It would behove we Conservatives to forget about Obama and concentrate
on our own convention. McCain was not the choice of a lot of
Conservatives... me being one of them. And his VP pick may make or
break this election.
"Jerry Wright"... Obama has walked away from this nutjob.
"Billy Ayers"... Obama has never had any connection with this nutjob
except maybe they shared the breathing air inside the same room once
or twice (or more).
"Tony Rezko"... the guy's shady and maybe a crook, but it has the same
to do with Obama as "Jeff Gannon" has to do with GWBush.
"Michelle Obama"... she knocked it outta the park the other night.
Nothing there either.
There are a million and a half other things to go after Obama with.
Time to move on.
-C-
The election of John McCain would be marginally better for the future of
our nation that would the election of Barak Obama. The difference is not
enough to convince me to vote for him.
In other words, I really do not care who wins in November, we are
screwed either way.
--- First sensible thing you've said. But I'm wondering what "million
and a half other things" there are to go after Obama with when McCain
probably has twice as many things to go after, especially when the
above mentioned things are probably the worst of it for Obama that
you've already negated.
Every once in a while Clay comes up with a decent post. He's about the only
regular right winger here who actually does. And he's not a racist like
Trace and and Horatio Fuckrotten and most of the others. I mean it's not
hard to see how far the GOP has strayed from actual conservative governing.
Most of the conservatives I know can see it. It's jsut the occasional
newsgroup nutcase who still believes in Neoconism.
How 'bout them Neo-Cons?
The Neocons Do Georgia: Humanity's Greatest Enemy?
Paul Craig Roberts
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts08152008.html
The success of the Bush Regime's propaganda, lies, and deception with
gullible and inattentive Americans since 9/11 has made it difficult
for intelligent, aware people to be optimistic about the future of the
United States. For almost eight years the US media has served as
Ministry of Propaganda for a war criminal regime. Americans incapable
of thinking for themselves, reading between the lines, or accessing
foreign media on the Internet have been brainwashed ... The
neoconservatives represent the greatest danger ever faced by the
United States and the world. Humanity has no greater enemy.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.org
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
--
If guns are out-lawed. Only the Out-laws & politicians will have guns.
> How 'bout them Neo-Cons?
How about you neo-Nazis?
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | be...@iphouse.com
How about you screw Reaganomics and move on.
> On Aug 28, 11:43 am, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > The fact is... the Democratic Convention is going off without a hitch
> > this week. I hear Rush try to downplay the success and trying to
> > inject controversy where none exists. I also see this coming from
> > "the usual suspects" on the Right... Hannity, NRO, Malkin, et al. But
> > there is no "there, there".
>
> > It would behove we Conservatives to forget about Obama and concentrate
> > on our own convention. McCain was not the choice of a lot of
> > Conservatives... me being one of them. And his VP pick may make or
> > break this election.
>
> > "Jerry Wright"... Obama has walked away from this nutjob.
> > "Billy Ayers"... Obama has never had any connection with this nutjob
> > except maybe they shared the breathing air inside the same room once
> > or twice (or more).
> > "Tony Rezko"... the guy's shady and maybe a crook, but it has the same
> > to do with Obama as "Jeff Gannon" has to do with GWBush.
> > "Michelle Obama"... she knocked it outta the park the other night.
> > Nothing there either.
>
> > There are a million and a half other things to go after Obama with.
> > Time to move on.
>
> --- First sensible thing you've said.
Alas, I'm still waiting for yours.
> But I'm wondering what "million
> and a half other things" there are to go after Obama with when McCain
> probably has twice as many things to go after, especially when the
> above mentioned things are probably the worst of it for Obama that
> you've already negated.
The reason why you're 'wondering" is b/c you're a hopeless leftist. I
guess there's nothing wrong with that; everybody has to be something
at some time. But in your arrogance and total confusion, you cannot
see that there is anything -- let me repeat and be clear -- there is
not one single thing that you can find that is wrong or incorrect with
being a leftist. To me, that's a sure sign of immaturity... but
that's simply my opinion.
I can look at Conservatives and see the good and the bad in us.
The hope is... one day you'll grow up and become an adult... in every
sense of the word.
"Keep hope alive."
-C-
The reason why you're 'wondering" is b/c you're a hopeless leftist. I
guess there's nothing wrong with that; everybody has to be something
at some time. But in your arrogance and total confusion, you cannot
see that there is anything -- let me repeat and be clear -- there is
not one single thing that you can find that is wrong or incorrect with
being a leftist. To me, that's a sure sign of immaturity... but
that's simply my opinion.
