On Wednesday 28 September 2011 01:07 in alt.os.linux.gentoo, somebody
identifying as Vitus Jensen wrote...
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Aragorn wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 27 September 2011 06:30 in alt.os.linux.gentoo, somebody
>> identifying as Vitus Jensen wrote...
>>
>>> I'm using NFSv4 shares from my server, this relies on idmap to
>>> translate user and group numbers. I've configured nfs to start that
>>> service when nfs is started:
>>>
>>> /etc/conf.d/nfs:
>>> ...
>>> # Optional services to include in default `/etc/init.d/nfs start`
>>> # For NFSv4 users, you'll want to add "rpc.idmapd" here.
>>> NFS_NEEDED_SERVICES="rpc.idmapd"
>>> ...
>>>
>>> But rpc.idmapd is not started. Does that file only configure the
>>> server and users have to add it to default runlevel by hand?
>>> Doesn't sound right to me.
>>>
>>> How is that supposed to work automatically?
>>
>> As I understand it, rpc.imapd is a dependency of nfs, meaning that it
>> should be automatically started, yes. Are the permissions on the
>> file correct?
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 523 4. Apr 07:24 /etc/init.d/rpcbind
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 595 24. Mai 19:54 /etc/init.d/rpc.idmapd
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 788 24. Mai 19:54 /etc/init.d/rpc.pipefs
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 818 24. Mai 19:54 /etc/init.d/rpc.statd
Okay, that is how it should be. Well, at least, I mean that they're
executable. They should not necessarily be executable to anyone other
than root.
> rpc.statd *is* automatically started.
>
> Please see my other posting: rpc.imapd is a dependency of nfsmount
> which is a dependency of netmount. And netmount I start and stop
> manually when booting or moving the laptop. Manually because starting
> it on location where my NFS server isn't available would cause
> extremly long delays for booting / mounting and shutdown / unmounting.
> I always wanting to tunnel NFS through the Internet so that a mount
> would succeed anywhere but are too lazy to experiment. Therefore the
> manual mount.
Well, I don't know whether that is the source of the dependency failing,
but in all honesty, I don't think it is. I think J.O. Aho was probably
closer on the mark with his reply.
>>> PS: see, an alt.os.linux.gentoo posting ;-)
>>
>> Unfortunately this group is pretty much dead, thanks to a stupid BBS
>> admin who let his BBS spam this group to death with old messages
>> several times a day for over a year.
>
> I know, I have seen and deleted them all.
I put up a killfile especially for that BBS.
> Very sad as before that incident alt.os.linux.gentoo was a very alive
> group.
Yes, I remember that. And very sad indeed.
>> Most of the traffic - and I do mean *lots* of it [*] - is now to be
>> found in
linux.gentoo.dev and linux.gentoo.users, but both are only
>> archives to mailing lists.
>>
>> Communication happens via the mailing lists (which are moderated) and
>> is then archived on Usenet. I don't think you can post to the Usenet
>> groups directly, and you either way need a real, working e-mail
>> address to be able to post. Not advisable on Usenet unless you want
>> to put yourself through the trouble of receiving filtering out all
>> the spam. :-/
>
> Please don't tell me to use mailinglists, [...
Oh, I'm not! I'm just telling you where they hang out these days, and
that they're obviously still very active.
> ...] I like Usenet a lot more [...
Then that makes two of us. ;-)
> ...] and will avoid mailings if possible. Usenet since 1996 or the
> like. Oh, always with valid email addresses and with the same mail
> provider since then. Usenet is overrated as source of spam.
Hmm... I'm not so sure about that. Still, best not to take any chances
here. ;-)