Paula Sladewski, model, Playmate, 26
Dave Sill
Aspiring Michigan model found burned in North Miami trash bin
Paula Sladewski and her boyfriend flew into South Florida to spend New
Year's Eve at a Lady Gaga concert at Miami Beach's posh Fontainebleau.
But the holiday trip would end in a horrific tragedy.
On Sunday night, police found a body burned beyond recognition in a
Dumpster in North Miami. The body, later identified through dental
records, was that of the 26-year-old Sladewski.
...
-Dave
rob cibik
when i was younger and attended a concert, getting trashed had an
entirely different meaning.
MWB
GO PATRIOTS
mark
NotYetObit
A horrible story, and hopefully they will catch the killer quickly.
One correction, she was *not* a Playmate. That title is reserved for the
monthly centerfold model.
Hall
"Dave Sill" <da...@sill.org> wrote in message
news:7qmptv...@mid.individual.net...
Very sad.
Checking out her pix I found her to be very attractive. Not the typical
bouncy blond airhead type. "Chestnut" hair and deep blue eyes.
It would still be tragic if she were a dog, but...
Hall
NotYetObit
She is a blond in many of the photos posted here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2010/01/07/crimesider/photoessay6067064.shtml?tag=page
Brad Ferguson
She never appeared in Playboy at all. She seems to have appeared
briefly in a 2003 direct-to-video thing called "Playboy: The Ultimate
Playmate Search." There are 80 women listed in the credits, and the
"ultimate search" involved more than 6600 candidates.
Her family says Sladewski's modeling career never took off, and at the
time of her death she was working as a stripper.
rob cibik
> > Aspiring Michigan model
>
> "Unsuccessful" and "struggling" models and actresses never die. Only
> "aspiring" ones. ;)
"expiring" may be more accurate.
Chris
news:8e925e0f-fa03-49bc...@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
You got a million of them today , don't you Rob ?
Louis Epstein
Kathi
From WDIV-Detroit:
http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/22149148/detail.html
Video news report link included with article, brunette and blonde
photos.
BobF
[Default] On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:10:54 -0500, Dave Sill
<da...@sill.org> magnanimously proffered:
>http://www.miamiherald.com/news/miami-dade/story/1413079.html
>
>Aspiring Michigan model found burned in North Miami trash bin
How you could get "Paula Ladewski, model, Playmate" out of an article
that stated ...
``She went on a lot of interviews, but never landed anything
big,'' Watkins said. ``She would have loved that, modeling, that was
her dream.''
IMDB.com, the Internet Movie Database, lists Sladewski
appearing in a 2003 video, Playboy: The Ultimate Playmate Search.
... is beyond understanding. Then so is your spokesidiot.
--
"The problem with you crazies is you listen to your own voice too
much and have fallen in love with yourselves. Take a break from what
O'Reilly/Coulter may spew out, and start reading freedom-and
libertarian-oriented books and blogs instead of fellow dummies as are
O'Reilly/Coulter/Olbermann/Mathews and other collectivist-warriors on the
phony Left-Right line which signifies nothing. You even identify with
Stalin (as was Hitler) as a collectivist of the worst in ordering
concentration camps for those who don't believe in their worldview of the
State-uber-alles."
- From "The Sayings of Roy"
rob cibik
slow news day.
BobF
[Default] On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:43:17 -0600, "A" <aa...@att.net>
magnanimously proffered:
>
>"rob cibik" <lcp...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1298a90f-da76-433a...@r26g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
> Not where *I* am!
> (murders, cold, snow...)
You left out "political intrigue" and "insanity" ace.
********
> And no ... The Bald Soprano is not a play about Roy Lieberman's birth
> defect.
One correction for your inane remark, Bobo: I do NOT have a birth
defect.
But I know someone in NZ who has a major one in making fun of
someone who merely was premature.
You are a total ass, and if I ever thought about visiting you when
I was thinking of visiting NZ, you destroyed it with your idiocy.
Go stick your head in the dirt, and gain some real brains, and
maybe you will also become a real human being.
- From "The Sayings of Roy"
"I was born with the defect."
- From "The Sayings of Roy"
I don't know--I'm color blind myself! LOL!
I see the colors--I just don't know what they are labeled!
Esp. the crazy-mixed colors like 'fushia'--what kind of a color name is
that, and what the hell color is it, anyway!?
I see the basic colors, otherwise I couldn't drive a car, but I just
have trouble labeling what a certain color is--if it isn't 'Sun-Yellow',
'Grass-Green', 'StopLight-Red', 'FlashingCaution-Orange',
'Chocolate-flavored licorice whips', oops, not that last one!
- From "The Sayings of Roy"
You know, I wouldn't mind (sometimes--like right
now) giving it to you with an object that is larger than your rectum.
> > Did anyone else experience a deer-in-the-headlights moment upon
> > reading this?
>
> Until I saw who the sender was. Then I remembered he has "the defect".
What is that, a disease or something?
Sometimes, it happens to preemies because of the lack of oxygen,
and this was over half-a-century ago, when preemies didn't usually survive
when they were that tiny.
I've been told it was a near-miracle I survived at all and wasn't
blind at birth.
I must be here for some reason--such as to annoy you and some
other birdbrains. ;-)
>At least he has revealed there is something amiss. Not all "preemies"
>grow up without some defects, physical or psychological.
>He really does act a lot like a young girl, but now I'm beginning to
>understand a little more about why.
You don't have to accept TdF's stupid-inaccurate line, unless you
want to be labeled that yourself.
I don't act like what he thinks, I just don't process some social
skills as easily as others, due from the preemie condition *or* from a
possible genetic basis, probably from the female parent side, who was a
bona-fide creepy woman.
I'm almost like you--except I'm smarter and my natural strength
is with number processing and mathematics/computers, since it is precise and
not subject to interpretative biases as are the social sciences. ;-D
Dave Sill
>
> [Default] On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:10:54 -0500, Dave Sill
> <da...@sill.org> magnanimously proffered:
>
>> http://www.miamiherald.com/news/miami-dade/story/1413079.html
>>
>> Aspiring Michigan model found burned in North Miami trash bin
>
> How you could get "Paula Ladewski, model, Playmate" out of an article
> that stated ...
>
> ``She went on a lot of interviews, but never landed anything
> big,'' Watkins said. ``She would have loved that, modeling, that was
> her dream.''
>
> IMDB.com, the Internet Movie Database, lists Sladewski
> appearing in a 2003 video, Playboy: The Ultimate Playmate Search.
>
> ... is beyond understanding.
Believe it or not, I actually read more than one article before I posted
that message, many of which identified her as a Playmate or model. For
example:
http://www.nationalledger.com/ledgerdc/article_272629847.shtml
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/charred-body-playboy-model-paula-sladewski-found-miami/story?id=9505777
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2010/01/07/2010-01-07_body_of_model_paula_sladewski_found_burning_in_miamidumpster_in__boyfriend_a_per.html
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/991429/mariah-carey-makes-bizarre-awards-speech
http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report_burned-body-of-playmate-paula-sladewski-found-in-miami-trash-bin_1332062
I realize now that that's not the case, but it wasn't obvious at the time.
> Then so is your spokesidiot.
*My* spokesidiot? If you're referring to Roy, I killfiled him years ago.
I wish he'd STFU, but it's a free country. Anyone who bases their
opinion of an ideology on his blatherings is as big a fool as he is.
-Dave
Arthur Preacher
I hope the military is all set to bomb the crap of of North and South
Florida and arrest Lady Gaggle for her potential role in this
senseless killing!!
Brad Ferguson
wrote:
Do you really think this is helping? Sometimes I base my opinion of an
ideology on the willingness of its adherents to call other people
"fools" without giving the matter much thought at all.
If your group is fronted by a clown, you'll have to forgive the rest of
us for thinking you belong to a circus.
BobF
[Default] On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:51:24 -0500, Dave Sill
<da...@sill.org> magnanimously proffered:
Like you, I made an assumption based on quantity, not quality.
Since Roy hammers this group with his "Libertarian" message ad
nauseum, and you seem to have supported that message in a previous
post as well as not replying to the question I asked, I assumed that
you approved of him as the ideology's self-appointed spokesfool cum
spokesidiot.
BTW - that question was:
Doesn't it embarrass you (and other libertarians) to have an
idiot like Roy Lieberman as your self-appointed spokesfool?
I wouldn't think that his off-topic political rants in
alt.obituaries and profligate posting to a number of groups as your
Usenet representative has not done the Libertarian cause any good over
the years.
--
> Chicago is out of the running for the 2016 Olympics, eliminated in the
> first round of voting.
How do you know this, since the voting is done in secret and the
result of the winner not announced until later today?
Source?
Link?
Thanks!
Dave Sill
>
> Since Roy hammers this group with his "Libertarian" message ad
> nauseum, and you seem to have supported that message in a previous
> post as well as not replying to the question I asked, I assumed that
> you approved of him as the ideology's self-appointed spokesfool cum
> spokesidiot.
>
> BTW - that question was:
>
> Doesn't it embarrass you (and other libertarians) to have an
> idiot like Roy Lieberman as your self-appointed spokesfool?
Sorry, Bob, I assumed that was rhetorical question. Of course he's
embarrassing.
> I wouldn't think that his off-topic political rants in
> alt.obituaries and profligate posting to a number of groups as your
> Usenet representative has not done the Libertarian cause any good over
> the years.
I think he's done his cause net harm, but I'm equally sure he doesn't
see it that way.
-Dave
Dave Sill
So you somehow know how much thought I've given the Roy matter? And I
didn't call *anyone* a fool. I stand by statement: I really do think
that anyone who dismisses libertarianism solely because some kook posts
OT junk to alt.obituaries is an idiot. Do I think I'm helping what? My
goal was to dispute the apparent claim that Roy is "my spokesidiot".
Just because we share the same ideology doesn't mean I approve of his
actions here.
> If your group is fronted by a clown, you'll have to forgive the rest of
> us for thinking you belong to a circus.
Our "group" isn't fronted by Roy, and, no, I don't have to forgive you
if you make a silly assumption like that.
-Dave
Brad Ferguson
wrote:
> On 01/08/10 13:32, Brad Ferguson wrote:
> > In article<7qp2jt...@mid.individual.net>, Dave Sill<da...@sill.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> *My* spokesidiot? If you're referring to Roy, I killfiled him years ago.
> >> I wish he'd STFU, but it's a free country. Anyone who bases their
> >> opinion of an ideology on his blatherings is as big a fool as he is.
> >
> > Do you really think this is helping? Sometimes I base my opinion of an
> > ideology on the willingness of its adherents to call other people
> > "fools" without giving the matter much thought at all.
>
> So you somehow know how much thought I've given the Roy matter? And I
> didn't call *anyone* a fool.
Um, not so. Some of us have said more than once that our opinion of
libertarianism has been colored by Roy's ceaseless nonsense. You said
someone who felt that way was as big a fool as Roy is.
How is that not calling anyone a fool?
> I stand by statement: I really do think
> that anyone who dismisses libertarianism solely because some kook posts
> OT junk to alt.obituaries is an idiot. Do I think I'm helping what? My
> goal was to dispute the apparent claim that Roy is "my spokesidiot".
> Just because we share the same ideology doesn't mean I approve of his
> actions here.
Now you're calling us idiots, too.
I ask again: Do you *really* think this is helping?
> > If your group is fronted by a clown, you'll have to forgive the rest of
> > us for thinking you belong to a circus.
>
> Our "group" isn't fronted by Roy,
It sure is, at least as far as this place is concerned.
> and, no, I don't have to forgive you if you make a silly assumption like that.
I'll recover, believe me ... but you might try making it a *good*
circus. The one your spokesmodel is running should have left town a
long time ago.
Dave Sill
> In article<7qphf4...@mid.individual.net>, Dave Sill<da...@sill.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 01/08/10 13:32, Brad Ferguson wrote:
>>> In article<7qp2jt...@mid.individual.net>, Dave Sill<da...@sill.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> *My* spokesidiot? If you're referring to Roy, I killfiled him years ago.
>>>> I wish he'd STFU, but it's a free country. Anyone who bases their
>>>> opinion of an ideology on his blatherings is as big a fool as he is.
>>>
>>> Do you really think this is helping? Sometimes I base my opinion of an
>>> ideology on the willingness of its adherents to call other people
>>> "fools" without giving the matter much thought at all.
>>
>> So you somehow know how much thought I've given the Roy matter? And I
>> didn't call *anyone* a fool.
>
> Um, not so.