I can look at Conservatives and see the good and the bad in us.
The hope is... one day you'll grow up and become an adult... in every
sense of the word.
"Keep hope alive."
-C-
Anyone listening to this crackpot?
--- No, you see, this is the way it really works. The one who makes
the most common sense is the one who *should* win, regardless of
affiliation. There's not been any one politician ever in any party
that anybody can agree with fully on everything, it just doesn't
happen. So it all basically comes to do with whom you agree the most
on as many issues as possible, partially or fully, and the less
hypocrisy in the candidate, the better for him, too. That's all
anybody can go by, bottom line. In this case, Obama wins hands down.
But that doesn't mean I fully agree with everything he says, but he
says a lot more that makes sense to me than whatever McCain babbles
and spurts out. Hopefully, you'll now have grown up enough to learn
that; otherwise, you're just misusing and abusing your vote.
> "Clay" <ClaysRi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
HEHEHEHEHEHE... aren't you missing "Seseme Street", junior. I hear
they're doing the letter "C" today.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
OK... if that's the case, even tho I'll have to hold my nose, I'm for
McCain.
> That's all
> anybody can go by, bottom line. In this case, Obama wins hands down.
Again... you believe this b/c you're a leftist. Like I said b4...
nothing wrong with that.
> But that doesn't mean I fully agree with everything he says, but he
> says a lot more that makes sense to me than whatever McCain babbles
> and spurts out.
And for me, it's just the opposite.
> Hopefully, you'll now have grown up enough to learn
> that; otherwise, you're just misusing and abusing your vote.
Thanks for the tip. But where you are now, I've already been... some
time ago too.
Keep hoofing tho... you'll make here yet. I still have a little faith
in you.
-C-
--- I'm an independent. I swing where the pendulum swings with fewest
creaks.
> > But that doesn't mean I fully agree with everything he says, but he
> > says a lot more that makes sense to me than whatever McCain babbles
> > and spurts out.
>
> And for me, it's just the opposite.
--- Well, here now you're being a total phony. It's impossible to be
in full agreement with anyone, and I mean anyone, especially a
politician. Why not check on McCain's voting record to see if you're
really in agreement with him. Seems to me that he's voted wrong more
times than right, and by that I mean for a lot of bills that have been
passed, he voted against them and for a lot that haven't passed he
voted for them. Check them out yourself. Maybe McCain isn't the man
you think he is. You can even check out Obama's record there, too.
http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=53270
> In other words, I really do not care who wins in November, we are
> screwed either way.
But if you screw McCain up, you can run a conservative in four years,
rather than eight.
HAHAHAHAH... you write, "McCain babbles and spurts out", yet I'm being
the phony.
Canuck, please !!!
> It's impossible to be
> in full agreement with anyone, and I mean anyone, especially a
> politician.
Did I disagree when you made this exact same point the first time?
BTW... do you repeat yourself a lot IRL? Must be very annoying if you
do.
> Why not check on McCain's voting record to see if you're
> really in agreement with him.
*sigh*
You're just reacting on instinct. Go back and read what I wrote... or
better still, for comprehension, have someone read it to you.
> Seems to me that he's voted wrong more
> times than right, and by that I mean for a lot of bills that have been
> passed, he voted against them and for a lot that haven't passed he
> voted for them.
OIC... the mark of a good politician is how ofter he follows the
crowd... is that what you're saying, Canuck?
Amazing !!!
> Check them out yourself. Maybe McCain isn't the man
> you think he is. You can even check out Obama's record there, too.
The arrogance and ignorance of a typical leftist is clearly exhibited
in you, Canuck. Your "me, me, me... I'm always right" hubris combined
with just over a half-full cup of confusion puddles together against
the curb like rain after a downpour.
Most folks want to jump over it and the unfortunate ones who step in
it... really wish they hadn't.
-C-
--- You think he really had a hard time in that Vietnamese prison?
Was there a reason why they called him 'Songbird'?
> > It's impossible to be
> > in full agreement with anyone, and I mean anyone, especially a
> > politician.
>
> Did I disagree when you made this exact same point the first time?
--- Well, you tell me what you meant by this exchange:
ME: But that doesn't mean I fully agree with everything he says, but
he says a lot more that makes sense to me than whatever McCain babbles
and spurts out.
YOU: And for me, it's just the opposite.
That don't sound like agreement to me. Unless you're referring to
another "first time".
> > Seems to me that he's voted wrong more
> > times than right, and by that I mean for a lot of bills that have been
> > passed, he voted against them and for a lot that haven't passed he
> > voted for them.
>
> OIC... the mark of a good politician is how ofter he follows the
> crowd... is that what you're saying, Canuck?
--- The mark of a good politician is to not always keep going against
the grain and get nothing done in the process. And for a war vet, he
sure voted against a lot of war vet bills.
> The arrogance and ignorance of a typical leftist is clearly exhibited
> in you, Canuck. Your "me, me, me... I'm always right" hubris combined
> with just over a half-full cup of confusion puddles together against
> the curb like rain after a downpour.
--- You say that as if you consider yourself to always be right. Oh,
the irony.
So... lemme get this straight: even tho there hasn't been WORD ONE on
this "songbird" fantasy cooked up by leftist kooks reported by the
media -- you believe this to be true?
<ROTFLMFAO>
Are you a 9/11 truther also, Canuck?
> > > It's impossible to be
> > > in full agreement with anyone, and I mean anyone, especially a
> > > politician.
>
> > Did I disagree when you made this exact same point the first time?
>
> --- Well, you tell me what you meant by this exchange:
>
> ME: But that doesn't mean I fully agree with everything he says, but
> he says a lot more that makes sense to me than whatever McCain babbles
> and spurts out.
>
> YOU: And for me, it's just the opposite.
>
> That don't sound like agreement to me. Unless you're referring to
> another "first time".
OIC your trouble, Canuck... you're having a miserable time with the
English language. "YOU" were refering to Obama, weren't YOU?
Perhaps that HUGE hint will get you back on track.
Ya think?
<ROTFLMFAO>
> > > Seems to me that he's voted wrong more
> > > times than right, and by that I mean for a lot of bills that have been
> > > passed, he voted against them and for a lot that haven't passed he
> > > voted for them.
>
> > OIC... the mark of a good politician is how ofter he follows the
> > crowd... is that what you're saying, Canuck?
>
> --- The mark of a good politician is to not always keep going against
> the grain and get nothing done in the process. And for a war vet, he
> sure voted against a lot of war vet bills.
So... you were confused when you wrote what you did.
Thought so.
> > The arrogance and ignorance of a typical leftist is clearly exhibited
> > in you, Canuck. Your "me, me, me... I'm always right" hubris combined
> > with just over a half-full cup of confusion puddles together against
> > the curb like rain after a downpour.
>
> --- You say that as if you consider yourself to always be right. Oh,
> the irony.
Jesus H. Christ !!!
Scroll up to the beginning of this thread, Poncho. Again... have
someone with brains read what I wrote.
Then come back to me -- OK, Canuck?
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Hey, you don't have to believe me or anyone else. All you have to
do is a simple Google search for 'John McCain Songbird' and you'll
have plenty of material to sift through and decide for yourself if any
of it is true or not. Quite a bit of it is referenced, too, so you
can double-check on the details in those other sources as well. I
thought you would've been able to figure out how to do that by now.
But ignorance is bliss for you, I guess.
> > > > It's impossible to be
> > > > in full agreement with anyone, and I mean anyone, especially a
> > > > politician.
>
> > > Did I disagree when you made this exact same point the first time?
>
> > --- Well, you tell me what you meant by this exchange:
>
> > ME: But that doesn't mean I fully agree with everything he says, but
> > he says a lot more that makes sense to me than whatever McCain babbles
> > and spurts out.
>
> > YOU: And for me, it's just the opposite.
>
> > That don't sound like agreement to me. Unless you're referring to
> > another "first time".
>
> OIC your trouble, Canuck... you're having a miserable time with the
> English language. "YOU" were refering to Obama, weren't YOU?
--- No, YOU is you. Of course, it could very well be that you've
confused yourself as to what it is you're referring to in the first
place. To be expected.
> > > > Seems to me that he's voted wrong more
> > > > times than right, and by that I mean for a lot of bills that have been
> > > > passed, he voted against them and for a lot that haven't passed he
> > > > voted for them.
>
> > > OIC... the mark of a good politician is how ofter he follows the
> > > crowd... is that what you're saying, Canuck?
>
> > --- The mark of a good politician is to not always keep going against
> > the grain and get nothing done in the process. And for a war vet, he
> > sure voted against a lot of war vet bills.
>
> So... you were confused when you wrote what you did.
-- No, I was perfectly clear about it. Confusion is your affliction.
> > > The arrogance and ignorance of a typical leftist is clearly exhibited
> > > in you, Canuck. Your "me, me, me... I'm always right" hubris combined
> > > with just over a half-full cup of confusion puddles together against
> > > the curb like rain after a downpour.
