Re: Why Linux has failed, and why Linux will fail again and again?
FatBytestard
<arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Joe should have what he is getting today: Simplicity and freedom.
Even if your name were Joe, there would be no hope for a user that
doesn't even fall on the one to ten user class list.
Your problems go far deeper than your capacity to grasp desktop GUI
paradigms.
Also, nothing you posted has anything to do with security to begin
with.
I am quite sure, however, that you are a fine addition to the Arizona
population. NOT!
EHWollmann
"FatBytestard" <FatByt...@somewheronyourharddrive.org> wrote in message news:bu7lg5d2t0hrvfo89...@4ax.com...
You Linux dumbasses block your programs from running, there is certain thing you have to do to run your shit I know that..... but you stupid assume every body knows it. Windows allows its users to go to command prompt and run anything underneath its shell, and your shell isn't doing it. No wonder why you call yourself "a coward --No virus" Of course you block everything. I understand centralized problem deal, that's a different issue, I wanted to evaluate your shit to see how it is and see it's it's as good as you claim or not. It turns out that it's a piece of shit. Why should any one care to run the failed OS? I can turn everything off too under Windows, that's what I did, I never have had any virus for 10 yrs now under Windows. So you are a whole bunch of coward stupid jerks. That's all you are. I 'm not impressed with your ugly OS.
FatBytestard
<arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I never have had any virus for 10 yrs now under Windows. So you are a whole bunch of coward stupid jerks.
More likely due to the fact that your hands were predominately attached
to your crotch, and not your network browser.
Do us all a favor and go back to physical masturbation, and discontinue
abusing the rest of the world with your pathetic mental masturbation.
You are obviously uneducated, and apparently uneducable as well.
In other words, dumbass... you are hard wired stupid.
bb
> - long list of junk...
I tested how hard it is to find a calculator in a KDE desktop.
Click where windows has it's start menu.
type in calc in the search field
Got Xcalc, Kcalc, Gcalc th shoose from.
But me as an old nerd only use bc from the command line :-)
Everything you list as examples works right out of the box with a linux eeepc
except watch DVD, I must put them in another linux box and rip them first, but
that is not so complicated.
If you see that Joe, please ask him to stop sending me spam for all those poker
sites located in china.
/BB
EHWollmann
"FatBytestard" <FatByt...@somewheronyourharddrive.org> wrote in message news:bu7lg5d2t0hrvfo89...@4ax.com...
J G Miller
> I am writing this on a Linux box. Running RedHat-something.
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Luca
> - Why Linux security has failed (for the past 10 years).
> Why Linux has failed, and why Linux will fail again? Warning:
> Incoherent rant ahead. Triggered after spending so long looking for a
> simple calculator in KDE that I forgot the numbers I was supposed to
> do calculations on.
KCalc. The end.
> The "Simple" Factor While Linux-whiners may argue all that we want
> that Windows is not about freedom, I'll state the opposite: Windows
> is all about freedom. Windows is freedom from complicated choices,
> it's freedom from having to learn something new, something not really
> relevant to the task you want to do.
Yet, the prechosen settings are crap and Redmond knows it.
> I found four different web browsers, Konqueror, Galeon, Mozilla and
> Opera. Three of them were preinstalled here. Joe doesn't understand
> why he needs four different programs to surf the web.
Because every single one is better than IE.
> So, if you are going to get Joe to switch, what do you need?
>
> First of all, you need an ultra-simple installation. Not to co-exist
> with Windows, but to migrate his Windows installation. Bootloaders
> with names such as "lilo: " and "grub" are just scary. And when I say
> migrate, that includes mail, bookmarks and documents.
That would be nice, but maybe a user manual on how to back up one's data
would be more efficient. Especially since they're venturing into new
land, a backup would be a good idea in the first place.
> If Joe for whatever reason should want to revert to Windows and
> uninstall Linux, he should have the opportunity to do so, without any
> hassle. Just a confirmation dialog or two, a root password, and
> "Ok!".
Tell that to Windows, using closed source. Who's playing hard to get?
Luca
--
"Paying taxes is like going to the zoo. Admission is 20 bucks.
You can't walk in and say 'Here's 18.50. I don't like zebras.'"
- Jon Stewart
Paul J Gans
I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked.... ;-)
--
--- Paul J. Gans
EHWollmann
"J G Miller" <mil...@yoyo.ORG> wrote in message news:125936...@vo.lu...
I looked at you fucker's programming skills, you dipshits are below average, really. You're not fast and you're unable to find core problem quickly. I'm new to Linux in just a few days, I already fixed your Linux dumbshit behavior problem. I got your fucking Linux working and already browsed through million lines of code to see what you were doing with your stupid OS. Some of you think you know much you can't help each other on changing driver's capability......heeeheeeh...... It's fun to play with you numbnuts.......Dontchaknow?
Kevin Gui
we are talking, not taunting, you are like monkey.