Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Speed questions from a beginner

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jeff Woodard

unread,
Aug 21, 2001, 10:23:17 PM8/21/01
to
Hi - I wondering if I can get some help.

I am new to RR and cable modems. I'm in Columbus, Ohio, subscribing through
Time Warner.

This cable modem has only been hooked up for a couple weeks and I'm trying
to find a reputable/process to test download speeds to see if, in my
opinion, this is worth it. I know that speeds change constantly, but would
appreciate any ideas anyone would give me so that I can determine a fair
average download speed.

Thanks for the help all!

Debbie


Don Voorhees

unread,
Aug 21, 2001, 11:25:03 PM8/21/01
to

"Jeff Woodard" <jwoo...@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pIEg7.31073$Iq4.12...@typhoon.columbus.rr.com...

Hi, Debbie, and welcome to the group!

Here's a link for a pretty decent speed test at DSLReports:

http://www.dslreports.com/stest?loc=3

As shown, it will use a server in New Jersey for the test. If you change the
number on the end to a 1 or 2, it will test with West Coast servers. As
you're aware, no single online test is a good indicator of performance,
other than at that moment. If you run a series of tests at different times
over several days though, you should get a feel for what you can expect from
your connection.

You also might want to check out the speed "tweaks" at
http://www.speedguide.net/ for some help in optimizing your speeds. It can
make a big difference!

Don


junk

unread,
Aug 21, 2001, 11:21:58 PM8/21/01
to
http://webservices.cnet.com/bandwidth/

fyi i logged 533.3 kbps


"Jeff Woodard" <jwoo...@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pIEg7.31073$Iq4.12...@typhoon.columbus.rr.com...

Scott McMillan

unread,
Aug 21, 2001, 11:37:23 PM8/21/01
to

Hi Debbie,

As Don has already mentioned, you would need to gauge your speed over
a period of time (different times of day, throughout a week or so).

www.dslreports.com/tweaks has some very helpful 'tweak' insights, and
I use http://64.13.111.3/icnt/support/speedTest.asp for testing.
Seems the InternetConnect servers don't get quite as much traffic.
The best speed test I have found is to download from one of the
Conxion servers
(http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/downloads/servicepacks/sp2/sp2lang.asp
will get you to the Win2000 SP2 link). Check your throughput at
either on a regular basis at different times to find your speed, but
don't skip the tweaks at dslreports.

Scott McMillan

Scott McMillan

unread,
Aug 21, 2001, 11:42:45 PM8/21/01
to
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 03:21:58 GMT, "junk" <junk...@mediaone.com>
wrote:

>http://webservices.cnet.com/bandwidth/
>

Hmm. Seems to be another "Sales Genie".

Scott McMillan

FTLNewsFeed

unread,
Aug 22, 2001, 12:08:46 AM8/22/01
to
"Scott McMillan" <sm...@usa.NOBOTnet> wrote in message
news:rm96ot01ogn0nfl2e...@4ax.com...

>has already mentioned, you would need to gauge your speed over
> a period of time (different times of day, throughout a week or so).
>
> www.dslreports.com/tweaks has some very helpful 'tweak' insights, and
> I use http://64.13.111.3/icnt/support/speedTest.asp for testing.
> Seems the InternetConnect servers don't get quite as much traffic.
> The best speed test I have found is to download from one of the
> Conxion servers
>
(http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/downloads/servicepacks/sp2/sp2lang.asp
> will get you to the Win2000 SP2 link). Check your throughput at
> either on a regular basis at different times to find your speed, but
> don't skip the tweaks at dslreports.
>
> Scott McMillan

Also visit www.speedguide.net and apply the appropriate patches. Those can
help alot.

FTLNewsFeed


Boyd Williston

unread,
Aug 22, 2001, 1:56:39 AM8/22/01
to
"Jeff Woodard" <jwoo...@columbus.rr.com> wrote in
news:pIEg7.31073$Iq4.12...@typhoon.columbus.rr.com:

Check RR's local web pages for a speedtest. Most RR franchises have one.
This will give you a pretty good idea of how things are running within the
RR system. You should get consistently 80% or better of advertised speed.

The problem with other sites is that congestion somewhere outside of RR's
control may slow things down. However, I've been getting pretty consistent
values better than 80% of my advertised speed from the speed test at
dslreports.

larry

unread,
Aug 23, 2001, 9:39:35 AM8/23/01
to
http://speedtest.net is great.

"Jeff Woodard" <jwoo...@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pIEg7.31073$Iq4.12...@typhoon.columbus.rr.com...

orlando...@yahoo.com

unread,
Aug 23, 2001, 3:41:24 PM8/23/01
to
Well, first of all, your speed is going to far out shine any modem you
may use. So its definatly worth it. However, that being said. Head
over to www.dlsreports.com and use there speed test. Its reliable and
free..

good luck Len


ZW

unread,
Aug 23, 2001, 8:31:48 PM8/23/01
to
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 02:23:17 GMT, "Jeff Woodard"
<jwoo...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:

On a sub note:
If you find that your download speed seems low and RR installed a
network card in your PC, please replace the card with a better than
the $1.00 card they installed for you. Made a huge difference for
me. Anyone selling bridges in here?

Larry Gamache

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 1:52:51 AM8/24/01
to
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 00:31:48 GMT, ZW <ha...@it.net> wrote:


>On a sub note:
>If you find that your download speed seems low and RR installed a
>network card in your PC, please replace the card with a better than
>the $1.00 card they installed for you. Made a huge difference for
>me. Anyone selling bridges in here?

I'm not using it now, but the card that RR installed for me back when
I first got the service was O.K. It was nothing great, but it worked
in a satisfactory manner.
--

Larry Gamache

JWolf

unread,
Aug 24, 2001, 3:28:11 AM8/24/01
to
ZW <ha...@it.net> wrote:

Replacing the RR supplied network cards in the two machines here also made a
big difference in speed. I'm sunrises at how poor the network cards are that
RR gave us. I do plan on trying to get RR to replace them as they are not
working to the full potential of RR.

0 new messages