I repeat, with emphasis:
Anyone who *bases* their opinion of an ideology on his blatherings is
as big a fool as he is.
> Some of us have said more than once that our opinion of
> libertarianism has been colored by Roy's ceaseless nonsense.
"Colored by" is not the same as "based upon".
> You said
> someone who felt that way was as big a fool as Roy is.
No, I didn't.
> How is that not calling anyone a fool?
Sorry if I assumed that folks here could read.
>> I stand by statement: I really do think
>> that anyone who dismisses libertarianism solely because some kook posts
>> OT junk to alt.obituaries is an idiot. Do I think I'm helping what? My
>> goal was to dispute the apparent claim that Roy is "my spokesidiot".
>> Just because we share the same ideology doesn't mean I approve of his
>> actions here.
>
> Now you're calling us idiots, too.
Do you dismiss libertarianism *solely* because of Roy? If Roy starts
posting OT nonsense in support of gravity or evolution will you suddenly
stop believing in them? *IF* you do (or would) *THEN* you are a fool. If
not, then great: I'm not calling you a fool or an idiot.
> I ask again: Do you *really* think this is helping?
Yes, but I realize that some people may be beyond reach. I won't lose
any sleep over it.
>>> If your group is fronted by a clown, you'll have to forgive the rest of
>>> us for thinking you belong to a circus.
>>
>> Our "group" isn't fronted by Roy,
>
> It sure is, at least as far as this place is concerned.
And "this place" appointed you as its official spokesman?
>> and, no, I don't have to forgive you if you make a silly assumption like that.
>
> I'll recover, believe me ... but you might try making it a *good*
> circus. The one your spokesmodel is running should have left town a
> long time ago.
Like I said, I've had him killfiled for years. If more people followed
suit, maybe he *would* go away. But too many people find him too
entertaining to ignore.
-Dave
BobF
[Default] On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:56:36 -0500, Dave Sill
<da...@sill.org> magnanimously proffered:
>On 01/08/10 13:58, BobF wrote:
>>
>> Since Roy hammers this group with his "Libertarian" message ad
>> nauseum, and you seem to have supported that message in a previous
>> post as well as not replying to the question I asked, I assumed that
>> you approved of him as the ideology's self-appointed spokesfool cum
>> spokesidiot.
>>
>> BTW - that question was:
>>
>> Doesn't it embarrass you (and other libertarians) to have an
>> idiot like Roy Lieberman as your self-appointed spokesfool?
>
>Sorry, Bob, I assumed that was rhetorical question. Of course he's
>embarrassing.
Not that your recent comments have left me in any doubt, but thank you
for answering.
>> I wouldn't think that his off-topic political rants in
>> alt.obituaries and profligate posting to a number of groups as your
>> Usenet representative has not done the Libertarian cause any good over
>> the years.
>
>I think he's done his cause net harm, but I'm equally sure he doesn't
>see it that way.
I'm afraid you're right.
*******
"Gene has different genes than Roger's jeans, although Gene was married
to Jean, and Roger loves the Dodger(s)."
Brad Ferguson
wrote:
> Do you dismiss libertarianism *solely* because of Roy?
Not anymore.
> And "this place" appointed you as its official spokesman?
Oh, please. Anybody here who disagrees with me that Roy is the local
Mr. Libertarian, please speak up.
Rest snipped.
Arthur Preacher
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Arthur Preacher" <scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message
>
> news:df0adb3b-537e-4788...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 7, 11:10 am, Dave Sill <d...@sill.org> wrote:
>
> >http://www.miamiherald.com/news/miami-dade/story/1413079.html
>
> > Aspiring Michigan model found burned in North Miami trash bin
>
> > Paula Sladewski and her boyfriend flew into South Florida to spend New
> > Year's Eve at a Lady Gaga concert at Miami Beach's posh Fontainebleau.
>
> > But the holiday trip would end in a horrific tragedy.
>
> >> On Sunday night, police found a body burned beyond recognition in a
> >> Dumpster in North Miami. The body, later identified through dental
> >> records, was that of the 26-year-old Sladewski.
> >Florida and arrest Lady Gaggle for her potential role in this
> >senseless killing!!
>
> humor postings.
Thanks for the compliment. Although the State may have to use some
harsh interrogation techniques on Lady Gaggle! She'll talk or ELSE!!!