What should we do about the worthless pieces of shit on a.o.l who have never once, in their entire lives, ever authored a thread of value

[Arlen Holder]

And yet, they incessantly shit on those that do.

[Wildman]

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:05:36 +0000, Arlen Holder wrote:

> And yet, they incessantly shit on those that do.

Narcissism:
1. Has a grandiose sense of self-importance and exaggerates achievements
and talents.
2. Dreams of unlimited power, success, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love.
3. Believes he or she is special and unique and can only be understood by,
or should associate with, other special or high-status people or
institutions.
4. Requires excessive admiration.
5. Unreasonably expects special, favorable treatment or compliance with
his or her wishes.
6. Exploits and takes advantage of others to achieve personal ends.
7. Lacks empathy for the feelings and needs of others.
8. Envies others or believes they’re envious of him or her.
9. Has arrogant behaviors or attitudes.

Reference:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/toxic-relationships/201804/understanding-the-mind-narcissist

--
<Wildman> GNU/Linux user #557453
"It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of
sapho that thoughts acquire speed, the lips acquire stains, the stains
become a warning. It is by will alone I set my mind in motion."
-Piter De Vries

[DecadentLinux...@decadence.org]

Wildman <best...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:wq2dnRzynqKym-nD...@giganews.com:

> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:05:36 +0000, Arlen Holder wrote:
>
>> And yet, they incessantly shit on those that do.
>
> Narcissism:
> 1. Has a grandiose sense of self-importance and exaggerates
> achievements
> and talents.
> 2. Dreams of unlimited power, success, brilliance, beauty, or
> ideal love. 3. Believes he or she is special and unique and can
> only be understood by,
> or should associate with, other special or high-status people
> or institutions.
> 4. Requires excessive admiration.
> 5. Unreasonably expects special, favorable treatment or compliance
> with
> his or her wishes.
> 6. Exploits and takes advantage of others to achieve personal
> ends. 7. Lacks empathy for the feelings and needs of others.
> 8. Envies others or believes they’re envious of him or her.
> 9. Has arrogant behaviors or attitudes.
>
> Reference:
> https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/toxic-relationships/201804/
> understanding-the-mind-narcissist
>

Hard to believe that you can post that, yet not see whom it
blatantly reminds 80% of Americans of and matches up perfectly with.

[Wildman]

I suggest we leave politics out of our discussions.

--
<Wildman> GNU/Linux user #557453

The cow died so I don't need your bull!

[Mike Easter]

Arlen Holder wrote a very long subject.

What should we do about those, or rather that /one/ wayward individual -
who never learned how to create a terse subject in the form of a brief
'title' to succinctly characterize the content of his message body.

The long subject's content belongs in the message body, not the subject.

And, what does your long subject content have to do w/ a.o.l?

What each individual newsgroup reader can do about those messages he
doesn't wish to read is ignore them, either 'mentally' or by using
reader filters to aid him in ignoring, either by marking them read or
hiding them from his vision.


--
Mike Easter

[Dan Purgert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Mike Easter wrote:
> Arlen Holder wrote a very long subject.
>
> What should we do about those, or rather that /one/ wayward individual -
> who never learned how to create a terse subject in the form of a brief
> 'title' to succinctly characterize the content of his message body.

Killfile?

Has saved me a fair bit of heartache over the last few months (although
I do still read those of you who respond to said child; and sometimes do
pipe up, like now).

>
> The long subject's content belongs in the message body, not the subject.

You'd think with all the spouting off about adding value to Usenet, he'd
have at least read RFC1855 (i.e. "Netiquette").


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl50kigACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooE9Cgf+PJF1yOI9aSyOIKEjVEgRuYrI9SJKNnFt5EivoDpj7OMW4+93e9QzW1NF
4gd47avmroNe161vend+e5DB1YKH44Oe94kZ/sXcwSWzn37bJbxrICjnJVAaJBiL
kghyNzlBN2CkNKW3uKn3dzZAV/15cvTuZNxaPm19wLP4ofwagKmxu823jM/E6vdm
ki2G4Tsile2a8Tqft8v8BqaNNoU2RWoGo4qK1WQgc/VhsfLKubSsv3hw/pvU/JEd
YmUhiI0jy6o22RULE3e8tSgxVoQjDlSMrx7L1PeESi3b6Ypmvv+N/X4YFx4FULNb
6MA7/DZtOQJ8kXR5JR2TEvh5qpZSdg==
=BuAo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281

[Dan Purgert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> Wildman <best...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:wq2dnRzynqKym-nD...@giganews.com:
>
>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:05:36 +0000, Arlen Holder wrote:
>>
>>> And yet, they incessantly shit on those that do.
>>
>> Narcissism:

>> [...]

>>
>> Reference:
>> https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/toxic-relationships/201804/
>> understanding-the-mind-narcissist
>>
>
> Hard to believe that you can post that, yet not see whom it
> blatantly reminds 80% of Americans of and matches up perfectly with.

Reagan? :D


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl50kmEACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooEDlAgAj3FVQzHVn2iAKMoI+PKjZeWmf/Q+LEzajWY9/FdisIEc5mspFBEuhsNw
cGlMJM80n71Nte/ZlHIXFTfsr1MjJuAi2fuXgskRNapiO+pK1mtyBdqg9/UGNm0o
SNu2kAKy4vKj26P0OUQNODbg7MwiGOYXDZITzPxCOxFa3ah25UPd7l0lfC7q52fp
jZQeQQGrkiGTNIvvwrcdg/DhXfOXXXkua39mHhvFQWYERkJLQZgdQLASal9GHZQd
C/sxYC8Y6W3oouNDrjCOkXoC33c01uumMoZKE1Pket29t/6aiLm0jdvJ2WnMlMJH
bxMc1YkC27RQLzV+wLRlPp2Va3WMQw==
=qBYG

[Richard Kettlewell]

Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> writes:

> Mike Easter wrote:
>> What should we do about those, or rather that /one/ wayward individual -
>> who never learned how to create a terse subject in the form of a brief
>> 'title' to succinctly characterize the content of his message body.
>
> Killfile?

Yes, but everyone who is willing to follow this advice did so long
ago. The people who are still reading and replying are doing so because
they want to.

> Has saved me a fair bit of heartache over the last few months
> (although I do still read those of you who respond to said child; and
> sometimes do pipe up, like now).

I killfile all the people who won’t stop replying to him, too (usually
for just a month at a time, but they go back in quickly...)

--
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/

[Dan Purgert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> writes:
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>> What should we do about those, or rather that /one/ wayward individual -
>>> who never learned how to create a terse subject in the form of a brief
>>> 'title' to succinctly characterize the content of his message body.
>>
>> Killfile?
>
> Yes, but everyone who is willing to follow this advice did so long
> ago. The people who are still reading and replying are doing so because
> they want to.

Don't bring logic into this! :P

>
>> Has saved me a fair bit of heartache over the last few months
>> (although I do still read those of you who respond to said child; and
>> sometimes do pipe up, like now).
>
> I killfile all the people who won’t stop replying to him, too (usually
> for just a month at a time, but they go back in quickly...)

Sure will get "interesting(tm)" in the next weeks / month.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl50ow4ACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooFabwgAshM9eQ7Qx/EaTGJ+B8zlKh/GMtlxk/7y43Qd3ke24j71gtY4M50lFE4+
Fu77WP2MRB/t09yloNxAcdF/+XmDsZTGTqslAFrW4NBAJCBUvjeuP7gSo98ZB+3V
BUngqc1EQ2KhP548pPXpo58dQah7l/BnAX0bydmvtHfxgl4++mg7ny9CsfZ94Lp5
SKYPLvMXP2TgyK6+bqCFtJoP+q028ZTmgGlrWZwqiQXlv0MPi9pbh2qB5wWr0vHX
Q+ut0XoDb5ztWATIcCxHR1c3p9fFTRATQTmpaK1X8lEL7kewxIshYEYsT/Y0/58z
uOUUTy6NsEsStIrk1wiSz0sy5+WSHA==
=F2RY

[William Poaster]

Same here. I use "three strikes & then permanently binned".

[Sea]

03/19/2020, 04:05 PM, Orlon wrote:
> And yet, they incessantly shit on those that do.

Sometimes birds sit at the top of our flagpole. I've seen large owls up
there, at night. The flag does collect shit.

I also used some thread on the flag today. Thread of value - Singer
Button/Carpet thread.

[R.Wieser]

"Arlen Holder" <arlen.geo...@is.invalid> wrote in message
news:r50trv$n37$1...@news.mixmin.net...

>What should we do ...

Be honest to yourself: there is no "we" in the above, just you. /You/
want those people outof /your/ life.
And as always you expect others to do the work for you.

> ... about the worthless pieces of shit on a.o.l who have never
> once, in their entire lives, ever authored a thread of value

Thats just a lot of wishfull thinking (you have no way of knowing), a
demonisation by which you tell yourself that you have the right to do
to/with them whatever you wish.

Also, you have claimed that about people who have a /proven/ professional
track record (and where trying to help you, just like they have others).
And that ofcourse devalues your above claim/statement greatly - pretty-much
into nothingness (or even below).

And then there is that "ever authored a thread of value". Thats an
interresting one. You see, that would mean that only the people who start
threads with questions (that get answered) can be of (any) value, and all
the people who do /not/ start threads but instead are the ones that actually
answer/solve those question are just "worthless pieces of shit". I must
say, thats a rather interresting POV. Especially as you heavily depend on
that latter group... :-)

> And yet, they incessantly shit on those that do.

Thats two-for-one claim. The first that what we are trying to do is to shit
on you, and the second that you are posting is actually something of value.
Nether of which seems to be true over any kind of range.


But to answer your question:

Normally the group response is to shun such people.

Which is pretty-much what is happening to you ...


As long as your response to info you don't like to hear is to personally
attack people and claim stuff about them you have no reasonable way of
knowing (and ofcourse never provide proof for any of it) that is what will
happen, no matter where you go..

There is an old joke about a guy in a car listening to the radio hearing the
police warn that there is a ghost rider on his road, not to overtake and
stay on the right. His thought ? "What do you mean just one ? There are
/tens/ of them here!"

You are that guy.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

[DecadentLinux...@decadence.org]

"R.Wieser" <add...@not.available> wrote in
news:r54u55$1big$1...@gioia.aioe.org:

>
> As long as your response to info you don't like to hear is to
> personally attack people and claim stuff about them you have no
> reasonable way of knowing (and ofcourse never provide proof for
> any of it) that is what will happen, no matter where you go..
>
> There is an old joke about a guy in a car listening to the radio
> hearing the police warn that there is a ghost rider on his road,
> not to overtake and stay on the right. His thought ? "What do
> you mean just one ? There are /tens/ of them here!"
>
> You are that guy.
>
> Regards,
> Rudy Wieser

Now IF his IQ is above 50 (about 4 times that of Donald John Trump),
the end result will be that you made him wiser, Rudy.

[jrg]

On 3/21/20 4:34 AM, R.Wieser wrote:

<snip>

> There is an old joke about a guy in a car listening to the radio hearing the
> police warn that there is a ghost rider on his road, not to overtake and
> stay on the right. His thought ? "What do you mean just one ? There are
> /tens/ of them here!"

Guess you had to be there, huh?

[R.Wieser]

jrg,

> Guess you had to be there, huh?

Be my guest. But I think you would instantly regret it. :-)

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

[jrg]

On 3/21/20 11:15 AM, R.Wieser wrote:
> jrg,
>
>> Guess you had to be there, huh?
>
> Be my guest. But I think you would instantly regret it. :-)
>

I remembered as I hit send that I should never ask someone to explain a
joke. :-(

[DecadentLinux...@decadence.org]

jrg <jeff.g...@att.net> wrote in
news:r55sn1$bqs$1...@gioia.aioe.org:

What do you mean by that? :-)

[Arlen Holder]

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:05:36 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:

> And yet, they incessantly shit on those that do.

For the permanent Usenet record, this related post was archived today.
o What is a privacy-aware cross platform free personal
video-tele-conference app to host & join meetings
of about a dozen participants discussing Great Books?
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/DMZxUOMFb7M>

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:45:05 -0700, Mike Easter wrote:
> As much as I hate your subject creation, this is mostly/partly a good
> project.

Hi Mike,

Between you and me, the reason for the clarity in the subject line is that
there are a thousand times more worthless pieces of shit children on Usenet
than there are actual purposefully helpful adults, where these worthless
pieces of shit listed below infest any thread that attempts to add value.

Why do these worthless pieces of shit listed below infest threads?
o I don't know why.

I suspect a few reasons, such as they _hate_ that they, themselves, utterly
lack any adult capacity whatsoever to add value, e.g., Rene Lamontagne's:
"*Why should I ever care about adding adult value, twit*"
clearly stated opinion of why _he_ is on Usenet.

These worthless pieces of shit like Rene Lamontagne or Dan Purgert are here
solely for their childish amusement as far as I can tell from what they
post.

Each of them has _never_ even once in the entire history of Usenet ever
posted a thread of any on-topic technical value (although I noticed Rene
attempted to do so just this week, to his credit).

And yet, these worthless pieces of shit listed below incessantly shit on
those who do.

A classic game these worthless pieces of shit like nospam play is they
instantly deny all facts and just as instantly they fabricate fantastic
functionality on their platform of choice which simply doesn't exist.

If you are incredulous, rest assured I can provide plenty of cites showing
these worthless pieces of shit incessantly send poor unsuspecting users on
doomed-to-fail wild-goose chases, where nospam and Jolly Roger and Lewis
are masters at their craft.

If you ask nospam if iOS can do something, he _instantly_ (without even
reading the cites) claims wholly fabricated functionality for iOS that
simply doesn't exist, and folks like Alan Baker instantly brazenly claim
that all functionality you want is a lie by liars, and others like Lewis or
Jolly Roger will instantly claim that nobody wants that functionality
anyway.

It's sickening how these children play, where all three of the ngs in this
thread are affected, e.g., Android has Carlos E.R., Frank Slootweg and
Poutnik playing their silly childish games, while iOS has the
aforementioned nospam and Jolly Roger and Lewis, for example, and Windows
has not only the aforementioned Rene and Purgert worthless pieces of shit
but plenty more like Wolffan & Char Jackson and Panthera Tigris Altaica.

Hence, I have to write the subject and original post to anticipate the
idiotically childish silly games these worthless pieces of shit love to
play, where it's clear to me they're on Usenet purely for their own
amusement, where none of them has a purposefully helpful intent, ever.
--
Known worthless pieces of shit listed below:

Apple, Linux, Windows, (Android list in progress)
o Alan Baker <nu...@ness.biz>
o Alan Browne <bitb...@blackhole.com>
o Ammammata <amma...@tiscalinet.it> (not an apologist but ignorant)
o Andreas Rutishauser <and...@macandreas.ch>
o Barry Margolin <bar...@alum.mit.edu> (educated & yet immune to fact)
o B...@Onramp.net
o Beedle <Bee...@dont-email.me>
o "Boris T." <b...@lsd.invalid> (a common troll)
o Carlos E.R. <robin_...@es.invalid> (it's a crap shoot with Carlos)
o Char Jackson <no...@none.invalid> (never posts as an adult)
o Chris <ithi...@gmail.com>
o Cindy Hamilton <angelica...@yahoo.com> (never posts any value)
o "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r...@WizardsTower.invalid> (always a child)
o Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> (sometimes, but only rarely posts as an adult)
o David Catterall <djc...@eircom.net> (a common troll)
o Davoud <st...@sky.net>
o Diesel <m...@privacy.net> (aka Dustin Cook, mentally scary)
o Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> (poser, makes believe he has knowledge)
o Elden <use...@moondog.org>
o Elfin <elfi...@gmail.com> (aka Lloyd, aka Lloyd Parsons)
o Fox's Mercantile <jda...@att.net> Jeff (devoid of redeemable value)
o "G. B" <g...@gb.com>
o Hawk <Ha...@gmail.com> (literally posts what children post)
o Hemidactylus <ecph...@allspamis.invalid>
o From: -hh <recscub...@huntzinger.com>
o Idaho Homo Joe <dick...@aol.com> (worthless common moron troll)
o James <jamesor...@yahoomail.org>
o Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> (mostly is an adult but often is a child)
o Jenny Telia <jnyt...@gmail.com> (sock of pooh, shadow or dan purgert)
o John Corliss <r9j...@yahoo.com> (can only comprehend 1 syllable words)
o John Gabriel <NoS...@nospam.net> (can only troll)
o joe <no...@domain.invalid> (rarely, but sometimes posts as an adult would)
o Joerg Lorenz <hugy...@gmx.ch>
o Johan <JH...@nospam.invalid>
o John Doe <alway...@message.header> worthless posts always
o John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net> (doesn't comprehend adult topics)
o John-Del <ohg...@gmail.com>
o Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com>
o Ken Blake <k...@invalidemail.com>
o Ken Hart <kwh...@frontier.com> (sometimes posts on linux as an adult)
o Lewis <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
o Lloyd <elfi...@gmail.com> (aka "Elfin")
o Lloyd Parsons <lloy...@gmail.com> (aka "Elfin")
o Lucifer <LuciferMo...@bigpond.com> (plays silly semantic games)
o Meanie <M...@gmail.com>
o micky <NONONOa...@rushpost.com>
o Shemp14 <she...@outlook.com>
o nospam <nos...@nospam.invalid> (bullshitter par excellence)
o Nil <redn...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net>
o Panthera Tigris Altaica <northe...@outlook.com>
o Paul Raymond (aka porn king) <arling...@nospam.net> (porn obsessed)
o "pf...@aol.com" <peterw...@gmail.com> Peter Wieck, Melrose Park, PA
o "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid>
o Rene Lamontagne <rla...@shaw.ca> (always posts as a child would post)
o roctb <gh...@mouse-potato.com> Russian poster hates all facts
o Roger Blake <rogb...@iname.invalid> wholly immune to basic facts
o "R.Wieser" <add...@not.available> (aka Rudy Wieser) (always a child)
o Sam E <why.sho...@be.email.invalid>
o Sandman <m...@sandman.net> (hates facts)
o Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
o Shadow <S...@dow.br>
o she...@outlook.com
o Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> (aka Michael Glasser, troll #1)
o Tim Streater <timst...@greenbee.net>
o Tim Taylor <t...@binford-tool.edu>
o trader_4 <tra...@optonline.net> (pretends to know things)
o Wade Garrett <wa...@cooler.net>
o William Poaster <w...@dev.null> (I can't find any post ever of any value)
o Wolffan <akwo...@zoho.com> (can only post childish remarks, ~BD~ sock)
o Wolf K <wol...@sympatico.ca> (always posts as a child)
o Your Name <Your...@YourISP.com>
o Zaghadka <zagh...@hotmail.com>
o % <per...@gmail.com> (always worthless posts)
o et al.

[DecadentLinux...@decadence.org]

Arlen Holder <arlen.geo...@is.invalid> wrote in

news:r56m1a$or8$1...@news.mixmin.net:

> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:05:36 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:
>
>> And yet, they incessantly shit on those that do.
>
> For the permanent Usenet record, this related post was archived
> today.

Oh Boy!

Einstein said not to commit to memory anything you can look up. It
clutters the mind.

In your case, it is stupid to "archive" posts locally since they
are ALL available online PERMANENTLY. In other words... You are
STUPID, boy.

All the crybaby horseshit in the world, regardless of you thinking
you worded it consicely or not, is meaningless.

Yet here YOU are spewing ANOTHER 145 lines of CRAP that NOT ONE
SOUL WILL EVER READ.

Look, CHILD... it is not needed. AND it serves exactly ZERO
purpose.

Your reaction could not be more immature if you actually went to a
psychologist and spent time crafting it up.

Sheesh. Move on with your life, idiot. It is NOT that tragic.
You do more damage to your own brain pitching your pathetic little
Usenet fits than pretty much anything else in your life. Unless you
have some other stupid shit you pull somewhere else in life. GROW
UP!

[Cybe R. Wizard]

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 03:28:42 -0000 (UTC)
Arlen Holder <arlen.geo...@is.invalid> wrote:

> o "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r...@WizardsTower.invalid>

Aw, you SWEETIE, you!

Gosh, I guess you really DO love me since you just won't leave me
alone. If this were the real world I'd think you were stalking me and
make a quick but mostly and VERY painful end of you.

As this is just online and you are as toothless as anyone else, then I
am reduced to only showing you for the truly despicable excuse for a
human that you are.

Since this is such an easy to accomplish task and SO MUCH FUN I will
undertake it right away.

Let's start with these quotes from missives past:

Here's one wherein you demonstrate pretty unequivocally that you have
absolutely no honor:
----------
In :
Message-ID: <q4h633$rnh$1...@news.mixmin.net>
you said, "I formally now leave this thread."

You've posted to this thread AT LEAST 6 (six) times since.

Liar.

You, "sir," are a being of no honor.
----------

Yep, that's you in a nut's hell.
Of course, there is the ongoing and totally amusing to the rest of
Usenet 'discussion' as to whether you are a liar or not. I tend to
believe you are since you posted this:

Here's one in which you prove fairly conclusively that you are a
low-bred, debased, and ignoble liar:
----------
You claim:
"I have likely written over ten thousand tutorials, where at my last
company, I wrote over five thousand alone. On the Internet, I don't know
how many I have, but if you assume that I write one a day sometimes,
and at least one a week, I have many thousands "
----------

Then, being the great guy I really am, I asked you for a list of
your theoretical tutorials and gave you a chance to own your past
contemptible behavior:

Can He Do / Be Right:
----------
As usual, I would like to see the linked list. Until that happens I
still decry you for a liar.

Of course, if you do supply it I will be a most courteous and humbly
apologetic man. Wouldn't you just love to see that? It'll happen if
only you supply the linked list of TEN THOUSAND tutorials that you've
supposedly written[1].

Seriously, I've known several actual writers who produce copious
amounts of for-profit text and each and every one keeps a list of, not
only publications, all their written material. Aren't you a
serious writer? Where's your list?

C'mon, an honest man would either pony up that list gladly or accept
and admit to being a liar and having no list or any idea as to the
number written.

Which will it be, or are you also duplicitous and conniving?

My bet is on your being and exposing yourself to be a duplicitous and
conniving liar by once again NOT showing that linked list.

A lie of omission is just as much a lie as one of commission.
----------


Is he A Thief:

----------
You certainly are one fetid, detestable, low-down, pathetic, and petty
excuse for a real man, aren't you? (no need to answer; the question is
rhetorical as that knowledge is wide-spread and everywhere
readily acknowledged)

Those qualities, though are easy to discern (even for the children whom
you seem to cherish (with quite possibly inappropriate 'interest') or
the low-mentality people of whom you seem to be one (and seem, moreover,
to be one of the lower mentality ones, might I add?)) in your every
post, whether or not you are dissing on your large and ever-growing
'enemies' list (on which we are each and all proud to be) or just
people in general who see your ignominious and quite shameless ploy to
garner, no let's call it, "steal," STEAL the work of others and present
it as your own.
----------

Which, of course, points out how egregious, disreputable, rebarbative,
and loathsome an example of the worst of us (and I hesitate to include
the rest of us in the same grouping as you) you actually are.

In conclusion, let me just reiterate what I said once before and again
offer the chance for you to now become the man you have always wished
you could someday hope (however vainly and forlornly) to be:

Can he Man Up:
----------
Each time you sidestep or ignore the disclosing of your lies you show
yourself to be the lying duplicitous idiot that you are, Arlene Holdout.

Here, once again, is a pointer to the biggest lie I know of that you've
so far told:
Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1...@news.mixmin.net>
You know the one; it's where you said that you've written TEN THOUSAND
tutorials.

Shut me up, Horlew, merely by showing that searchable list. Hell, just
show the list.

The instant that you show a viable list of TEN THOUSAND tutorials that
YOU have written I will shut up about it, I guarantee and promise.

Be a man and 'fess up to being a liar otherwise.

Failing to do either, you are just and only a liar. ...and not much of
a man, either.

--
Cybe R. Wizard

“The freedom of authentic masculinity is an amazing thing to see. It
produces a "divine elasticity" in men. Finally they can lead with
firmness, then submit with humility. They can challenge with a cutting
edge, then encourage with enthusiasm. They can fight aggressively for
just causes, then moments later weep over suffering.”
Bill Hybels

[R.Wieser]

jrg,

> I remembered as I hit send that I should never ask someone to explain a
> joke. :-(

You want it explained ?

The joke consists outof a person not being able to weigh possibilities and
than come to a logical conclusion.

Instead the guy is stuck on himself, /ofcourse/ not doing anything wrong,
and thus the others must be - no matter how many of them there are.

Granted, a bid of a sad joke.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser



"jrg" <jeff.g...@att.net> wrote in message
news:r55sn1$bqs$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

[Dan Purgert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 03:28:42 -0000 (UTC)
> Arlen Holder <arlen.geo...@is.invalid> wrote:
>
>> o "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r...@WizardsTower.invalid>

> [...]

> ----------
> In :
> Message-ID: <q4h633$rnh$1...@news.mixmin.net>
> you said, "I formally now leave this thread."
>
> You've posted to this thread AT LEAST 6 (six) times since.
>
> Liar.
>
> You, "sir," are a being of no honor.
> ----------
>
> Yep, that's you in a nut's hell.

I quite enjoyed the pun here, Cybe. +1 entirely worthless internet
point to you!


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl53W8QACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooE0vwf+MieazbhgQESIX1DgwdQqQeS/4Rhjjct4/qqYmK20D02LCm/2ij8+kqJZ
+gS/3cwairrcuBFWoA4LRMawLGOl9cKi5fFW/vSrhAMLRw6xm412tNEzv/SdN2TE
h1LhD3cz0/gzfJopKB/AscYGFdlkyvUJDXJ57GLR5cKVxZ+jgPo34LyG1ks7mA+Z
nik7HrkB2biMhuDfpE7ShE7OJt2ubg28T7x7HWbaabhs1e0TB9mMlQLizEs9JOFY
5UMt+eJYCNPUqIVkxy2/2OrtCK9Z7iuHU19Sk4mCOnycowPLMWuFa2YD6FwTY7We
SXcL0QyoJ4q6j/NGMNmV/xka5SiSkA==
=11kb

[Cybe R. Wizard]

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:36:21 -0000 (UTC)
Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 03:28:42 -0000 (UTC)
> > Arlen Holder <arlen.geo...@is.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> o "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r...@WizardsTower.invalid>
> > [...]
> > ----------
> > In :
> > Message-ID: <q4h633$rnh$1...@news.mixmin.net>
> > you said, "I formally now leave this thread."
> >
> > You've posted to this thread AT LEAST 6 (six) times since.
> >
> > Liar.
> >
> > You, "sir," are a being of no honor.
> > ----------
> >
> > Yep, that's you in a nut's hell.
>
> I quite enjoyed the pun here, Cybe. +1 entirely worthless internet
> point to you!
>

Why, thank you, kind sir.
--
Cybe R. Wizard

"I assure you that I am not pretending to be wrong, BTW."
Brian (Brain Ray) Reay

[Rene Lamontagne]

On 2020-03-22 8:25 a.m., Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:36:21 -0000 (UTC)
> Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 03:28:42 -0000 (UTC)
>>> Arlen Holder <arlen.geo...@is.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> o "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r...@WizardsTower.invalid>
>>> [...]
>>> ----------
>>> In :
>>> Message-ID: <q4h633$rnh$1...@news.mixmin.net>
>>> you said, "I formally now leave this thread."
>>>
>>> You've posted to this thread AT LEAST 6 (six) times since.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>> You, "sir," are a being of no honor.
>>> ----------
>>>
>>> Yep, that's you in a nut's hell.
>>
>> I quite enjoyed the pun here, Cybe. +1 entirely worthless internet
>> point to you!
>>
> Why, thank you, kind sir.>

Beautifully done Cybe, I give you a 5 out of 5 +.

Rene

[Carlos E.R.]

On 20/03/2020 11.22, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> writes:
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>> What should we do about those, or rather that /one/ wayward individual -
>>> who never learned how to create a terse subject in the form of a brief
>>> 'title' to succinctly characterize the content of his message body.
>>
>> Killfile?
>
> Yes, but everyone who is willing to follow this advice did so long
> ago. The people who are still reading and replying are doing so because
> they want to.

Sometimes the subject is interesting to us - till he goes up in a tantrum.

In Thunderbird you can automatically filter any thread or subthread he
starts, without having to list those of us that sometimes respond.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

[Ken Hart]

On 3/21/20 11:28 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:05:36 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:
>

snip

>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Between you and me,

snip
You do understand that Usenet is a public forum, right? If something is
just between you and someone else, you should probably use email.

>
> Why do these worthless pieces of shit listed below infest threads?
> o I don't know why.
>

big snip

Because it's fun to see you get all hot under the collar about something
so unimportant.

I don't "infest" all threads, just yours.


--
Ken Hart
kwh...@frontier.com

[jrg]

On 3/22/20 12:15 AM, R.Wieser wrote:

<snip>

> You want it explained ?

no, thanks anyway...

[DecadentLinux...@decadence.org]

"Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r...@WizardsTower.invalid> wrote in
news:20200322082559.2a157121@WizardsTower:

> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:36:21 -0000 (UTC)
> Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> wrote:
>

snip

>> >
>> > You, "sir," are a being of no honor.
>> > ----------
>> >
>> > Yep, that's you in a nut's hell.
>>
>> I quite enjoyed the pun here, Cybe. +1 entirely worthless
internet
>> point to you!
>>
> Why, thank you, kind sir.

Is that then an anti-point?

An "Inte-point"?

Take your time to answer,
I'm a patient, man.

[DecadentLinux...@decadence.org]

Ken Hart <kwh...@frontier.com> wrote in news:r585sn$1le5$1
@gioia.aioe.org:

> I don't "infest" all threads, just yours.
>

So, you are a transmission vector. :-)

I saw an interesting song to pull a Weird Al move on...
Needs work though...

Bum bum bum bum bum bum... bum bum, bum bum...

Ooh, my little pretty one, my pretty one
When you gonna give me some time, Corona
Ooh, you make my FEVER run, my FEVER run
Got it coming off o' the line, Carona!

Never gonna stop, give it up, such a dirty virus
I always get it up, for the touch of the younger kind
My, my, my, aye-aye, whoa!
M-m-m-my Carona!

Come a little closer, huh, a-will ya, huh?
Close enough to splash in my eyes, Carona!
Keeping it a mystery, it gets to me
Running down the length of my lung, Carona!

Never gonna stop, give it up, such a dirty virus
I always get it up, for the touch of the younger kind
My, my, my, aye-aye, whoa!
M-m-m-my Carona
M-m-m-my Carona
When you gonna give to me, a gift to me
Is it just a matter of time, Carona?
Is it d-d-destiny, d-destiny
Or is it just a shame...

[DefecatingLinuxUserNumeroUno]

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 23:35:20 +0000 (UTC), DecadentLinux...@decadence.org, cogitated

> Ken Hart <kwh...@frontier.com> wrote in news:r585sn$1le5$1
> @gioia.aioe.org:
>
>> I don't "infest" all threads, just yours.
>>
>
> So, you are a transmission vector. :-)
>
> I saw an interesting song to pull a Weird Al move on...
> Needs work though...
>
> Bum bum bum bum bum bum... bum bum, bum bum...

You like men's bums?
Boohawahhahboohah

Esc ddddddd

--
“You can never get a cup of tea large enough
or a book long enough to suit me.” ― C.S. Lewis

[DecadentLinux...@decadence.org]

DefecatingLinuxUserNumeroUno
<defecatinglinu...@defecate.invalid> wrote in
news:r58viu$v9t$4...@dont-email.me:

> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 23:35:20 +0000 (UTC),
> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org, cogitated
>> Ken Hart <kwh...@frontier.com> wrote in news:r585sn$1le5$1
>> @gioia.aioe.org:
>>
>>> I don't "infest" all threads, just yours.
>>>
>>
>> So, you are a transmission vector. :-)
>>
>> I saw an interesting song to pull a Weird Al move on...
>> Needs work though...
>>
>> Bum bum bum bum bum bum... bum bum, bum bum...
>
> You like men's bums?
> Boohawahhahboohah
>
> Esc ddddddd
>

Fu fu fu fu fu fu fu FUCK OFF AND DIE BALOGNA!!!

