Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

putty like client

4 views
Skip to first unread message

f825_633

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 7:08:00 AM11/23/09
to
anyone suggest a putty like client - to replace hyperterm ?

I need to be able to dial into some systems, I don't like
hyperterm.

Loki Harfagr

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 7:19:45 AM11/23/09
to
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:08:00 +0000, f825_633 did cat :

> anyone suggest a putty like client - to replace hyperterm ?
>
> I need to be able to dial into some systems, I don't like hyperterm.

Putty should be the best 'putty like client' I think...-)
http://slackbuilds.org/repository/13.0/network/putty/

f825_633

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 7:54:13 AM11/23/09
to

OOoopsm perhaps I should have been a little clearer, I want
a client to run on a windows machine, that will use dialup -
ie a modem to then dial into a Linux box.

Helmut Hullen

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 8:48:00 AM11/23/09
to
Hallo, f825_633,

Du meintest am 23.11.09:

> anyone suggest a putty like client - to replace hyperterm ?

http://www.putty.org/

There you find the windows program.

Viele Gruesse
Helmut

"Ubuntu" - an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".

f825_633

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 8:58:48 AM11/23/09
to
Thank you for the suggestions - can the original post and
requirement for dialup be noticed please. thank-you.

Helmut Hullen

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 9:18:00 AM11/23/09
to
Hallo, f825_633,

Du meintest am 23.11.09:

>>> anyone suggest a putty like client - to replace hyperterm ?

>> http://www.putty.org/
>>
>> There you find the windows program.

> Thank you for the suggestions - can the original post and


> requirement for dialup be noticed please. thank-you.

Are you searching a dialer or a telnet program?

f825_633

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 10:17:41 AM11/23/09
to
Helmut Hullen wrote:

>
>>>> anyone suggest a putty like client - to replace hyperterm ?
>
>

> Are you searching a dialer or a telnet program?
>

Telnet type program with dialer support and the terminal
support ie VT100, ANSI, etc. of putty.

Lew Pitcher

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 11:35:08 AM11/23/09
to
On November 23, 2009 10:17, in alt.os.linux.slackware, f825_633
(f825_633}NOSPAM{@ntlworld.com) wrote:

Telnet is a TCP/IP protocol only; there is no such thing as a direct-dial
Telnet.

So, what is it that you are really looking for?

Are you looking for an ANSI terminal program for Microsoft Windows, that has
built-in telephone dialer controls?

Or, are you looking for a Telnet (or SSH) terminal program for Microsoft
Windows, to interface with your Linux system via a dialup connection?

If it's just an ANSI terminal you want, you would be better off asking in a
newsgroup relating to Microsoft Windows, or searching on a MSWindows
software site like Tucows.com

If it's a Telnet terminal program, then you already have the answer: use
PuTTY. As for the "dial up" part, install or enable Dial-Up-Networking on
the MSWindows box, and install and configure the PPP server on your
Slackware box. The PPP server should use the device entry associated with
the modem on the Slackware system. With this setup, you get TCP/IP
connectivity, through the telephone line, using a simple PPP connection.
You probably should read the PPP-Howto (http://tldp.org/HOWTO/PPP-HOWTO/)
before you start this process.

HTH
--
Lew Pitcher
Master Codewright & JOAT-in-training | Registered Linux User #112576
Me: http://pitcher.digitalfreehold.ca/ | Just Linux: http://justlinux.ca/
---------- Slackware - Because I know what I'm doing. ------


Loki Harfagr

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 1:57:19 PM11/23/09
to
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:54:13 +0000, f825_633 did cat :

OK, I didn't see the 'dial into' for what it was :D)
Sorry but that's such a long time I've used windows in an
"open net env." that I really can't remember if the puTTY.exe
has any dial-in extension/cousin :-)
But, wouldn't that question have a better fate in some Windows savvy group?

f825_633

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 3:55:25 PM11/23/09
to

HEHEHE, thats okay - I thought I'd ask the guru's first :-)

Dan C

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 6:21:45 PM11/23/09
to

Bugger off, Win-droid.


--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he wiped the vomit from his chin.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/

Grant Taylor

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:46:56 AM11/24/09
to
On 11/23/2009 7:48 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> http://www.putty.org/

Holly crap!

When did PuTTY get a decent URL? I'm use to Googling for it and the
comments that the author made about the URL.

Grant. . . .

Grant Taylor

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:48:20 AM11/24/09
to
On 11/23/2009 6:54 AM, f825_633 wrote:
> OOoopsm perhaps I should have been a little clearer, I want a client to
> run on a windows machine, that will use dialup - ie a modem to then dial
> into a Linux box.

I'm not 100% positive, but I /think/ PuTTY can be used to communicate
via a COM port.

With a modem, simply use PuTTY as a terminal emulator and issue the AT
commands to the modem.

Grant. . . .

