ABDUCTEE HARASSMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BECHTEL/LOCKHEED/NSA/ECHELON: GROSS WORLD WIDE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
OM
http://www.iahf.com/nsa/20010214.html
How The NSA Harasses Thousands Of Law Abiding Americans Daily By The Usage
Of Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM)
John St. Clair Akwei
vs.
NSA, Ft. Meade, MD, USA
**************************************************************************************************
-
BECHTEL/NSA/US Department of Defense
Electromagnetic Aritficial 'Remote Viewing' and Mind Control:
US Patent #3951134
Malech April 20, 1976
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves
Abstract
Apparatus for and method of sensing brain waves at a position remote from a
subject whereby electromagnetic signals of different frequencies are
simultaneously transmitted to the brain of the subject in which the signals
interfere with one another to yield a waveform which is modulated by the
subject's brain waves. The interference waveform which is representative of
the brain wave activity is re-transmitted by the brain to a receiver where
it is demodulated and amplified. The demodulated waveform is then displayed
for visual viewing and routed to a computer for further processing and
analysis. The demodulated waveform also can be used to produce a
compensating signal which is transmitted back to the brain to effect a
desired change in electrical activity therein.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inventors: Malech; Robert G. (Plainview, NY)
Assignee: Dorne & Margolin Inc. (Bohemia, NY)
Appl. No.: 494518
Filed: August 5, 1974
Current U.S. Class: 600/544; 600/407
Intern'l Class: A61B 005/04
Field of Search: 128/1 C,1 R,2.1 B,2.1 R,419 R,422 R,420,404,2 R,2 S,2.05
R,2.05 V,2.05 F,2.06 R 340/248 A,258 A,258 B,258 D,229
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References Cited [Referenced By]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Patent Documents
2860627 Nov., 1958 Harden et al. 128/2.
3096768 Jul., 1963 Griffith, Jr. 128/420.
3233450 Feb., 1966 Fry 128/2.
3483860 Dec., 1969 Namerow 128/2.
3495596 Feb., 1970 Condict 128/1.
3555529 Jan., 1971 Brown et al. 128/2.
3773049 Nov., 1973 Rabichev et al. 128/1.
3796208 Mar., 1974 Bloice 128/2.
Primary Examiner: Kamm; William E.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Darby & Darby
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claims
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is claimed is:
1. Brain wave monitoring apparatus comprising
means for producing a base frequency signal,
means for producing a first signal having a frequency related to that of the
base frequency and at a predetermined phase related thereto,
means for transmitting both said base frequency and said first signals to
the brain of the subject being monitored,
means for receiving a second signal transmitted by the brain of the subject
being monitored in response to both said base frequency and said first
signals,
mixing means for producing from said base frequency signal and said received
second signal a response signal having a frequency related to that of the
base frequency, and
means for interpreting said response signal.
2. Apparatus as in claim 1 where said receiving means comprises
means for isolating the transmitted signals from the received second
signals.
3. Apparatus as in claim 2 further comprising a band pass filter with an
input connected to said isolating means and an output connected to said
mixing means.
4. Apparatus as in claim 1 further comprising means for amplifying said
response signal.
5. Apparatus as in claim 4 further comprising means for demodulating said
amplified response signal.
6. Apparatus as in claim 5 further comprising interpreting means connected
to the output of said demodulator means.
7. Apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising
means for producing an electromagnetic wave control signal dependent on said
response signal, and
means for transmitting said control signal to the brain of said subject.
8. Apparatus as in claim 7 wherein said transmitting means comprises means
for directing the electromagnetic wave control signal to a predetermined
part of the brain.
9. A process for monitoring brain wave activity of a subject comprising the
steps of
transmitting at least two electromagnetic energy signals of different
frequencies to the brain of the subject being monitored,
receiving an electromagnetic energy signal resulting from the mixing of said
two signals in the brain modulated by the brain wave activity and
retransmitted by the brain in response to said transmitted energy signals,
and,
interpreting said received signal.
