Attention avec "Nicolas"!

Skip to first unread message


Oct 12, 2001, 1:14:24 PM10/12/01
"Nicolas" n'est pas votre ami. Il fait des bêtises.


Oct 12, 2001, 7:36:21 PM10/12/01
WolfWolf wrote:

> "Nicolas" n'est pas votre ami. Il fait des bêtises.

On voit que tu t'obstines a te rediculiser en public.
Pauvre couillon.



Oct 13, 2001, 7:16:21 AM10/13/01
Why are you responding to this idiot ?

He only wants to practice his french .

Anyway , his recycling of old discredited sources( by the US Government
no less)

shows he has nothing original to add.

He has a Turkish wife ( see other posts). All this is done to " please "
her .........


Oct 13, 2001, 1:23:18 PM10/13/01
astro wrote:

Is this ng moderated now?



Oct 14, 2001, 12:31:51 PM10/14/01
"Nicolas" <> wrote in message

> Is this ng moderated now?
> Nicolas

The self-styled "moderators" agree by silent acquiescence.



Oct 14, 2001, 8:09:40 PM10/14/01
The field rep of state terrorism and great fiction writer
"WolfWolf" <> wrote in message news:<9qcerb$b00$>...


Oct 14, 2001, 9:29:20 PM10/14/01


Bin-Ladin went to Turkey in 1996, 1998. He did not face difficulties

According to Turkish TV private channel NTV (20.9.01, 15:00 hours) Usamah
Bin-Ladin, who is the number one suspect in the terrorist attacks launched
on the United States, went to Turkey twice during the period he was sought
by the Interpol with the red bulletin. Bin-Ladin came to Istanbul aboard his
eponymous private plane. Reportedly, he was not faced with any difficulties
on his arrival. These visits had been reported by the Washington Post, which
based its reports on CIA sources.

Usamah Bin-Ladin's plane took off from Jeddah in Saudi Arabia and arrived in
Turkey on 28 August 1996. According to official records, he stayed in Turkey
for 33 hours. He first landed at Adana Sakir Pasa Airport and then flew to
Istanbul. He left Turkey the next day for Jeddah. Besides the crew, he had
one other person with him.

Bin-Ladin's first visit to Turkey was during the Welfare Party-True Path
Party coalition government.

His second visit took place in 1998. It was about six months before the
bombing in August 1998 of the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

According to the records, once again Bin-Ladin landed at Adana first and
then in Istanbul. That was on 17 February 1998. According to the passenger
manifesto of the HAVAS company that serviced Bin-Ladin's plane, the only two
passengers were Bin-Ladin who was registered as Muhammad Usamah and another
person called Al-Savaf. This visit took place during the Motherland Party,
Democratic Left Party, and Democratic Turkey Party coalition government.

It is reported that Bin-Ladin, who is being sought by the Interpol with the
red bulletin ever since 1994, was not faced with any difficulties during
either of his visits.

It is a matter of curiosity why, in both visits, Bin-Ladin chose to land at
Adana Airport first. According to aviation experts, Bin-Ladin's private
plane had to land in Adana for refuelling.

There are interesting elements in Bin-Ladin's visits; one of them is the
State Airports Administration document, which shows that the private plane
arrived in Turkey. A copy of these documents that must be drawn up each time
a private plane lands in Turkey must be sent to the Ankara State Airports
Administration Directorate General. The document on Bin-Ladin's first visit
was not sent to Ankara but to the Secret Documents and Circulars File in

Another interesting point concerns the receipt for the fee charged in return
for the ground services given to the private plane. The form's number was
left vacant. Furthermore, it was not processed through the computer but was
filled by hand. In this way, Ankara could not see it in the on-line system.


Oct 14, 2001, 9:12:28 PM10/14/01
"pansak" <> wrote in message


You must have big pain. Don't worry - time cures.

Nevzat Akdemir

Oct 14, 2001, 9:29:10 PM10/14/01

Ladin had a passport from south cyprus.
Take a hike.


Oct 14, 2001, 10:09:36 PM10/14/01


Oct 14, 2001, 10:34:52 PM10/14/01
"Voyager" <> wrote in message
Greece's Stand on National Minorities*

by Eqerem Mete**

In early 2001, the EU is expected to send a committee to discuss a
cooperation agreement with Albania. Greece's Foreign Ministry General
Secretary on a recent visit to Tirana told the Albanian Prime Minister that
"Tirana had to review its legislation on minorities if it wanted to get
closer to the European Union," whereas the Albanian prime minister expressed
his conviction that "Albania will compile and apply an advanced legislation,
one of the most progressive in Southeastern Europe.''

The EU initiative to teach the Albanian authorities how to behave themselves
towards the so-called 35 to 40 thousand-strong Greek minority, the ultimatum
of the envoy of the Greek Prime Minister and the statement of the Albanian
Prime Minister seem to imply that there are serious defects in the Albanian
legislation on national minorities. To clear up this issue, to see where
they stand and for the sake of arguments, the relevant Albanian authorities
are in duty bound to study the legislation and practice of other countries
including Greece, as well as those of other countries who pose as the most
advanced in this regard.

Are there more advanced legislation and more absurd practice in other
countries than what is observed in our country as concerns national
minorities? In stead of pupils going where the school is, in Albania [Greek]
schools follow the children of the Greek diaspora wherever they are, despite
their numbers, even though these numbers are in flagrant violation of the

For their part, the Greek authorities have not deigned so far to give
official permission to open even a single elementary school for the children
of hundreds of thousands of Albanian immigrants. It never occurs to Greece
to take such an official step that would have even the remotest semblance of
recognition to the rights of a national element, who is not and does not
call itself Greek. In the Greek opinion, such a step would be a dangerous
precedent that would undermine the theories about the so-called homogeneity
of the Greek state and whet the appetite of the national minorities for
education in their own mother tongues. This step would also lead to
increased pressure at home and abroad on Greece. It would also nullify the
endeavors of the Greek authorities over many decades to assimilate the
Albanians, those who are native to the land and those who have immigrated
during the centuries to Greece. The attempts to change the nationality of
the recent Albanian immigrants through schooling in Greek and with the help
of the Greek Orthodox churches by changing their religion, and the dictate
of the Greek authorities by exploiting their presence in Greece to the
Albanian state would be ever less ineffectual.

Such a domestic policy of the Greek state has a powerful impact on its
foreign policy towards its neighbors despite its European patchwork and
ornaments. In stead of reciprocity towards Albania at least for the sake of
the position of the present-day Albanian government, Greece has increased
the intensity and range of its pressure.

Greece has not given up its territorial claims on Albania. To avoid such an
accusation and to keep up the pressure, the Greek government lets the
so-called ultra nationalistic circles raise territorial claims, whereas for
the moment in its official capacity, it covers them up with the slogan about
respect for human rights and democratic rules.

At high level official meetings between the two sides, the Greek side makes
ultimatum-like demands, which signify the imposition of a master-apprentice
relationship. At the Greek parliament debates are held on "growing Albanian
nationalism, increasing disruptive role of Albanian armed groups in Kosova,
Macedonia and southern Serbia" though the struggle of the Albanians against
aggressive Serbian nationalism has been supported by the entire democratic
world, with the exception of the Greeks. One thing is more than clear in
this context. The closer the Kosova issue edges to a settlement, the greater
their irritation and emphasis on the absurd parallel they draw to this

Greek Eurodeputies, of the New Democracy and PASSOK, demand that the
macro-financial aid to Albania be stopped and that the latter denied the
right to start negotiations on signing an association and stability
agreement with the European Union. Greek Foreign Minister George Papandreou
has also mounted the stage. He has written to European Commissioner for
External Relations Chris Patten making an issue of "the lack of respect for
the rights of 'the Greek minority.'"

Though the two countries have signed a Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation,
the Law of the State of War with Albania is still in force. Greece has
abrogated such a law with Italy despite the stark truth that it was fascist
Italy and not Albania, which committed aggression against it in 1940. The
property of the Albanians in Greece have been frozen on the pretext of such
an absurd law, while as to the property of the Albanian population,
massacred and compelled at gunpoint to flee Chameria, most absurd arguments
are put forward not to return it to its legal owners.

In view of such Greek policies and activity against Albania, one might as
well say that Greece is still living in the past. To live in the present, it
should abide by the old Chinese wise saying: "To know others is knowledge,
to know yourself is enlightenment." It is precisely the latter that our
neighbors have missed.

It is against this backdrop of Greek political activity against Albania that
the present Albanian government approaches relations with its southern
neighbor in the context of "the strategic partnership between the two
parties, two governments and two countries" hoping that the road to Europe
will pass through Athens the same as in the past when the road to Moscow
passed through Belgrade.

With the exception of those who have their hands and feet bound, nobody in
their right mind can fail to see through what the Greek side is aiming at.

To return to the topic of the beginning about national minorities, I would
say that people would be really curious to learn what Greek authorities have
to say about this issue. The following material based on Greek and European
Community sources, published in an abbreviated form in the Albanian-American
newspaper Illyria (New York, the USA), can shed some light on the experience
of the Hellenic state in this direction.


x x

The July 23, 1999 appeal to the Speaker of the Greek Parliament and the
Party leaders on the eve of the 25th anniversary of the restoration of
democracy in Greece reminded me of a document entitled Report on the
Albanians of Greece a group of researchers of the European Community
compiled in 1987.

The appeal, signed by all three Turkish minority deputies, seven Turkish and
three Macedonian minority organizations, as well as three human rights
non-governmental organizations, including Greek Helsinki Monitor and
Minority Rights Group - Greece, emphasizes that the Republic of Greece has
an important weakness: it does not recognize the existence of national
minorities on its territory.

The undersigned call upon the Greek state to recognize the existence of
Macedonian and Turkish minorities, to ratify the Framework Convention for
the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe without any
conditions for its implementation and to implement the principles of the
Convention, as well as of the related OSCE documents, so that all forms of
discrimination or persecution against members of these minorities cease and
their rights be respected.

It is true that the Greek authorities, who have always been playing the
ostrich, and the Greek public, which has been duly indoctrinated for decades
on end, refuse in no uncertain terms the existence of national minorities on
Greek territory. The principle that the Greeks have always stuck to runs as
follows: "Those who live in Greece are Greeks. All those who are not Greeks
should quit". That is the prevailing frame of mind in Greece, a member of
the United Nations, the European Union, NATO, OSCE, and other international
organizations. It does not cross their Greek mind that if the neighboring
countries had applied the same principle, there would have been no Greeks
outside the borders of the Greek state.

Let us cite in brief the responses of some Greek authorities to the appeal
according to Greek sources:

The Speaker of the Parliament, Apostolos Kaklamanis: "In Greece there is no
Turkish or Macedonian minority. There is a Muslim religious minority.
Whatever constructs, especially at this moment, serve other purposes and
will be handled in the appropriate way." The minister for the Press Dimitris
Reppas: "Unhistorical and unrealistic constructs will fall by the wayside."
The Greek foreign minister Papanadreou: "Greece, in a difficult region, is
carrying out an exemplary policy in the area of minorities." Whereas the
former Minister of Macedonia and Thrace Stelios Papathemelis declared: "I
should tell them in their language "Ai sihtir" (Screw off!). The KKE leader
added another version to the motivation of the appeal. He said: "We believe
that the issuing of such a statement is less related to the anniversary of
the restoration of democracy than with whichever dialogue is being carried
out between Greece and Turkey. it gives the United States of America the
opportunity to impose their conditions on this dialogue. The perpetrators of
this action can be found not only in Greece." While the newspaper
Eleftherotypia ran an article by Professor Nicholas Stavrou, a
Greek-American, on the US being behind the travails of the Balkans. Mr.
Stavrou writes that "Ankara and its patrons in Washington with the support
of the human rights industry in the US and its affiliates in Greece are
behind the appeal." This statement, which shifts the blame onto the United
States, bears resemblance to what the Speaker of the Greek parliament
Apostolos Kaklamanis has said about the NATO air strikes against Serbia.
"The US-led attacks revert 'Europe back to Cold War Times,' he has declared.
'We must stop being prey to a power [read USA] that does not want to see
Europe stand on its own.'"

What draws one's attention in particular is the striking similarity of the
responses of the Greek authorities and of representatives of the political
parties to the appeal and the statements contained in the Report on the
Albanians of Greece. The conclusion that can be drawn from the content of
the appeal is that the policies of the Greek authorities on the issue at
present are the same as they were in 1987, when the above-mentioned report,
a summary of which follows, was compiled.


by the Commission of the European Community

A group of researchers of the European Community visited Greece from the 4th
to the 10th of October 1987 to study the existence of the Albanian element
and the preservation of its ethnicity and language.

The trip was organized by the "European Bureau" to study the lesser-used
languages, observed by the Commission of the European Community.

Composition of the Group:

Antonio Belushi Italy

Ricardo Alvares Spain

E. Angel France

Kolom Anget Spain

Havier Boski Spain

Onom Falkona Holland

Volfgang Jeniges Belgium

Robert Marti France

Stefan Moal France

Kol O'Cinseala Ireland

Joseph San Sokasao Spain

Object of the trip:

Research in 300 Albanian communities in Greece.


To help European representatives on their visit to get in touch with the
Albanian people in Greece, who are currently speaking Albanian, which is not
taught in Greek schools.
To assess the reaction of various parties and other institutions to the
issue of protection of linguistic minorities existing in Greece, which are
not recognized at present even below a minimum criterion as is the case with
the Albanians, etc.

Views of the main parties:

The "New Democracy" Party:

We talked with Michael Papakonstantinu, Efstakios Paguhos, Nikola Martis,
Joanis Vulfefis and Kaeti Papannastasion. Here are some of their answers:

"There is no problem of Albanian language in Greece. If we put linguistic
problems on the table, we would create very great problems for the Greek
state. If the Albanian language is spoken, it is spoken only in families. No
opinion can be fully expressed on this issue. There has never been room for
the Albanians in our problems. Your mission is very delicate. Do not
complicate things. Watch out! Minority issues will lead to war in Europe. We
can in no way help at these moments. Likewise, we do not want to give the
impression of Albanian presence in Greece. This problem does not exist for

The "PASOK" Party:

Questions were addressed to Dr. Jorgos Sklavunas and Manolis Azimakis. Their

"We do not deem it necessary for the Albanian and other minorities to learn
their mother tongues because the language they speak is not a language.
There are no Albanian territories in Greece. There are only Greek
territories where Albanian may also be spoken. He who does not speak our
language does not belong to our race and our country."

The Ministry of Culture:

Having listened to the questions, Doc. Athina Sipirianti said:

"To solve a problem, you have always to set up a commission. We do not have
the possibility of dealing with the problem you are raising. Your experience
will be necessary for what we shall do in the future. Your visit is a great
stimulus to us."

The Pedagogical Department:

Dr. Trinnidafilotis' answer was very cold:

"There is no teaching of Albanian. What you are saying is a political rather
than a cultural problem. I have nothing else to add."

The Commission of the Independent Magazine Anti:


"Borders between states are not fair. This interest in minorities in Greece
can hide interests of domination by other states. Linguistic minorities,
namely, the Albanian minority, have no right whatsoever. In Greece, there
are only Greeks."

The above statements and the appeal to the Speaker of the Greek Parliament
and the party leaders are clear evidence of the presence of Albanians, Turks
and Macedonian Slavs in Greece, who still speak their mother tongues.
According to research done by scholars, there are about 700 Albanian
villages in Greece, whose Albanian ethnicity the Greeks deny. It is a
well-known fact that national minority members in Greece have all been
subject to intense, organized assimilation, which the Greeks, while ignoring
their distinct ethnicity, justify by pointing to their Orthodox religion, as
though religion were the criterion to determine one's nationality. However,
there are also Greeks who contradict the absurd claims of the Greek
authorities. In a study on the subject, Professor of International Law and
current Vice-President of the European Court of Human Rights, Christos
Rozakis, acknowledges the ethnic character of minorities in Greece.

In view of Greek domestic policies on national minorities, it is regrettable
to observe that an EU member like Greece has so far failed to be a role
model for the other Balkan countries, that its example in this area adds to
the Balkans' already tarnished image as a result of Serbia's policies, that
though a NATO member, despite the government's 'efforts' to keep a so-called
balance, Greece opposed NATO's air war against Serbia under the threadbare
pretext of its religious and traditional historical ties with the Serbs and
tacitly supported Milosevic's policy of genocide and ethnic cleansing in
Kosova. In this campaign of solidarity with Milosevic when the NATO bombing
began, even Archbishop Christodoulos of Athens hastened to join Patriarch
Alexii of Moscow, head of the Russian Orthodox Church, to call for support
for Serbia.

It is also a pity that nothing has so far changed in Greece's nationalistic
and theocratic policies since the 1944-1945 period when the Greeks were the
first in southeastern Europe after World War II to perpetrate genocide. They
massacred and ethnically cleansed Albanians from Chamouria, an
Albanian-inhabited region in the northwest of today's Greek state.

It stands to reason that their religious brethren, the Serbs, would
naturally draw on the Greek experience of the ethnic cleansing of Albanians
and extensively use it against the Kosova Albanians in the year 1999.

The way the Greeks respond to the national minority issue signifies the
existence of a strong, unhealthy nationalistic trend, raised to state policy
level, which runs counter to the general tendency in the other countries of
the European Union. The official 1951 census in Greece indicated that ethnic
minorities in the country constituted 2.6 to 3.8 per cent of the total
population. Just as in the case of other non-Greeks, the number of
Albanians, too had radically been reduced in the census. According to other
sources, there were at least as many as 350,000 Albanians at that time.
Slavic speakers in Greece today number up to 300,000 though the majority of
them had to flee during and after World War and the Civil War. Facts are
stubborn. Nevertheless, these figures that have been drastically reduced,
have always been suppressed whenever they have been brought up. Worth
mentioning are also the following facts, symptomatic of Greek intolerance in
the area of national minorities: A few years ago, death threats against
Anastasia Karakasidou, a Guggenheim Fellowship scholar at Harvard
University, first came from the Greek community in the United States and
then in Greece because she had described the presence of a Slavic speaking
Macedonian community in Greece in her book "Fields of Wheat, Hills of
Shrubs." Almost at the same time, Christos Sideropulos, leader of "the Human
Rights movement in Macedonia" faced trial on charges of "spreading false
information that might cause disturbance in the international relations of
Greece." His guilt had been a statement to the effect that the ethnic
Macedonians faced curbs on their language and culture by a state, which
denies their existence.