>
> > --- You say that as if you consider yourself to always be right. Oh,
> > the irony.
>
> Jesus H. Christ !!!
>
> Scroll up to the beginning of this thread, Poncho. Again... have
> someone with brains read what I wrote.
--- I did. And you still didn't get what I wrote. Your description
of me suggests that you're right about me, and if you're right about
me, you probably think you're right about everything else. That's an
arrogance about you that you accuse me of having. The difference
being, of course, is that I'm *always* right about you and you're
always wrong about everything. No arrogance about it, just plain and
simple fact.
HAHAHAHAHAHA... the Internet?
My, my... are you gullible.
Dumbass.
<ROTFLMFAO>
> Quite a bit of it is referenced, too, so you
> can double-check on the details in those other sources as well. I
> thought you would've been able to figure out how to do that by now.
> But ignorance is bliss for you, I guess.
OIC... is one of those references "The New York Times", Poncho?
Dumbass.
<ROTFLMFAO>
> > > > > It's impossible to be
> > > > > in full agreement with anyone, and I mean anyone, especially a
> > > > > politician.
>
> > > > Did I disagree when you made this exact same point the first time?
>
> > > --- Well, you tell me what you meant by this exchange:
>
> > > ME: But that doesn't mean I fully agree with everything he says, but
> > > he says a lot more that makes sense to me than whatever McCain babbles
> > > and spurts out.
>
> > > YOU: And for me, it's just the opposite.
>
> > > That don't sound like agreement to me. Unless you're referring to
> > > another "first time".
>
> > OIC your trouble, Canuck... you're having a miserable time with the
> > English language. "YOU" were refering to Obama, weren't YOU?
>
> --- No, YOU is you. Of course, it could very well be that you've
> confused yourself as to what it is you're referring to in the first
> place. To be expected.
HEHEHEHEHEHE... they sure do grow 'em pretty stupid up there in
Canuckistan, I see.
YOU were referring to Obama, dimbulb. That's who the "he" was in your
statement, moron.
You don't do this "newsgroup thing" that well, do you, Canuck? I
know... it's all of these WORDS that are giving you the trouble.
<ROTFLMFAO>
> > > > > Seems to me that he's voted wrong more
> > > > > times than right, and by that I mean for a lot of bills that have been
> > > > > passed, he voted against them and for a lot that haven't passed he
> > > > > voted for them.
>
> > > > OIC... the mark of a good politician is how ofter he follows the
> > > > crowd... is that what you're saying, Canuck?
>
> > > --- The mark of a good politician is to not always keep going against
> > > the grain and get nothing done in the process. And for a war vet, he
> > > sure voted against a lot of war vet bills.
>
> > So... you were confused when you wrote what you did.
>
> -- No, I was perfectly clear about it. Confusion is your affliction.
Sooo... I was right then... according to you, the mark of a good
politician is how ofter he follows the crowd.
Your mind (such as it is) is a pliable as putty.
> > > > The arrogance and ignorance of a typical leftist is clearly exhibited
> > > > in you, Canuck. Your "me, me, me... I'm always right" hubris combined
> > > > with just over a half-full cup of confusion puddles together against
> > > > the curb like rain after a downpour.
>
> > > --- You say that as if you consider yourself to always be right. Oh,
> > > the irony.
>
> > Jesus H. Christ !!!
>
> > Scroll up to the beginning of this thread, Poncho. Again... have
> > someone with brains read what I wrote.
>
> --- I did. And you still didn't get what I wrote. Your description
> of me suggests that you're right about me, and if you're right about
> me, you probably think you're right about everything else.
That's a dumbass ASS-U-MPTION. "U" being me... and ASS being your
dumbass, Canuck.
<LOL>
Do me a favor, Poncho... come on back to me when you grow some brains.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Or you can do it the old-fashioned way and head over to a library
[you know what a library is?] and dig these up:
Newsweek, Dec. 13, 1965, Jan. 10, 1966, Apr. 25, 1966
U.S. News and World Report, May 14, 1973, POW-Two Years With The Viet
Cong
The Nightingale's Song, by Robert Timberg
Viet Cong Memoir, by Truong Ntu Tang
Five Years to Freedom, by Nick Rowe
Last Firebase Archives files
and last, but not least - ta-daaaa!!!
Faith of My Fathers, by the Songbird himself, John McCain.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... while you're at "the library", Canuck... see if
you can find something on the conspiracy of 9/11.
