Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

X-CAA-SPAM

752 views
Skip to first unread message

Nil

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 3:39:55 PM12/9/07
to
I think this came up in discussion a few weeks ago, but I don't think
this question was really addressed:

If I see the string "X-CAA-SPAM" in the header of my email, does that
it has passed through Comcast's spam detector and been tagged as such?
Or has the header line been introduced somewhere before hitting
Comcast?

What about the "X-Authority-Analysis" line? Is it added by Comcast, and
what is its significance?

Barry Margolin

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 6:41:24 PM12/9/07
to
In article <Xns9A019F5B...@216.196.97.136>,
Nil <rednoi...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:

> I think this came up in discussion a few weeks ago, but I don't think
> this question was really addressed:
>
> If I see the string "X-CAA-SPAM" in the header of my email, does that
> it has passed through Comcast's spam detector and been tagged as such?
> Or has the header line been introduced somewhere before hitting
> Comcast?

I just looked at a few messages in my Screened Mail folder, and they had
that header. Messages in my Inbox didn't. So I suspect that this is
added by the spam filter to tag suspected spam.

> What about the "X-Authority-Analysis" line? Is it added by Comcast, and
> what is its significance?

Yes. I think it's related to DomainKey or SPF authentity checking.

--
Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***

meg0...@gmail.com

unread,
May 7, 2018, 11:00:01 AM5/7/18
to
yeah is refund to x-spam because filter is bannner your Ip

Nil

unread,
May 11, 2018, 9:36:30 PM5/11/18
to
On 07 May 2018, meg0...@gmail.com wrote in alt.online-service.comcast:

> yeah is refund to x-spam because filter is bannner your Ip

Come again?

Nil

unread,
May 13, 2018, 3:41:48 AM5/13/18
to
On 12 May 2018, Bill <no...@none.invalid> wrote in
alt.online-service.comcast:
> Just ignore it. That was someone replying to a post from 2007.

Yes, I know. I was just marvelling at the word-saladness of it all.
0 new messages