10. A process as in claim 9 further comprising the step of transmitting a
further electromagnetic wave signal to the brain to vary the brain wave
activity.
11. A process as in claim 10 wherein the step of transmitting the further
signals comprises
obtaining a standard signal,
comparing said received electromagnetic energy signals with said standard
signal,
producing a compensating signal corresponding to the comparison between said
received electrogagnetic energy signals and the standard signal, and
transmitting the compensating signals to the brain of the subject being
monitored.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Medical science has found brain waves to be a useful barometer of organic
functions. Measurements of electrical activity in the brain have been
instrumental in detecting physical and psychic disorder, measuring stress,
determining sleep patterns, and monitoring body metabolism.
The present art for measurement of brain waves employs
electroencephalographs including probes with sensors which are attached to
the skull of the subject under study at points proximate to the regions of
the brain being monitored. Electrical contact between the sensors and
apparatus employed to process the detected brain waves is maintained by a
plurality of wires extending from the sensors to the apparatus. The
necessity for physically attaching the measuring apparatus to the subject
imposes several limitations on the measurement process. The subject may
experience discomfort, particulary if the measurements are to be made over
extended periods of time. His bodily movements are restricted and he is
generally confined to the immediate vicinity of the measuring apparatus.
Furthermore, measurements cannot be made while the subject is conscious
without his awareness. The comprehensiveness of the measurements is also
limited since the finite number of probes employed to monitor local regions
of brain wave activity do not permit observation of the total brain wave
profile in a single test.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to apparatus and a method for monitoring brain
waves wherein all components of the apparatus employed are remote from the
test subject. More specifically, high frequency transmitters are operated to
radiate electromagnetic energy of different frequencies through antennas
which are capable of scanning the entire brain of the test subject or any
desired region thereof. The signals of different frequencies penetrate the
skull of the subject and impinge upon the brain where they mix to yield an
interference wave modulated by radiations from the brain's natural
electrical activity. The modulated interference wave is re-transmitted by
the brain and received by an antenna at a remote station where it is
demodulated, and processed to provide a profile of the suject's brain waves.
In addition to passively monitoring his brain waves, the subject's
neurological processes may be affected by transmitting to his brain, through
a transmitter, compensating signals. The latter signals can be derived from
the received and processed brain waves.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the invention to remotely monitor electrical
activity in the entire brain or selected local regions thereof with a single
measurement.
Another object is the monitoring of a subject's brain wave activity through
transmission and reception of electromagnetic waves.
Still another object is to monitor brain wave activity from a position
remote from the subject.
A further object is to provide a method and apparatus for affecting brain
wave activity by transmitting electromagnetic signals thereto.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other and further objects of the invention will appear from the following
description and the accompanying drawings, which form part of the instant
specification and which are to be read in conjunction therewith, and in
which like reference numerals are used to indicate like parts in the various
views;
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the interconnection of the components of
the apparatus of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing signal flow in one embodiment of the
apparatus.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to the drawings, specifically FIG. 1, a high frequency transmitter
2 produces and supplies two electromagnetic wave signals through suitable
coupling means 14 to an antenna 4. The signals are directed by the antenna 4
to the skull 6 of the subject 8 being examined. The two signals from the
antenna 4, which travel independently, penetrate the skull 6 and impinge
upon the tissue of the brain 10.
Within the tissue of the brain 10, the signals combine, much in the manner
of a conventional mixing process technique, with each section of the brain
having a different modulating action. The resulting waveform of the two
signals has its greatest amplitude when the two signals are in phase and
thus reinforcing one another. When the signals are exactly 180.degree. out
of phase the combination produces a resultant waveform of minimum amplitude.
If the amplitudes of the two signals transmitted to the subject are
maintained at identical levels, the resultant interference waveform, absent
influences of external radiation, may be expected to assume zero intensity
when maximum interference occurs, the number of such points being equal to
the difference in frequencies of the incident signals. However, interference
by radiation from electrical activity within the brain 10 causes the
waveform resulting from interference of the two transmitted signals to vary
from the expected result, i.e., the interference waveform is modulated by
the brain waves. It is believed that this is due to the fact that brain
waves produce electric charges each of which has a component of
electromagnetic radiation associated with it. The electromagnetic radiation
produced by the brain waves in turn reacts with the signals transmitted to
the brain from the external source.
The modulated interference waveform is re-transmitted from the brain 10,
back through the skull 6. A quantity of energy is re-transmitted sufficient
to enable it to be picked up by the antenna 4. This can be controlled,
within limits, by adjusting the absolute and relative intensities of the
signals, originally transmitted to the brain. Of course, the level of the
transmitted energy should be kept below that which may be harmful to the
subject.
The antenna passes the received signal to a receiver 12 through the antenna
electronics 14. Within the receiver the wave is amplified by conventional RF
amplifiers 16 and demodulated by conventional detector and modulator
electronics 18. The demodulated wave, representing the intra-brain
electrical activity, is amplified by amplifiers 20 and the resulting
information in electronic form is stored in buffer circuitry 22. From the
buffers 22 the information is fed to a suitable visual display 24, for
example one employing a cathode ray tube, light emitting diodes, liquid
crystals, or a mechanical plotter. The information may also be channeled to
a computer 26 for further processing and analysis with the output of the
computer displayed by heretofore mentioned suitable means.
In addition to channeling its information to display devices 24, the
computer 26 can also produce signals to control an auxiliary transmitter 28.
Transmitter 28 is used to produce a compensating signal which is transmitted
to the brain 10 of the subject 8 by the antenna 4. In a preferred embodiment
of the invention, the compensating signal is derived as a function of the
received brain wave signals, although it can be produced separately. The
compensating signals affect electrical activity within the brain 10.
Various configurations of suitable apparatus and electronic circuitry may be
utilized to form the system generally shown in FIG. 1 and one of the many
possible configurations is illustrated in FIG. 2. In the example shown
therein, two signals, one of 100 MHz and the other of 210 MHz are
transmitted simultaneously and combine in the brain 10 to form a resultant
wave of frequency equal to the difference in frequencies of the incident
signals, i.e., 110 MHz. The sum of the two incident frequencies is also
available, but is discarded in subsequent filtering. The 100 MHz signal is
obtained at the output 37 of an RF power divider 34 into which a 100 MHz
signal generated by an oscillator 30 is injected. The oscillator 30 is of a
conventional type employing either crystals for fixed frequency circuits or
a tunable circuit set to oscillate at 100 MHz. It can be a pulse generator,
square wave generator or sinusoidal wave generator. The RF power divider can
be any conventional VHF, UHF or SHF frequency range device constructed to
provide, at each of three outputs, a signal identical in frequency to that
applied to its input.
The 210 MHz signal is derived from the same 100 MHz oscillator 30 and RF
power divider 34 as the 100 MHz signal, operating in concert with a
frequency doubler 36 and 10 MHz oscillator 32. The frequency doubler can be
any conventional device which provides at its output a signal with frequency
equal to twice the frequency of a signal applied at its input. The 10 MHz
oscillator can also be of conventional type similar to the 100 MHz
oscillator herebefore described. A 100 MHz signal from the output 39 of the
RF power divider 34 is fed through the frequency doubler 36 and the
resulting 200 MHz signal is applied to a mixer 40. The mixer 40 can be any
conventional VHF, UHF or SHF frequency range device capable of accepting two
input signals of differing frequencies and providing two output signals with
frequencies equal to the sum and difference in frequencies respectively of
the input signals. A 10 MHz signal from the oscillator 32 is also applied to
the mixer 40. The 200 MHz signal from the doubler 36 and the 10 MHz signal
from the oscillator 32 combine in the mixer 40 to form a signal with a
frequency of 210 MHz equal to the sum of the frequencies of the 200 MHz and
10 MHz signals.
The 210 MHz signal is one of the signals transmitted to the brain 10 of the
subject being monitored. In the arrangement shown in FIG. 2, an antenna 41
is used to transmit the 210 MHz signal and another antenna 43 is used to
transmit the 100 MHz signal. Of course, a single antenna capable of
operating at 100 MHz and 210 MHz frequencies may be used to transmit both
signals. The scan angle, direction and rate may be controlled mechanically,
e.g., by a reversing motor, or electronically, e.g., by energizing elements
in the antenna in proper synchronization. Thus, the antenna(s) can be of
either fixed or rotary conventional types.
