Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

is desktop retro CDE in Sparky linux usable?

170 views
Skip to first unread message

pedr...@lycos.com

unread,
Jun 5, 2021, 9:37:27 PM6/5/21
to
I see in Sparky there is nsCDE, which looks like CDE, and CDE which is apparently pure X11-motif. So if you used that, are you limited to ancient applications using motif?
If you want to use contemporary GTK/Qt applications, then nsCDE would be needed?

Mike Easter

unread,
Jun 5, 2021, 10:45:35 PM6/5/21
to
I have no experience w/ this; I just read the Sparky pages & wp on CDE:

https://sparkylinux.org/nscde/
https://sparkylinux.org/cde-common-desktop-environment/

To me, the DE or WM is just a UI on top of the Sparky Base OpenBox WM
over current Debian testing.

Sparky is 'known for' providing 'myriad' DE/WM environment options, some
20 or so, including your interests CDE & nsCDE.

Because it is Debian, the repo/s of applications will include all kinds
of gtk/qt apps which installation will include their dependencies.

The suggestion about CDE is

> I recommend the Common Desktop Environment for didactic and learning
> purpose only. Its archaic design does not resemble today’s desktops,
> but it’s my private opinion only.

... whereas the suggestion about nsCDE is a moderniized CDE look-alike:

> Not so Common Desktop Environment (NsCDE) is a retro but powerful
> (kind of) UNIX desktop environment which resembles CDE look (and
> partially feel) but with a more powerful and flexible framework
> beneath-the-surface, more suited for 21st century unix-like and Linux
> systems and user requirements than original CDE. NsCDE can be
> considered as a heavyweight FVWM theme on steroids, but combined with
> a couple other free software components and custom FVWM applications
> and a lot of configuration, NsCDE can be considered a lightweight
> hybrid desktop environment.

If I were going to mess w/ it, nsCDE sounds more interesting to me.

All I know about FVWM is what I read in the wp article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FVWM


--
Mike Easter

Mike Easter

unread,
Jun 6, 2021, 9:27:23 AM6/6/21
to
Mike Easter wrote:
> All I know about FVWM is what I read in the wp article:

Speaking of useful wp articles, I see articles w/ tables:
Comparison of X window managers
Comparison of X Window System desktop environments
> 1 Technical elements of a desktop environment
> 2 Desktop comparison information
> 2.1 Overview
> 2.2 Default programs packaged
> 2.3 Comparison of ease of use and stability
> 3 Compatibility and interoperability issues
> 4 System resources utilization

Also tables for file managers and wayland compositors (as a separate
article from the Wayland art.)


--
Mike Easter

ray

unread,
Jun 6, 2021, 10:43:10 AM6/6/21
to
On 6/5/21 7:37 PM, pedr...@lycos.com wrote:
> I see in Sparky there is nsCDE, which looks like CDE, and CDE which is apparently pure X11-motif. So if you used that, are you limited to ancient applications using motif?
> If you want to use contemporary GTK/Qt applications, then nsCDE would be needed?
>

Been there, done that. I recall back in the 'good old days' around the
early 90's. We had brand new DECstations with ultrix and CDE. I always
liked the look of CDE. Built CDE on a Raspberry Pi - which took a while.
I still like the responsiveness of the desktop - quite light - just don
't expect any updates. Yes, it will run modern applications - they
depend on X and GTK or other toolkit.

nsCDE gives the same feel.

Mike Easter

unread,
Jun 6, 2021, 10:56:23 AM6/6/21
to
ray wrote:
> Built CDE on a Raspberry Pi -

Sparky has an ARM, but I've never tried it. I suspect the full
complement of Sparky DE/WMs are not available for it.

https://wiki.sparkylinux.org/doku.php/sparky_arm
> NOTE: some packages which are available via Sparky tools can not be
> installed on ARM system, such as a few window managers, a few web
> browsers, etc.



--
Mike Easter

Mike Easter

unread,
Jun 28, 2021, 12:21:02 PM6/28/21
to
Bud Frede wrote:
> I used CDE on both Solaris SPARC, and on HP-UX on an HP-9000
> workstation I owned for a while. I also had CDE on Linux at one point
> - I think it was from Metro-X. The first version or two of KDE looked
> a lot like CDE as well. It didn't really work like CDE, but it looked
> a lot like it.

wp:
> The name KDE was intended as a wordplay on the existing Common
> Desktop Environment, available for Unix systems. CDE was an X11-based
> user environment jointly developed by HP, IBM, and Sun through the
> X/Open consortium, with an interface and productivity tools based on
> the Motif graphical widget toolkit. It was supposed to be an
> intuitively easy-to-use desktop computer environment.



--
Mike Easter
0 new messages