On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 9:04:19 AM UTC-4, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>
> Why is there a debate, exactly? The marriage, in and of itself, is
> irrelevant and therefore a distraction. It's not "marriage" if she
> were forced into it as she had to be able to freely enter into the
> contract. It's the series of violent crimes that were perpetrated upon
> her. "Debate" is argument and counter-argument. What argument can there
> possibly be?
>
> Why cannot journalists just write a story about a terrible crime without
> embellishment that there is some sort of controversy here?
I didn't read every article, but it's likely a safe bet that, while it's illegal in Zimbabwe to marry before 18, there are compelling reasons that so many (1 in 3) parents of girls think they're doing them a big favor by forcing them to marry much earlier, even though teen pregnancy is seriously dangerous even in First World countries. So, the officials can't just ignore that mindset when they try to enforce the law.
As in, if a girl has consensual premarital sex with a peer, she's then ruined for life, even if she DOESN'T get pregnant. Or, if she's raped, even by a stranger twice her size, she's still considered unmarriageable. In societies like that, unmarried women are likely seen as little more than burdens.