Dumbass.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
I am. He's the only one that show an inkling of thought.
--- You know what they say. Those who keep straying off topic are
those who know they're wrong.
Cite a NYTimes article about your tin-foil-hat fantasy, Poncho.
See ya next year, Canuck.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Yeah. Try not to commit suicide when Obama takes over. On second
thought, do your best.
Obama becomes POTUS, he will be my president, Canuck.
What size tin-foil-hat do you wear anyway, Poncho?
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- As long as you can take orders from a black man, you should be
fine.
What does Obama being a Black man have to do with him becoming POTUS,
Canuck?
I'm offended by your hate-filled racism. I'm glad I was able to
expose you for the lying hypocrite racist you truly are.
Say... "thank you, Clay."
-C-
> I can grow up and become an adult... in every
> sense of the word.
>
> "Keep hope alive."
We're with you all the way, Claybot.
--- Woah, you really must be a Republican through and through. For
someone who can't stay on track or follow a discussion and then to
twist everything around as to make it completley incomprehensible is a
skill only Republicans can master. But let's see if any of this makes
sense to you, according to your own words:
"Obama becomes POTUS, he will be my preseident."
Well, of course he'll be POTUS, and of course he'll be *your*
president. After which I said:
"As long as you can take orders from a black man, you'll be fine."
And then you go on to say:
"What does Obama being a black man have to do with him becoming
POTUS?"
Well, a lot of your ramblings suggest that you'd rather see a
Republican as POTUS. A good ol'-fashioned redneck white man running
with a good 'ol-fashioned redder-necked white woman. It's hard to
imagine how I could be wrong about that, unless your affliction of
confusion has succeeded in confusing me. Besides, it all seems to me
by your tone of things that you wouldn't particularly enjoy taking
orders from a black man, despite calling me - me! - a racist, as in
the following:
"I'm offended by your hate-filled racism. I'm glad I was able to
expose you for the lying hypocrite racist you truly are."
Now this is absolutely too fucking hilarious - you being offended.
You're probably one of the most offensive people around here and you
claim being offended in any way, shape or form yourself? What a very
confused Republican you are. Time to donate your brain to someone in
a Third World country who can fix it and make better use of it,
because it's really being wasted in you.
> > > > > --- Yeah. Try not to commit suicide when Obama takes over.
>
> > > > Obama becomes POTUS, he will be my president, Canuck.
>
> > > --- As long as you can take orders from a black man, you should be
> > > fine.
>
> > What does Obama being a Black man have to do with him becoming POTUS,
> > Canuck?
>
> > I'm offended by your hate-filled racism. �I'm glad I was able to
> > expose you for the lying hypocrite racist you truly are.
>
> --- Woah, you really must be a Republican through and through. �
Your dumbass has just quoted the thread accurately, Canuck. Where, in
this thread, did Obama's race come up?
The answer is easy, shit-for-brains... it's when you brought it up.
You have been exposed as an African-American hating, surrender-monkey
coward from Canuckistan.
Like I said... say "thank you, Clay".
It's like anything else... you have to confront your racism b4 you're
able to combat it. Think of this as your first step to redemption.
-C-
--- Race doesn't have to be quoted anywhere when your own racism is
implicit in everything you say.
HEHEHEHEHEHE... feeling kinda bad that your racist tendencies have
been exposed, Canuck?
Listen, boy... this is a good thing.
Embrace it.
Too motherfucking funny.
-C-
--- Once again, typical of a true hardcore right-winging Republican
who always needs to resort to masking his own ugly truths by
deflecting them onto others. Hey, I'm the one who's all for Obama.
The more Obama, the better. I hope half his administration is black.
And that would be the real irony, wouldn't it? If it took a black man
to fix what a good ol' Southern white boy has recklessly damaged to a
nearly irreperable point.
> On Aug 30, 12:50�pm, Clay <cnote...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 30, 12:42 pm, WQ, the 9/11 truther, very gullible Canuck, has
> > been exposed as a leftist racist (as most of the left is):
> > � � � � � � � � �...
> > > > > > > > > --- Yeah. Try not to commit suicide when Obama takes over.
>
> > > > > > > > Obama becomes POTUS, he will be my president, Canuck.
>
> > > > > > > --- As long as you can take orders from a black man, you should be
> > > > > > > fine.
>
> > > > > > What does Obama being a Black man have to do with him becoming POTUS,
> > > > > > Canuck?
>
> > > > > > I'm offended by your hate-filled racism. I'm glad I was able to
> > > > > > expose you for the lying hypocrite racist you truly are.