A second 100 MHz signal derived from output terminal 37 of the three-way
power divider 34 is applied to a circulator 38 and emerges therefrom with a
desired phase shift. The circulator 38 can be of any conventional type
wherein a signal applied to an input port emerges from an output port with
an appropriate phase shift. The 100 MHz signal is then transmitted to the
brain 10 of the subject being monitored via the antenna 43 as the second
component of the dual signal transmission. The antenna 43 can be of
conventional type similar to antenna 41 herebefore described. As previously
noted, these two antennas may be combined in a single unit.
The transmitted 100 and 210 MHz signal components mix within the tissue in
the brain 10 and interfere with one another yielding a signal of a frequency
of 110 MHz, the difference in frequencies of the two incident components,
modulated by electromagnetic emissions from the brain, i.e., the brain wave
activity being monitored. This modulated 110 MHz signal is radiated into
space.
The 110 MHz signal, modulated by brain wave activity, is picked up by an
antenna 45 and channeled back through the circulator 38 where it undergoes
an appropriate phase shift. The circulator 38 isolates the transmitted
signals from the received signal. Any suitable diplexer or duplexer can be
used. The antenna 45 can be of conventional type similar to antennas 41 and
43. It can be combined with them in a single unit or it can be separate. The
received modulated 110 MHz signal is then applied to a band pass filter 42,
to eliminate undesirable harmonics and extraneous noise, and the filtered
110 MHz signal is inserted into a mixer 44 into which has also been
introduced a component of the 100 MHz signal from the source 30 distributed
by the RF power divider 34. The filter 42 can be any conventional band pass
filter. The mixer 44 may also be of conventional type similar to the mixer
40 herebefore described.
The 100 MHz and 110 MHz signals combine in the mixer 44 to yield a signal of
frequency equal to the difference in frequencies of the two component
signals, i.e., 10 MHz still modulated by the monitored brain wave activity.
The 10 MHz signal is amplified in an IF amplifier 46 and channeled to a
demodulator 48. The IF amplifier and demodulator 48 can both be of
conventional types. The type of demodulator selected will depend on the
characteristics of the signals transmitted to and received from the brain,
and the information desired to be obtained. The brain may modulate the
amplitude, frequency and/or phase of the interference waveform. Certain of
these parameters will be more sensitive to corresponding brain wave
characteristics than others. Selection of amplitude, frequency or phase
demodulation means is governed by the choice of brain wave characteristic to
be monitored. If desired, several different types of demodulators can be
provided and used alternately or at the same time.
The demodulated signal which is representative of the monitored brain wave
activity is passed through audio amplifiers 50 a, b, c which may be of
conventional type where it is amplified and routed to displays 58 a, b, c
and a computer 60. The displays 58 a, b, c present the raw brain wave
signals from the amplifiers 50 a, b, c. The computer 60 processes the
amplified brain wave signals to derive information suitable for viewing,
e.g., by suppressing, compressing, or expanding elements thereof, or
combining them with other information-bearing signals and presents that
information on a display 62. The displays can be conventional ones such as
the types herebefore mentioned employing electronic visual displays or
mechanical plotters 58b. The computer can also be of conventional type,
either analog or digital, or a hybrid.
A profile of the entire brain wave emission pattern may be monitored or
select areas of the brain may be observed in a single measurement simply by
altering the scan angle and direction of the antennas. There is no physical
contact between the subject and the monitoring apparatus. The computer 60
also can determine a compensating waveform for transmission to the brain 10
to alter the natural brain waves in a desired fashion. The closed loop
compensating system permits instantaneous and continuous modification of the
brain wave response pattern.
