Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Is this where existence is?

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

edmund...@duskmail.com

unread,
Apr 10, 2005, 4:51:35 AM4/10/05
to

Hi...@low.com wrote:
> In article <b2vo31974n38nebfm...@4ax.com>, Dude With the
> Hair <dudewiththe(remove)ha...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> Well, Doc, it's like this...
> How much of *everything* is really politics?
> It's as much as the people involved want it to be. Or not.
> It could be nothing at all, or almost all of it, depending upon how you
> want to define politics. In it's broadest definition, it's all of human
> social interaction. In it's narrowest definition, it's the process of
> how a society governs itself. Or tries to. :-)
> In the forging of a relationship, there are "phases". It always
> happens, although most people don't think of it that way. Those of us
> who specialize in the human sciences, such as philosophy and
> psychology, are very much aware of this. The testing phase that Y Not
> and I are now in, is made more difficult than usual because we both
> know we are doing it. How can we test each other, when we know we're
> doing it? Think of it as intellectual sparring. I have the advantage,
> too. I know *much* more about him than he knows about me. :-)
> We know why Y Not is here. I'm here for my own reasons:
> To download movies and pictures. I think you know why. [grin]
> To have social intercourse with my own kind.
> For intellectual stimulation, where I can find it.
> To further my understanding of myself and other people.
> For the last two reasons, I was hoping to chiefly use Y Not. I was
> disappointed that he was leaving. I haven't posted but infrequently, in
> years, but I've been reading *all* the posts I could find of his, and
> many other posters. To possibly change this situation, I thought I
> could see if I could use myself to entice him to stay a little more
> active in these newsgroups than he had thought to. He's complained that
> there aren't any people here who are intelligent enough to fully engage
> him on an intellectual level. I hope to change that.
> If you're wondering, I haven't decided if I like Y Not personally, or
> not. It doesn't matter, if I get what I want out of him. Selfish of me,
> isn't it? :-)
> Now Y Not knows a little more about me. It's only fair that he should.
> I've decided to make it my mission to make things interesting enough in
> these newsgroups, in a non harmful way (I hope), and probably in a very
> limited way, to stimulate Y Not's benign attention. To take a page from
> Y Not's own book, that he knows this, isn't going to reduce it's
> effectiveness. It might actually make him even more curious to see what
> will happen.
> I'm going to debate Y Not in the discussion group, in a way that he
> will find it very difficult to refute my slightly outrageous
> contentions. I hope you'll chose to participate. The first topic will
> surprise you!
> Have a nice day,
> High

Great

edmund...@duskmail.com

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages