Alan Connor is severely mentally ill and can't keep a job. I received
emails from former coworkers who said that Alan was fired because he
was caught trashing a company bathroom and smearing feces on the
walls. This company is an Internet provider which explains why we
couldn't kick him off USENET earlier.
Basically, people who play with their poop and destroy things were
sexually abused as children. This is the source of Alan's psychosis.
He must live with his parents now. After the failure of his Spam
Filtering software he has modified it to flood USENET with
artificially unintelligent automated responses in order to first
harass the Linux open source community that spurned his craziness --
and then to attack The Church of $cientology. But Alan didn't stop
there. He uses his Spam Flooding software to harass all religious
groups on forums, blogs and newsgroups to this day. He is the most
prolific troll in USENET history because of his severe chemical
imbalances. He wants to be the most prolific troll on the web as well
but he gets banned only after a few posts everywhere.
Alan deserves no trolling award because all he does is cut and paste.
There is very little originality in his trolling. He does deserve the
kook award. He should be in the USENET Kook Hall-of-Shame!
A few of Alan Connor's 80+ Aliases
Bruce Burhans(2001)
Farley Benn(2002)
Tom Littlefoot(2003)
David I. Raines(2004)
Alexander Mulligan(2005)
Tom Newton(2007)
Sidney Lambe(2008)
Alan Connor
606 E Manitoba Ave, Apt 204
Ellensburg, WA 98926-3876
509-962-1048
However Looking at the number reversed I came up with these two that
look similar, family or other related.
Arthur J Connor
200 N MAPLE ST
ELLENSBURG, WA 98926
(509) 962-1048
Sharron R Connor
200 N MAPLE ST
ELLENSBURG, WA 98926
(509) 962-1048
This one has the same address but with a different name.
Sharon Wood
606 E MANITOBA AVE
ELLENSBURG, WA 98926
(509) 962-1048
>This post is specifically directed
<snip real life info>
to tell you to shut the fuck up.
Now, please, die a lonely and quite painful self-inflicted death.
Keep you real life fuckwittery to yourself.
You run with a hate-group and you cannot figure why people might like to
shine some sunlight on you?
Happy to explain if you'll lay off the fire-water long enough to sober up.
In the meantime, poor widdow babies, WAAAAHHHHHHHHH......
LOL !
HJ
>Do you think it odd we have two people showing up here at one time
>going RL on users. Three if you count charles atlas the ugly bugger.
They are spanked to the tune of Martin Mull's "Pig In A Blanket"
>"Bob Officer" <bobof...@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
>news:fuodm49ohojmrn4bn...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:07:58 -0800, in alt.usenet.kooks, Aratzio
>> <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:21:56 -0800 (PST), in the land of
>>>alt.usenet.kooks, Ren <ren...@hotmail.com> got double secret
>>>probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>This post is specifically directed
>>>
>>><snip real life info>
>>>
>>>to tell you to shut the fuck up.
>>>
>>>Now, please, die a lonely and quite painful self-inflicted death.
>>>
>>>Keep you real life fuckwittery to yourself.
>>
>> Do you think it odd we have two people showing up here at one time
>> going RL on users. Three if you count charles atlas the ugly bugger.
>
>You run with a hate-group and you cannot figure why people might like to
>shine some sunlight on you?
>
>Happy to explain if you'll lay off the fire-water long enough to sober up.
>
>In the meantime, poor widdow babies, WAAAAHHHHHHHHH......
Pansy assed little whiner.
The irony is that he excused his real-lifing of Vince by claiming that
he'd been real-lifed, so he's PKBing himself.
He's a dishonest shit in addition to possibly being a target of Interpol
monitoring since he goes on child-fucking trips to southeast Asia.
--
I'm a romantic adventure
And I'm a reptile, too
>>>>>This post is specifically directed
>>>><snip real life info>
>>>>to tell you to shut the fuck up.
>>>>Now, please, die a lonely and quite painful self-inflicted death.
>>>>Keep you real life fuckwittery to yourself.
>>> Do you think it odd we have two people showing up here at one time
>>> going RL on users. Three if you count charles atlas the ugly bugger.
>>You run with a hate-group and you cannot figure why people might like to
>>shine some sunlight on you?
>>Happy to explain if you'll lay off the fire-water long enough to sober up.
>>In the meantime, poor widdow babies, WAAAAHHHHHHHHH......
>How's that thing with the AN and A and when to use them with vowel and
>consonant sounds coming? You of all people should know the usage yet
>you use them incorrectly.
Wow, you got him good Meat Plow. I've never seen anybody derive so
much pleasure out of a grammar lame.
At least somebody took you to school enough so that you've improved
your grammar lame so that you refer to vowel and consonant sounds, not
just vowels and consonants.
http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/3431
As much as I think AB has revealed himself as a piece of shite, the
mistake you point out is common among the population more intelligent
than you (94%). My ear prefers "an hilarious" over "a hilarious" and I
am certain I am not alone.
Give it a rest, you sad boy.
Here's another link, sad boy.
http://en.allexperts.com/q/Teaching-Advice-1730/use.htm
"Technically incorrect but gaining favor."
Give it a rest, sad boy.
> Give it a rest, you sad boy.
My only question is why is this crap cross posted to all the other groups
when in reality it probably needs to be posted to alt.basic.english.usage??
a hilarious
an hilarious (either way seems ok)
H is voiced, no y glide
a hypocrite
an hypocrite (doesn't work here)
H is voiced, no y glide
a humorous
an humorous (doesn't work well here)
H is voiced, y glide
a humiliating
an humiliating (works here)
H is voiced, y glide
English is fun.
--
Kali
Thank you for your respect and consideration.
"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
news:gkasf0$klr$5...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> In article <srhhm45pfmm5qf2gi...@4ax.com>, mjc101
> @gmail.com says...
>> Meat Plow wrote:
>> >"atlas bugged" wrote:
>> >>"Bob Officer" wrote:
>> >>> Aratzio wrote:
>> >>>>Ren:
[brevity snip]
I'm sorry, but I'm not in the mood to police the thread for you. And
although I will set followups, the only person likely to respond to
this post is you, so that won't help you much.
More expedient for you to ignore/kill the thread. If you don't know
how to do that, let the happy people at alt.usenet.kooks know, and
the next available service technician will be happy to help you.
> "Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
> news:gkasf0$klr$5...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> > In article <srhhm45pfmm5qf2gi...@4ax.com>, mjc101
> > @gmail.com says...
> >> Meat Plow wrote:
> >> >"atlas bugged" wrote:
> >> >>"Bob Officer" wrote:
> >> >>> Aratzio wrote:
> >> >>>>Ren:
>
> [brevity snip]
>
>
>
--
Kali
Sounds familiar....
--
ah
Easy, the people posting it are trolls, stop responding to them.
--
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America,
and to the republic which it established, one nation, from many peoples,
promising liberty and justice for all.
Feel free to use the above variant pledge in your own postings.
Tim Merrigan
Thank you for your respect and consideration.
- and special thanks to "Kali" for setting the example.
Much appreciated.
"ah" <splif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:49695c98$0$67974$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
Here's an important question. Who was more powerful, Buffy or the Dark
Willow?
I say Buffy was way more powerful. She could have kicked the Dark
Willow's evil wannabe ass.
Exactly... thats why I have most all of them in the bin and stopped the
cross-post.
Now... If we could get that across to the rest of the folks.......
ALL HALE KALI!!1!
<repartais style="allègre" class=":D">
First, "debate" is a formal method of interactive and
position(-)representational "argument", which--in-and-of-itself--is a set of
one or more declarative sentence(s) (e.g. "proposition(s)") known as the
'premise(s)' along with another declarative sentence known as the conclusion.
This was simple analysis.
Secondly, your proposition (even though a top-posting (which breaks the
logical argument (which is what we now have (if you will)))) is duly noted.
</repartais>
--
ah
If you tell me where to hale her to, I will.
In the mean time...
Please stop crossposting nonsenical errors of grammar to a.r.d.
*cough*
--
ah
Ah, I had no idea you were so articulate!
<Groups made me sneck a few, sorry.>
Are dictionaries and kill-files not allowed by the religion of druids?
I can hand-sew, too.
>
> <Groups made me sneck a few, sorry.>
No-worry; just make sure you keep sneckin' that druid shit!
--
ah
> This post is specifically directed to the Linux community on USENET
Then why aren't any of the Linux groups in the newsgroups line?
> and the religious newsgroups under attack by Sidney Lambe/Tom Newton
> -- real name -- Alan Connor.
[Meatspace contact info redacted.]
For your outer-filthing of Alan, which may or may not be his real name, so
the contact info may be of another person entirely, I'm nominating you for
Coward of the Month, the description of which reads as follows:
"Given to the most cowardly, yellow-bellied Usenet chicken of the month.
Anyone who meets the current month's eligibility bar can get it; like the
HL&S and the Palmjob Paddle, this award is not necessarily reserved for
Kooks!
Those who hide behind pseudoanonymous sockpuppets, to say and do things
they would not normally say or do as 'themselves', usually make good
candidates; you can nominate either the sockpuppet or if you know the real
name behind it that person; either way, the sockpuppeteer gets just credit.
This award is also given to people who don't follow up on threats. Or
respond to hard questions. Or other cowardly acts AUK can be convinced of."
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Coward_of_the_Month
Furthermore, in message <474ebe8b-ec24-4c42-99e8-9a123ed9e224
@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, you cited Encyclopedia Dramatica as a
resource. LMAO! Anyone with a clue knows that ED is full of lies and not
to be trusted. Obviously, you don't have a clue if you trust ED for
anything. Combined with claiming that your original message was directed
to the Linux groups while not posting to any linux groups, this shows
noteworthy cluelessness. The description of the appropriate awards is as
follows.
"The Clueless Newbie of the Month (CNotM) is pretty much the same sort of
thing as the KotM, but honors spectacular cluelessness on Usenet rather
than Kookery. Actually being a newbie is not a strict requirement for
eligibility; but the type of cluelessness being recognized needs to be of
the sort typical of newbies. If someone has been on the net for some time
and still acts like a newbie, they're eligible."
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Clueless_Newbie_of_the_Month
For his real-lifing crusade against Alan Connor, I nominate Ren of
alt.religion.wicca for the Coward of the Month.
Seconds?
For two noteworthy displays of cluelessness, I also nominate Ren of
alt.religion.wicca for Clueless Newbie of the Month.
Seconds?
--
Pinku-Sensei
FNVW of AUK
Acting Pollmaster of AFA-B
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Alt.usenet.kooks
http://tinyurl.com/AUKFAQ