In performing the brain wave pattern modification function, the computer 60
can be furnished with an external standard signal from a source 70
representative of brain wave activity associated with a desired nuerological
response. The region of the brain responsible for the response is monitored
and the received signal, indicative of the brain wave activity therein, is
compared with the standard signal. The computer 60 is programmed to
determine a compensating signal, responsive to the difference between the
standard signal and received signal. The compensating signal, when
transmitted to the monitored region of the brain, modulates the natural
brain wave activity therein toward a reproduction of the standard signal,
thereby changing the neurological response of the subject.
The computer 60 controls an auxiliary transmitter 64 which transmits the
compensating signal to the brain 10 of the subject via an antenna 66. The
transmitter 64 is of the high frequency type commonly used in radar
applications. The antenna 66 can be similar to antennas 41, 43 and 45 and
can be combined with them. Through these means, brain wave activity may be
altered and deviations from a desired norm may be compensated. Brain waves
may be monitored and control signals transmitted to the brain from a remote
station.
It is to be noted that the configuration described is one of many
possibilities which may be formulated without departing from the spirit of
my invention. The transmitters can be monostratic or bistatic. They also can
be single, dual, or multiple frequency devices. The transmitted signal can
be continuous wave, pulse, FM, or any combination of these as well as other
transmission forms. Typical operating frequencies for the transmitters range
from 1 MHz to 40 GHz but may be altered to suit the particular function
being monitored and the characteristics of the specific subject.
The individual components of the system for monitoring and controlling brain
wave activity may be of conventional type commonly employed in radar
systems.
Various subassemblies of the brain wave monitoring and control apparatus may
be added, substituted or combined. Thus, separate antennas or a single
multi-mode antenna may be used for transmission and reception. Additional
displays and computers may be added to present and analyze select components
of the monitored brain waves.
Modulation of the interference signal retransmitted by the brain may be of
amplitude, frequency and/or phase. Appropriate demodulators may be used to
decipher the subject's brain activity and select components of his brain
waves may be analyzed by computer to determine his mental state and monitor
his thought processes.
As will be appreciated by those familiar with the art, apparatus and method
of the subject invention has numerous uses. Persons in critical positions
such as drivers and pilots can be continuously monitored with provision for
activation of an emergency device in the event of human failure. Seizures,
sleepiness and dreaming can be detected. Bodily functions such as pulse
rate, heartbeat reqularity and others also can be monitored and occurrences
of hallucinations can be detected. The system also permits medical diagnoses
of patients, inaccessible to physicians, from remote stations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.gisdevelopment.net/technology/rs/techrs0020.htm
Remote Sensing - an overview
Remote Sensing (RS) is the science and art of acquiring information
(spectral, spatial, temporal) about material objects, area, or phenomenon,
without coming into physical contact with the objects, or area, or
phenomenon under investigation. Without direct contact, some means of
transferring information through space must be utilised. In remote sensing,
information transfer is accomplished by use of electromagnetic radiation
(EMR). EMR is a form of energy that reveals its presence by the observable
effects it produces when it strikes the matter. EMR is considered to span
the spectrum of wavelengths from 10-10 mm to cosmic rays up to 1010 mm, the
broadcast wavelengths, which extend from 0.30-15 mm.
Types of Remote Sensing
In respect to the type of Energy Resources
Passive Remote Sensing: Makes use of sensors that detect the reflected or
emitted electro-magnetic radiation from natural sources.
Active Remote Sensing: Makes use of sensors that detect reflected responses
from objects that are irradiated from artificially-generated energy sources,
such as radar.
In respect to Wavelength Regions
Remote Sensing is classified into three types in respect to the wavelength
regions
Visible and Reflective Infrared Remote Sensing
Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing
Microwave Remote Sensing
Bands Used in Remote Sensing
Emission of EMR (Electo-Magnetic Radiation) from gases is due to atoms and
molecules in the gas. Atoms consist of a positively charged nucleus
surrounded by orbiting electrons, which have discrete energy states.
