Gremlin 1.423.491.1448

Skip to first unread message

Smit Michael Glaser

Sep 7, 2021, 4:09:34 AMSep 7
Despite all the bragging Snit sock Snot / Snit has done on this topic,
the 'Information Architect' doesn't understand how to do this. It literally
takes a couple seconds to click and drag across a range and 'translate'
it. Now let's see, who knows JavaScript, is an avid scripter, has forged
Mike Easter's ID, has passion for this shit and is a huge conniption-
fit throwing man-child who, when he is quoted lying, posts lie after
lie after lie even when he's not flooding... AND... who struggles to
attributes everything *he* is doing on "others" and has for over a decade?
Snit sock Snot / Snit and Mike Easter both lie repeatedly and flagrantly
and continue to do so. So no incentive in showing any further kindness
or restraint.

Snit sock Snot / Snit's essentially misleading Mike Easter to keep feeding
him by trying to 'develop websites', specifically, his incessant bragging
and Mike Easter's efforts to help him become a better scripter. He needs
attention, and as long as you're willing to continue play his game, he'll
remain. When I was new here, I wanted to be fair and impartial. I gave
Snit sock Snot / Snit more than an intelligent person generally would.

Ha! For crying out loud, chap... even you have filtered that halfwit.
Given what he is (and does) nary a soul should find fault with anyone
for pushing to be rid of his insane type of nonsense.

Do not click this link!
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud


Sep 8, 2021, 5:08:59 AMSep 8
Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <>:
Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
I didn't write that.
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked".
Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use
two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the
like... but at least POSSIBLE.

Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone
in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
hard to hack these days.

So already Carroll's story is unlikely.

But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the
two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password
and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he
is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The
"hacker" got one post in.

But Carroll could not leave his story there.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <>:
Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
don't trust anything from it.
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid
to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely*
must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still
have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process

This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.

Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked
- but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed
up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need to
note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks
of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only
posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!

He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <>:
Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
anything that's coming from it was written by me.
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just
changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your
account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine
multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies
WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account!
His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <>:
Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
I may have to kill the account.
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other
than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would
someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would
need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where
they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.

Just nonsense.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step
authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone
is trying to hack you.
They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
- and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be
using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any
way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which
is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public
information so the hacker would not know.

Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it
simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one
he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible
deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing
with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <>
[]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really*
hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out.
Why would they not?
There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers"
and "forgers" which do not even exist.

The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area,
likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet
café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).

My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured
this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than
he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about
him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments.
"Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies
are. :)

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
one standing for some odd reason.
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from
*before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can
*post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll
says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense.
Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would
Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some
odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense
at all.

Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even
if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back
his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
password protected ;)
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll
says they did.

Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely?
Why has he not said anything about this?

My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and
is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was
not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.

This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting
like him. Makes complete sense, eh?

Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <>:
The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
a feeble password on this account.
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which
contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved
password on a device he had.

His story changes with the telling.

But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently
tried it with me.

Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the
Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail
interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are
in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the
basic look stays the same.

He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he
pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
to be ;)
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts
but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they
would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use
Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
for now.

Do not think this is over.

No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies).
Carroll is making public threats based on lies.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
at Yavapai College contacts you.

Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on

See if those can not be quoted.

Direct lies and threats by Carroll.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
was over a line.

A complete and utter lie from Carroll.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
The above post is Snit hacking my account.
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
access to it.
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.

Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
have never used.

No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts
being edited.

Do not click this link!!
Dustin Cook is a functionally illiterate fraud


Sep 9, 2021, 2:25:37 PMSep 9
You wanting something false to be true does not make it true. I do not know
if there is a free open sores that promotes PEE.

Besides Peeler, who *doesn't* know what I am doing? Not only did Chris's
request not touch on the "distro", it has nada to do with computers. Peeler
should learn to read ;) Chris trolled Peeler as much as he deserves, big
deal. No need to be a howling asshole about it?

Curious how these posts are made? Email:

Ann Glaser

Sep 9, 2021, 2:41:58 PMSep 9
ronb writes all kinds of crap, don't use that boob as a reference. I quoted
examples of ronb flat out making things up, trolling multiple groups, etc.
His response: to repeat the same nonsense. Just look at the effort Michael
Snit Glasser once again had to spend to get ronb able to pull messages from
an IRC server via reverse engineering. Michael Snit Glasser once again,
took abuse from ronb, instead of a great thanks, sign of indebtedness, response
- that I believe Michael Snit Glasser was owed for the trouble and time
he spent on the matter.

In fact ronb's lies became more vile. So as might be expected I regret
doing a favor for ronb. While I am sure the trolls liked it, being nice
to him made things worse.

Puppy Videos
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

Stefen Carroll

Sep 10, 2021, 10:06:34 PMSep 10
Recently I did work on and showed some AppleScript for the front end
which is the only thing you can do when trying to avoid Apd's immature
crap while reading with Google Groups. What Apd really means: Apd's "troubleshooting
mastery" diverted his attention from an add-on he wants that Snit found
in under a minute for this application. Just about everything Apd says
about what Snit has done is dishonest but he thinks he is fooling people.

Apd's actions are actually perfectly disingenuous. There can be zero
doubt that as soon as any pardoned 'person in his KF' does one thing
to frighten the inferior daisy's feelings that they will be reblocked.

Best CMS Solution of 2017
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages