I found it in Knode, but I can't find it in Pan. Does anyone know how to
disable this?
--
-Joseph-
> How do you get rid of that stupid warning about sig length?
>
> I found it in Knode, but I can't find it in Pan. Does anyone know how to
> disable this?
>
you cant, let me re phrase, you can, just shorten your sig, or grab the
source, make the change and recompile.
--
David
http://www.mameworld.net/ MameWorld, The largest MAME resource on the net
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/ Activation Free since November 1998
http://www.tombstones.org.uk/burners.php - Free CD MAME ROM Offer
> While strolling through alt.os.linux, Joseph was overheard plotting:
>
>> How do you get rid of that stupid warning about sig length?
>>
>> I found it in Knode, but I can't find it in Pan. Does anyone know how
>> to disable this?
>>
>>
> you cant, let me re phrase, you can, just shorten your sig, or grab the
> source, make the change and recompile.
Thanks for the reply. I may check out the source option. It's not like
my sig was -huge- or anything...it's not much larger than yours.
--
-Joseph-
_Newbies_: There are those on the NewsGroups who are so immature that they
insult you for asking questions or for not understanding their rants or the
cryptic language in the docs. Just ignore their asinine attitude, they are
legends in their own mind. Just learn how to PLONK them ASAP.
Joseph tempted the fates in alt.os.linux
by rushing in here and proclaiming the following to be true:
> Thanks for the reply. I may check out the source option. It's not like
> my sig was -huge- or anything...it's not much larger than yours.
True. However, you sugnature is still in violation of RFC 1855
RFC 1855
Netiquette Guidelines
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html
RFC1855 states that your signature (if you use one) should be only 4 lines
in length, whereas, your signature
[ begin Signature]
-Joseph-
_Newbies_: There are those on the NewsGroups who are so immature that they
insult you for asking questions or for not understanding their rants or
the cryptic language in the docs. Just ignore their asinine attitude, they are
legends in their own mind. Just learn how to PLONK them ASAP.
[end signature ]
is 5 lines in length. Thus, why PAN bitches at you about it not conforming
to the Usenet standards. Chop a single line out of that (such as your name)
and PAN will no longer complain about your sig length again. =)
What *I* find utterly amusing is the fact that your problems center around not
conforming to Usenet standards, so you asked the very same people that your
signature complains about for help in conforming with Usenet standards.
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
That's funny.
No offense Joseph, but if you can't do something as simple as read an RFC
for Usenet compliance, you certainly are not qualified enough to "modify"
the original source code to change it so you can continue to break the
standards put forth in RFC1855, and still expect that program to work.
Which is easier? Reading the RFC and changing a single line to comply,
or modifying the source code so you can have one more line without complaints?
Drop the newbie "You guys owe me" attitude and you'll find that many of us
are quite willing to help, providing you don't act like an asshole and piss
everyone off.
HTH
- --
+Chiron+ ( [The members of the Chamberlain government]
GnuPG Pub Key 848D1A2D -o) ) are decided only to be undecided, resolved to
Linux Kernel 2.4.20 /\\ ( be irresolute, adamant for drift, all-powerful
Slackware 8.1 *w00t* _\_v ) for impotency. -- Winston Churchill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Hcv2e8wcrYSNGi0RAo2EAKC9WCUgjyROsNmF8qDapzECFmkixACdE5jH
RcBwBhyanSHlFrcGUUhDfZ8=
=b4f9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
or just use slrn because it doesnt bug you about sig length ? ;0
Learn to trim your fucking post!
>> - --
>> +Chiron+ ( [The members of the Chamberlain government]
>> GnuPG Pub Key 848D1A2D -o) ) are decided only to be undecided, resolved to
>> Linux Kernel 2.4.20 /\\ ( be irresolute, adamant for drift,
>> all-powerful Slackware 8.1 *w00t* _\_v ) for impotency. -- Winston
>> Churchill -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.3.1 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iD8DBQE+Hcv2e8wcrYSNGi0RAo2EAKC9WCUgjyROsNmF8qDapzECFmkixACdE5jH
>> RcBwBhyanSHlFrcGUUhDfZ8=
>> =b4f9
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> or just use slrn because it doesnt bug you about sig length ? ;0
Or just learn to read the RFC's.
http://www.slack.net/~hermit/HOWTO/signature.html
They give out doctorates too easily these days.
'---...____ Faux_Pseudo ________________...---~~~
--
ICQ=66618055 : (Now Playing) http://asciipr0n.com/fp updated=10/30
YIM=faux_pseudo : Rev: /rollins/big_ugly_mouth/02-_Boy_on_the_train.mp3
I am the prayers : Now: _Rollins_-_03_-_Think_Tank_-_Disc_2_-_Russia.mp3
of the naive : Fwd: y_Rollins_-_02_-_Sweatbox_-_Disc_2_-_Sex_Ed..mp3
> I think it's time for a few words of wisdom from our good friend Dr.
