sir Arthur Wholeflaffer A.S.A.) Re:
Besides O-Borg

[Sir Arthur Wholeflaffer A.S.A.]

I would say anything written by you is a worthless, time-wasting
read. If you knew ANYTHING about alien abductions, you would
know that the majority of them are recalled without the
aid of hypnosis. Along with scoop marks, multiple witness
sightings around the area, radioactive trace cases around the
area, there is plenty of evidence that it is really happening
like it is portrayed.

It is sad that UFO debunkers have come to attack books,
but what else would we expcet
from these hooligans when their attacks
aren't convincing the public? Pre-emptive attacks on
Cooper are about as low as I have seen in a while,
and debunkers have hit many lows, swamp gas and
time-compressed crash-test dummies come readily to mind.

How much lower will debunkers go? Klass is 81 and
is nowhere to be found, except on a little newspaper
that is read by all of 10 people.

I think I'll take my own advice and quit reading EL,
we know what he has to say and every other word is
an expletive. What's lower than a bottom-of-the-barrel
debunker? A swamp gas crash-test dummy debunker!

ARt
----------
In article <14078-39...@storefull-155.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,