OCS and Butter Bar Fraud Exposed -Rebuttal
DGVREIMAN
OCS and Butter Bar Fraud Exposed - Rebuttal
http://tinyurl.com/ygy52yg Smear Merchant Disclaimer which applies to
this post: (2010 disclaimer).
Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks recent fraud and false accusations about me,
along with his gang's:
I have noticed that when Nigel Brooks nominates a post for "the post
of the month" it often contains some kind fraud, forgery, false
accusation, defamation, invasion of privacy, or other obloquy posted
by some member of his hate/smear/con gang about me.
This "echoing and backing up" con man fraud is a classic example of
how a hate/smear/con gang operates to smear their targeted victim.
One of the gang members posts some obloquy, replete with its false
accusations and fraud, and then the gang leader incites more and
encourages the gang by praising the con. Like I said, this is typical
Nigel Brooks.
I suspect this tells us a lot about the true ethics and character of
Nigel Brooks.
This con tactic is almost as bad as when Google's Legal Team proved
Nigel Brooks was and had been lying about them for months, and lying
about his gang digging typos out of my waste basket to fraudulently
claim "posts found in my waste basket" were my intentional post.
Nigel Brooks, in his response to my post revealing what Google said
about him, desperately hides from the fact that yet another third
party has proved he has been conning everyone about my posts for
years, and instead howls and barks that I said "Law enforcement was
supposed to contact him" (or words to that effect).
But we all know, and is evidenced by the post involved in revealing
Google's legal team email below, I never said anything about "law
enforcement contacting Nigel Brooks." He made that false straw man up
so he could duck, dodge, obfuscate, and hide from the fact that Google
(yet another independent third party) proved Nigel Brooks was conning
and using serial lying about my posts for years. You would think ol
Brooks would fess up to his fraud and at least apologize and slink
away in shame, but I have found that con men rarely ever address
evidence that prove them a con man. Usually they respond with just
more cons, and a bit of bluster and threats, which is precisely what
Nigel Brooks did when Google exposed his fraud.
Here is what I posted in respect to Google, which contains nothing
but the truth and the facts: (Note a copy of an email I received from
Google's legal team is included - if you want more details about this
post all you need to do is email me, verify your identity and request
it - which some gang members are shaking in their boots to do - they
know they cannot lend their real names to their fraud.)
http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.
Post of the Month Fraud
Here is where Brooks repeated and posted outright fraud and declared
this obloquy and false accusations as "nomination for post of the
month" and below you will find URL proving Nigel Brooks and his gang
member outright liars and caught posting fraud and utterly false
accusations once again.
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7q6ru8...@mid.individual.net...> "tankfixer"
<paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.25a6a94...@news.bytemine.net...
>> In article <hhimp9$qe1$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> awrli...@hotmail.com says...
>>>
>>> "tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:MPG.25a6783...@news.bytemine.net...
>>> > In article <s66dnYBZ146RxKHW...@giganews.com>,
>>> > dgvr...@comcast.net says...
>>> >>
>>> >> I said I returned and was forced to act as a butter bar as a
>>> >> SFC E-7.
>>> >
>>> > But you didn't SAY that.. did you..
>>>
>>> he still hasn't....he left Ft Benning and went to Vietnam later.
>>> wasn't
>>> any 'return' to it still a marroon
>>
>> Try, after OCS booted his sorry ass the Army had to send him
>> someplace..
>> Since France was of so little consequence by then he could do
>> little
>> damage there..
>>
>> Or was Doug the reason France asked the US to remove our forces
>> from the
>> country ?
>>
>> Say it isn't so !
> Nominated for December 2009 post of the month.
>
> Nigel Brooks
Doug's Rebuttal: This is classic Nigel Brooks: He knows what the
person posted above about OCS booting me was complete fraud, total
lies, and contradictory to what Nigel Brooks has even posted about my
promotion to SSG E-6 after I agreed to leave OCS and accept the France
assignment offer.
We all know that my military records show that I was promoted from
E-5 to SSG E-6 via a recommendation for promotion by the very OCS
school that this idiot claims "booted me."
Anyone that has ever been in the US Army knows people that are booted
are not then promoted to SSG E-6 and sent to France.
I have posted several times the reason I initially left OCS, and it
was due to an emergency leave, and I had *returned* and was waiting
for another class when I was offered the promotion and the France
assignment. The US Army was desperate for French speaking soldiers
that could do the job they wanted done while we were pulling our
troops out of France and sending them into Germany.
