On 29/12/11 17:50, houghi wrote:
> Ulick Magee wrote:
>> You get access to patches/updates for 60 days without a paid
>> subscription, after that time your access to the patch download site is
>> cut off, but otherwise the OS would function as normal. I don't think
>> that releasing a time-crippled Linux version that would cease to
>> function after a certain time could be done without violating the GPL.
>
> It could easily be done. As long as the code is available it can be
> done. GPL is about how the CODE is distributed, not about the funtioning
> of the software.
For it to work, you'd have to withhold the source for your crippling
mechanism. Even with closed source, copy-protection mechanisms are
usually broken sooner or later, with the source available it'd be trivial.
Possibly this could be done with kernel modules, which don't have to be
GPL if you write them yourself. It'd be pretty evil though :) and how
would you stop the end user removing the module?
>> If you want a free enterprise OS that will continue to have access to
>> updates/patches then consider CentOS (based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux)
>> - there is no 'community' version of SLE that I'm aware of.
>
> The community version of SLE is openSUSE.
I probably should've said 'clone' not 'version' :) there is no
free-as-in-beer clone of SLE analogous to CentOS - same package
versions, lifetime etc. as the enterprise OS - and CentOS doesn't feed
into the RHEL development process in the way that Fedora would (or
openSUSE feeds into SLE)