Courtney Brown has reportedly sent two remote viewers to the site of
TWA Flight 800, and one Professional Remote Viewer. While none of them
have correctly identified the mechanism for the destruction of TWA Flight
800, they have given a vague description of the person they feel was
responsible for the crash. If I were sending a Remote Viewer I would
want to know "why" the plane went down, and the home address of the
person responsible. But I digress.
Ed Dames, of PSI 3000, and who claims to have been a Remote Viewer from
the military, published a statement stating that it was not a missle, and
it was not a bomb, but the result of a mechanical failure. Seems like a
pretty catastrophic failure to me, but who am I to judge.
There is the ever so slight chance that the person described on
Courtney Brown's Farsight Institute web page, had something to do with the
mechanical failure, but the preparation described by the Farsight team
is incongruous with the report coming from PSI 3000. Farsight reports
the "dark person" "packing something." They aren't sure if it was a
missle or bomb, but they sense a foreign underworld. Somehow this person
was wronged by the government, they claim.
PSI 3000 claims a 100% success rate with all of the information it
releases, where Courtney Brown has claimed an 85% rate with his
information. Someone must be wrong. Remote Viewing shouldn't be able to
give two different results. Should it?
The decisions are in. And the winner is . . .
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"I'm out of the loop. And that's the way I like it."
-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Well, anyone who follows the Remote Viewing scene, or has any knowledge
>of Remote viewers, will know that the two most expensive institutes for
>learning this art belong to Courtney Brown, and Ed Dames.
Before you place any stock whatever in these individuals I suggest you
examine their credibility. You will find one invalid prediction after
another. Joe McMoneagle (the genuine article) claims that "major"
Dames was nothing but an interviewer and monitor during his military
experience. Read Brown's book if you want to see an exercise in
incredibility obviously targeted toward New-Age know-nothings.
>On 17 Sep 1996 15:05:57 GMT, tmr...@saturn.acs.oakland.edu
>(Agamemnon) wrote:
>> Well, anyone who follows the Remote Viewing scene, or has any knowledge
>>of Remote viewers, will know that the two most expensive institutes for
>>learning this art belong to Courtney Brown, and Ed Dames.
Anyone who really knows would also include Lyn Buchanan's
Problems>Solutions>Innovations
(http://www.ameritel.net/lusers/rviewer).
>Before you place any stock whatever in these individuals I suggest you
>examine their credibility. You will find one invalid prediction after
>another. Joe McMoneagle (the genuine article) claims that "major"
>Dames was nothing but an interviewer and monitor during his military
>experience. Read Brown's book if you want to see an exercise in
>incredibility obviously targeted toward New-Age know-nothings.
Check out Buchanan's credentials--sounds like the real deal.
Peace.
Fred Kidd
fk...@wil.net
"Wind over lake: the image of inner truth." I Ching