Lew Pitcher

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 9:18:46 AM11/24/09
to
On November 24, 2009 01:48, in alt.os.linux.slackware, Grant Taylor
(gta...@riverviewtech.net) wrote:

> On 11/23/2009 6:54 AM, f825_633 wrote:
>> OOoopsm perhaps I should have been a little clearer, I want a client to
>> run on a windows machine, that will use dialup - ie a modem to then dial
>> into a Linux box.
>
> I'm not 100% positive, but I /think/ PuTTY can be used to communicate
> via a COM port.

AFAIKT, No.

Putty (at least up to and including v 0.59) only communicated via TCP. The
documentation for the current version (v 0.60) does not indicate that this
has changed. There are no dialogs that affect COM port settings, and /only/
dialogs and settings for TCP

> With a modem, simply use PuTTY as a terminal emulator and issue the AT
> commands to the modem.

Putty doesn't talk to COM ports.

As I said before, the OP needs to look for a Microsoft Windows "Serial
Terminal Emulator". If he insists on sticking with PuTTy, he needs to
configure DUN on Windows and PPP on Linux, and use
Putty->TCP/IP->DUN->modem->POTS->modem->PPP->TCP/IP->Linux.

goarilla

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:28:32 PM11/24/09
to
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:18:46 -0500, Lew Pitcher wrote:

> On November 24, 2009 01:48, in alt.os.linux.slackware, Grant Taylor
> (gta...@riverviewtech.net) wrote:
>
>> On 11/23/2009 6:54 AM, f825_633 wrote:
>>> OOoopsm perhaps I should have been a little clearer, I want a client
>>> to run on a windows machine, that will use dialup - ie a modem to then
>>> dial into a Linux box.
>>
>> I'm not 100% positive, but I /think/ PuTTY can be used to communicate
>> via a COM port.
>
> AFAIKT, No.
>
> Putty (at least up to and including v 0.59) only communicated via TCP.
> The documentation for the current version (v 0.60) does not indicate
> that this has changed. There are no dialogs that affect COM port
> settings, and /only/ dialogs and settings for TCP
>
>> With a modem, simply use PuTTY as a terminal emulator and issue the AT
>> commands to the modem.
>
> Putty doesn't talk to COM ports.
>
> As I said before, the OP needs to look for a Microsoft Windows "Serial
> Terminal Emulator". If he insists on sticking with PuTTy, he needs to
> configure DUN on Windows and PPP on Linux, and use
> Putty->TCP/IP->DUN->modem->POTS->modem->PPP->TCP/IP->Linux.


i'm gonna burst your bubble but i have used putty to
connect via rs232 to some switches before
http://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/0.60/htmldoc/Chapter3.html#using-serial

Lew Pitcher

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 6:07:17 PM11/24/09
to
On November 24, 2009 17:28, in alt.os.linux.slackware, goarilla
(kevin....@skynet.remove-this.be) wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:18:46 -0500, Lew Pitcher wrote:

[snip]


>> As I said before, the OP needs to look for a Microsoft Windows "Serial
>> Terminal Emulator". If he insists on sticking with PuTTy, he needs to
>> configure DUN on Windows and PPP on Linux, and use
>> Putty->TCP/IP->DUN->modem->POTS->modem->PPP->TCP/IP->Linux.
>
>
> i'm gonna burst your bubble but i have used putty to
> connect via rs232 to some switches before
>
http://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/0.60/htmldoc/Chapter3.html#using-serial

Well! I learn something new every day.

Thanks for the tip; I didn't think that PuTTy could do that (obviously).

And now, the OP has his definitive answer: use PuTTY.

Grant Taylor

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 12:54:42 AM11/25/09
to
On 11/23/2009 6:08 AM, f825_633 wrote:
> anyone suggest a putty like client - to replace hyperterm ?

I've used TeraTerm Pro for a number of years.

Grant. . . .

Theodore Heise

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 11:37:05 AM11/26/09
to

Glad I'm not the only one that does this! (typical approach when
I'm on a strange computer and want to connect to my Slack box at
home).

I'm also embarrassed to see the version I currently use (0.58) is
well over four years old. :-/

--
Theodore (Ted) Heise <th...@heise.nu> Bloomington, IN, USA

Grant

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 1:39:45 PM11/26/09
to
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:37:05 -0500, Theodore Heise <th...@heise.nu> wrote:

>On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:46:56 -0600,
> Grant Taylor <gta...@riverviewtech.net> wrote:
>> On 11/23/2009 7:48 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
>>> http://www.putty.org/
>>
>> Holly crap!
>>
>> When did PuTTY get a decent URL? I'm use to Googling for it and the
>> comments that the author made about the URL.
>
>Glad I'm not the only one that does this! (typical approach when
>I'm on a strange computer and want to connect to my Slack box at
>home).
>
>I'm also embarrassed to see the version I currently use (0.58) is
>well over four years old. :-/

Funny that, I followed the URL and updated too... Didn't notice any
difference. The PuTTY suite is a mature tool, even if the author still
calls it a beta.

Grant.
--
http://bugsplatter.id.au

0 new messages