>
> > > > > --- Woah, you really must be a Republican through and through.
>
> > > > Your dumbass has just quoted the thread accurately, Canuck. Where, in
> > > > this thread, did Obama's race come up?
>
> > > --- Race doesn't have to be quoted anywhere when your own racism is
> > > implicit in everything you say.
>
> > HEHEHEHEHEHE... feeling kinda bad that your racist tendencies have
> > been exposed, Canuck?
>
> --- Once again, typical of a true hardcore right-winging Republican
> who always needs to resort to masking his own ugly truths by
> deflecting them onto others. �
Read the archives, Canuck.
You will see that it was YOU who brought up Obama's race, not I.
This is the true mark of a leftist racist. I've always known you
were... thanks for confirming it.
Are you getting psychological help for that?
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Getting very defensive now, aren't you? More Republican
strategizing on your part to avoid your ugly truths? You know very
well what I said, especially after I've already explained what I
said. And yes, the explanation is right there in the archives, just
look back a couple of posts. But a true Repugnant will refuse and
deny truth as it really is, even his own truths.
Nah... I'm just having a wonderful time seeing you trying to back away
from your racist remark, Jesse Helms Jr..
Read the archives, Canuck. I can quote you if needed. I can do it...
________________ <========== Right here.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Then do it. But remember the context. We know how Repugnants are
bad with context.
Read it and weep, Jesse Helms, Jr.
OBTW... the context (non-existent) is still there.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- You'll have to do better than that. Try to be more specific.
No need, Canuck... they're your words -- choke on 'em.
And they're very racist too.
I asked b4, but you dodged (typical leftist cowardice)... you getting
psychological help for that, Jesse Helms Jr?
*snicker*
-C-
--- Ahh, there you go. Like the good true Repugnant you are, when
push comes to shove and the bluster has gone out of you, then just run
from the fight with the tail tucked firmly between your legs. Run,
Clay, Run! That's a good boy.
> On Aug 30, 7:22�pm, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 30, 6:17 pm, it's so much fun watching WQ the 9/11 truther,
> > very gullible Canuck, try to scramble his way from his racist remark
> > <LOL>:
> > � � � � � � � � � ...
> > > > > > > > You will see that it was YOU who brought up Obama's race, not I.
>
> > > > > > > --- Getting very defensive now, aren't you?
>
> > > > > > Nah... I'm just having a wonderful time seeing you trying to back away
> > > > > > from your racist remark, Jesse Helms Jr..
>
> > > > > > Read the archives, Canuck. I can quote you if needed. I can do it...
>
> > > > > --- Then do it. But remember the context. We know how Repugnants are
> > > > > bad with context.
>
> > > > <http://tinyurl.com/5zqwuf>
>
> > > --- You'll have to do better than that. Try to be more specific.
>
> > No need, Canuck... they're your words -- choke on 'em.
>
> --- Ahh, there you go. �
OK... now you're on the first step of resolving your blantant
racism... admittance..
Now... seek some psychological help. Do that quickly.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Bow-wow, Clay. Bow-wow. And Clay - isn't that like ... dried-up
mud?
--- Oops. I forgot to include the relevant text that you so deviously
removed after "Ahh, there you go."
Ahh, there you go. Like the good true Repugnant you are, when push
comes to shove and the bluster has gone out of you, then just run from
the fight with the tail tucked firmly between your legs. Run, Clay,
Run! That's a good boy.
--- So typical of an intellectually impotent Repugnant to cut out the
truth he doesn't like and want others to know. Bow-wow, Clay. Bow-
Wha? Now, your dumbass is pretending to be a puppy?
First an anti-Black man racist... now a puppy.
You definitely need psychological help. Do you have a friend you can
stay with tonite? You really shouldn't be alone with your pathology.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
> On Aug 30, 8:57�pm, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 30, 8:49 pm, the fun continues as I watch WQ, the 9/11 truther,
> > very gullible Canuck, try to scramble his way from his racist remark
> > <LOL>:
> > � � � � � � � � � � � � ...
>
> > > On Aug 30, 7:22 pm, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 30, 6:17 pm, it's so much fun watching WQ the 9/11 truther,
> > > > very gullible Canuck, try to scramble his way from his racist remark
> > > > <LOL>:
> > > > ...
> > > > > > > > > > You will see that it was YOU who brought up Obama's race, not I.
>
> > > > > > > > > --- Getting very defensive now, aren't you?
>
> > > > > > > > Nah... I'm just having a wonderful time seeing you trying to back away
> > > > > > > > from your racist remark, Jesse Helms Jr..
