>
> Anybody monitoring these froups?
I don't know. Why?
S.
> In article <%ELaf.149927$dP1.5...@newsc.telia.net>,
> Sevenhundred Elves says...
> > Juan Tootreeego wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Anybody monitoring these froups?
> >
> > I don't know. Why?
>
> Once upon a time there were some quite interesting ffolkes here.
Those were the days. Lots of water has been passed under the bridges
since then.
S.
> In article <wk2bf.149988$dP1.5...@newsc.telia.net>,
> Sevenhundred Elves says...
> Quite true. I've been off usenet for about three years, and am
> still trying to get the lay of the land. Many changes, very few
> of which I can see in a positive light. And at the same time,
> some of the same feuds are continuing. Over in ara the vjikings
> and Bertie have been repeating the same dance for about six
> years now.
I have to go have a look. You know what else? Over in az, white lotos is
making a come-back.
S.
> In article <VDMbf.37712$d5.1...@newsb.telia.net>, Sevenhundred
> Interesting handle, BTW. Might you have once been known as O-5?
No. Used to post under my real name until advertisement grew unbearable.
I'm just a lurker in most of the ng:s I visit.
Could you be somehow related to the Gang of Steves?
I didn't mean to compare WL to Bernie. WL is reformed now, it seems,
while B is obviously priding himself on being a major disturbance.
S.
"Juan Tootreeego" <123...@NOTBXpats.edu> wrote in message
news:MPG.1dd091fe7...@notbxpats.edu...
>
> Anybody monitoring these froups?
>
> All hail Discordia!
With the closing of dredging Atlantis, by gunpoint, you're going to start
seein' a lot more of [people].
> >All hail Discordia!
The 2nd amendment to the Constitution wasn't for the protection of
individuals for owning guns, it was for getting rid of politicians that
refute the Constitution, with both barrels.