[Arlen Holder]

In response to what Ken Hart <kwh...@frontier.com> wrote :

> Because it's fun to see you get all hot under the collar about something
> so unimportant.

Hi Ken Hart,

We're different in that you're on Usenet merely for childish amusement.
o I'm here to add value, gain value, and disseminate that added value.

While I've added value so many times that you trolls _hate_ that fact, as a
temporal example, this one post, from me, just today, added more value to
Usenet than you've ever added to this newsgroup in your entire life, IMHO.
o Script to set the system timezone randomly to foil fingerprinting
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.msdos.batch/0EE2VwfKwYc>

Where folks can attain similar functionality on Linux, if we work together:
<https://i.postimg.cc/5NLJCznK/tz03.jpg>
<https://i.postimg.cc/Gh62bnq0/tz04.jpg>
--
Those like Ken Hart who have never added value already proved they can't.

[Arlen Holder]

In response to what "R.Wieser" <add...@not.available> wrote :

> And as always you expect others to do the work for you.

For the permanent Usenet record, this thread opened two days ago
_perfectly_ shows how people like Rudy Wieser prove to always post sans any
purposefully helpful intent, and, as a result, they prove to be the
worthless pieces of shit that add _negative_ value to Usenet in every post.

That's not even an ad hominem attack - it's simply a statement of fact
which is _easily_ proven in this simple verifiable timeline outlined below:

1. I researched the problem and failed at a batch coding solution.
2. I opened this thread on April 14th, 2020 asking for batch coding help.
3. Almost immediately, Rudy Wieser posted a childish worthless attack.
4. I ignored Rudy's post as all his posts are purposefully unhelpful.
5. A batch coding solution came immediately thereafter from someone else.
6. I tested & improved on that solution & gave back so all benefit.
7. A further improved coding solution resulted soon thereafter.
8. Again, I tested, improved, and gave back for a general purpose solution.

For the permanent record, all adults will notice that Rudy Wieser proved in
that thread, exactly who is is, why he's here, and what his value is.
o negative value (i.e., Rudy proved to be a worthless piece of shit, again)

And I proved mine, e.g., this is what Rudy can't possibly contribute:
o <https://i.postimg.cc/J0mLXN73/tz02.jpg>
o <https://i.postimg.cc/5NLJCznK/tz03.jpg>
o <https://i.postimg.cc/Gh62bnq0/tz04.jpg>
etc.
--
Those like Rudy Wieser who never added value already proved they can't.

[Arlen Holder]

In response to what Sea <fres...@coast.org> wrote :

> Sometimes birds sit at the top of our flagpole. I've seen large owls up
> there, at night. The flag does collect shit.
>
> I also used some thread on the flag today. Thread of value - Singer
> Button/Carpet thread.

Hi Sea,

Take a look at these recent uploads for a second, if you can:
o <https://i.postimg.cc/TPRhWnsQ/tire09.jpg>
o <http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=7906618app18_01.jpg>
o <https://i.postimg.cc/9f6KJx4f/clock02.jpg>
o <https://i.postimg.cc/RCn2h5FM/webdav01.jpg>
etc.

We're different, Sea, in that you're on Usenet merely for your amusement.

o I'm here to add value, gain value, and disseminate that added value.

You're here to play your silly childish games, Sea.

While I've added value so many times that worthless pieces of shit trolls
like Sea _hate_ the fact that they can't ever add value.

On any topic.

For the permanent Usenet record, as just one recent example, this one
thread this week added more value to Usenet than Sea has ever added in his
entire lifetime.
o Tutorial: How to connect Android to Windows as a drive letter
over a Wi-Fi LAN for free simple reliable bidirectional copy
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/9Lu2_dPsu6o>

That's simply a fact about Sea that he, himself, hates, because he is
incapable of ever adding value to any thread ever posted on Usenet.
o We easily proved that in spades in the Dan Purgert thread, in fact.

This goal of adding value to every thread extends well past just Linux.

For example, I've written tutorials galore on how to fix automobiles, e.g.,
how to replace a clutch, or cooling system, or brakes, or even this recent
one from last week on how to mount & balance your own tires at home.
o Questions about mounting & balancing new LT tires on new steel rims
at home (match mounting marks, red dots, yellow dots, & spacers)
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.autos.tech/J5-7TxdDpBw>

The _huge_ difference between me and those worthless pieces of shit like
Sea always proves to be is in what our intentions are on being on Usenet.

Worthless pieces of shit like Sea have zero intention of adding any value.
o They're on Usenet merely for their own childish amusement.

And every single post from worthless pieces of shit like Sea prove that.

BTW, notice how _polite_ and _helpful_ people are on that thread?
o Hint: The proven worthless pieces of shit like Sea aren't on it.
--
Those like Sea who have never added value already proved they can't.