>
> > > > > > > > Read the archives, Canuck. I can quote you if needed. I can do it...
>
> > > > > > > --- Then do it. But remember the context. We know how Repugnants are
> > > > > > > bad with context.
>
> > > > > > <http://tinyurl.com/5zqwuf>
>
> > > > > --- You'll have to do better than that. Try to be more specific.
>
> > > > No need, Canuck... they're your words -- choke on 'em.
>
> > > --- Ahh, there you go.
>
> > OK... now you're on the first step of resolving your blantant
> > racism... admittance..
>
> --- Bow-wow, Clay.
>
> --- Oops. �I forgot
What did you forget, puppy?
You forgot your anti-psychotic medication, you poor, mentally deranged
moron?
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- You really are disturbed by this text I keep having to reinsert
because you keep removing, huh?
Like the good true Repugnant you are, when push comes to shove and the
bluster has gone out of you, then just run from
the fight with the tail tucked firmly between your legs. Run, Clay,
Run! That's a good boy.
--- Truth digs deep, don't it?
Wha?
Kicking your ass all over USENET?
Why... yes I am.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Atta, boy, Clay. Play. Play! Roll in the mud now. Roll in the
mud. Good boy. Yes, sirreee, very good boy! Here, Clay. Have a
cookie.
> > Wha?
>
> > Kicking your ass all over USENET?
>
> > Why... yes I am.
>
> --- Atta, boy, Clay. �
First a 9/11 truther.
Then a very gullible Canuck.
Then a documented anti-Black man racist.
Then a dog... more to the point, a puppy.
And finally... a masochist.
This was your "coming out" day, wasn't it... Jesse Helms, Jr?
Is there another door to open, boy?
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Atta boy, Clay. Woof-woof. Dig your bones. Dig your bones
deep. Those skeletons in your closet must never be found. Deeper,
boy, deeper! Good boy, Clay. Here. Have another cookie.
First a 9/11 truther.
And finally... a masochist.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Atta boy, Clay. Woof-woof. Dig your bones. Dig your bones
> --- Woof-woof. �
Bad dog. You need a smack on your snout.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Beginning to talk to yourself, I see.
> I've always known psychological help for that?
>
> Too fucking funny.
Clay, are you retarded?
> On Aug 30, 2:16 pm, Clay <clayonl...@lycos.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 30, 1:55 pm, WQ the 9/11 truther, very gullible Canuck, has
> > Read the archives, Canuck.
> > You will see that it was YOU who brought up Obama's race, not I.
> --- Getting very defensive now, aren't you?
Nah... I'm just having a wonderful time seeing you trying to back
away
from your racist remark, Jesse Helms Jr..
Read the archives, Canuck. I can quote you if needed. I can do
it...
________________ <========== Right here.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
"Repugnant" You're soooooo kewwwwl.
--- You already tried to do it before and rather feebly, too. If
you;ve got real dirt, besides the kind that's stuck between your paws
from digging holes for the skeletons in your closet, then show it.
But again: remember the context. Without it, you fail again. And
Repugnants are really bad with context, so let's all watch you fail
gloriously.
And it worked like a charm. Don't think so, go back and read your
reaction once I exposed your leftist racism.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Worked like a charm? The Repugnant illusion is all yours to
wallow in, fooling nobody else. So you can't do your own dirty work,
huh? You want me to do it for you? Yep, that's a Repugnant at his
spineless finest when they themselves can't back up anything they
say. Now roll over, Clay. Play dead, Clay. Atta boy, Clay. Here,
have another cookie.
> > > > Read the archives, Canuck. I can quote you if needed. I can do
> > > > it...
>
> > > --- You already tried to do it before
>
> > And it worked like a charm. �Don't think so, go back and read your
> > reaction once I exposed your leftist racism.
>
> --- Worked like a charm? �
Yep...
OBTW, shit-for-brains... it's STILL working.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Come on, Clay, stop being a dog and start being a real man. I'm
calling your bluff. The longer you drag this out, the worse you make
yourself look in not being able to back up what you say. You can do
it, Clay. Yes you can. Sure you can. Here, have 2 cookies to get
you going.
Glad to see you can still be reasonable, Clay. Now I will see who
responds to you and how. It should be interesting.
Tartarus
> Every once in a while Clay comes up with a decent post. He's about the only
> regular right winger here who actually does. And he's not a racist like
> Trace and and Horatio Fuckrotten and most of the others.