The original person that posted above clearly has very limited or zero
knowledge about the US Army if he believes those booted from OCS are
then promoted by those doing the booting to SSG E-6. Pathetic.
Nigel Brooks knows and has posted herein that my records confirms that
I was promoted within eight days after I arrived in France, and he
also knows that independent military experts have confirmed I could
have only been promoted in a replacement unit in France with a
recommendation for promotion from my previous commander, anyone that
was really in the US Army would know that fact. Apparently the
original poster was never in the US Army, or knows so pitiful little
about it he could never make it out of the Junior NCO ranks.
But even with the clear knowledge he is reproducing cons, fraud,
serial lying, defamation and outright fraud, he nominates his fellow
gang's fraud for "post of the month." This unethical act is very
typical of Nigel Brooks.
See the following URL's for evidence of Nigel Brooks fraud - it
appears he and his gang have been caught red handed yet again using
fraud, false accusations, obloquy and serial lying to defame and smear
me in a typical hate/smear/con gang fashion.
http://tinyurl.com/aa3kls Brooks Platoon Sergeant Lie:
http://tinyurl.com/d833hg In This rebuttal I prove that Nigel Brooks
confirmed my promotion to SFC E-7 AFTER I left OCS - then he later
lied about it.
http://tinyurl.com/cnqp7v In this post Nigel Brooks confirms and
acknowledges that I said and was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight days
AFTER I left OCS. So how can Nigel now claim that I said I was a SFC
E-7 BEFORE I attended OCS? There are 32 posts on any Google search
that proves I said often I was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I LEFT OCS!
Many of which Nigel Brooks and many of his hate gang members
acknowledged by responding to them.
Obviously, the (SFC) entry in the original extemporaneous Butter Bar
quip was typographically placed in the wrong place in the sentence
Brooks is forging as the PREPONDERANCE of evidence clearly and
irrefutably proves. Which BTW, also proves that Brooks has been
caught in mid con yet again.
"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I went to OCS and
returned as a Butter Bar myself (as a SFC)."
It is clear the (SFC) entry was placed in the sentence to clarify what
I meant about being a Butter Bar, and if Brooks would ever show the
post in true context, it will prove that I was talking about NCO's
taking the place of commissioned officers in the post - no wonder
Brooks hides the entire post - it would also prove his fraudulent and
forged context.
http://tinyurl.com/art5yk Here I state I was promoted to SSG E-6
eight days after I left OCS. So how can Nigel Brooks now claim that I
said I was a SFC before I went to OCS? Sp4 Brooks was of course never
in the regular Army, but you would think that even a SP4 personnel
clerk draftee would know the rank of SFC E-7 comes AFTER the rank of
SSG E-6? I suspect that Brooks does know about that proper order of
rank, but he needs to lie about it so he can further his fraud about a
clear and unmistakable typo that he is trying to exploit into a means
to con the readers again about something I said in the past.
http://tinyurl.com/dmpgrl In this post I provide more evidence that
other people have also heard and used the term Butter Bar to reference
a Platoon Leader. - URL's are included. I also point out again that
I was promoted to SSG E-6 immediately after I left OCS - so Brook's
obviously fraudulent claim that I was claiming I was a SFC E-7 BEFORE
I even went to OCS is clearly fraudulent, a lie, and his goofy fraud
is equally clearly a typo as the above corrected passage of the quip
clearly proves. As I said, Brooks regularly uses typos to smear and
defame, while "clarifying" his own. As just one example, Brooks
claimed that OCS members graduated as a 1st Lieutenant, but when
challenged he "clarified" that statement as a typo - it seems that
Brooks and gang can make typos and correct or clarify them, but his
smear victims cannot. I wonder if the word "Hypocrite" means anything
to Nigel Brooks?
Also, we all know that OCS does not "boot out" candidates and then
immediately promote them to SSG E-6 - that claim cannot be coming from
anyone that knows anything about the US Army. I was promoted to SSG
E-6 because I was willing to delay my OCS and accept an assignment the
US Army wanted me to perform due to my language skills.
http://tinyurl.com/cnzpvf In this post I once again expose Nigel
Brooks fraud about my rank after I left OCS - which again Nigel ties
to lie about, and other lies.
http://tinyurl.com/5ttdjw Here is yet another post in which I clearly
state that I was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I left OCS and was assigned
to France. "Which was if I was willing to delay my return to OCS, I
would be sent to France, promoted to SSG E-6,. . . "
Brooks and gang clearly knew that I had said dozens of times that I
was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I LEFT OCS - thereby making it virtually
impossible their claim that I said and meant I was a SFC E-7 BEFORE I
went to OCS is true - we all know that E-7 comes AFTER E-6, and that
fact clearly, irrefutably, without question, proves Nigel Brooks and
gang has been caught in mid con yet again! Amazing how many times
this smear and fraud merchant exposes his own con game and fraud!
Like I said, there are not less than 32 posts found on any Google
search in which I said I was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight days
after I left OCS and arrived in France. So it is impossible for any
statement that I was a SFC E-7 BEFORE I went to OCS to be correct and
intentional. Brooks was told this simple fact, and about the typo,
when he first asked about my meaning in respect to my extemporaneous
quip. As the following URL proves, I pointed out the typo and told
him that the typist simply placed the (SFC) acronym in the wrong place
in the sentence. Which is something that is done often by us all.
Yet Brooks had already been lying and conning about this issue, so he
could not admit that he was clearly wrong as not less than 32 Google
archived POSTS CLEARLY PROVE!
Brooks also stated that he knew the term Butter Bar could mean
something other than simply a 2nd Lieutenant - which the following URL
clearly proves - once again Nigel Brooks has been caught in mid con.
Even the tiniest of investigation into Nigel Brooks smear and
defamation irrefutably proves he is lying, conning and using fraud and
forgeries to do so. Brooks claim that a SFC E-7 comes before the rank
of SSG E-6 is a classic example of how Brooks trips up, and of course
his now infamous preposterous claim that people can receive Purple
Heart Medals in non-combat situations, which also has been exposed for
the fraud it clearly is. In fact Nigel Brooks has a propensity to use
forgeries and fraud to smear and defame, and it has been my experience
that he is easily caught if you take the time to simply do a little
investigation into his fraudulent accusations.
Doug Grant (Tm)
tankfixer
dgvr...@comcast.net says...
> Post of the Month Fraud
>
> Here is where Brooks repeated and posted outright fraud and declared
> this obloquy and false accusations as "nomination for post of the
> month" and below you will find URL proving Nigel Brooks and his gang
> member outright liars and caught posting fraud and utterly false
> accusations once again.
>
> "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:7q6ru8...@mid.individual.net...> "tankfixer"
> <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> from the
> >> country ?
> >>
> >> Say it isn't so !
>
>
> > Nominated for December 2009 post of the month.
> >
> > Nigel Brooks
>
>
The fool can't even incude the entire post the is whining about !
Pepperoni
>
> The fool can't even incude the entire post the is whining about !-
It probably contradicts his rant.
Ordie55
Does he really think that a link to his other ranting about legal
people contacting someone is proof that they did?
SteveL
tankfixer
0d8c58...@j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, ord...@gmail.com says...
Maybe in his mind he thinks it happened....
Mac
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 17:06:20 -0800, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net>
wrote:
>"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
>Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I went to OCS and
> returned as a Butter Bar myself (as a SFC)."
>
>It is clear the (SFC) entry was placed in the sentence to clarify what
>I meant about being a Butter Bar, and if Brooks would ever show the
>post in true context, it will prove that I was talking about NCO's
>taking the place of commissioned officers in the post - no wonder
>Brooks hides the entire post - it would also prove his fraudulent and
>forged context.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
There appears to be some little trouble with your post.
First, the sites wherein you CLAIM to "PROVE" your point...
Well, they lead to the following:
""CYBERSTALKER WEB NAMES ""
That site has a message by:
Smitty
From: "Smitty" <dgvrei...@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:41:46 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 28 2006 7:41 am
Subject: BS BROOKS CONFIRMS SFC E-7 PROMOTION FOR REIMAN-THEN LIES
ABOUT IT
Google Groups: alt.news-mediadgvrei...@comcast.net |
--------------------------------------------------------
You refer people to:
http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.
All that site is is simply you showing a copy of one of your
CycberStalking epistles posted to five or six NewsGroups, several
times and containing ONLY YOUR COMMENTS ---no documentation, no
evidence, simply your blather.
etc., etc
-Mac, the Medic
!Jones
<paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The fool can't even incude the entire post the is whining about !
... and, this is bad, why? The less he includes, the better, I say!