JAMES MASON ON SATANISM
Floyd Diebel
>THREE FACES OF SATANISM www.universalorder.com
why?
-----
fdi...@boulez.emrl.com
a/v composition and engineering.
thu...@my-dejanews.com
JAMES MASON
The complacent clueless masses are going wild looking for "Satan" under every
rock. Especially where their children are concerned, whether it be in the
music they listen to or their mode of fashion. Exactly as when I was a kid,
the parents are upset over the ever-steepening downward trend but only able
the moan and bewail the latest outward manifestations of a deeper problem.
This generation is as alienated from it's parents as the previous one was
from theirs.
Why? Because whatever "values" the older ones may somehow yet cling to are
patently, uniformly hollow, hypocritical and rotten. They go in search of
something, anything. Unfortunately, the same source that destroyed the
traditional values also took care to lay every sort of gimmick and trap out
there to snare the lost and the searching. A deliberate set-up.
The worse-than-useless churches are leading the cry over "Satanism" in
precisely the same sense that he is a super-spook counterpart to their God.
It has the same ring of crap to it as any of the rest of their garbage and,
by the unbroken trends, it is having the corresponding effect. That's what
happens to a people when it's belief system degenerates to total
superstition. The people themselves degenerate next. Throwing more
superstition at very real social problems is just like throwing gasoline on a
fire trying to douse it.
But if we're going to talk about Satan, let's at least try to do it
intelligently.
It was in 1967, in San Francisco, that Anton LaVey founded the Church of
Satan. I'm very proud of my original 33 1/3 album of his "Satanic Mass" and
my inscribed copy of his "Satanic Bible". I quoted LaVey extensively in my
first book and a number of my closest and best Movement comrades are bona
fide high priests in LaVey's church. A person might be shocked.
I even permitted myself to be billed as a "Neo-Nazi Satanist" to appear
opposite radio evangelist-for-profit, Bob Larson. If they want me to be
"evil", I'll be "evil" for them. Evil sells, evil excites and electrifies.
That is what has been done to the image and reputation of "good". That's part
of the trap. A world deliberately turned upside-down. LaVey himself attacks
those who give truth for lies and lies for truth. He borrows straight from
the Bible.
Not wanting to tell tales out of class, LaVey has showmanship strikingly
reminiscent of George Lincoln Rockwell and knows how to use shock and
symbolism to defeat the news blackout and to reach people's minds and shatter
preconceptions. It works like this: To the average person who finds himself
disillusioned and alienated by a world full of lies, if "God" is really as
nowhere as those churches represent then it only seems logical to take a
second look at his opposite number, Satan, in hopes of finding some meaning
and worth.
Only an intrepid soul will go a route like this but only the intrepid will, in
the end, be worth anything - precisely as George Lincoln Rockwell knew when he
adopted the name "American Nazi Party."
The heavy reliance upon Ragnar Redbeard's "Might Is Right", so "Viking" in
it's nature, even provides a direct philosophical link between the two
groups. The Norse, the Vikings, the doctrine of strength as opposed to
weakness - everything that this Big Brother System and it's State Religion
brands as "evil". Names and labels are as nothing. If something rings true,
go with it and to hell with whatever slander may be flung at you.
One more striking similarity shared by LaVey and Rockwell is/was their
insistence upon strict legality on the part of their respective memberships.
Plain good citizenship. This so as not to provide the "criminality" to
cripple the effort and to enhance their own scam of "good Guys versus Bad
Guys" for the stupid masses.
That's one face of Satanism.
The second face is the one which most catches the public eye and causes the
greatest concern. That is the "jokers"and the "wild cards" of the Night
Stalker variety. Intent to "do evil" as it is defined by the society as a
means of rebelling or attacking a hypocritical and grossly cruel and unjust
Big Brother System. They are to LaVey's group what the younger and more
hot-headed Skinheads are to older and more orthodox Nazis - an embarrassment.
But they fire the imagination and attract the youth by their exploits.
