CNN reception breaking up

Cameo

unread,

Apr 6, 2010, 11:37:05 PM4/6/10

to

I subscribe to the Digital Economy package that includes CNN (Ch 44) and
Animal World (Ch 43) which I could receive just fine till last week but
not since. The picture on both channels is kinda' broken up as some kind
of puzzle and the sound is coming in short bursts, as if it was
constantly buffering. I don't see this on any of the other channels, so
I am at a loss. I wonder if anybody else has experienced this before I
call Comcast support. My STB is Motorola DCT 700.

Thomas T. Veldhouse

unread,

Apr 7, 2010, 9:48:04 AM4/7/10

to

Sounds like your signal levels have gotten really low [or the noise levels
really high]. Time to call Comcast.

--
Thomas T. Veldhouse

Religion is a crutch, but that's okay... humanity is a cripple.

Rick

unread,

Apr 7, 2010, 5:05:07 PM4/7/10

to

Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Cameo<ca...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> I subscribe to the Digital Economy package that includes CNN (Ch 44) and
>> Animal World (Ch 43) which I could receive just fine till last week but
>> not since. The picture on both channels is kinda' broken up as some kind
>> of puzzle and the sound is coming in short bursts, as if it was
>> constantly buffering. I don't see this on any of the other channels, so
>> I am at a loss. I wonder if anybody else has experienced this before I
>> call Comcast support. My STB is Motorola DCT 700.
>>
>
> Sounds like your signal levels have gotten really low [or the noise levels
> really high]. Time to call Comcast.
>

Ayup!

Betts

unread,

Apr 7, 2010, 5:19:48 PM4/7/10

to

Or bad or loose connections at a splitter.

Rick

unread,

Apr 8, 2010, 8:10:10 AM4/8/10

to

Yes but - bat connection(s) should show issues on more than 1 channel as
the OP reported.

Thomas T. Veldhouse

unread,

Apr 8, 2010, 9:39:08 AM4/8/10

to

If he didn't figure that out on his own before posting here, then he is still
better off calling Comcast IMHO.

Cameo

unread,

Apr 8, 2010, 2:19:43 PM4/8/10

to

"Rick" <rick0....@gmail.com.lessspam> wrote:
> Yes but - bat connection(s) should show issues on more than 1 channel
> as the OP reported.

Actually, it showed up on two channels. I mentioned the Animal
Planet as well (Ch 43.) Anyway, I emailed to Comcast about it and they
also suggested loose cable connection which turned out to be the
apparent case. Once I tightened it at the wall plate, the problem seemed
to disappear. I would have thought of this myself if it had affected all
channels, or if it had not shown up suddenly last weekend without me
doing anything around the connections. At least next time I know better.

Thanks for your suggestions, guys.

Thomas T. Veldhouse

unread,

Apr 8, 2010, 3:12:37 PM4/8/10

to

Do you have any pets, in particular, any cats? I am always blowing dander out
of my computers and restoring power cords that get yank ... one day that cat
is getting a 230gr Winchester JHP 45 round in it .... dust and muck is all I
have to deal with then ;-)

Another cause of loosening cables which I have first hand experience with is
nearby trains. My previous home had a dual track line right behind the house
and it shook one monitor to death, but back then I had 10baseT coax Ethernet
and occassional a cable would loosen over time [although I have to say it was
rare]. Those were the days when my Cable Modem (via MediaOne) was one way
400+Kbps down and a phone line for upload and they were bound together to form
one connection [it was quite unreliable].

Cameo

unread,

Apr 8, 2010, 10:28:30 PM4/8/10

to

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <vel...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>
> Do you have any pets, in particular, any cats? I am always blowing
> dander out
> of my computers and restoring power cords that get yank ... one day
> that cat
> is getting a 230gr Winchester JHP 45 round in it .... dust and muck is
> all I
> have to deal with then ;-)
>
> Another cause of loosening cables which I have first hand experience
> with is
> nearby trains. My previous home had a dual track line right behind
> the house
> and it shook one monitor to death, but back then I had 10baseT coax
> Ethernet
> and occassional a cable would loosen over time [although I have to say
> it was
> rare]. Those were the days when my Cable Modem (via MediaOne) was one
> way
> 400+Kbps down and a phone line for upload and they were bound together
> to form
> one connection [it was quite unreliable].

None of those applies here but I can see now how little stress on
that outlet jack can make a difference in reception. When it happens
only on one or two channels that you don't even use that much, it
becomes almost impossible to link the cause and effect later together.

Rick

unread,

Apr 9, 2010, 7:09:56 AM4/9/10

to

"The signal travels on the surface of the wire" - cable guy. The carrier
RF form(s) standing waves, so partial contact of the surface can lead to
spotty problems.

Thomas T. Veldhouse

unread,

Apr 9, 2010, 12:20:20 PM4/9/10

to

True, but the signal travels on the surfact of the tiny interior wire of the
cable, the outer metal is simply shielding (An attempt at a Faraday Cage).

Kaimbridge

unread,

Apr 10, 2010, 7:58:51 AM4/10/10

to

On Apr 8, 6:19 pm, "Cameo" <ca...@invalid.invalid> wrote:

Realize too, if your area has taken off most of the analog ch.s, then
"Ch.43" may actually be RF "Ch.29-3" or "Ch.25-12"!
For instance, up here in the Boston area, we have (partial)

*Mapped>Ch.<RF Station
======= ====== ===============
2-1 115-01 WGBH:2
4-1 114-02 WBZ:4
5-1 113-01 WCVB:5
7-1 113-02 WHDH:7
8/46-1 83-12 WWDP:46
9-1 85-89 WMUR:9
11-1 82-06 WENH:11
16/44-1 82-10 WGBX:44
17/27-1 82-08 WUNI:27
18/50-1 82-11 WZMY:50
19/60-1 83-04 WNEU:60
20/62-1 83-05 WMFP:62
23/48-1 83-11 WYDN:48
24 26-05 DISNEY
25 26-06 NICK
25-1 114-01 WFXT:25
28 26-04 MTV
29 26-11 VH1
35 26-12 USA
38 26-10 TLC
39 26-09 DISCOVERY
44/27-1 27-01 C-SPAN
44-1 116-04 WGBX:44
47 25-02 WEATHER Channel
55 25-08 SPIKETV
59 26-08 AMC
56-1 115-02 WLVI:56
60 26-02 CARTOON
61 26-03 COMEDY CENTRAL
62 26-07 SYFY
68-1 98-01 WBPX:68
83 85-07 INSP

*"44/27-1" = Ch.44 on ComCast analog converter box,
Ch.27-1 on HD digital TV tuner (otherwise,
HD tuner shows RF Ch.)

So, if RF-Ch.83 is poor, then the mapped Ch.s 8/46-1,
19/60-1, 20/62-1 and 23/48-1 will all be poor while the
adjacent (mapped) Ch.s will be fine!

~Kaimbridge~

-----
Wikipedia—Contributor Home Page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kaimbridge

***** Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer. *****

Cameo

unread,

Apr 10, 2010, 12:09:31 PM4/10/10

to

~Kaimbridge~

-----
Wikipediaï¿½Contributor Home Page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kaimbridge

***** Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer. *****

Reply: ------------------------------

I'm not doubting what you say. Not knowing any better, I just
assumed that if the single center wire carries all channels then any
contact issue would also effect all channels, not just one or two.

Kaimbridge

unread,

Apr 10, 2010, 4:53:14 PM4/10/10

to

On Apr 10, 4:09 pm, "Cameo" <ca...@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> "Kaimbridge" <kaimbri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Realize too, if your area has taken off most of the analog ch.s, then
> "Ch.43" may actually be RF "Ch.29-3" or "Ch.25-12"!
> For instance, up here in the Boston area, we have (partial)

<snip>

> So, if RF-Ch.83 is poor, then the mapped Ch.s 8/46-1,
> 19/60-1, 20/62-1 and 23/48-1 will all be poor while the
> adjacent (mapped) Ch.s will be fine!
>

> Reply: ------------------------------

>
> I'm not doubting what you say. Not knowing any better, I just
> assumed that if the single center wire carries all channels then any
> contact issue would also effect all channels, not just one or two.

Not necessarily: On one of our TVs in particular, the connection is
such that the VHF-lo signal's (i.e., Ch.s 2-6) are usually weak and
snowy (sometimes Ch.s 2 & 4 are outright unwatchable...this was
particularly true when the OTA analogs were ghosting over the CATV co-
Ch. retransmissions!), as well as a few of the higher, >Ch.70, ones
(including the aforementioned Ch.83). Then, if you wiggle the wire
(or sometimes even flush a toilet! P=), it may clear up. Thus any of
the affected upper Ch.s with digital signals may sometimes degrade to
anything from just minor pixellation to the dreaded BSOD.

~Kaimbridge~

-----
Wikipedia Contributor Home Page:

vintageth...@gmail.com

unread,

Feb 16, 2017, 6:51:59 AM2/16/17

to

I am experiencing the same thing, why?

Adam H. Kerman

unread,

Feb 16, 2017, 10:42:32 AM2/16/17

to

It must be the seven year time offset that you're using.

Allodoxaphobia

unread,

Feb 16, 2017, 6:41:04 PM2/16/17

to

heh... Good one!

Bill

unread,

Feb 17, 2017, 7:10:28 PM2/17/17

to

You might need a free government subsidized lefty-loon ObamaBox to watch fake news on CNN.

https://www.lifewire.com/dtv-converter-box-coupon-3276277

starryni...@gmail.com

unread,

Aug 16, 2018, 5:11:27 PM8/16/18

to

On Tuesday, April 6, 2010 at 11:37:05 PM UTC-4, Cameo wrote:

This is happening across multiple cable platforms, not just yours. Also MSNBC, but not other news stations.

Hmm.

Nil

unread,

Aug 16, 2018, 8:51:26 PM8/16/18

to

On 16 Aug 2018, starryni...@gmail.com wrote in
alt.online-service.comcast:

Being that you're a Google person, you probably don't know that you're
responding to an 8-year-old post, and I doubt you'll ever stumble your
way back here to see this response. Still...

I notice this, too. MSNBC and CNN often stall and pixilate for several
seconds before resuming. I rarely or never see this on other channels.

Hmm, indeed.

mica...@gmail.com

unread,

Jan 18, 2019, 10:32:53 PM1/18/19

to

In the past few days1/15 to 1/18 I too have been experiencing the exact same Problem. with CNN and Only CNN channels.I also am a Comcast subscriber and I use my HD Channel Of 757 to get CNN.

Cambio De Nombre

unread,

Jan 19, 2019, 6:07:55 AM1/19/19

to

I think watching CNN can cause permanent brain damage. Maybe you should consider Foxnews or Newsmax.

Peter

unread,

Jan 19, 2019, 8:10:51 AM1/19/19

to

I've been having the exact same problem (only CNN), received here in
greater D.C. metro area on channel 817. Very intermittent and usually
only for less than one second at a time. Figured it may be CNN's
microwave link(s). If it continues I'll contact Comcast.