Though there is no denying the fact that Greece is a full-fledged member of
the European Union, its behavior, past and present, which has little to do
with Western values, is helping an increasing number of people realize that
the country is a far cry from the rest of the EU members as far as
mentality, culture, as well as religious and national tolerance are
concerned. Greece is also distinct from the other EU member countries as far
as its domestic legislation is concerned. For instance, citizenship,
ethnicity and religion are deliberately confused in Greece. The Greek
Constitution outlaws proselytism. There are also provisions, especially
Article 20 of the Greek Citizenship Law in Greece, under which sanctions,
prison terms and denial of Greek citizenship are imposed on religious
minority members, accused of involvement in so-called activities against
Hellenism. Irrespective of the fact that Greece has repealed Article 19 of
the Greek Citizenship Law under international pressure, which entitled the
government to deprive those regarded as allogenes [Greece's natives of
non-Greek origin] of Greek citizenship, it has not made the Article
retroactive in order to restore citizenship to those who have unjustly lost

Financial Times quotes Takis Michas, social affairs specialist at the Athens
daily Eleftherotypia, as saying: "Greece is an inward-looking society.
Orthodox values reinforce that mentality. Orthodoxy sees the West as a
threat, a place where conspiracies are hatched against it," a mind frame of
both Greeks and Serbs, which draws its source from the ancient split between
western and eastern Christendom. Whereas British historian Norman Davies
writes in his book "Europe A History": "From the time of the Crusades, the
Orthodox looked on the west as the source of subjugation worse than the
infidel." This mindset is made manifest in the United States, too. According
to recent news reports, Archbishop Spyridon, the head of the Greek Orthodox
Church in the United States, who has spent most of his life in Europe, has
been accused of trying to keep the church inaccessible to members who feel
more American than Greek. Spyridon, who is the first American-born leader of
the Greek Orthodox church in this country, says he works to protect the
church's Byzantine traditions, proving to be one of those Greeks who are
still living in the Byzantine empire. As Jeane Carthner of the newspaper
Liberacion points out: "A few years ago, the Greeks were enemies of the
Albanians, Macedonians and Bulgarians. They are constant enemies of the
Turks, while now they have become enemies of the Americans, the British, the
French, the Germans and the rest of the world." "The West is full of
enemies," the president of Greece, Costis Stephanopolous, has been quoted as
saying. Scholars consider such statements "a reminder of emotions that are
deeply felt in the eastern Balkans. The common link is the Orthodox
religious tradition. It is a tie that cements the alliance with Serbia ."
Such a mentality that has been conducive to national and religious bigotry
has prompted analysts to draw the logical conclusion that Greek presence in
the EU and NATO, etc. is an anomaly and a paradox. Greece continues to be an
awkward partner or indeed a black sheep in the European Union even today.
Time and again, it creates false problems for Europe with its whimsical
behavior towards its neighbors. This conclusion is not a thing of the past,
of the early 1990s, as another Greek, Loukas Tsoukalis, of the European
Institute of the London School of Economics, says.

Such being the case, it is wrong, at least in the foreseeable future, to
regard Greece as the bridge that will link the neighboring countries to
Europe. This EU member country, which regards every criticism of its
handling of domestic affairs, the minority and religious issues in
particular, as a West-inspired, hostile step to destabilize the country,
cannot play such a role unless it improves its image, which is still low by
European standards, and gives up sowing the seeds of religious and national

Far from trying to find the culprit abroad, Greece should mend its ways at


* The article was published in the Albanian newspaper "Albania" in December

** The article writer was political director for the Balkans and the Middle
East in the Foreign Affairs Ministry of Albania from 1992 to 1996


Oct 14, 2001, 10:35:11 PM10/14/01
"Voyager" <> wrote in message


Oct 15, 2001, 3:11:03 AM10/15/01
Heres your own medicine grey wolf

Turkey's Killing Machine: The Contra-Guerrilla Force
By Serdar Celik

How The Force Was Set Up

Turkey joined NATO on April 4, 1952. In the same year, the organisation known as
"Gladio", or officially as "Super NATO",
whose arm in Turkey is the contra-guerrilla force called Seferberlik Taktik
Kurulu (STK - Tactical Mobilisation Group), started
its activities in the building of the CIA organisation American Yardim Heyeti
(American Aid Delegation - JUSMATT) in the
Bahcelievler district of the Turkish capital Ankara. (*1)

During the 1960s, following on from the experience of Korea and Vietnam, the
American-dominated armies of NATO began
to set up their own special guerrilla warfare units. The 1959 military accord
between the Turkish and US governments
envisaged the use of the contra-guerrillas "also in the case of an internal
rebellion against the regime". (*2)

The STK was restructured in 1965 and was renamed Ozel Harp Dairesi (OHD -
Special Warfare Department). It comes
under the authority of the President of General Staff and is also known by other
titles such as Ozel Kuvvetler Komutanlik
(Special Forces Command) or Harekat Dairesi (Operations Department).

Although it was revealed through the "Gladio" affair in Italy in 1990 that such
secret organisations also existed in other member
states of NATO, and that they maintained close contacts with these countries'
secret services and had been involved in a series
of murders and bomb plots, the Turkish military and state authorities continued
to deny the existence of any such organisation in

Only after ex-CIA chief William Colby had revealed that "there is also such an
organisation in Turkey" did the Turkish
authorities withdraw their false pretentions that there was no Turkish Gladio.
On December 3, 1990, General Dogan Beyazit,
President of the Harekat Dairesi (Operation Department) of Turkey's General
Staff and General Kemal Yilmaz, commander of
the Ozel Kuvvetler (Special Forces), issued a press statement. In this statement
they revealed that the title of the special NATO
organisation in Turkey was Ozel Harp Dairesi (Special Warfare Department) and
that its task was "to organise rewsistence in
the case of a communist occupation". They further explained that this
organisation had fought in Cyprus in 1974 and against the
PKK in Kurdistan in 1980, but that its secret members, whom they called
"patriots", had "no connection with the
contra-guerrilla forces" (1). This latter claim is a blatant lie.

The bloody dictator of the September 12, 1980 coup, Kenan Evren, wrote in his
memoirs that Prime Minister Suleyman
Demiriel had in the 1970s written to him of his wish to engage the Special
Warfare Department to deal with civil unrest (2). This
was denied by Demuriel. Bulent Ecevit, another Prime Minister of the 1970s,
revealed that: "As Prime Minister I first became
aware of its existence in 1974 through requests from Semih Sancar, chief of the
General Staff, for money for secret payments
to the Special Warfare Department. I was shocked". (3)

How and why was the Special Warfare Department set up?

The founding aim of the Department is: "In the case of a communist occupation or
of a rebellion, to use guerrilla methods and all
possible underground activities to bring an end to the occupation." (4) The
special war methods which are taught supposedly
for the prevention of a communist occupation include among others
"assasinations, bombings, armed robbery, torture, attacks,
kidnap, threats, provocation, militia training, hostage- taking, arson,
sabotage, propaganda, disinformation, violence and
extortion." (5)

Textbooks by American contra-guerrilla experts were translated into Turkish, and
these special war methods were thus
introduced into Turkey. Some of the textbooks written by American experts are:
"U.S. Army FM 31/16" (contra-guerrilla
operations), "U.S. Army Special Warfare School" (contra-guerrilla tactics and
techniques), "FM 31/20" (special forces
operational techniques), "FM 31/21 Special Forces Operations" (ST urban
assignments, 31/21 guerrilla warfare and special
forces operations ), "FM 31/21 A. Special Forces Operations (U)" (special forces
secret operations). (6)

The Turkish contra-guerrilla force developed the most complex and sophisticated
methods for its war against the PKK. Since
1985 a series of new textbooks and instructions for the contra- guerrillas have
been published. Just one example is the book "Ic
Guvenlik Konsepti" (The Concept of Internal Security), which was published by
the Special Warfare Command of the General
Staff in 1985, and which is used as a textbook in the contra-guerrilla camps.

The underground elements of the Special Warfare Department - that is, the
elements which carry out actions - are called
contra- guerrillas. The Special Warfare Department can be identified with the
contra-guerrillas, since it is the latter who put the
Department's work into practise.

The Turkish contra-guerrillas have many schools in Turkey, in which they receive
their training - in Ankara, Bolu, Kayseri, Buca
near Izmir, Canakkale and since 1974 in Cyprus. "In the mountain commando school
in Bolu, green berets (Delta Forces) who
fought in Vietnam also got their training". (7)

The contra-guerrilla teams, who are implanted with a fanatical hatred of the
"peril" of "communism" and "separatism", whose
heads are full of chauvanism, are unleashed against anyone who stands in
opposition to the regime. For their goal, which they
pursue with the support of the USA, is "the establishment of a competent
military and semi-military force which will, jointly with
the security forces, maintain internal security". (9)

In their eyes not only the "communists", but each and every democratic movement
is a danger which they aim to counter using
guerrilla methods. The American military doctrine as presented in the textbooks
holds that "our security is threatened not only
by open attacks, but also by other types of threats which are even more
dangerous than open attacks but which do not look
like open attacks. These dangers consist of the attampts to bring about
transformations and changes from the inside." (10)

Selected elements of the Turkish contra-guerrillas together with the generals
were all trained in contra-guerrilla schools in the
USA. The aims of this training are defined as follows: "The goal of military aid
is to educate soldiers from underdeveloped
countries in accordance with U.S. ideology and then to install them
advantageously in the leadership of their countries". (11)
During their training in the USA the contra-guerrilla forces "are taught about
social problems in their countries, and shown films
which demonstrate the aggression and subversion of the communists. They learn
how to handle explosives under the
supervision of green berets in Matamoros near the Mexican border, and they are
taught how to kill, stab or strangle somebody
silently, etc". (12). Other places where Turkish officials are trained are the
Escuela de los Americas in Panama, which is
attached to the U.S. base Southern Comfort, the Police Academy near Washington
and the Schongau and Oberammergau
bases in Germany. (*3)

Part of the Special Warfare Department is made up of officers from official
units known as A-units or Special Operations Units.
As the war became more intense, B-units were formed within the Special Warfare
Department, made up of professional
volunteer commando forces. Both types of units employ contra-guerrilla tactics.

The forces built by the Special Warfare Department have everywhere formed
organisations in the form of cells. These elements,
known as "patriots", are placed in front-line duties by being infiltrated as
agents-provocateurs into political parties,
administrative departments and opposition groups.

The strongest pillar of the Special Warfare Department is the Secret Service. In
Turkey the Secret Service is subordinate to the
General Staff and so also to the Special Warfare Department. The civilian
government has no control whatsoever over the
Secret Service. In Turkey there are various secret services: the MIT (National
Secret Service Organisation) and the Secret
Services of the Gendarmerie, the General Staff, the Foreign Ministry, the
Director of Security (the political police) and the
Presidential Office. These secret services hold quarterly meetings under the
umbrella of the National Secret Service
Coordinating Committee.

The MIT has the greatest influence of all these organisations. This Turkish
secret service organisation was originally called
MAH and was restructured and renamed MIT in 1965. The MIT is a branch of the CIA
and collaborates with the Israeli
secret service MOSSAD, the German BND and earlier (up to 1975) with the Iranian
SAVAK. Many operations of the
Special Warfare Department are carried out in collaboration with the MIT. A
third of the MIT's functionaries are members of
the armed forces and the rest are mostly retired military personnel. It is a
legal requirement that the chief of the MIT must be a
member of the armed forces. Since the founding of the MIT, all the heads have
been generals. They are appointed by the
General Staff or by the Special Warfare Department. The 1989 budget of the MIT
amounted to 42,745 million Turkish lira.

Another organisation coming under the Special Warfare Department is the
Psychological Warfare Department. On November
9, 1983 this department became the TIB (Ministry for Social Relations). Its
headquarters are in Ankara. Its first chief was
Dogan Beyazit, who was at the same time also head of the Special Warfare
Department. He was in charge of propaganda
operations which the CIA program divided into "white, "grey" and "black"
propaganda. Many professors were employed within
the TIB. (*5)

The TIB has brought out numerous journals and pamphlets and even comics. It
formed satellite organisations under such names
as "The Institute for Research into Turkish Culture", "Turkish World Research
Institute", etc. The main aim of the TIB since the
'80s has been to develop the psychological front in the war against the PKK.

With this aim in mind, pamphlets are printed which try to blame the PKK for
massacres committed by the contra-guerrillas.
Such pamphlets are distributed in various languages in Europe, purporting to
originate from such ficticious publishers as "the
Union of Anatolian Women". Or else bogus leaflets attacking the PKK are
distributed under the names of existing or ficticious
political organisations. Posters and leaflets are put about which are full of
ridiculous propaganda such as those claiming that the
PKK is an Armenian organisation. Or television programmes and books are produced
which slander the PKK. In the towns of
Kurdistan professors hold seminars about how "Kurds are really Turks" etc. The
most effective institution from the point of
view of the TIB - that is the Psychological Warfare Department of the Special
Warfare Department - is the press. Turkish daily
newspapers such as "Hurriyet", "Milliyet", "Tercumann", "Turkiye" and "Sabah",
which have become semi-official organs of the
state, are pressured into carrying out systematic propaganda against the PKK.

Another area where the Special Warfare Department wields its influence is of
course the political parties. All state politicians
and all bourgeois parties in Turkey are under the control of the Special Warfare
Department. Here are just two examples:

Turkish President Suleyman Demirel was the first Turk to get a scholarship from
the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship, which is
controlled by the CIA. Later he held for many years the agency rights for the
firm of Morrison, which built the death cells in
Vietnam. (*6) When Demirel was in the USA in 1963, he was sent into the Adalet
Partisi (Justice Party). In 1965 he became
the chairman of this party and is now State President.

Turgut Ozal, who was Prime Minister from 1983 to 1990 and President from 1990
until his death in 1993, was an official of
the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Special Warfare Department And Paramilitary MHP

During the 1970s the struggle for democracy was developing in Turkey. In
Kurdistan the struggle for national liberation was
growing. With the help of the MHP (National Action Party), which was brought
onto the scene in the 70s, hundreds of
students, workers, intellectuals, trades unionists and educationalists were
murdered: the president of DISK (the Federation of
Revolutionary Trades Unions) Kemal Turkler, the journalist Abdi Ipekci,
Professor Dr Bedri Karafakiroglu, professors Umit
Doganay and Cavit Orhan Tutengil, Umit Kaftancioglu, State Counsel Dogan Oz,
security chief Cevat Yurdakul, University
Professor Orhan Yavuz, Bedrettin Comert, Server Tanilli (who survived but
remained disabled), Chair Adana Chamber of
Agricultural Engineers Akin Ozdemir and hundreds more. In 1974 in Maras they
massacred inumerable Kurdish and Alevi
people - children, women and old folk and men. This preplanned act of genocide
opened the way for the military coup of
September 12, 1980.

It is know from the experiences of various countries that the CIA works together
with the police to organize paramilitary groups
in the tactics of irregular warfare. William Colby wrote: "To prevent Turkey
from falling into the hands of the communists, the
CIA gave support to anti-communist institutions". (13) Retired general Sezsi
Orkunt, ex-chief of the General Staff said: "The
Turkish armed forces were more worried about the Left than the Right. The Right
was organised in the MHP and its leader
Turkes was helped on his way". (14) When the MHP's Ankara headquarters were
searched at the time of the 1980 coup, the
"Contra-Guerrilla Assignment 31/15 on the Model Plan for Underground Cells" was
found there. (15) The MHP had obtained
this plan from Colonel Mehmet Alanyuva of the Agents Section of the Special
Warfare Department, the MHP's militants, who
were organised in accordance with this plan, went on to perpetuate a veritable
massacre against innocent people from the

The CIA also employed the MHP militants for terrorist plots on an international
level. For example, the murderer of the
journalist Abdi Ipekci was the same man who in 1991 carried out the
assassination attempt on Pope John Paul.

The MHP is also organised in Europe, and particularly in Germany. Until 1976 it
was organised there under the same title.
After that in Europe they took on the title Avrupa Ulkucu Dernekleri Federasyonu
(Federation of National Associations in
Europe). The MHP's organisation in Germany maintains connections with the German
Secret Service. The journalist Ugur
Mumcu, who was assassinated in 1993, wrote: "These connections were set up in
Cologne by a German named Kannabin".
(16) The MHP has another patron in Germany - Rudi Nazar. He is a CIA agent who
was for many years active in Ankara and
was later transferred to Bonn. Jurgen Roth went into this matter in detail in
his book "Criminals Incorporated" and came to the
conclusion, based on information from a president of one of the republics of the
former Soviet Union, that the MHP is also
involved in the heroin trade in Germany.

General Haydar Saltik, one of those responsible for the September 12, 1980 coup,
later left the army and became Consul in
the Turkish consulate in Berne. He renewed his contacts with the Turkish
nationalists and sent 15,000 officers and MHP
militants, who came under the Special Warfare Department and had already had a
hand in many attacks against the Armenians,
to Azerbaijan. After their training, these militants were sent to Baku. The
attacks on the Kurdish population in Antalya and
other Turkish towns during the past year were also carried out by the MIT and
the MHP. The MHP is still the paramilitary
wing of the Special Warfare Department. This time, however, it was more
effective, since the entire state with all its constituent
parts has grown into an even more racist, anti-Kurdish and paramilitary

The Operations Of The Turkish Contra-Guerrillas

The bloody work of the Special Warfare Department is so wide- ranging that we
can not go into everything here. We will,
therefore, go straight over to Kurdistan, where the contra- guerrillas are
employed in the front line against the national liberation
struggle. First, however, we would like to recount some of the decisive points
of the decisive points of the contra- guerrillas'
activities prior to 1980:

Agents from the Special Warfare Department threw a bomb into the house in
Thessallonika in Greece which was used as the
Mustafa Kemal Museum, and blamed this act on the Greek police. Consequently, on
the 6 and 7 of September 1955, fanatical
groups fired up by the contra-guerrillas wrecked Greek homes and businesses in

The most important actions of the Special Warfare Department were the three
military coups. This Department was responsible
for the coup of May 27, 1967 and above all for the last two coups of the March
12, 1971 and September 12, 1980. The then
Foreign Minister Ihsan Sabri Caglayangil, who was invited to Teheran a few days
before March 12, 1971, learned from the
Shah of Iran that there was going to be a coup in Turkey. (17) The then
commander of the Turkish airforce, Muhsin Batur,
went the the USA just before the coup of September 12, 1980. Again the then
airforce commander Tahsin Sahinkaya flew to
the USA and the coup took place two days after his return. Carter, who was at
the opera when he heard about the coup,
called Paul Henze, the CIA agent responsible for Turkey, and told him: " Your
people have just made a coup". (18)

The torture chambers which opened in 1971 gave the contra- guerrillas an
important opportunity to gain practical experience.
The contra-guerrilla generals who took people to the torture chambers in
Ziverbay in Istanbul told their victims for the first time
that they were prisoners of the contra-guerrillas. The interrogations were
carried out by contra-guerrilla specialists called EBU
(Correct Information Officers). A team of interrogation specialists called the
DAL (Deep Investigation Laboratory) was set up
by the political police in Ankara. These torture specialists murdered or caused
permanent damage to hundreds of people. Later
on, these teams were dispatched all over Turkey and especially Kurdistan. In
1971 the contra-guerrillas' torture was directed
by General Faik Turun, Turgut Sonap and Memduh Unluturk. (*7)

The invasion of Cyprus was an action of the Special Warfare Department. In 1955
the Department set up a secret organisation
called the Turk Mukavemet Hareketi (Turkish Resistance Movement). This
organisation carried out systematic provocations in
Cyprus in order to prepare the conditions for the 1974 coup. To prepare for the
occupation of Cyprus, teams directed by
Hiram Abbas and the Special Warfare Department established themselves in Beirut,
from where they could organise activities
in Cyprus. The Cyprus invasion was organised by the then chief of the Special
Warfare Department Kemal Yemek. Cyprus
was the first serious test for the Turkish contra-guerrillas. After 1980
Kurdistan took the place of Cyprus in this respect.

The State Security Courts are a product of the Special Warfare Department and
they are assigned the task of restructuring the
judicial process to fit the demands of the contra-guerrillas. In accordance with
a directive of the contra-guerrillas, the the State
Security Courts aim "not to condemn the defendants according to the punishments
set out for the political crimes, but to
administer punishments as severe as those set out for murder and other crimes
against the person". (19) The detainees were
severely tortured and then came before a contra-guerrilla court. Most of the
judges have come from the military and are
therefore tools of the Special Warfare Department.

The murders and terrorist acts committed by the MHP were actions of the Special
Warfare Department. Their purpose was to
intimidate the opposition and prepare the conditions for a coup. The Special
Warfare Department was successful in this task:
on September 12, they carried out the military coup d'etat. This coup was the
most important action of the contra-guerrillas. All
arms of the state were reorganised on paramilitary lines. The Special Warfare
Department gained control over the underworld
(the Turkish mafia), the press, commerce, the judicial system, parliament, the
universities and all other areas of society. All
administrative organs and laws were restructured along the same lines.

1. Interview with the President of the Turkish General Staff Dogan Gures,
"Milliyet" 5/6 September 1992 2. "Hurriyet" 26
November 1992 3. "Milliyet" 28 November 1990 4. "Cumhuriyet" 17 November 1990 5.
"Directive ST 31/15 for Operations
Against Irregular Forces" 6. "The Contra-Guerrillas and the MHP" Vol 1, Aydinlik
Yayinlari, p19 and Talat Turhan "The
Contra-Guerrilla Republic", p19 7. "The Contra-Guerrillas and the MHP", p16 8. "
The American Military Doctrine, Report of
the Rockerfeller Foundation", p356 9. "The Age of Imperialism", Harry Magdorff
(translated by M. Emin Doger., "CIA,
Contra-Guerrillas and Turkey"), p104 10. ibid. p122 11. McNamara, 1967 (US State
Department of Defense) 12. Franco
Salinas, "State of Emergency", pp82-88 13. "Cumhuriyet" 21 November 1990 14.
"Hurriyet" 19 November 1990 15. "Gunes"
17 November 1990 16. Ugur Mumcu "Pope-Mafia-Agca" p143 17. Cuneyit Arcayurek
"Coups and the Secret Services"
p160 18. ibid. p190 19. "Directive ST 31/15 for Operations Against Irregular


The "Super-NATO" organisation was set up under the control of the CIA in all the
NATO countries. The headquarters of this
organisation was in Brussels and was named the Allied Coordination Committee
(ACC). Secret meetings were held annually in
which delegates from all the member countries took part. The official purpose of
the organisation is "to organise resistance using
irregular warfare methods in case of a communist occupation". The organisation
has at its disposal special funds and weapons
depots. It is not answerable for its activities under the laws of the individual
member states. The organisation's branch in Italy
was called "Gladio", in Germany "Anti-Communist Assault Unit", in Greece " Hide
of the Red Buck", in Belgium "Glavia". The
"Super- NATO" also set up branch organisations in non-NATO countries such as
Austria and Switzerland.

Referring to contra-guerrilla warfare conducted by the USA, former U.S.
Secretary of State McNamara explained that
"partisan wars call for a change in our understanding of warfare. In regions
where partisan war has broken out, what is needed
is not a great number of military units and weapons, but rather small units who
have been well trained in guerrilla and
counter-guerrilla tactics and armed with special weapons".(8) The American Delta
Forces, the British Special Air Service
(SAS), the Italian Special Forces Section and the German GSG-9 are units of this
type. The former U.S. President Johnson
declared in 1964 that 344 contra-guerrilla units had been trained by the USA in
49 countries of the world.

In the 70s the following persons, among others, who still occupy important
positions today, were members of the Turkish
police and secret service: Sekru Balci, Ilgaz Aykutlu, Kenan Koc, Umit Erdal,
Hiram Abbas (who was killed in 1990 [by
militants of the armed communist organization Devrimci Sol, was in the 70s one
of the three most influential persons in the
MIT), Mehmet Aymur (Abbas' right-hand man in the MIT), Hayri Kozakcioglu (who
was trained by Scotland Yard and in
1987 made Governor with Special Powers), Unal Erkan (at that time Kozakcioglu's
successor as "Supergovernor" in

Divided among the 55 million people of the Turkish and Kurdish population, this
means 949 Turkish Lira per head that every
Turk and Kurd have to pay in order to finance the "work" of spying, torture and
murder of this gang of killers.

Professors Abdulhaluk Cay, Ibrahim Kafescioglu, Bahattin Ogel, Ertugrul Zekai
Okte, Aydin Yalcin, among others.

"In 1967 the CIA's budget for the funding of 'useful friends and elements'
abroad was raised to 10 million U.S. dollars per year.
Most of these funds flowed through our trade unions, student unions and special
institutions into foreign institutions. The use of
our trade unions and associations as a sort of screen prevented it from becoming
known that the source of these funds was in
reality the CIA". (Fron the book "CIA, Secret Services and Democracy" by the
former CIA chief Stanfield Turner).

Faik Turun became an MP for the AP (Justice Party) in 1977. Turgut Sunalp became
a minister in parliament in 1982 as a
member of the MDP (National Democratic Party). The retired Memduh Unluturk was
killed by militants of the organization
Devrimci Sol (Revolutionary Left) in 1991.
(From Kurdistan Report #17 - February/March 1994)

Adanali you support the grey wolves. You claim Kurds are "narcos" yet what about
your government MHP/Grey Wolves?

"A great loss to the political life of Turkey."
Demirel about the death of the Nazi-sympathiser and former leader of the fascist
MHP and its Grey Wolves, Turkes

Grey Wolves
Middle East



Abdullah Chatli ( killed in a 1996 car accident in Turkey)


The National Movement Party ("Milliyetci Hareket Partisi", MHP, aka Nationalist
Action Party), founded by Alparslan Turkes
in the 1960s, like all other parties, was banned after the military coup of
September 12, 1980. The National Workers Party
("Milliyetci Calisma Partisi", MCP) was founded in 1983 as a successor to the
MHP, which as of 1992 is once again known as
the MHP. The MHP supports the government's military approach to an 11-year
insurgency by the Kurdistan Workers Party
(PKK) in southeast Turkey, and it opposes any concessions to Kurdish

The unofficial militant arm of the MHP -- known as the Grey Wolves after a
legendary she-wolf that led captive Central Asian
Turks to freedom -- has been involved in street killings and gunbattles with
leftists. Mehmet Ali Agca, the Turkish gunman who
shot and wounded Pope John Paul II in 1981, was a former Grey Wolf. The 1996
accidental death of the Grey Wolves'
leader, Chatli, brought to light the relations between Turkish mafia and the

Stated Goal(s):
A significant pillar of the group's ideology is the creation of the Turan, the
Great Turkish Empire, including Turkish peoples in
the countries of the former Soviet Union.


Area of Operation:
Turkey, Mediterranean area

Terrorist Acts:

July, 1996 - assassination of Kutlu Adali, a prominent Turkish Cypriot
journalist critical of the Denktash regime and, more
generally, of Turkey's policies in Cyprus.
1996 - Abdullah Chatli, the leader of the Grey Wolves, was are responsible for
arson fires in Greece's islands.
Had ties to former Government of Nicaragua and possibly Cuba.

The Hague, 17/05/1999 (MPA)

The Dutch local administration organization was the financial backer of the
Turkish extreme right "Grey Wolves" organization
from 1990 until 1996. The revelation was made by the Dutch newspaper "Algemeen
Dagblad" in a report signed by Frank
Renout and published in the May 15 issue. Based on facts provided by a research
conducted by the Dutch committee against
fascism and racism, the municipality of Utrecht had financed a number of
organizations of the Turkish extreme right "Grey
Wolves" in the period 1990-1996.

The newspaper published city council decisions according to which, the Turkish
Cultural Center, which in reality is an
extreme-right gang having links with the extreme right party MHP as well as with
the "Grey Wolves", has received 24.000

The news report also mentions the statements made by Turkish-born criminology
professor in the University of Utrecht Mr.
Yesilgoz, who is specialising on issues concerning the Turkish organized crime
according to which, the financing of the "Grey
Wolves" is a usual phenomenon in Holland given the fact that the Turkish right
extremists often manage to mislead the Dutch
authorities over their true intentions.

On the Trail of Turkey's Terrorist Grey Wolves
By Martin A. Lee

In broad daylight on May 2, 50 armed men set upon a television station in
Istanbul with gunfire. The attackers unleashed a
fusillade of bullets and shouted slogans supporting Turkey's Deputy Prime
Minister Tansu Ciller.

The gunmen were outraged over the station's broadcast of a TV report critical of
Ciller, a close U.S. ally who had come under
criticism for stonewalling investigations into collusion between state security
forces and Turkish criminal elements.

Miraculously, no one was injured in the attack, but the headquarters of
Independent Flash TV were left pock-marked with
bullet-holes and smashed windows. The gunfire also sent an unmistakable message
to Turkish journalists and legislators: don't
challenge Ciller and other high-level Turkish officials when they cover up state

For several months, Turkey had been awash in dramatic disclosures connecting
high Turkish officials to the right-wing Grey
Wolves, the terrorist band which has preyed on the region for years. In 1981, a
terrorist from the Grey Wolves attempted to
assassinate Pope John Paul II in Vatican City.

But at the center of the mushrooming Turkish scandal is whether Turkey, a
strategically placed NATO country, allowed mafiosi
and right-wing extremists to operate death squads and to smuggle drugs with
impunity. A Turkish parliamentary commission is
investigating these new charges.

The rupture of state secrets in Turkey also could release clues to other major
Cold War mysteries. Besides the attempted papal
assassination, the Turkish disclosures could shed light on the collapse of the
Vatican bank in 1982 and the operation of a
clandestine pipeline that pumped sophisticated military hardware into the Middle
East -- apparently from NATO stockpiles in
Europe -- in exchange for heroin sold by the Mafia in the United States.

The official Turkish inquiry was triggered by what could have been the opening
scene of a spy novel: a dramatic car crash on a
remote highway near the village of Susurluk, 100 miles southwest of Istanbul. On
Nov. 3, 1996, three people were crushed to
death when their speeding black Mercedes hit a tractor and overturned. The crash
killed Husseyin Kocadag, a top police
official who commanded Turkish counter-insurgency units.

But it was Kocadag's company that stunned the nation. The two other dead were
Abdullah Catli, a convicted fugitive who was
wanted for drug trafficking and murder, and Catli's girlfriend, Gonca Us, a
Turkish beauty queen turned mafia hit-woman. A
fourth occupant, who survived the crash, was Kurdish warlord Sedat Bucak, whose
militia had been armed and financed by the
Turkish government to fight Kurdish separatists.

At first, Turkish officials claimed that the police were transporting two
captured criminals. But evidence seized at the crash site
indicated that Abdullah Catli, the fugitive gangster, had been given special
diplomatic credentials by Turkish authorities. Catli
was carrying a government-approved weapons permit and six ID cards, each with a
different name. Catli also possessed
several handguns, silencers and a cache of narcotics, not the picture of a
subdued criminal.

When it became obvious that Catli was a police collaborator, not a captive, the
Turkish Interior Minister resigned. Several
high-ranking law enforcement officers, including Istanbul's police chief, were
suspended. But the red-hot scandal soon
threatened to jump that bureaucratic firebreak and endanger the careers of other
senior government officials.

Grey Wolves Terror
The news of Catli's secret police ties were all the more scandalous given his
well-known role as a key leader of the Grey
Wolves, a neo-fascist terrorist group that has stalked Turkey since the late
1960s. A young tough who wore black leather
pants and looked like Turkey's answer to Elvis Presley, Catli graduated from
street gang violence to become a brutal enforcer
for the Grey Wolves. He rose quickly within their ranks, emerging as
second-in-command in 1978. That year, Turkish police
linked him to the murder of seven trade-union activists and Catli went

Three years later, the Grey Wolves gained international notoriety when Mehmet
Ali Agca, one of Catli's closest collaborators,
shot and nearly killed Pope John Paul II in St. Peter's Square on May 13, 1981.
Catli was the leader of a fugitive terrorist cell
that included Agca and a handful of other Turkish neo-fascists.

Testifying in September 1985 as a witness at the trial of three Bulgarians and
four Turks charged with complicity in the papal
shooting in Rome, Catli (who was not a defendant) disclosed that he gave Agca
the pistol that wounded the pontiff. Catli had
previously helped Agca escape from a Turkish jail, where Agca was serving time
for killing a national newspaper editor. In
addition to harboring Agca, Catli supplied him with fake IDs and directed Agca's
movements in West Germany, Switzerland,
and Austria for several months prior to the papal attack.

Catli enjoyed close links to Turkish drug mafiosi, too. His Grey Wolves henchmen
worked as couriers for the Turkish mob
boss Abuzer Ugurlu. At Ugurlu's behest, Catli's thugs criss-crossed the infamous
smugglers' route passing through Bulgaria.
Those routes were the ones favored by smugglers who reportedly carried NATO
military equipment to the Middle East and
returned with loads of heroin.

Judge Carlo Palermo, an Italian magistrate based in Trento, discovered these
smuggling operations while investigating
arms-and-drug trafficking from Eastern Europe to Sicily. Palermo disclosed that
large quantities of sophisticated NATO
weaponry -- including machine guns, Leopard tanks and U.S.-built Cobra assault
helicopters -- were smuggled from Western
Europe to countries in the Middle East during the 1970s and early 1980s.

According to Palermo's investigation, the weapon delivers were often made in
exchange for consignments of heroin that filtered
back, courtesy of the Grey Wolves and other smugglers, through Bulgaria to
northern Italy. There, the drugs were received by
Mafia middlemen and transported to North America. Turkish morphine base supplied
much of the Sicilian-run "Pizza
connection," which flooded the U.S. and Europe with high-grade heroin for
several years.

[While it is still not clear how the NATO supplies entered the pipeline, other
investigations have provided some clues.
Witnesses in the October Surprise inquiry into an alleged Republican-Iranian
hostage deal in 1980 claimed that they were
allowed to select weapons from NATO stockpiles in Europe for shipment to Iran.

[Iranian arms dealer Houshang Lavi claimed that he selected spare parts for Hawk
anti-aircraft batteries from NATO bases
along the Belgian-German border. Another witness, American arms broker William
Herrmann, corroborated Lavi's account of
NATO supplies going to Iran.

[Even former NATO commander Alexander Haig confirmed that NATO supplies could
have gone to Iran in the early 1980s
while he was secretary of state. "It wouldn't be preposterous if a nation,
Germany, for example, decided to let some of their
NATO stockpiles be diverted to Iran," Haig said in an interview. For more
details, see Robert Parry's Trick or Treason. ]

A Vatican Mystery
Italian magistrates described the network they had uncovered as the "world's
biggest illegal arms trafficking organization." They
linked it to Middle Eastern drug empires and to prestigious banking circles in
Italy and Europe. At the center of this operation, it
appeared, was an obscure import-export firm in Milan called Stibam International
Transport. The head of Stibam, a Syrian
businessman named Henri Arsan, also functioned as an informant for the U.S. Drug
Enforcement Administration, according to
several Italian news outlets.

With satellite offices in New York, London, Zurich, and Sofia, Bulgaria, Stibam
officials recycled their profits through Banco
Ambrosiano, Italy's largest private bank which had close ties to the Vatican
until its sensational collapse in 1982. The collapse
of Banco Ambrosiano came on the heels of the still unsolved death of its furtive
president, Roberto Calvi, whose body was
found hanging underneath Blackfriar's Bridge in London in June 1982. While
running Ambrosiano, Calvi, nicknamed "God's
banker," served as advisor to the Vatican's extensive fiscal portfolio.

At the same time in the mid- and late 1970s, Calvi's bank handled most of
Stibam's foreign currency transactions and owned
the building that housed Stibam's Milanese headquarters. In effect, the Vatican
Bank -- by virtue of its interlocking relationship
with Banco Ambrosiano -- was fronting for a gigantic contraband operation that
specialized in guns and heroin.

The bristling contraband operation that traversed Bulgaria was a magnet for
secret service agents on both sides of the Cold
War divide. Crucial, in this regard, was the role of Kintex, a Sofia-based,
state-controlled import-export firm that worked in
tandem with Stibam and figured prominently in the arms trade. Kintex was riddled
with Bulgarian and Soviet spies -- a fact
which encouraged speculation that the KGB and its Bulgarian proxies were behind
the plot against the pope.

But Western intelligence also had its hooks into the Bulgarian smuggling scene,
as evidenced by the CIA's use of Kintex to
channel weapons to the Nicaraguan contras in the early 1980s.

The Reagan administration jumped on the papal assassination attempt as a
propaganda opportunity, rather than helping to
unravel the larger mystery. Although the CIA's link to the arms-for-drugs
traffic in Bulgaria was widely known in espionage
circles, hard-line U.S. and Western European officials promoted instead a bogus
conspiracy theory that blamed the papal
shooting on a communist plot.

The so-called "Bulgarian connection" became one of the more effective
disinformation schemes hatched during the Reagan era.
It reinforced the notion of the Soviet Union as an evil empire. But the apparent
hoax also diverted attention from extensive --
and potentially embarrassing -- ties between U.S. intelligence and the Turkey's
narco-trafficking ultra-right.

Fabrication of the conspiracy theory might have even involved suborning perjury.
During his September 1985 court testimony in
Rome, Catli asserted that he had been approached by the West German BND spy
organization, which allegedly promised him
a large sum of money if he implicated the Bulgarian secret service and the KGB
in the attempt on the pope's life.

Five years later, ex-CIA analyst Melvin A. Goodman disclosed that his
colleagues, under pressure from CIA higher-ups,
skewed their reports to try to lend credence to the contention that the Soviets
were involved. "The CIA had no evidence linking
the KGB to the plot," Goodman told the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Friends of the Wolves
Duane "Dewey" Clarridge, the CIA station chief in Rome at the time of the papal
shooting, had previously been posted in
Ankara. Clarridge was the CIA's man-on-the-spot in Turkey in the 1970s when
armed bands of Grey Wolves unleashed a
wave of bomb attacks and shootings that killed thousands of people, including
public officials, journalists, students, lawyers,
labor organizers, social democrats, left-wing activists and ethnic Kurds. [In
his 1997 memoirs, A Spy for All Seasons,
Clarridge makes no reference to the Turkish unrest or to the pope shooting.]

During those violent 1970s, the Grey Wolves operated with the encouragement and
protection of the Counter-Guerrilla
Organization, a section of the Turkish Army's Special Warfare Department.
Headquartered in the U.S. Military Aid Mission
building in Ankara, the Special Warfare Department received funds and training
from U.S. advisors to create "stay behind"
squads comprised of civilian irregulars. They were supposed to go underground
and engage in acts of sabotage if the Soviets

Similar Cold War paramilitary units were established in every NATO member state,
covering all non-Communist Europe like a
spider web that would entangle Soviet invaders. But instead of preparing for
foreign enemies, U.S.-sponsored stay-behind
operatives in Turkey and several European countries used their skills to attack
domestic opponents and foment violent
disorders. Some of those attacks were intended to spark right-wing military

In the late 1970s, former military prosecutor and Turkish Supreme Court Justice
Emin Deger documented collaboration
between the Grey Wolves and the government's counter-guerrilla forces as well as
the close ties of the latter to the CIA.
Turkey's Counter-Guerrilla Organization handed out weapons to the Grey Wolves
and other right-wing terrorist groups. These
shadowy operations mainly engaged in the surveillance, persecution and torture
of Turkish leftists, according to retired army
commander Talat Turhan, the author of three books on counter-guerrilla
activities in Turkey.

But the extremists launched one wave of political violence which provoked a 1980
coup by state security forces that deposed
Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit. The Turkish security forces cited the need to
restore order which had been shattered by rightist
terrorist groups secretly sponsored by those same state security forces.

Cold War Roots
Since the earliest days of the Cold War, Turkey's strategic importance derived
from its geographic position as the West's
easternmost bulwark against Soviet communism. In an effort to weaken the Soviet
state, the CIA also used pan-Turkish
militants to incite anti-Soviet passions among Muslim Turkish minorities inside
the Soviet Union, a strategy that strengthened ties
between U.S. intelligence and Turkey's ultra-nationalists.

Though many of Turkish ultra-nationalists were anti-Western as well as
anti-Soviet, the Cold War realpolitik compelled them to
support a discrete alliance with NATO and U.S. intelligence. Among the Turkish
extremists collaborating in this anti-Soviet
strategy were the National Action Party and its paramilitary youth group, the
Grey Wolves.

Led by Colonel Alpaslan Turkes, the National Action Party espoused a fanatical
pan-Turkish ideology that called for reclaiming
large sections of the Soviet Union under the flag of a reborn Turkish empire.
Turkes and his revanchist cohorts had been
enthusiastic supporters of Hitler during World War II. "The Turkish race above
all others" was their Nazi-like credo. In a
similar vein, Grey Wolf literature warned of a vast Jewish-Masonic-Communist
conspiracy and its newspapers carried ads for
Turkish translations of Nazi texts.

The pan-Turkish dream and its anti-Soviet component also fueled ties between the
Grey Wolves and the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc
of Nations (ABN), a CIA-backed coalition led by erstwhile fascist collaborators
from East Europe. Ruzi Nazar, a leading
figure in the Munich-based ABN, had a long-standing relationship with the CIA
and the Turkish ultra-nationalists. In the 1950s
and 1960s, Nazar was employed by Radio Free Europe, a CIA-founded propaganda

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the shifting geopolitical terrain
created new opportunities -- political and financial --
for Colonel Turkes and his pan-Turkish crusaders. After serving a truncated
prison term in the 1980s for his role in
masterminding the political violence that convulsed Turkey, Turkes and several
of his pan-Turkish colleagues were permitted to
resume their political activities.

In 1992, the colonel visited his long lost Turkish brothers in newly independent
Azerbaijan and received a hero's welcome. In
Baku, Turkes endorsed the candidacy of Grey Wolf sympathizer Abulfex Elcibey,
who was subsequently elected president of
Azerbaijan and appointed a close Grey Wolf ally as his Interior Minister.

The Gang Returns
By this time, Abdullah Catli was also back in circulation after several years of
incarceration in France and Switzerland for
heroin trafficking. In 1990, he escaped from a Swiss jail cell and rejoined the
neo-fascist underground in Turkey.

Despite his documented links to the papal shooting and other terrorist attacks,
Catli was pressed into service as a death squad
organizer for the Turkish government's dirty war against the Kurds who have long
struggled for independence inside both
Turkey and Iraq. Turkish Army spokesmen acknowledged that the Counter-Guerrilla
Organization (renamed the Special
Forces Command in 1992) was involved in the escalating anti-Kurdish campaign.

Turkey got a wink and a nod from Washington as a quid pro quo for cooperating
with the United States during the Gulf War.
Turkish jets bombed Kurdish bases inside Iraqi territory. Meanwhile, on the
ground, anti-Kurdish death squads were
assassinating more than 1,000 non-combatants in southeastern Turkey. Hundreds of
other Kurds "disappeared" while in police
custody. Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the European Parliament
all condemned the Turkish security forces
for these abuses.

Still, there was no hard evidence that Turkey's security forces had recruited
criminal elements as foot soldiers. That evidence
surfaced only on Nov. 3, 1996, when Catli' died in the fateful auto accident
near Susurluk. Strewn amidst the roadside
wreckage was proof of what many journalists and human rights activists had long
suspected -- that successive Turkish
governments had protected narco-traffickers, sheltered terrorists and sponsored
gangs of killers to suppress Turkish dissidents
and Kurdish rebels.

Colonel Turkes confirmed that Catli had performed clandestine duties for
Turkey's police and military. "On the basis of my
state experience, I admit that Catli has been used by the state," said Turkes.
Catli had been cooperating "in the framework of a
secret service working for the good of the state," Turkes insisted.

U.S.-backed Turkish officials, including Tansu Ciller, Prime Minister from
1993-1996, also defended Catli after the car crash.
"I don't know whether he is guilty or not," Ciller stated, "but we will always
respectfully remember those who fire bullets or
suffer wounds in the name of this country, this nation and this state."

Eighty members of the Turkish parliament have urged the federal prosecutor to
file charges of criminal misconduct against
Ciller, who currently serves as Turkey's Foreign Minister, as well as Deputy
Prime Minister. They asserted that the Susurluk
incident provided Turkey "with a historic opportunity to expose unsolved murders
and the drugs and arms smuggling that have
been going on in our country for years."

The scandal momentarily reinvigorated the Turkish press, which unearthed
revelations about criminals and police officials
involved in the heroin trade. But journalists also have been victims of death
squads in recent years. The violent attack on
Independent Flash TV was a reminder. Prosecutors have faced pressure, too, from
superiors who are not eager to delve into
state secrets. Thus far, no charges have been lodged against Ciller.

Across the Atlantic in Washington, the U.S. government has yet to acknowledge
any responsibility for the Turkish Frankenstein
that U.S. Cold War strategy helped to create. When asked about the Susurluk
affair, a State Department spokesperson said it
was "an internal Turkish matter." He declined further comment. ~

Martin A. Lee's book on neo-fascism, The Beast Reawakens, will be published by
Little, Brown in July.

(c) Copyright 1999

Al-Ahram Weekly
22 - 28 April 1999
Issue No. 426

Grey wolves rising
By Gareth Jenkins

Provisional results in Turkey's general elections suggest that the Democratic
Left Party (DLP) of incumbent Prime Minister
Bulent Ecevit will be the largest party in parliament, with 22.1 per cent of the
vote and 133 seats in the 550-seat unicameral
assembly. But, contrary to all pre-election predictions, the ultra-nationalist
National Movement Party (NMP) finished second
with 18.2 per cent (130 seats), ahead of the Islamist Virtue Party (VP) with
15.1 per cent (112 seats), the centre-right
Motherland Party (MP) with 13.4 per cent (88 seats) and the conservative True
Path Party (TPP) with 12.5 per cent (85

For the first time in its 75-year history, the social democrat Republican
People's Party (RPP) has been excluded from
parliament, winning only 8.5 per cent of the vote, well below the 10 per cent
threshold for representation in the assembly.

The victory of Ecevit's DLP had been widely expected. A crusty 74-year-old
former poet and journalist, Ecevit began his
political career as a social democrat back in the 1960s. But while he has
retained the populist economic policies of his socialist
youth, during the 1990s his domestic and foreign policies have shifted
increasingly towards the nationalist right.

Despite persistent rumours of ill health and allegations that the DLP is
effectively controlled by Ecevit's wife Rahsan, who has a
daunting reputation for purging dissenters in an environment where political
leaders and their families become suddenly and
fabulously wealthy, Ecevit has built the latter stages of his career on a
reputation for personal honesty.

His public standing received a huge boost in February 1999 when US intelligence
delivered Kurdish separatist leader Abdullah
Ocalan to Turkish agents in Kenya during Ecevit's term as caretaker prime
minister. It was enhanced further by his refusal to
make party political capital out of Ocalan's capture during the election

Ocalan's capture had been expected to give Ecevit a slight edge over the
Islamist VP, which, in the run-up to the polls,
appeared to be the DLP's main challenger ahead of the centrist MP and TPP.

But the stunning surge in support for the NMP was totally unexpected and appears
to indicate a radical shift in the Turkish
political spectrum towards the nationalist right. Not only does the DLP have a
strong nationalist element but there is also a
strong nationalist component in the Islamism espoused by the VP.

Yet the NMP more than doubled its share of the vote from eight per cent in the
last elections in December 1995 to more than
18 per cent on 18 April. The vote won by parties of the centre-right has
collapsed from a total of 51 per cent in 1991 to 39 per
cent in 1995 and 26 per cent in 1999.

The NMP grew out of the nationalist movements of the 1960s and 1970s when
militants, calling themselves 'Grey Wolves' after
the legendary Grey Wolf which is said to have led the Turks out of Central Asia
into Anatolia, fought a dirty civil war against
Turkish leftists. During the 1990s the NMP has sought to present itself as a
mainstream political party, although it has continued
to be dogged by allegations of links to organised crime, particularly Turkey's
powerful narcotics smugglers, and death squads
used to assassinate alleged supporters of the separatist Kurdistan Workers Party

NMP officials admit that the war against the PKK has triggered an increase in
support for the party, which has been fuelled by
Turkey's increasing international isolation, particularly since it was rejected
by the European Union at the Luxembourg summit in
December 1997. There is also little doubt that by not being represented in the
previous parliament, the NMP has been able to
distance itself from the widespread public perception of politicians as corrupt
and self-serving. Its inclusion of Islam as a
component of Turkish national identity has helped it to attract the religious
vote and present itself as an alternative to the VP.

The NMP is also very strong among the young. Initial estimates suggest that in
the 18 April elections 60 to 70 per cent of the
4.5 million new voters supported the NMP. Yet the party's appeal seems to have
been its image rather than its policies. Its
election manifesto, which was only announced two weeks before the polls, was
primarily composed of vague rhetoric rather
than specific policy proposals.

But the NMP is likely to hold the balance of power in the new parliament. The
DLP and MP have already indicated that they
will be prepared to cooperate in a coalition government, while the VP has made
it clear that its preferred partner would by the
TPP. Each of the two blocs needs NMP support if it is to secure a majority in

"There will be a coalition government and we believe that the NMP will form part
of that coalition," said Devlet Bahceli, the
soft-spoken 51-year-old former economics professor who has led the NMP since the
death of its founder Alparslan Turkes in
April 1997.

But Bahceli has refused to speculate on what price the NMP might ask in return
for its support. "At the moment the NMP is a
closed box," said Professor Ergun Ozbudun of Bilkent University. "We don't know
what is inside."

Bulent Ecevit has already implicitly signalled his willingness to work with the
NMP. "The age of ideological polarisation is over,"
he said.

But some in the NMP are not so sure. They note that beneath the urbane image of
the party's current leadership there are still
radical elements who have not forgotten the struggles of the 1960s and 1970s
when the NMP and the Ecevits were on different
sides. "We could probably work with Bulent Ecevit," said a high-ranking party
official. "He appears to have changed. But the
obstacle could be Rahsan. She still hasn't forgotten the bloodshed."

The rise of the NMP has triggered alarm bells in the capitals of both Turkey's
allies and its traditional foes. Russian officials
have expressed concern that the NMP has still not abandoned its old dreams of a
belt of Turkish influence stretching across
Central Asia. The party has also been consistently hostile to the Arab states,
which it accuses of betraying the Ottoman Empire
during World War I. The EU is worried that the participation of the NMP in
government may deal a fatal blow to Turkey's
already strained relations with Brussels and halt, or even reverse, the recent
tentative improvement in Turkey's human rights

In the short-term, perhaps the person who should be most worried is imprisoned
PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan. The NMP has
repeatedly insisted that Ocalan should be executed. "Ocalan to the gallows" was
one of the party's most popular election

Grey Wolves
The National Movement Party ("Milliyetci Hareket Partisi", MHP, aka Nationalist
Action Party), founded by Alparslan Turkes
in the 1960s, like all other parties, was banned after the military coup of
September 12, 1980. The National Workers Party
("Milliyetci Calisma Partisi", MCP) was founded in 1983 as a successor to the
MHP, which as of 1992 is once again known as
the MHP. A significant pillar of the MHP's ideology is the creation of the
Turan, the Great Turkish Empire, including Turkish
peoples in the countries of the former Soviet Union. The MHP supports the
government's military approach to an 11-year
insurgency by the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) in southeast Turkey, and it
opposes any concessions to Kurdish

The unofficial militant arm of the MHP -- known as the Grey Wolves after a
legendary she-wolf that led captive Central Asian
Turks to freedom -- has been involved in street killings and gunbattles with
leftists. Mehmet Ali Agca, the Turkish gunman who
shot and wounded Pope John Paul II in 1981, was a former Grey Wolf. The Grey
Wolves have been accused of assassinating,
on July 6, 1996, the prominent Turkish Cypriot journalist Kutlu Adali, because
of his criticism of the Denktash regime and,
more generally, of Turkey's policies in Cyprus. In 1996 a turkish deputy from
Tansu Ciller's True Path Party (DYP) revealed
that Abdullah Chatli, the leader of the Grey Wolves, was are responsible for
arson fires in Greece's islands. Catli was killed in a
1996 car accident in Turkey which brought to light the relations between Turkish
mafia and the government.
Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi

English name
Nationalist Movement Party (or: Nationalist Action Party)
Party leader
Devlet Bahçeli
In the late 60s by Alpaslan Turkes (1917-1997), a former propaganda officer of
the Turkish army convicted for "racist
activities" in 1944 and described in a Gestapo report as "the Führer of
This party is in fact the successor of the Republican Peasant Party. Turkes
became vice Prime Minister in the cabinet of
Suleyman Demirel 1975. In 1978, he declared in Berlin, in front of an audience
of more than 1,500 people, that all Armenians,
Kurds and Jews had to be exterminated. After the military putsh of 1980, the MHP
was outlawed and his leader thrown into
prison. It reemerged in 1987 when the ban was lifted. Since then, it has earned
considerable electoral support.
% of vote (*)
Seats in national Parliament
129 (550)
In government
1975-1980; Spring 1999-

Turkish Fascists: The MHP
From Arm the Spirit. 3 January, 1995
The National Movement Party ("Milliyetci Hareket Partisi", MHP), founded by
Alparslan Turkes in the 1960s, can already
look back on an active history. This article, however, concerns itself with
contemporary information.

The MHP In The 1980s
After the military coup of September 12, 1980, the MHP, like all other parties,
was banned. Turkes, who was arrested shortly
after the putsch and put on trial, was released from prison for health reasons
in April 1985 and sentenced in 1987 to an
11-year prison term, which he did not have to serve on account of an amnesty law
which was passed.

In the meantime, the National Workers Party ("Milliyetci Calisma Partisi", MCP)
was founded in 1983 as a successor to the
MHP. Other former MHP members had already joined the ranks of other parties,
such as the Motherland Party (ANAP) of T.
Ozal. Turkes became chairman of the MCP after the ban on political activity
against certain party functionaries was lifted after a
(close) referendum on September 6, 1987. As of 1992, the party has returned to
its tradition in both words and deeds and is
once again known as the MHP.

Initially, the MCP/MHP did not have much success in elections. An election
alliance with the Islamic fundamentalist Welfare
Party (RP) of N. Erbakan (and another small party, the IDP) won close to 17% of
the vote in parliamentary elections on
October 22, 1991. But the MHP's share of these votes was probably quite small.
After the elections, the alliance fell apart,
partly since no further long-term cooperation was planned.

During regional elections in March 1994, the MHP won close to 8% of the vote
(compared to just over 4% in 1989). The
party won the most votes in the following provinces: Kastamonu, Cankiri, Yozgat,
Kirsehir, Kars, and Erzincan (in 1989:
Kirikkale, Yozgat, Erzincan, and Elazig). There were, therefore, MHP governors
in 6 of the country's 76 provinces.

Anti-Kurdish Hatred
A significant portion of the MHP's election propaganda, and most of its public
activity in general, is dedicated to spreading
anti-Kurdish hatred. At the parliamentary political level, the MHP plays an
important role in formulating nationalist state
propaganda, which has been directed against the Kurdish people more and more
since the 1980s, particulary through creating
a fiendish image of the PKK.

For example, in 1992, Turkes stated that the "separatists", in other words the
PKK, were been trained in camps located in
Greek-controlled southern Cyprus. (This connecting of "old" enemies with
contemporary themes is a favorite activity of Turkes.
He thereby draws the Greeks into the matter, too. For a while, Turkish
newspapers spread rumors that PKK members were
primarily Armenians.)

That same year, Turkes stated publically once again that the Kurds had descended
from the Turkish "race".

"Every vote for the MHP is a blow against the PKK", Turkes said, during an
election rally before the regional elections in
March 1994, as he made the Grey Wolves hand-sign with his hands. (MHP members
sometimes operate under the name
"Bozkurt", which means Grey Wolves. - trans.)

The Great Turkish Empire: Turan
Another significant pillar of the MHP's ideology is the foolish dream of
creating the Turan, the Great Turkish Empire. Thus, they
pay close attention to developments in the countries of the former Soviet Union
where so-called Turkish peoples live, namely
Azerbaidjan, Turkmenistan, Kazachstan, Uzbekistan, and Kirgistan. The "Basbug"
(a word which roughly means leader, in this
case Turkes - trans.) is not an unknown figure in those lands.

More important than election results in the MHP's influence on state
institutions, and this influence is not insignificant. But the
MHP's election success in March 1994 has made the party more bold. According to
reports from people who recently visited
Turkey, MHP fascists are now appearing publically more than they ever have in
the past; they even put Grey Wolves symbols
on their cars. Attacks on leftists and unfavored student associations at various
universities have not only been carried out by
Islamic fundamentalists over the past few years, but also by Grey Wolves as

(Source: Inisiyatif #5)

"Grey Wolves" Gather In Germany
On November 26, 1994, more than 10,000 members (organizers put the number as
high as 30,000) of the Turkish
ultra-nationalist organization MHP (National Movement Party) gathered in the
German town of Sindelfingen to hear speeches
by their leader, Alparslan Turkes. Turkish fascists from all across Germany, as
well as from Austria and The Netherlands,
attended the event. Turkish prime minister Ciller sent her greetings to the
event via telephone, thus clearly illustrasting the level
of close cooperation which exists between the Turkish government and the Turkish

The MHP, also known by the name "Bozkurt" (Grey Wolves), stands for racist,
fascist terror. Human rights experts in Turkey
make the organization responsible for more than 4,000 murders, primarily of
Kurds, Turkish leftists, and progressive journalists
and union leaders. Its most deadly action was an attack on the May Day rally in
Istanbul in 1977 which left 35 people dead and
more than 200 wounded. Today, the Turkish army and special forces actively
recruit MHP members to fight in special
commando units in Turkey's dirty war against the Kurdish national liberation


The notorious background of the MHP with their previous ganging up in the State
mechanism is one of the biggest worries and
possible weaknesses of the prospective tripartite Government under PM Bulent
Ecevit. Will there be any radical foreign policy
changes in Turkey with the MHP’s influence? Abdullah Ocalan’s trial may be the
first indicator.

Designer fascism or rebirth of the Grey Wolves?

In the Turkish parliamentary election on April 18, the openly fascist
Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) gained 18 per cent of
the vote making it a close second party in the contest. The Democratic Left
Party (DSP) of Prime Minister Ecevit won a mere
22 per cent, scraping into first place..

At the last election the MHP, also known as the Grey Wolves received 8 per cent
, and therefore did not have even one MP in
the last parliament as it did not pass the 10 per cent bar nationally.

The Grey Wolves take a very hard line on the Kurdish and Cyprus issues. They
fully support Turkey’s annexation of part of
Cyprus and deny the very existence of Kurds as a people.

It is virtually certain that the Nationalist Movement Party will be part of the
next government coalition. This surge in support for
this dangerous, far right party took place against all predictions at the
expense of other right wing contenders and the Islamist

About 12 groups of people from various European countries travelled to Turkey as
independent monitors. Alain Hertzman, one
of those who went from Britain, explains.

There are two main reasons for the staggering increase in the MHP vote. One was
that voters refused to vote for the parties in
power, as they had not kept their promises to sort out the economic crisis.

The second was the effect of the "Falkland factor", in this case, the arrest of
Abdullah Ocalan, the leader of the Kurdish
guerrilla struggle. Ocalan’s kidnapping by the Turkish state in breach of
international law after his trek round Europe seeking
political asylum, has strengthened Turkish nationalism. The preparations for his
show trial due to start on May 31 are whipping
up further anti-Kurdish bigotry.

The MHP’s slogan during the election campaign was "Turkey, love it or leave it".
Ecevit’s DSP ran a very nationalistic
campaign but were not able to keep pace with the Grey Wolves enough to undercut
their support.

Fazilet, the Islamic party, received 15.5 per cent, a loss of some 3 per cent
since the last election. It is quite likely that it was
due to their watering down of their previous hard-line fundamentalist line. A
good part of their vote went to the MHP.

The Istanbul stock market dropped by 6.58 points in response to the results. The
bourgeoisie is definitely worried that social
tension will increase sharply and will affect profits.

In Southeast Turkey, where the majority of the people are Kurds, the People’s
Democratic Party , HADEP received around
50 per cent of the vote. It is the only party which is supportive of the Kurds.
All the same they will not be able to sit in
parliament, as their share of the vote nationally was only 5-6 per cent.

HADEP is constantly subject to harassment – for example Veli Haydar Guleg, the
party’s candidate for mayor of Istanbul was
arrested four times in the last six months and spent two months in prison. No
charges have been brought against him. Now the
possibility of a political solution to the Kurdish question seems even more
remote than ever.

Our group travelled to the town of Batman in Eastern Turkey. This is an
industrial city, under military rule, sitting astride the only
oil reserves of Turkey. We talked to trade unionists, human rights activists,
and members of the People’s Democratic Party

Members of the PETROL-IS union told us that although the union was not allowed
to declare publicly for any candidate, over
90 per cent of its members supported HADEP. Everyone we met agreed that in
Batman itself the situation was bearable, but in
the small towns and villages in the area, repression was harsh and people were
commonly threatened that if they voted for
HADEP their villages would be burned.

Of course what is bearable in Turkey would lead to outrage here. For example on
our way to Batman we were travelling on a
public bus and were stopped at 4 military checkpoints and at the third forced
off the bus and questioned. We managed to
spend around 24 hours in Batman before being forced to return to Istanbul.
Around 20 security personnel came to our hotel,
surrounded us and escorted us to the airport where they ensured we boarded the
first plane out. We only got to stay long
because we had escaped their notice earlier.

We quickly realised that Batman was an exception, as in other towns, repression
was continuous and often on a grand scale.
For example in Diyarbakir, the de facto capital of the Turkish Kurdistan, when
HADEP organised a public meeting, 40,000
came. The police attacked the meeting and arrested 4,000 people. A German
women’s group went to Diyarbakir to discuss
raising funds for a womens’ project there. They were heavily intimidated, with
security personnel sitting at the same table as
them so that no one could talk with them in any confidence. They were swiftly
forced out of the area.

Turkey has long been seen as an important ally of both Britain and the US, who
routinely ignore its human rights abuses. Again
within the war in the Balkans it is playing a key role supporting NATO’s
intervention. So it was little surprise when the well
known democrat Tony Blair, announced the day after the election, that Turkey was
now a candidate for entry into the
European Union.

Fascists and Social Democrats form new government
By Justus Leicht
3 June 1999

It took over a month, but it has now been decided: for the first time since the
1970s and the second time in the history of
modern Turkey, the fascist party—MHP (Nationalist Movement Party)—will sit in
government in this unhappy land. At the
head of the government stands Bülent Ecevit from the DLP (Democratic Left
Party), a long-serving social democrat and
confirmed Kemalist.

This development is of enormous international and historical significance. It
should serve as a warning to workers all over the
world. When the profit system is mired in a profound crisis, there are no limits
beyond which the social democrats are not
prepared to go to defend it. All of Ecevit's protestations cannot disguise the
fact that the character of the right extremist MHP,
widely known as the Grey Wolves, has not changed. The MHP itself emphasises this

The fascist party has nothing to fear from the state; quite the contrary. On May
14, Vural Savas, the leading prosecutor of the
country's constitutional court, declared there was no basis for press reports of
investigations being conducted into the MHP.
Afterwards a deputy of the MHP declared that it was a legitimate party carrying
out a legitimate struggle which continues today.
The party leader Bahceli made a similar point.

What is meant by this “legitimate struggle”? The blood of thousands of people
clings to the paws of the Grey Wolves. Over the
last 30 years they have been responsible for numerous attacks on striking
workers and protesting students, for the murder of
journalists and human rights activists, for pogroms against left-wingers and
Alevits (a religious minority) and for the brutal
massacre of Kurds.

They have close connections with the Mafia, army, police and secret services. In
the course of the 15 year-long bloody civil
war in the Kurd provinces they have dominated the “special units” of the
security forces, as well as the dreaded death squads
of the so called “counter-guerrillas”. It is not so much the MHP that has
changed, as the state itself. Its various organs can be
hardly distinguished from the fascist bands.

It is no wonder that, following parliamentary elections on April 18, it was
unclear for some time whether a coalition government
between the DLP, MHP and conservative ANAP (Motherlands Party) of Mesut Yilmaz
would really come into being. Ecevit,
along with many leading newspaper commentators, had from the very beginning
orientated towards such a coalition.

Others were worried about the bad reputation of the MHP both at home and abroad
and their unpredictability. For the past
four years the party had no representation inside parliament. Two years ago its
founder and undisputed absolute leader,
Alparslan Türkes, died. The MHP was thought to be an unknown quantity.

For a time, therefore, a coalition of the DLP and the ANAP with the other
conservative party, the TPP (The True Path Party)
of Tansu Ciller was regarded as a possibility. Both centre-right parties have
been enormously discredited because of their
notorious corruption and nepotism and were the biggest losers in the election.
In addition, a bitter rivalry exists between the
party leaders. Some newspapers have therefore demanded that the chairpersons of
both parties, particularly Ciller, step down
and open the way for a merger of the parties.

As it became clear that the TPP had been relegated to a role in opposition,
hefty internal political struggles begun. A similar
development is to be seen in the Islamic Virtue Party (FP) and the Social
Democratic-Left Kemalist CHP (Republican Peoples
Party), once the state party of the founder of modern Turkey, Kemal Atatürk, but
now a party without representation in

Ecevit has taken considerable care to bind the MHP into the government while
“softening it up”. His requirements for a
coalition agreement were first leaked to the press. Rahsan Ecevit, the wife of
the prime minister and chairwoman of the DLP,
publicly declared her “concern” over the “past” of the MHP and her “doubts”
about whether the party had really changed.

For their part the MHP leaders melodramatically declared their allegiance to the
“legitimate struggle” of their party and vainly
demanded a public apology. The coalition of right and “left” parties appeared to
be on the brink of collapse. The press, state
president Demirel, the ANAP and a section of the employers did everything they
could to rescue the coalition—and were

The need on the part of the Turkish bourgeoisie for such a “strong” government
is easily explained. The ordinary people of
Turkey, who at present suffer under unbearable levels of unemployment and
poverty, are expected to swallow more bitter
medicine from the “poison cabinet” of the International Monetary Fund over the
next few years. In addition, employers'
federations are demanding that the Turkish economy be made “fit and streamlined”
for a broad integration into the European

With regard to the social and economic questions, there are barely any
differences between the future coalition partners.
Massive privatisation, “reform” of social insurance, the lowering of taxes for
the employers and the raising of consumer
taxes—there is general agreement on these points. Differences emerge, however,
on how these measures should be imposed
while at the same time holding society together.

In the absence of a visible socialist alternative, the social tensions have
principally expressed themselves in the form of support
for Islamist tendencies. Although the FP, the successor of the banned RP
(Welfare Party), was forced to accept electoral
defeat, it is still the third strongest force in parliament and will lead the

Already in 1991 the MHP entered parliament as part of a joint list with the RP
and took over central Islamic demands in the
course of the election campaign. Because of this they were able to take many
votes from the FP. For their part, the TPP and
the ANAP adopted as vague a position as possible on these issues.

As Marx put it: “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a
heartless world, just as it is the spirit of an
unspiritual situation.” For many workers, poor and lower-middle-class people the
political turn to Islam has less to do with the
desire for the introduction of the Sharia (head scarf) or a religious state, as
with a vague desire for “justice” and “morality”. This
mood is aimed against the enormous destruction of living standards, which has
been carried out by Kemal Atatürk's “holy
knights” in the name of “modernisation” and “orientation to the West”, a process
bound up with huge state corruption.

The reaction of Ecevit to the appearance in parliament of FP deputy Merve
Kavakci garbed in a head scarf speaks volumes.
“This is no place to challenge the state!” he cried out excitedly.

The Islamists have made the head scarf their political symbol. Later President
Demirel made compromising comments on this
issue. The DLP is practically the only party in parliament taking as
uncompromising a line as the military on this question. One of
the DLP's main differences with the MHP is the former's support for a ban on
head scarves in schools and universities.

The Grey Wolves made the abolition of this ban one of the main planks of their
election campaign. For this reason the head of
the MHP, Bahceli, surprisingly praised the chairman of the constitutional court
and Turkey's senior judge, Ahmet Sezer, as the
latter called for more freedom of opinion and sharply criticised the existing
practice of bans and persecutions.

The position is different with regard to the Kurdish question. All of the
coalition partners agree that a “Kurdish problem” does
not exist—it is rather a problem of “terrorism”. But the problem of how to
resolve this issue is contentious.

In common with many businessmen Ecevit is fearful of a further escalation and
has therefore advocated a “Law of Repentance,”
permitting lighter sentences for self-confessed and defecting PKK cadre. The
carrying out of the probable death penalty for
PKK chief Abdullah Ocalan is also controversial. On both questions the MHP has
adopted an uncompromising position: “No
mercy for terrorists”.

The experienced old fox Ecevit is seeking to use his DLP to establish a balance
and hold in check the Islamist and fascist
tendencies represented by the MHP. The ANAP is seen as a force for arbitration.
The problem is, however, that these
tendencies arise from the bankruptcy of the Kemalist state model and the
break-up of existing society.

The growing political weight of the military and the fascists stems from the
failure of democratic mechanisms under conditions of
increasing class polarisation. This is also the reason for the hysterical forms
of Turkish chauvinism and the accompanying flexing
of muscles abroad, alongside intensive domestic repression. These policies
enflame Kurdish nationalism, which in turn feeds
Turkish nationalism even more.

It may be that the new government coalition is able to hold power for some time.
But one thing is clear, flying in the face of their
election promises, this government will bring neither prosperity, nor social
justice and democracy, nor an end to the loss of life
arising from the Kurdish conflict.

by Andrew Finkel

(On June 10-after this article had been completed-Andrew Finkel was summoned by
an Instanbul Criminal Court to answer
charges that he had insulted the Turkish military -- a crime under article 159
of the Turkish penal code. The charges stem from
a story published in February 1998 in the daily Sabah, in which Finkel reported
on conditions in a garrison town in southeastern
Turkey where Kurdish rebels and Turkish security forces have been battling each
other for more than a decade. If convicted,
Finkel faces up to six years in prison. )

Although it's been a decade since I first came to Turkey as a correspondent, I
remain puzzled by this country's reluctance to
shake off its reputation as Europe's problem child.

Even as I sit down to write, I am confronted with the sentencing of Oral
Calislar, a friend and colleague, to 13 months in jail.
His offense was to publish in 1993 contrasting interviews with Abdullah Ocalan,
leader of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers'
Party (PKK), and Kemal Burkay, head of the non-violent Kurdistan Socialist
Party. Nor is the state's reaction to Calislar's
journalistic work an isolated event. Tucked away in today's newspapers is yet
another item, reporting that Nazmiye Yilmaz, the
news editor of Kanal 7--the television station that supports the Islamic-leaning
Virtue Party--and Behiç Kiliç, one of her
reporters, are on trial in an Istanbul criminal court for insulting the Turkish
armed forces and holding them in contempt. If
convicted, the pair face a sentence of one to six years.

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of Turkey's record of press freedom abuses
is finding an interlocutor for one's sense of
outrage. TUSIAD, Turkey's largest business confederation, condemned the Calislar
verdict. Bulent Ecevit, the recently elected
prime minister, said it saddened him. Even the military judge on the three-man
state security court tribunal expressed a
dissenting judgment.

So why does it happen?

The headlines dominating the press this week have not been about journalists in
court, but about the attempts to nail together a
government after the April 18 election. It now looks pretty certain that
Ecevit--who has himself worked as a journalist and been
in trouble with law--will lead a coalition that includes the right-wing
Nationalist Action Party (MHP). During the 1970s, the
MHP harbored the violent "Grey Wolves," the gangs of political toughs
responsible for a large share of the violence that led to
the 1980 military coup. The MHP's current leader, Devlet Bahceli, appears
genuine in his desire to lead a party based on the
rule of law. The third partner is former Prime Minister Mesut Yilmaz of the
Motherland Party, who assured a CPJ delegation
nearly two years ago shortly after he had assumed that post that the time when
Turkey imprisoned people for what they wrote
was coming to an end. Will this bunch be any better than previous governments?

Two Turkish elections ago, in January 1992, there was hope in the air that a
newly forged coalition between social democrats
and the center right would embark on a program of fuller democratization. Of
course, the year 1992 turned out to be anything
but the annus mirabilis for human rights or prisoners of conscience in Turkey.
That cause became hopelessly compromised in
the intensification of the Kurdish conflict in the southeast of the country and
the perception among politicians that desperate
times justified turning a blind eye to freedom of expression. That was the year
that Musa Anter, the Kurdish intellectual, was
killed--the ninth in a series of extra-judicial assassinations of journalists.
This was followed by the still-unsolved bombing in
December 1994 of the Istanbul offices of Ozgur Ulke, a paper sympathetic to the
PKK. The police did not get away with the
murder of the young journalist Metin Goktepe in January 1996--just a month after
another Turkish election when politicians
were trying to form yet another coalition--but most advocates of reform believe
the sentences of between six to seven and a
half years in prison for the convicted officers do not suit the crime of
clubbing someone to death. At the end of 1998, Turkey
again did its lap of dishonor for topping CPJ's tally of journalists under lock
and key.

Governments in Turkey will come and go, but the ultimate engine of reform has to
be Turkish society itself. And that change is
predicated on the acceptance of the existence of certain irreducible human
rights. Until that acceptance takes root in Turkish
society, international organizations such as CPJ must remain vigilant. In the
case of CPJ, this involves debating its Turkish
journalistic colleagues with the skill of medieval scholastics over who is a
"real" journalist in Turkey (as opposed to political
activists in journalist clothing), and therefore who has the right to be
inscribed in the ranks of journalists in jail.

Turkey is a country that is passionate about politics, and it holds reasonably
free elections. It possesses an increasingly assertive
press. Its routine violations of international norms, then, must presume the
complicity of a population that is both committed to
democratic freedoms yet accepts infringement upon those freedoms in the name of
a greater good, defense of the realm. It is
instructive to remember that Turks regard the military as the bulwark of
democracy. Since 1960, the Turkish military has
intervened openly or indirectly on four occasions to "salvage" the political
system, often with the approval of the population. So
it just won't do to blame state repression or the vigilantism of the police.

Clearly it would be a mistake to expect a government one of whose partners
believes in the near infallibility of the Turkish state
to be the one to embark on a wholesale program of reform. Both major partners
converge on their suspicion of the European
Union. In Turkish eyes, Brussels has let Greece get away with murder in helping
Abdullah Ocalan on the run. The EU has no
carrots to offer Turkey to get it to clean up its act.

Yet it is too early to be pessimistic. The MHP's hard line is not a change in
policy but merely a calcification of existing political
attitudes of other governments. There is at least no immediate reason to expect
things to get worse. Better, goes an argument
now popular in Turkey, to have the MHP inside the tent micturating out, then
outside pissing in. The MHP will have to be on its
best behavior, and like the Islamic Party before it, must face the historic
decision whether to move to the center of the political

To see the glass half full, Devlet Bahceli has made clear his own belief in the
rule of law; the party has called for the replacement
of the military component of the state security court with a civilian
judge--though this in itself will not make the judiciary more
liberal. The government will command nearly two-thirds of the seats in
parliament: the magic number needed to amend the
constitution. But the politicians will only act if their constituents demand it.

Is Turkey a democracy that does not want to democratize? Certainly, there are at
least three barriers to reform. The first has
been the instability of successive governments. When in trouble, politicians
tend to thump the nationalist card. And given the
history of the last few years, with a series of fragile coalitions between
unlikely partners, Turkish governments always seem to
be in trouble. Second, the government's continuing efforts to smother Kurdish
nationalist sentiment has led to armed conflict in
the southeast, poisoned the body politic, and been the excuse for repression and
reluctance to reform. Third, the polarization
over Islam has made the guardians of the ideal of secular democracy reluctant to
abandon their arsenal of repressive legislation.

To this list, however, must be added another impediment: the Turkish press
itself. In the day following Oral Calislar's conviction
I bought 10 national newspapers. It's true--three, including Calislar's own
Cumhuriyet, did mention the trial on their front page.
Sabah, one of the largest-selling papers, did not mention it at all. Hurriyet,
the other giant, mentioned the verdict in a deep inside

Other papers had a paragraph here or there. Two pro-Islamic papers forgot to
mention it, despite their passionate defense of
their own liberties. A third did so in a sarcastic vein--sniping that the
rabidly secular Cumhuriyet was convicted for "Kurdish
separatism." In the following days, the news did gather some momentum as
columnists weighed in to defend a friend.

The Turkish press is perfectly capable of hammering points home. One has only to
look at the way the press savaged Merve
Kavakci, the newly elected member of parliament from the Virtue Party who
appeared for her swearing-in wearing an Islamic
headscarf. In paper after paper, she was vilified and finally--in what was a
genuine piece of investigative reporting--revealed to
be a dual Turkish-U. S. national. In such a climate it was a simple matter for
the cabinet to strip her of her nationality in record

Imagine the effect of such indignation and concerted coverage being brought to
bear by the powerful proprietors and editors of
the mainstream Turkish press on the country's woeful press freedom record. Why
they haven't done so is a long story. Some
are too compromised by their financial interests or just their own vainglory.
Others don't know how to do their job.

Why indeed should the Turkish public rise to the defense of a profession that
itself often forgets how to be a champion of
justice and fairness? The simple point is that it shouldn't just be committees
that protect journalists but the press itself. By all
means, CPJ should write letters that begin "Dear Excellency." But it should also
write Turkish editors letters that begin "Pull up
your socks."

Andrew Finkel has worked in Turkey as a journalist for the last 10 years.
Currently he reports for Time magazine and the
Times of London and appears on CNN. For three years he wrote a column in the
Turkish-language daily Sabah newspaper.

Date: Tue, 3 Dec 96 15:25 MET
A Turkish deputy from Tansu Ciller's True Path Party (DYP) yesterday revealed
that Turkish paramilitary organizations are
responsible for arson fires in Greece's islands while, at the same time, an
article published in the pro-government Turkish daily
"Yeni Safak" provocatively boasted in its title: "We Burned Rhodes".
According to the DYP deputy Sedat Bucak, the perpetrator of these fires was
Abdullah Catli, the leader of the extremist group
"Grey Wolves". Catli was recently killed in a notorious car accident in Turkey
which brought to light the relations between
Turkish mafia and the government.

These revelations came to confirm reports the Greek authorities already had in
their hands, according to which, the fires that
have devastated the Greek islands every summer were an act of arson performed by
specially-trained forces of Turkish agents.

Greece's alternate Foreign Minister George Papandreou stated that the Turkish
deputy's statements are "especially worrisome
and show that various sabotage raids have been committed in our country with
Turkish instigation."

Moreover, Mr. Papandreou pointed out that these disclosures by themselves
constitute a criminal act which, in conjuction with
Ms. Ciller's statements ("it is an honor for those who shoot for Turkey"),
should trouble the international community.

Before proceeding to the necessary actions, the Greek Government awaits the
immediate probe and reaction on behalf of the
Turkish government, which, according to Mr. Papandreou, bears the essential

Ankara, August 25 (M.P.A.)

Turkish daily Evrensel reads that at least 200 of the members of the Grey
Wolves, the extreme right-wing organization who
were brought to Cyrpus to stand against the manifstation of the cyrpiot
motorcyclists, had their expenses paid by the turlish
state and especially funds which were at the disposal of the vice-prime minitser
and foreign minister ms Tansu Ciller.

Two unarmed greek-cypriots were killed last week at the neutral zone in Cyrpus
where they wantd to protest against the
prohibition to visit their houses in the north of Cyprus which they suffer since
1974 when Turkey invaded and occupied the
north of the island sending them away from their houses.

Ms Ciller claims that she gave money from the fund for the promotion of Turkey
to the turkish medallits in the Atlanta
olympiade but turkish press seems to doubt the claims by the ex-premier and
president of the party of the "True Path".

In the meantime greek lawyers arrived in Cyprus to examine alongside their
cypriot colleagues the legal extensions of the events
in the neytral zone while information from Washington says that the US will
focus their attempts for a military dialogue between
the two parts in Cyprus since they estimate that a Cleridis - Denktas summit is
not likely to take place soon.

Info On the MHP (Turkish Fascists)
(The following is the text of a pamphlet, distributed during a
picket-line because of a meeting of the MHP in the Netherlands.)

What Is The MHP? Who's Interest Does It Serve?

Over the last few years the MHP has become stronger and more
organized. Also in Europe they have become more active. Their
relation with the forces in the Turkish state who have the real
power are to such an extent that we can speak of a close
cooperation. How is this possible, and what are the reasons? Why
is it important to fight this organisation in a militant manner?
We want to deal with these questions and start a discussion about
this subject.

The Fundamental Political Opinion Of The MHP-Fascists

For understanding what the MHP means, it is necessary to
look at the political ideas of the MHP.
Their ideology is called Turanism. The adherents of this
ideology see "their own people" (just like the Nazis), the
Turkish people as a superior race. "The whole world" belongs "to
them". They dream of world domination. The MHP-fascists want a
"Greater Turkey", just like the Nazis wanted a "Greater German
Concretely this means they want to subject all people and
countries, from the Caucasus to the Balkans and from the Balkans
through to Middle Asia to their slavery and put them under
Turkish rule. Their active support and propagandistic
contributions for the fascist and racist Turkish state is best
proof of this.
Their ideology does not allow any national rights to the
Kurds, Armenians, Laz, Arabs, Syrians, etc. who live in Turkey
(speaking freely in their native tongue, learning this language
or publishing in it, etc.). The MHP does not even recognize these
peoples and threatens to "cleanse" society from non-Turkish
"elements" and it tries to put this threat into practice. A
slogan, used by the MHP, goes: "Either you become Turks and
become proud to be a Turk, or you'll have to reckon with your
Of course there are differences between the policy of the
Nazis and the policy of the MHP. However, these differences are
marginal and arise from the differing circumstances in Germany
and Turkey. Anyway, both groups have the following similarities:
They both serve the ones in power, both serve oppression till its
most bloody form, one serves German imperialism, the other serves
Turkish fascism.

The Connection Between The MHP And The Turkish State

We will now try to show how the MHP supports the ruling
state in Turkey and what connections there are with the
present-day Turkish state.
The first important point is that we cannot approach the MHP
separated from the Turkish state. The MHP is integrated in the
present-day fascist regime and performs certain tasks for this
state. In other words, if you want to understand the terror and
the dictatorship in Turkey, you'll have to examine and understand
the MHP.

a) The education system.

The education system is completely at the service of
Turanism. From the primary school up to the universities it is
taught that Turkey is a superior nation and this is supposed to
be proven with the formation of the Osman Empire. One tries to
prove that the Osman empire has a glorious and honourable
tradition which is respected by all countries. In this way the
pupils must be made proud of the fact it is to be an Osman.
Suffice it to point anyone who believes this propaganda to the
mass murders on, e.g. the Armenians. This was a genocide which is
denied by the present-day Turkish state and the MHP as well, like
the Holocaust is denied in some fascist circles. As the Kurdish
people nowadays, the Armenians were exterminated by the Turkish
nationalist forces when they began to formulate demands
concerning equal rights and independence.

b) The slogans of the MHP are used by the government and the
Turkish state policy.

The slogan from the MHP-banner: "One Turkish world, from the
Adriatic Sea until the Chinese Wall" is also constantly used by
the government parties and other parties in conformity with the
system. Lies like "keeping together and being together", as well
as racist and chauvinist slogans like "PKK: descendants of the
Armenians" and "In the East and the West, Turkey is everywhere
and indivisible" are nowadays used daily by the Turkish state.
However, it is not confined to common slogans. The fascist
and racist projects, once demanded by the MHP, like the creation
of a "elite army" and the expulsion from, mostly Kurdish, people
from the country to round them up artificially in the cities in
order that they can be controlled more easily, are nowadays put
into practice by the Turkish state.
The state does not stop at realizing the projects which are
demanded by the MHP, she goes so far to install MHP-cadres in
positions which are very important to the state. For example, a
lot of governors in the Kurdish areas are members of the MHP.
Furthermore the MHP has a special role to play in the "elite

The Special Role Of The MHP In The "Elite Army"

a) The training, building up and tasks of the "elite army".

The "elite army" is subordinated to the general staff of the
Turkish armed forces. The personnel from this "special army"
consists of experienced and especially selected personnel from
the Turkish armed forces. This "elite army" receives special
training, given by especially experienced members of the Turkish
armed forces. The training personnel is partly trained by the
German GSG-9.
The following facts are admitted by the Turkish papers
themselves who support the present-day regime: The members of
this special army are preferably choosen among members of the
murderous, fascist MHP.
The task of this "elite army" is in fact attacking the
national liberation struggle of the Kurds and other revolutionary
organisations and the execution of pogroms. In the areas,
inhabited by Kurds, the "elite-units" set fire to the villages,
oppresses the people by all conceivable means, and murder the
This "elite army', which officially has to fight
"terrorism", was created last year. Earlier the creation of a
such-like unit was demanded for a long time by the chairman of
the MHP, A. Turkes. One can postulate that the creation of this
special army was put on the political agenda by the MHP.
Some pensioned generals report that a such-like unit existed
already for a longer time. The difference with earlier days would
be that in the present-day situation preferably MHP-members are
taken in. Thus the MHP is given the opportunity to, within legal
boundaries and led by the state, to attack the Kurdish, the
democratic and the revolutionary movements. The "work", earlier
done by the MHP with its own resources, is now done under the
protection and with support of the state and the military. Of
course, in earlier days there has been a form of division of
labour between the Turkish state and the MHP. However, this
division of labour was never admitted, or this cooperation was
concealed. Now we have to speak of a new phase concerning the
problems of the fascist Turkish state. The political crisis has
risen to a level, similar to the time prior to 1980. The
opposition inside the country is growing to enormous proportions.
Furthermore, the army is not capable of defeating the Kurdish
liberation movement militarily. The build up of the Turkish army
is not suited for guerrilla warfare and a large part of the
soldiers do not want this war - it is forced upon them. The MHP
constitutes a reservoir of Turkish nationalists, prepared to kill
and not shunning any means.

b) The past role of the MHP within the "contra-guerrilla" and the
earlier forms of cooperation with the MIT (Turkish Secret

It's not a new phenomenon that the MHP attacks and murders
revolutionaries, democrats and non-Turkish patriots. A few
examples from the past of joint actions from the MHP, MIT and the

Bloody May Day, 1977 (Istanbul): 39 workers are shot by fascists
and driven over by armoured cars, more than 200 workers are

March 10, 1978: MHP-fascists and agents from the contra-guerrilla
throw bombs at the exit of the University of Istanbul and open
fire upon the people with machineguns. 6 democrats die and 50
students are wounded.

Maras: This mass murder, jointly organised by the MHP, MIT and
the contra-guerrilla, cost the lives of almost a thousand people.
During the pogroms - which lasted for three days - women,
children and the elderly are murdered at random. Shops and houses
were set on fire.

The Daily Murders For The Protection Of The Present-Day Turkish
And The MHP's Role In This

Almost every day people get murdered in Turkey by so-called
"unknown forces". These death-squads only target individuals who
are not highly agreeable to the state. The perpetrators of these
murders are never arrested, let alone convicted. It is plausible
that these death-squads for the main part consist of members from
the MHP.
One of the most recent acts of terror where the MHP can be
suspected of having their hands in it, was the vile and cowardly
assault on a cafe in Istanbul. This resulted in a three day long
uprising from the people in the Gazi-neighbourhood against the
police and the army. The government tried to convince the
international opinion that it had been a religious conflict.
However, during the uprising Alevites and Sunnites fought side by
side against the armed forces of the state. The way this action
was executed: At first a taxi-driver is kidnapped, his throat is
cut and he is thrown in the back of his own car which is then
used in a vile attack where the murderers use machineguns against
unsuspecting citizens. The way this attack was carried out leads
to the suspicion that the MHP, led by the MIT, must have played
an important role. Gazi is a neighbourhood with a lot of people
where left has traditionally been strong.

The MHP Abroad

The "Hollanda Turk Federasyon" which organised a congress
here today, is one of the many cover-organisations of the MHP
abroad. It was founded three months ago and this foundation fits
exactly, once again, in the policy of the Turkish state. The
Turkish state has made it its goal to estrange the European
population from the Kurdish national liberation struggle and the
democratic forces of Turkey. Hundreds of thousands Turkish and
Kurdish democrats live all over Europe and they try to put in
their best for human rights, democracy, and self-determination in
their homeland. This is a thorn in the flesh of the Turkish
state. It was also recently decided that people with the Turkish
nationality who live abroad may vote for the elections in Turkey.
So the European platform has become very important to the Turkish
state. The MHP acts, more than willingly, as agent of the Turkish
The last action of the MHP in Europe was organizing the big
demonstration as a protest against the founding of the Kurdish
parliament-in-exile in The Hague. Everyone could see on Dutch
television how thousands of Turkish nationalists made the sign of
the Grey Wolves. The ring-finger and the middle finger against
the thumb, and the pink and forefinger up, representing the head
of a wolf.


The political crisis in Turkey - the present-day regime can
only keep up by using the most gruesome means -, the importance
of the European platform for Turkish policy and the strengthening
organisation of the MHP, signify that this congress will not be
the last provocation of Turkish fascism. Alas, it is to be
expected that the anti-fascist, the democratic and the solidarity
movement will be confronted more often with meetings like this in
the future, with demonstrations like the one in the days of the
founding of the Kurdish parliament, and even with manifestations
of violence from the side of the MHP.
Therefore, and for the fight for human rights, democracy and
self-determination in Turkey, it is necessary to watch the MHP
very carefully, to investigate her cover-organisations, and to
make sure a movement arises which can effectively fight her.

My lies?

Your obvious inability to answer te questions have exposed the wolf in sheeps

You are calling lies that the MHP/Grey Wolves are in a coallition government,
that Turkey destroyed 3000-4000 villages, that
the Turkish regime supported Hizbollah.

All this support of terrorists! despite all the substantiation!

Thanks for showing yourself.

Ask the UN about PKK in Greece.
Athens dismisses Turkish military chief's claims over 'camp'
Athens, 03/10/2001 (ANA)

Athens sharply condemned the latest statements by the Turkish military
chief this week over alleged training camps in Greece for Kurdish
separatists, with a government spokesman saying on Tuesday that Ankara
is simply trying to take advantage of the current international

"It's simply a repeat of the stereotypical charges leveled by Turkey
against Greece," government spokesman Dimitris Reppas said during a
regular press briefing in the Greek capital.

The spokesman also called on the Turkish military chief, Gen. Hussein
Kivrikoglu, to take the matter up with the United Nations' High
Commission for Refugees, the organization that operates the so-called
"training camp" near the port town of Lavrio - only a few kilometers
from the popular archaeological site of Cape Sounion, in extreme
southeast Attica prefecture.

"That's where he'll (Kivrikoglu) find the answers he is looking for,"
Reppas said.

Additionally, the spokesman said Turkey's military establishment
should also refer to the UN's decisions and resolutions pertaining to
Cyprus in regards to questions involving the island republic's
long-standing problem.

The PKK arose because of Turkeys terrorist actions.

The Kurdish tribes of Anatolia, which predate the Turkish presence in the Middle
East, sided with Ataturk against the British
and Greeks in the early 1920s, but the Turks quickly turned on their Muslim
brothers. From 1923 on, Ataturk's repression of
Kurdish nationalism and even Kurdish identity was savage and predatory. He
filled the Kurdish southeast with Turkish
administrators, gave land to Turkish war veterans, forbade the use of Kurdish
language in court, and, most important, banned
the native tongue in schools, effectively denying formal education to Kurdish
children. The measures quickly spurred a Kurdish
uprising, led by Sheik Said, which erupted throughout the southeast in 1925. It
was quashed by overwhelming Turkish force:
Ataturk, using the ragtag revolt as a pretext for assuming dictatorial powers
which he never completely relinquished, crushed
the Kurdish insurgents. Sheik Said and 660 of his compatriots were executed,
most by public hanging, and another 7,500 were
arrested. Villages were destroyed, massacres reported. The response was well in
excess of the challenge, and the army's
terrorism bred more resistance; individual towns and villages rose up through
the ensuing years. The army's reply was again
harsh: hundreds of villages were razed, thousands of Kurds killed, and perhaps
half a million were deported. The tribal
rebellions persisted through the 1930s, the bloodiest of which (in Dersim, now
Tunceli province) may have taken 40,000 lives
as a result of army reprisals. Turkish Kurdistan was placed under a nearly
permanent state of martial law and a news blackout.

The basis of the confrontation was Turkish nationalism. The Turkish state from
1923 onward simply refused to acknowledge
that Kurds even existed--they were known, until the 1990s, as "Mountain Turks."
The new mythology of Turks as founders of
the great Asian civilizations neatly folded the Kurds into that conceit.
Scholarly work on Kurdish history was outlawed. A
"Turkification" program was instituted in the southeast, raising the visibility
of Turkish culture, moving Turks into the area, and
earnestly promoting the cult of Ataturk. At the same time, the area, so long a
pastoral and agrarian economy, was steadily
impoverished by pogroms, deportations of Kurdish elites, and the disappearance
of the Christian entrepreneurial class.

Chief among the insults was the attack on language, which penetrated beyond the
formal venues of court or schoolroom. The
Ankara regime replaced Kurdish village names with Turkish equivalents, forbade
the naming of children with Kurdish names,
and outlawed the singing of Kurdish folk songs. Because only one Kurd in twenty
could speak Turkish in the first years of the
Republic, the denial of their own language was economically devastating.

In the 1960s and 1970s, as David McDowall explains in his excellent Modern
History of the Kurds, the situation became more
desperate. Unemployment among Kurds rose by 150 percent between 1967 and 1977.
By the early 1990s, less than 10
percent of adults in the Kurdish southeast had industrial jobs, and those tended
to be in low-skilled industries. On the large
landowners' estates, peasants would work eleven hours a day for $2.
Children--the fortunate survivors of a 30 percent
mortality rate--would work alongside their parents. Less than a third of the
population received any formal education and less
than one in five women attended school.

The demise of viable agrarian life and the growth of urban poor and unskilled
youth radicalized large segments of the Kurdish
people--20 percent of Turkey's population. However varied in social outlook and
separated by tribes, dialects, and rates of
assimilation, the Kurds were ripe for rebellious nationalism. Their chance came
with the creation of the PKK in 1974 on the
campus of Ankara University. The founder, Abdullah Ocalan, modeled the PKK on
other Marxist liberation movements that
employed revolutionary violence. By 1980, the PKK was poised to respond to the
pivotal event of the Turkish-Kurdish
conflict: the September 12 coup.

For the outside world, the coup was a bloodless, temporary measure, engineered
by a "reluctant" military, and essential to
eliminating terrorist threats and restoring order. To the Kurds in southeastern
Turkey, the generals' reign was a new wave of
terror and repression, rivaled only by the sanguinary pogroms of the 1930s.
While many Turkish militants of left and right were
prosecuted, vast numbers of Kurdish nationalists were targeted. The new
constitution promulgated by the junta (which remains
in force today) was designed to punish Kurdish nationalism: the mere recognition
of a distinct Kurdish identity was criminalized,
and the Kurdish language was effectively outlawed. The statements by junta
leader General Evren at the time of the coup,
which focused on keeping Turkey undivided, and the arrests and trials of so many
prominent Kurds immediately after the
military seized power, clearly exposed the junta's primary, obsessive fear of
Kurdish nationalism.

That nationalism did grow quickly in response to the dictatorship's harsh
measures. From 1984 the PKK became a force to be
reckoned with, a genuine guerrilla movement significantly supported by ordinary
Kurdish peasants. What began as a nuisance
to the Turkish state grew over the 1980s into a large-scale civil war. By 1990,
some 300,000 troops were deployed in the
southeast, and an enormous amount of the national budget (with reports ranging
from 25 to 40 percent) was going to support
police and military operations there. In 1992, the government began a policy of
forcibly evacuating villages in order to deprive
the PKK of its popular support. Some 3,000 villages have been emptied, and as
many as two million Kurds driven from their
homes into shantytowns and overcrowded apartments in Diyarbakir, Adana, Izmir,
and Istanbul--a population of "internally
displaced" second in the world only to Sudan.

At issue was not so much a separate Kurdistan (the PKK dropped this goal in
1993), but cultural rights--principally the right to
speak, publish, educate, and broadcast in Kurdish, aspirations confirmed in an
exhaustive survey of Kurdish attitudes
conducted by Ankara University Professor Dogu Ergil in 1995. President Turgut
Ozal had granted limited rights to speak
Kurdish in 1991, but other cultural freedoms--for example, broadcasting and
educating in Kurdish--were denied. Kurdish
activists were also concerned with economic development in the southeast, which
the government had long promised and never
delivered. Firmly in control of the civilian governments' policy toward the
southeast, the military would not allow broader
cultural rights or the emergence of Kurdish political parties. Turkish
nationalism, the bedrock tenet of Kemalism, could not be
modified even to accommodate harmless cultural longing.

This rigidity is especially pernicious. In an insightful essay in Nationalism
and Ethnic Conflict, MIT professor Stephen van Evera
presents ten hypotheses on war and nationalism. One focuses on the content of
nationalist ideology: "Does the ideology of the
nationalism incorporate respect for the freedom of other nationalities," he
asks, "or does it assume a right or duty to rule them?"
Those that exclude, he says, are forms of "hegemonistic, or asymmetrical,
nationalism," which "is both the rarest and the most
dangerous variety of nationalism." The hegemonistic type--of which Kemalism is
an instance--is especially dangerous both
because it cannot permit even mild deviations and because violent suppression
begets violent reaction, especially against a
minority with the muscle to fight back. The PKK, whose vague Marxism and violent
acts alienated many Kurds, remained the
only vehicle for Kurdish aspirations and the only protector against
state-sponsored cultural genocide, which was rationalized by
an inflexible, unitary, racialist ideology, and enforced with organized

The second challenge to Kemalism--a vibrant political Islam--has also appeared
often in the years of the republic. The
September 12 coup occurred just six days after Necmettin Erbakan, the leader of
an Islamic political party and the deputy
prime minister, gave a rabble-rousing speech condemning Israel. Erbakan was
arrested during the coup, and the incident
renewed the tensions between Islam and the military. Like Ataturk, the generals
of the 1970s and 1980s used Islam to their
advantage: Marxists and Kurdish leftists were countered with military support
for the so-called imam-hatip schools--religious
instruction for adolescents meant to divert them from leftist politics.
Meanwhile, in the junta and its aftermath, Turkish politics
barely tolerated the likes of Erbakan and his new party, Refah.

But with the civil war draining the treasury, boosting inflation to more than
100 percent, piling on more debt, and strangling
foreign investment, low-skilled workers and farmers--the most religious strata
in Turkish society--were the first to suffer. The
economic impacts of war and "globalization" drove increasing numbers to Refah.
Students of the imam-hatip schools were
coming of age politically. And the swarms of Kurdish refugees were given aid and
comfort by Refah and other Islamic
organizations. This combination of factors boosted Refah's fortunes in 1994
municipal elections (electing mayors in Ankara and
Istanbul) and December 1995 national elections, when the party won a slight
plurality, enabling Erbakan to form a government
six months later.

The secularist military would not tolerate Erbakan in power, however, and within
a few months was demanding that he rescind
his mild reforms, which permitted greater religious expression--allowing women
to wear head scarves in court, for example.
When he balked, the military forced a "soft coup," threatening to oust him;
finally, in June 1997, he resigned. Democratic
governance would again not stand in the way of Kemalism. The military has made
it clear that Erbakan will not be permitted to
become premier again, even if Refah is the top vote recipient in the next

As Jonathan Randal deftly puts it, "Only a state as slavishly faithful to the
ossified letter of its founding dogma could have
backed itself into a corner as totally as Turkey did in this final decade of the
twentieth century." Randal makes a compelling
case: Kemalism, sclerotic and corrupt but clinging to the rigid mindset of
Turkish nationalism, could not allow the pluralism that
makes Western democracies so adaptive. The obdurate military dashed hopes for
economic growth and democracy, and
turned perhaps a third of the electorate toward traditionalist reactionaries
like Refah. Randal, whose reporting skills are
legendary (while his book is oddly gossipy and repetitive), has it exactly
right. McDowall's more measured and conventional
history also pinpoints Turkish nationalism as the core problem, whereas neither
Huntington nor Kaplan frame the issue with
quite such clarity. Huntington, to his credit, does offer a remarkable answer to
this question: What follows Kemalism, if (as
Huntington supposes) Turkey cannot totally escape its Islamic past and will
never be accepted by Christian Europe? Turkey
could, he replies "be ready to give up its frustrating and humiliating role as a
beggar pleading for membership in the West and to
resume its much more impressive and elevated historical role as the principal
Islamic interlocutor and antagonist of the West."
(Erbakan's inability to deliver such a vision is due to his personal failures as
a politician.) Huntington says Turkey could "become
a South Africa . . . changing itself from a pariah state in its civilization to
the leading state of that civilization." But the possibility
of a Turkish Mandela emerging to turn that trick--to reject "Ataturk's legacy
more thoroughly than Russia has rejected
Lenin's"--is difficult to imagine among Turkey's corrupt, obsequious, and aging

Moreover, a visionary, Islamic Turkey is everything America would abhor.
American backing of Ankara, lavish since the time
of the 1980 coup, is predicated on precisely the opposite: that Turkey will
remain not only secular and Western-oriented, but
will serve as a bulwark against Islamic and Arab militancy in the region. Until
the anti-foreign aid virus infected Capitol Hill,
Turkey was the third-largest recipient of military assistance. The dispatch of
sophisticated weaponry--F-16 fighter jets, Black
Hawk and Cobra helicopters, tanks, etc.--is justified by Turkey's "bad
neighborhood": Syria, Iraq, and especially Iran.

But the bad 'hood rationale is a canard. As Henri Barkey and his colleagues
point out in Reluctant Neighbor: Turkey's Role in
the Middle East, the relations Ankara pursues with these difficult states are
complex and not without some danger (partially
stemming from Kurdish restiveness). But they neither justify the weapons flow to
Turkey nor fulfill the US policy of "dual
containment" of Baghdad and Teheran. One could instead view Turkey as the
meddlesome neighbor: sending arms to Chechen
rebels and Azeri belligerents, occupying northern Cyprus, repeatedly bombing
Kurdish areas of northern Iraq, threatening Syria
(which harbors Ocalan), and huffing about Greece, Bosnia, Macedonia, Bulgaria,
and Russia.

In any case, the neighborhood where the Turks use the weapons conveyed from
Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Texas is its
own southeast, where jets and helicopters attack PKK camps and empty out Kurdish
villages. It is by far the most significant
use of US weapons in the world. America has supplied the muscle for Turkey's
war, and winked at the military's
actions--including its violent supression of free expression--to sustain Turkey
as a platform for the protection of US "strategic
interests" in the Persian Gulf and in the newly independent states of the former
Soviet Union, especially the flow of Caspian Sea
oil. This, in essence, is what Nixon, Kissinger, and Carter did in the Shah's
Iran in the 1970s, and, in a different way, what
Reagan and Bush did in Saddam's Iraq in the 1980s: bribe tyrants in exchange for
their fidelity to American interests. Both
ended badly, indeed disastrously for nearly everyone. Now the disaster unfolds
in Turkey: tens of thousands dead and
wounded, millions homeless.

The new attention to this debacle is welcome, but the regard of a few
intellectuals and journalists is unlikely to unlock the grip of
ideology in Turkey or overcome American inertia. Of the former, one can say that
Kemalism will ultimately lose its power; the
current crisis, which includes official corruption of the dirtiest kind,
indicates how tenuous Ataturk's legacy may be, how easily it
may disassemble with the right combination of charismatic leadership and the
internal will to change. As to the policies of
Turkey's most stalwart ally: Washington's embrace of the status quo is simply
thoughtless and reflexive. America's major news
media regard Turkey as some sort of exotic Muslim sideshow. But the show has
been running for a long time, and features a
sustained pattern of massive human rights violations, among the most egregious
in the twentieth century.

Would it be different, one wonders, if we saw Turkey as a fascist bully
engendering its own collapse? If we saw the "white
genocide" of the Kurds in a more compelling historical light, and the peril in
Turkey's re-running the "Iran precedent"? That
fascism still lives in Europe is a disturbing idea. That America is its closest
ally is an abhorrent one.

John Tirman's Spoils of War: The Human Cost of America's Arms Trade

The long-term Turkish policy on Cyprus - Partition

Turkey invaded the island of Cyprus using the short-lived coup d'etat
against President Makarios as a pretext. To explain this brutal act Turkey
offered the restoration of the constitutional structure of the Republic of
Cyprus that was damaged by the coup, and the protection of the
Turkish-Cypriot minority on the island. However, this argument contradicts
statements made by Turkish official decades before the invasion and even
after it. These statements seem to indicate that the truth behind the
invasion was simply expansionism.

Ataturk himself, who is considered by the Turks as their national hero, and
the founder of modern Turkey, regarded Cyprus as being particularly
important for Turkey. Professor Dervis Manizade in an article in the
Istanbul daily "Milliyet" (20.7.78) quoted Attaturk as saying while
addressing military commanders:

"Pay attention to Cyprus, this island is important to us."

Ali Nesim reported in "Dogus" (20.9.84):

"Ataturk, replying to a question on Cyprus after the annexation of
Alexandretta said: The turn of Cyprus has not yet come." (1939)

In 1954, nine years before intercommunal conflict broke out in 1963, the
then Foreign Minister of Turkey F. Koprufu, declared that Cyprus is an
"extension of continental Turkey", and that it should revert to Turkey "on
the basis of geographical proximity."

At the tripartite conference on Cyprus in August-September 1955, the then
Turkish Foreign Minister, Zorlu, stated:

"...The importance of Cyprus to Turkey does not arise from a single cause;
it is a necessity which emanates from the exigencies of history, geography,
economy and military strategy, from the right to existence and security,
which is the most sacred of every state, in short, from the very nature of

A prophetic statement by Kemal Satir, former Vice-President of Turkey, 1964,

"Cyprus will be divide into two sections, one of which will join Turkey"

F.C. Erkin the then Foreign Minister of Turkey to an Athens newspaper in
June 1964 expanded on the above with,

"The radical solution would be to cede one part o Cyprus to Greece and the
other, closest to the Turkish Asiatic coast, to Turkey".

The Turkish journalist and historian A. Gurkan, more recently in "Kibris
Postasi" (20.12.83) put it quite succinctly when he said:

"Speaking from a purely strategic point of view we could say that for
Turkey's security, a safe Cyprus is a Cyprus which would be, in its
entirety, under Turkish control."

But what makes Turkish expansionism even more evident are the following

By Gunes (former Turkish Foreign Minister) which reads:

"Cyprus is as precious as the right arm of a country which cares for her
defence or her expansionist aims if she harbours any. If we don't keep in
mind this strategic importance of Cyprus, we cannot understand the peace
operation of 20 July or rather it is impossible to understand the whole
Cyprus crisis...

Many states, to a certain extent because it suits their interest, want to
see the Cyprus problem merely as our desire to protect the Turkish community
on the island. Whereas the actual problem is the security of 45 million
Turks in the motherland together with the Turks in the island and the
maintenance of the balance in the Middle East."

By Ozal, (...) Prime Minister of Turkey who, referring to the illegal UDI
(unilateral declaration of independence of the Turkish occupied areas) of
November 1983, said:

"Cyprus is an island which pierces the middle of Turkey like a dagger. It is
extremely vital from the viewpoint of our security. This island should not
be in enemy hands. The existence of the Turks in northern Cyprus is a
guarantee in this direction."

The Turkish Cypriot Leader Rauf Denktash himself who stated ("Milliyet"

"Naturally Turkey has strategic interests in Cyprus. It is fortunate for
Turkey that the Turkish Cypriot community exists here. Even if the Turkish
Cypriot community did not exist, Turkey would not have left Cyprus to

Mr. Koruturk told me something which is very important. The honorable
President had told me: "If Cyprus passes to Greece and is militarized, then
Turkey ceases to be a maritime nation". This is an extremely important

More recently, Professor Kuran delivering the closing speech at a symposium
organised on the general theme of "Turkey's problems" on 2nd February 1986
referred to the continuing presense of the Turkish troops on part of the
territory of the Republic of Cyprus...:

"They say that we do not covet the territories lying outside our nation's
sovereign territory. This is wrong. All the nations have their great
ideology. In that case, what is the Turkish army seeking in Cyprus? Cyprus
does not lie within the frontiers of our national territory."

The former Turkish prime Minister himself, in a number of recent statements,
left no doubt about Turkey's real aims regarding Cyprus. In an interview
with the "International Herald Tribune" (2.6.86) Mr. Ozal said:

"The island had never been Greek in its history. It belonged to the
Venetians and then was taken over by the Ottomans. Later the British came. I
believe that it was during the Ottoman period and later under the British
rule that the Greeks immigrated to the island. And I said, if you want to
the island something, it is more Turkish than Greek. It was governed for
many hundreds of years by the Ottomans."

When Turkey sent an officer of the Turkish Army, Riza Vukuskan, to Cyprus to
organize the TMT rerrorist organization, she was simply taking the first
practical step in a long standing policy aimed at the annexation of Cyprus
or at least part of it.

The handy excuse used by Turkey to further her aim of partition was the
"oppression" of the Turkish Cypriot minority by the Greek Cypriot majority.

Denktash himself, in an interview to the London "Times" (20.1.78) admits
that he had organized the TMT saying:

"I had to create the TMT with some friends in order to coordinate those
individuals who were going around doing things."

"I had set up the TMT with a few friends...Everybody thought that I was the
leader, but I was not. I was political advisor. Immediately after forming it
I handed it over... The leaders were former army officers from Turkey."

Emin Dirvana, then Turkish Ambassador to Cyprus, explains what Denktash
means, in an article in "Milliyet" (15.5.64)

"...I was informed that on the 7th of June, 1958, a bomb had been planted in
the Turkish Press Office in Nicosia by persons who, as was established
later, had nothing to do with the Greek Cypriots. The Turks of Nicosia were
then incited (...) and perpetrated acts similar to those committed on the
6th and the 7th of September, 1955 in Istanbul."

In an interview given by Denktash to the British television channel ITV for
the programme "Cyprus: Britain's Grim Legacy", he said:

"There was an explosion at the information bureau of the Turkish Consulate.
A crowd had already gathered there, a crowd of the Turkish Cypriot
community. And they almost immediately decided that Greeks had done it and
they were swearing vengeance against the Greeks and so on." "The explosion
started a night of riots in Nicosia. Turkish Cypriots burned and looted
Greek shops and homes. Soon came counter-attacks and the fighting spread
round the island. Later on, a friend of mine, whose name must still be kept
secret, was to confess to me that he had put this little bomb in their
doorway in order to create an atmosphere of tension so that people would
know that Turkish Cypriots mattered."

The climax of the "holy indignation" which Ambassador Dirvana refers to, was
the massacre of eight Greek Cypriots and the serious wounding of five, near
the village of Geunyeli on 12th June 1958, five days after the explosion.

In an interview to the "London Times" (20.1.78) Denktash said:

"It was now in the late 1950s and there was bitter intercommunal strife.
Eventually TMT became more than a military force, it became a moral force."

" are condemned to be crushed by a 65-million-strong Turkey."
Warning to Greek Cypriots by Turkish occupation representative Rauf Denktash
soon after delivering what he termed a "peace plan" for permanent apartheid
in Cyprus (September 9, 1998)

Turkey Censured By COE

Turkey was slated at a meeting of a Council of Europe (COE) Committee of
Ministers in Strasbourg yesterday. The ministers met to discuss the Titina
Loizidou case and Turkey's blatant non-compliance with a ruling by the
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

In 1989 Titina Loizidou, a Greek Cypriot refugee, filed a citizens complaint
to the Strasbourg based ECHR that she was being prevented from peacefully
enjoying the use of her home in Kyrenia by Turkey, whose occupation troops
control the area. In 1996 in a landmark decision for Cyprus, the court ruled
that Turkey was responsible for depriving Loizidou of the use of her
property and later ordered that country to pay her compensation amounting to
almost £500,000. So far, Turkey has not paid a single cent and steadfastly
refuses to comply with the court's decision.

The Committee noted that Turkey, as a contracting party to the European
Convention of Human Rights and as a member of the Council of Europe, was
showing a lack of respect for these bodies and that its behaviour was

Facing a deluge of lawsuits from tens of thousands of Greek Cypriot refugees
if it pays up, Turkey yesterday continued its trite argument that
responsibility lay with the Turkish Cypriot regime not itself, knowing full
well that as a non recognised state, the Denktash regime cannot be sued.
They also tried to divert the Committee's attention to the ongoing Cyprus
settlement talks, saying the whole issue would be decided there.

[14/07/00 - Newswire]
Background information:

In July 1974, Turkey using as a pretext the coup against President Makarios,
invaded the Republic of Cyprus in violation of the UN Charter and all
principles of international law.

As a result, 37% of the island was occupied - the wealthiest part,
representing 70% of the island's economic potential.

200,000 Greek Cypriots - one third of the population - were forcibly
expelled from their homes, became refugees in their own country and are
still deprived of the right to return to their homes and properties. In
addition over 1,600 Greek Cypriots went missing and what became of them is
unknown to this day. About 20,000 Greek and Maronite Cypriots remained
enclaved in the occupied area. Over the years they became victims of
Turkey's ethnic cleansing - harassed and intimidated they were forced to
leave and today only a few hundred still remain in their homes. Byzantine
churches, monuments and antiquities were destroyed or looted and many items
were smuggled abroad.

The cultural heritage of the occupied area, that reaches back to the 7th
millennium BC, forming part of the cultural heritage of mankind, continues
to this day to be systematically and deliberately plundered and destroyed.

Moreover, more than 114,000 settlers from Turkey have been imported
illegally and colonised the occupied areas with the aim of changing the
demographic structure of Cyprus. Properties usurped from the expelled Greek
Cypriots were distributed to such settlers. All this, coupled with a strong
Turkish military presence in the occupied areas (estimated at 40,000 Turkish
troops) and an attempt to change Greek place-names of villages and towns
into Turkish ones, is clear evidence that Turkey's aim is to turn the
occupied part of Cyprus into a Turkish province.

A series of UN General Assembly and Security Council Resolutions, as well as
resolutions adopted by numerous other international organisations, condemned
the Turkish invasion of Cyprus and all that followed, demanded the return of
refugees to their homes in safety and the tracing of the missing persons and
called for respect of the human rights of all Cypriots. Moreover, the
European Commission of Human Rights found the government of Turkey
responsible for gross and systematic violations of human rights in Cyprus
during and after the invasion.


"There are many examples of joint upsprings against the Sultan and the
Pashas. We shall only mention the uprising of Halil Agha in 1765, of the

peasants in 1804-1805 and of Giaour Imam in 1833. In these upsprings Greeks
and Turks fought jointly for better living conditions, but they were put
down through the co-operation of aghas- landlords and the higher Greek Clergy.
This brief survey of the circumstances that enabled the Ottoman Empire to impose

itself upon Cyprus accounts for the main causes that led to the cooperation
of the Greek and Turkish masses."
Ibrahim Aziz, The Historical Course of the Turkish Cypriot Community, 1981.

For hundreds of years Greek and Turkish Cypriots lived in social harmony and
economic interdependence in the villages and towns of Cyprus.

This web of interdependence was only disturbed after protracted and violent
attacks against it. Even after incidents, planned and instigated to prove
that Greek and Turkish Cypriots could not live together, ordinary people again
and again proved the opposite until they were torn apart by the Attila operation

in 1974.

The Turkish Cypriots originated as a Muslim population during the period
when Cyprus was ruled by the Ottoman Empire between the 16th and the 19th
centuries. Some are descended from the Greeks and Latins who changed their faith


ease the burden of oppression. Their interdependence with the rest of the
population of Cyprus is indicated by the fact that until 1974 they lived
in towns and villages all over Cyprus. The mass of Greek and Turkish Cypriots
lived and cooperated peacefully in an atmosphere of religious and cultural
tolerance. As Cyprus moved into the twentieth century, Greek and Turkish Cypriot

workers engaged in common trade union struggles organized in the Pancyprian
Federation of Labour.

During the years of colonial rule the Greek Cypriots agitated for freedom.
The Turkish Cypriot minority was the object of continuous attempts at
manipulation aimed at converting them into an instrument of colonial policy in
the anti-colonial movement of the rest of the population of the island. The
Colonial power involved Turkey in its dispute with the people of its colony:
It was easier to continue ruling the colony if the dispute was not between
the colonial masters and its subjects, but a more complicated one.

TMT was the outcome of Turkey's cooperation with the colonial power, and was
the means of frustrating the wishes of the majority of the population of
Cyprus, dividing Greek and Turkish Cypriot and beginning the long path towards

The organization was set up by Mr Rauf Denktash.
"I had set up the TMT with a few friends...Everybody thought that I was the
leader, but I was not. I was political advisor. Immediately after forming it
I handed it over... The leaders were former army officers from Turkey."
(The Times, 20.1.1978)

Dr Kuchuk takes up the story with an account of how Riza Vurushkan came to
Cyprus from Turkey to lead TMT.
"Year order to give daily reports to Ankara...and to secure aid
from Turkey I used to go to Ankara very frequently. During one of these
visits, the late Prime Minister of Turkey, Adnan Menderes, introduced Riza
to me...Later I met him at the office of a Lieutenant General and talked
with him there. During our meeting it was decided that Vurushkan should come to
Cyprus as "civilian adviser". He arrived in Cyprus under an assumed name and
settled down here."
(Halkin Sesi, 16.2.1979)

TMT incited anti-Greek riots and tried to force Turkish Cypriot workers to
establish separate trade unions.

Murder, arson and intimidation were the means that TMT used in order to
prove that Greek and Turkish Cypriots could not live together. The victims were
trade unionists, journalists and ordinary Turkish Cypriots who resisted TMT's

After the signing of the Zurich and London Agreements in 1959, which led to
the independence of Cyprus, TMT continued its clandestine activities in the
cause of dividing Cyprus, and was to continue until 1984 as Mr Ozgur was to

In October, 1959, seven months after the signing of the agreements on Cyprus
independence, the British mine-sweeper HMS Burmaston intercepted the Turkish
boat "Deniz" as it was attempting to deliver a shipment of arms to TMT in

Despite TMT terrorism, the mass of Greek and Turkish Cypriots citizens
entered hopefully into the period of independence.

Some TMT attacks against Turkish Cypriots, May-July, 1958

- 22.5.58: Murder attempt against Ahmet Sadi, Director of the Turkish Office
of the Pancyprian Workers Federation. In order to save his life,
Sadi left Cyprus soon after and settled in England.

- 24.5.48: Murder of Fazil Onder, Chief Editor of the weekly newspaper

- 29.5.58: Murder of Ahmet Yahya, committee member of the progressive
Turkish Cypriot Athletic-Cultural Centre.

- 5.6.58: Murder attempt against Hasan Ali, member of a Construction Workers
Committee of the Pancyprian Labour Federation.

- 30.6.58: Murder of Ahmet Ibrahim, a barber from Limassol, because he had
friendly relations with Greek-Cypriots and expressed himself in
favour of Greek-Turkish cooperation.

- 3.7.58: Murder attempt against Arif Hulusi Barudi. He was working in a
business owned by a Greek Cypriot. Before the attempt he had
received a threatening letter demanding that he leave his job.

"The Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots alike were spread widely over the
island- not according to any fixed geographical pattern but rather as a
result of the usual factors behind the movement and settlement of people over

generations; for example, the search for farming land and for employment,
and other such social and economic motives... Thus out of 619 villages at the
time of the last census, 393 were wholly or predominantly Greek Cypriot, 120
Turkish Cypriot and 106 were classified as mixed. But the villages
themselves are not usually to be found in clusters where one community or the

predominates; the more general pattern in any given area is a mixture of
Greek Cypriot, Turkish Cypriot and mixed villages. The capital, Nicosia, and the

other main towns such as Famagusta, Limassol and Larnaca are also mixed in
population... There is evidence of considerable intermingling of the two
communities, more especially in employment and commerce but also to some
degree at the social level."
Gallo Plaza, United Nations Mediator,
"Report to the Secretary General", 1965.

"Going ...back... to our schooldays... I don't think that the generation of
that age, the boys of that age... had any cause for alarm for the future... were

years when people who are now in our age group knew there was British
"repression" on the island... We were just boys in the English School; Greek
and Turkish boys living probably in the same street in opposite houses,
playing together, fighting together... As a boy I remember going around with my
father to Greek monasteries all over Cyprus, to Greek houses, and being

by Greeks on an equal footing as friends, good friends. They used to come to
our house, too, and the reason, I now believe, looking back, is that we had
no political quarrel, no political bone to pick".
Rauf Denktash at a Rotary Club Luncheon 1n 1972
in R. Denktash, "The Cyprus Problem", 1974.

"In 1954 I felt great anxiety about Cyprus.
Harold Macmillan was urging us to stir up the Turks in order to neutralise
the Greek agitation. I wrote a minute in opposition to this tactic. I also asked

the Prime Minister's private secretary if I could see Churchill on the
subject, but he absolutely refused even to pass on the suggestion, which he

regarded as impertinence."
C.M. Woodhouse, "Something Ventured", 1982.

TMT Leaflet Circulated on 7 May 1958:
"Oh Turkish Youth!
The day is near when you will be called upon to sacrifice your life and
blood in the "PARTITION" struggle - the struggle for freedom... You are a brave
Turk. You are faithful to your country and nation and are entrusted with the
of demonstrating Turkish might. Be ready to break the chains of slavery with
your determination and willpower and with your love of freedom.
All Turkdom, right and justice and God are with you. PARTITION OR DEATH."
quoted in Nancy Crawshaw "The Cyprus Revolt", 1978.

"Although the nucleus of the first Turkish Cypriot political party was
organized in 1942, it was not until 1955 that the Turkish Cypriot community
became politically active. Within the next three years, a community
political structure was developed as a result not only of efforts of Turkish
leaders to oppose Enosis, but also of encouragement from the British and
Turkish officials who were seeking to safeguard their countries' strategic
Dr Fazil Kuchuk in interview to R.A.Patrick, Doctoral
Dissertation, London School of Economics and
Political Science, 1972.

"The early stages of the Cyprus conflict, in the mid-1950's, were mainly a
struggle between the Greek Cypriots and the British Colonial power, with the
Turks at that time hardly interested in the island. There is strong evidence
that the British Government of the day deliberately encouraged an
indifferent Turkey to take more active interest, as a useful counterweight in
struggle against the Greeeks. One of the most violent expressions of this
artificially contrived Turkish indignation was on the night of 6th-7th September

when a terrifying Turkish mob destroyed quantities of Greek property in
Instanbul. It should be noted that at the Yassaida trials in 1960 evidence was
given by
the defence witnesses that the Turkish Government had been put up to staging a
Cyprus demonstration by the then British Foreign Secretary Harold Macmillan,
but that the demonstration, mis-managed by Menderes, had degenerated into an
uncontrollable riot".
David Hotham, "The Turks", 1972.

"When the armed struggle started, the British had at their disposal
thousands of men and could even increase their existing numbers to put down the
struggle. This they did not do, but they formed instead the well known
Auxiliary Corps. The ordinary Turkish Cypriots, who did not realize where the
were leading them (since their leadership did not warn them, rather it
them), hastened to reinforce this Auxiliary Corps thinking only of securing
a living. Thus, the Greek Cypriots, who thought that they were waging a holy
against the British, found themselves facing the Turkish Cypriots. In this
way the British started submitting to the Turkish community their plans for
Ibrahim Aziz, "The Historical Course of the Turkish Cypriot Community",


Oct 15, 2001, 3:19:45 AM10/15/01






Terrorist Acts:

(c) Copyright 1999

(Source: Inisiyatif #5)