Transition of electrons from one energy state to the other leads to emission
of radiation at discrete wavelengths. The resulting spectrum is called line
spectrum. Molecules possess rotational and vibrational energy states.
Transition between which leads to emission of radiation in a band spectrum.
The wavelengths, which are emitted by atoms/molecules, are also the ones,
which are absorbed by them. Emission from solids and liquids occurs when
they are heated and results in a continuous spectrum. This is called thermal
emission and it is an important source of EMR from the viewpoint of remote
sensing.
The Electro-Magnetic Radiation (EMR), which is reflected or emitted from an
object, is the usual source of Remote Sensing data. However, any medium,
such as gravity or magnetic fields, can be used in remote sensing.
Remote Sensing Technology makes use of the wide range Electro-Magnetic
Spectrum (EMS) from a very short wave "Gamma Ray" to a very long 'Radio
Wave'.
Wavelength regions of electro-magnetic radiation have different names
ranging from Gamma ray, X-ray, Ultraviolet (UV), Visible light, Infrared
(IR) to Radio Wave, in order from the shorter wavelengths. {see rest of
article URL above}
Also see:
http://www.rhfweb.com/hweb/shared2/usexist.html
http://www.hpcc.gov/pubs/imp97/73.html
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~alb/misc/thoughtPatterns.html
"The Central Intelligence Agency funded research on electromagnetic mind
control at least as early as 1960, when the notorious MKULTRA program,
mostly concerned with hypnosis and psychedelic drugs, included money for
adapting bioelectric sensing methods (at that time primarily the EEG) to
surveillance and interrogation, as well as for finding `techniques of
activation of the human organism by remote electronic means.'"
http://www.arm.gov/docs/about/history.html
http://liun.hektik.org/tag/cw/cl/satsurv.htm
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes%3Bread=34754
US Patent # 3,393,279. July 16th, 1968
US Patent # 3,647,970. March 7th, 1972
The Neurophone was developed by Dr Patrick Flanagan in 1958. It's a device
that converts sound to electrical impulses. In its original form electrodes
were placed on the skin but with defence department developments, the
signals can be delivered via satellite. They then travel the nervous system
directly to the brain (bypassing normal hearing mechanisms). Dr Flanagan's
"3D holographic sound system" can place sounds in any location as perceived
by the targeted / tortured listener. This allows for a variety of deceptions
for gullible victims.
Today, the CIA (etc){comment: NSA} use satellites and ground - based
equipment to deliver
verbal threats, deafening noise and propaganda; using neurophone technology.
Anything from TV's/radio's appearing to operate when switched off through to
"Voices from God" and encounters with "telepathic" aliens are all cons using
neurophone technologies to torment, deceive and (most importantly) discredit
agency/criminal targets. Naturally, the system can mimic anyone's voice and
automatic computer translations (into any language) are incorporated.
mmm
bco6...@gmail.com
The U.S. secret government is far more powerful than almost can be believed - capable (NSA) of containing a person from the inside and literally remote controlling a body if they so choose, know everything the person is knowing, and everything the person has ever known, and can bring anything a person has known into their awareness at any time at their will. I know. They got me - seeing what I see, and being in 2-way mental communication at all times for 11 months now, following a lesser degree of control going back several years. The NSA treatment is severe, like slavery in how it is employed in me, but they do not seem to mean to kill. And they say their mission is "open-ended," and so despite great trouble from them I am able to write this and share it. The NSA commands a power and cohesiveness in enormity of understanding that so far outperforms any everyday person that it is going to take some getting use to when it becomes more public - their mission of connecting to people via their pineal gland and the power for them it entails - big change in the world folks. I maintain an open-to-the-public account on google+ under my name, Brenden Osuchowski, in order to share GOOD, truthful information to the public at large.