> Phil-x>
>
<snip>
>> - --
>> +Chiron+ ( [The members of the Chamberlain government]
>> GnuPG Pub Key 848D1A2D -o) ) are decided only to be undecided, resolved to
>> Linux Kernel 2.4.20 /\\ ( be irresolute, adamant for drift,
>> all-powerful Slackware 8.1 *w00t* _\_v ) for impotency. -- Winston
>> Churchill -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.3.1 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iD8DBQE+Hcv2e8wcrYSNGi0RAo2EAKC9WCUgjyROsNmF8qDapzECFmkixACdE5jH
>> RcBwBhyanSHlFrcGUUhDfZ8=
>> =b4f9
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> or just use slrn because it doesnt bug you about sig length ? ;0
[begin Signature]
> +Chiron+ ( [The members of the Chamberlain government]
> GnuPG Pub Key 848D1A2D -o) ) are decided only to be undecided, resolved to
> Linux Kernel 2.4.20 /\\ ( be irresolute, adamant for drift, all-powerful
> Slackware 8.1 *w00t* _\_v ) for impotency. -- Winston Churchill
[end Signature]
Line count 4
Not part of Signature as defined by RFC 1855, take the time to read it and
understand it.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.3.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE+Hcv2e8wcrYSNGi0RAo2EAKC9WCUgjyROsNmF8qDapzECFmkixACdE5jH
> RcBwBhyanSHlFrcGUUhDfZ8=
> =b4f9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
end
Why you cannot read this, try a different reader!!
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q265230
I see 5 lines
--
> I think it's time for a few words of wisdom from our good friend Dr.
> Phil-x>
Don't top-post.
>> [begin Signature]
>>> +Chiron+ ( [The members of the Chamberlain government]
>>> GnuPG Pub Key 848D1A2D -o) ) are decided only to be undecided, resolved
>>> to Linux Kernel 2.4.20 /\\ ( be irresolute, adamant for drift,
>>> all-powerful Slackware 8.1 *w00t* _\_v ) for impotency. -- Winston
>>> Churchill
>> [end Signature]
>>
>> Line count 4
>
> I see 5 lines
Because your reader/the posters client wrapped the text due to
the quoting. Read one of +Chiron+'s signatures before stating something so
stupid as that. A line in most readers are 80 chars iirc.
[-huge trimming which should have been done by previous poster-]
--
-> Erik Ljungström (er...@northernmost.org)
-> ipv4: http://www.northernmost.org
-> ipv6: http://freebsd.northernmost.org
-> Norrköping, Sweden
Indeed, and that should never happen in a regular post, since signatures
shouldn't be quoted anyway.
Sybren
--
Running a Mickeysoft game using wine:
| Evil attempt to exploit win9x system security flaws detected |
| UNIX system security is too strong, can't emulate properly |
> Amen!...sheesh!
You must be the most annoying and dumbest person I have ever seen on
usenet (and I've seen windows advocacy groups). Please read up on some
usenet mannors and standards. How about lay that fucking top-posting
aside? And stop quoting hundreds of lines just to say something that no
one actually cares about, or understands for that sake? Get a grip, or
slip down to warmer places..
dave tempted the fates in alt.os.linux
by rushing in here and proclaiming the following to be true:
> I see 5 lines
His quotation caused the last line to wrap, genius.
Trim your fucking posts.
- --
+Chiron+ ( The best number for a dinner party is
GnuPG Pub Key 848D1A2D -o) ) two--myself and a damn good head waiter. --
Linux Kernel 2.4.20 /\\ ( Nubar Gulbenkian
Slackware 8.1 *w00t* _\_v )
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+HhS0e8wcrYSNGi0RAgBWAKCD8AOmu/16C5dx3nkN7u0EDtonlQCfYka1
RMBVQT030tq8+GuXoGEezZw=
=uPCf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Trim your fucking posts.
>
> - --
> +Chiron+ ( The best number for a dinner party is
> GnuPG Pub Key 848D1A2D -o) ) two--myself and a damn good head waiter. --
> Linux Kernel 2.4.20 /\\ ( Nubar Gulbenkian
> Slackware 8.1 *w00t* _\_v )
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.3.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE+HhS0e8wcrYSNGi0RAgBWAKCD8AOmu/16C5dx3nkN7u0EDtonlQCfYka1
> RMBVQT030tq8+GuXoGEezZw=
> =uPCf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I count 12...welcome to my killfile.
--
--Joseph says: There are those on the NewsGroups who are so immature that
they insult you for asking questions; for not understanding their rants; or
the cryptic language in the manfiles. Ignore their asinine attitude; they are
simply legends in their own mind. PLONK them ASAP and be done with them.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
It showed as five lines in your 1st reply to Joseph
PLONK
pgp signatures don't count as part of the .sig. and neither does the
'-- ' at the start of the sig.
--
Registered Linux User #273744
<www.volutin.net -- everything irrelevant>
now playing :: crowded house - when you come