On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 07:07:45 +0000, Henrik Carlqvist wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:39:43 +0100, R2-D2 wrote:
>> looking forward to see
>>
http://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-15.0/slackware/n/
> rsync-3.2.3-i586-4.txz
>> replaced by 3.2.4.
>
> That is probably not going to happen. In the best case you will one day
> find an updated rsync in
http://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/
> slackware-15.0/slackware/patches , but that is probably only going to
> happen if some kind of security hole is found in rsync.
I concur. Pat V. plays a conservative game, only upgrading packages to
cover specific needs (like changing timezone info) or specific threats
(like security exposures). It seems unlikely that Slackware would issue
a new rsync package simply to address a minor reporting issue.
> If you want the latest greatest version of all applications with its
> advantages and disadvantages you should run Slackware current instead of
> the stable Slackware 15.
>
> If you are lucky you will be able to use an updated package from
> Slackware current in Slackware 15.0.
Here's where you and I differ; with Slackware 15.0 /just/ released, it
seems, to me, to be a little, shall we say, imprudent to run Slackware
unstable, /just/ on the hopes of getting an update to /one/ package.
If I were in the OP's position, I'd simply download the rsync 3.2.4 source,
when it finally gets out of beta, and compile it myself. I'd use that
locally-installed rsync until Slackware releases it's own version.
For that matter, I'd build a local Slackware package (pkgtools aren't all
that hard to use), so that I can revert the change when Slackware releases
the official package.
Just my 2 cents worth here :-)
--
Lew Pitcher
"In Skills, We Trust"