I even had occasion to become a sort of second-hand acquainted with the Night
Stalker, Richard Ramirez, through a mutual friend during 1993-1994.
Intelligent and personable, one of those rare personality types which can
make others "fishers of men." What is Ramirez in reality other than a
philosophical forerunner of what has already been dubbed the on coming
generation of thoroughly disaffected "Super Predators"?
So we have the one, LaVey and his followers, as a very conscious and careful
reaction to the phoniness of the System. While the real nightmare people, like
Ramirez, ect., are direct and organic products of a very inhuman System - it's
own sins assuming solid form to come back upon it.
However - and I know I'll be offending both when I say it - they share one
thing in common: Satan himself could hardly careless about either of them.
The directness and exuberance of both betrays an honest and will-to-life that
places them at direct odds with what Satan is and is all about.
Not a showman, not a prankster - Satan is "the man in grey flannel suit." Not
out to enlighten or even cause alarm - Satan has a businesslike agenda of
supreme seriousness. The words, "I'm the Devil and I wish to do evil." will
never issue forth from his lips. He will never present himself as what he is.
His mission being serious, his methodology is equally serious - designed for
effect, not to gain superfluous reaction from bored people.
The mission is not to light hot-foots oo plant whoopie cushions in world
affairs or even in people's lives. The mission is to destroy God's people, to
erase them biological and genetically. What else would it be - or hadn't you
considered that? And you don't do that by making people afraid of you on
sight. You do it by leading them over the precipice - with their full
confidence and participation. You do it by being "responsibility"
personified, by being "legitimate authority", by actually stepping in and
having these stupid people worship you and your doctrine of death as "God."
There you have it: The third and actual face of Satan.
Big Brother System? No. It's the Beast System, the Whore of Babylon, the
Satanic System. Right here and now.
All power - everything - is solely in the hands of the System. Regardless
what anyone may say or do, only it controls the trends which are leading
straight up to Apocalypse. The omnipresent corruption of the philosophy of
racial suicide. Not to mention the fanatical and irresistible DRIVE to force
all this without variance.
No accident. No mistake.
So - if you really want to serve Satan's cause, enter big business or the
media, join one of the major parties, become a minister in a major
denominational church. Become a real "law and order", "vote and pay taxes"
person. Fall in line with the "New World Order."
But now that you know all this, how attractive does any of it really sound?
-END-
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Noise is all, all is noise
Diebel) wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Oct 1998 00:18:41 GMT, <thu...@my-dejanews.com> wrote:
>>THREE FACES OF SATANISM www.universalorder.com
>
>why?
Because JAMES MASON IS INDUSTRIAL, of course.
Oops, wrong NG. He was a fine actor, tho (but not on the level, of
course, of Dan Knotts and Wilfred Brimley).
Fr.Goatley
on: Merzow/Watermann "No Title"
(hey John-- did that CD EVER show up?)
Matthew Turner
> On 21 Oct 1998 18:59:08 +0700, fdi...@REMOVEME.emrl.com (Floyd
> Diebel) wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 22 Oct 1998 00:18:41 GMT, <thu...@my-dejanews.com> wrote:
> >>THREE FACES OF SATANISM www.universalorder.com
> >
> >why?
>
> Because JAMES MASON IS INDUSTRIAL, of course.
>
> Oops, wrong NG. He was a fine actor, tho (but not on the level, of
> course, of Dan Knotts and Wilfred Brimley).
>
> Fr.Goatley
> on: Merzow/Watermann "No Title"
> (hey John-- did that CD EVER show up?)
Well, yes...naturally. My only problem with George Lucus is that he made
the tragic error of not casting Don Knotts as "The Emperor" in Return Of
The Jedi.
Imagine...
Rev.Goat
wrote:
>Well, yes...naturally. My only problem with George Lucus is that he
made
>the tragic error of not casting Don Knotts as "The Emperor" in Return
Of
>The Jedi.
>Imagine...
My God, man, that would have been perfect. Think of the genius.
Fr.G