As a black man, he has a little more perspective on the way things
really work than idiots like Traace and Fudruckerton.
Tartarus
Clay is a black man. He has been taking orders from blacks (his
mother, father, grandfather, etc.) all his life.
Tartarus
--- Clay's black? Are you serious? Could've fooled me. He doesn't
come across anything at all like Obama. I guess nutcases come in all
races.
> On Aug 31, 12:14�pm, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 31, 12:05 pm, WQ the 9/11 truther, very gullible Canuck, has
> > been exposed as a leftist racist, and is now scrambling <LOL>:
> > � � � � � � � � � ...
>
> > > > > > Read the archives, Canuck. I can quote you if needed. I can do
> > > > > > it...
>
> > > > > --- You already tried to do it before
>
> > > > And it worked like a charm. Don't think so, go back and read your
> > > > reaction once I exposed your leftist racism.
>
> > > --- Worked like a charm?
>
> > Yep...
>
> > OBTW, shit-for-brains... it's STILL working.
>
> --- Come on, Clay,
Sorry, Poncho... remember, your dumbass began this. I'm just
finishing up, by exposing how much of an anti-Black racist.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
Yes, indeed. He is a light skinned black man named Clarence Lee, and
he lives in Brooklyn. We have had many interesting conversations.
Tartarus
HEHEHEHEHEHE... and you would know this how?
Again?
Too fucking funny.
-C-
> On Aug 31, 1:02�pm, Tartarus <tarta...@rome.com> wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHA... there goes your gullible ass again, Canuck.
Believing things someone reads to you on the Internet by other brain-
dead morons.
Too motherfucking funny.
-C-
I am? You shouldn't play with the mentally retarded, moron.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
But... since you have... you should finish... .you didn't tell the
gullible Canuck "the rest of the story", shit-for-brains:
I'm actually kin to Obama.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
Will see?
Who WILL respond?
<LOL>
As per usual, shit-for-brains... you're a day late and a coupla
dollars short.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
The answer is obvious: Yes, Clod is retarded.
"Kewwwwl". Wow, dewd, that's sooooo original.
Yep... another illegal here. Whaddyou... three, four or five step
ahead of the authorities?
Too fucking funny.
-C-
That was the point, moron.
Yes. If anyone is interested in proof, I can easily provide it.
Tartarus
Yes, I checked the responses after I made that post.
Tartarus
> On Aug 31, 3:41�pm, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 31, 4:27 pm, Tartarus is the typical leftist... lying his
> > dumbass off... (shhh... and he has a live one) �<LOL>:
> > � � � � � � � � � � � � �...
>
> > > On Aug 31, 11:21 am, WQ <WQi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 31, 1:02 pm, Tartarus <tarta...@rome.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Aug 30, 9:52 am, WQ <WQi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Besides, it all seems to me
> > > > > > by your tone of things that you wouldn't particularly enjoy taking
> > > > > > orders from a black man, despite calling me - me! - a racist, as in
> > > > > > the following:
>
> > > > > Clay is a black man. He has been taking orders from blacks (his
> > > > > mother, father, grandfather, etc.) all his life.
>
> > > > --- Clay's black? Are you serious? Could've fooled me. He doesn't
> > > > come across anything at all like Obama. I guess nutcases come in all
> > > > races.
>
> > > Yes, indeed. He is a light skinned black man named Clarence Lee, and
> > > he lives in Brooklyn. We have had many interesting conversations.
>
> > I am?
>
> Yes. If anyone is interested in proof, I can easily provide it.
OIC... you mean like you can prove this one:
Or... I'm guessing you mean this beauty:
Can't wait, shit-for-brains.
Too motherfucking funny.
-C-
*crickets*
Too fucking funny.
-C-
Of course not. It is pretty obvious I was trolling there. You are a
black man, though (at least that's what I think you call yourself when
you identify your racial background). It's nothing to be ashamed of.
Tartarus
Tartarus
> > > > > There are a million and a half other things to go after Obama with.
> > > > > Time to move on.
>
> > > > > -C-
>
> > > > Glad to see you can still be reasonable, Clay. Now I will see who
> > > > responds to you and how. It should be interesting.
>
> > > Will see?
>
> > Yes, I checked the responses after I made that post.
>
> *crickets*
Why do you say "*crickets*"? There were plenty of responses to your
post, and I was not expecting any to mine.
Tartarus
Then... what YOU just typed was either a mistake (I'll let you off
with that) or a lie (more than likely).
Your choice, shit-for-brains.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
You?
A troll?
Get outta town !!!
Too motherfucking funny.
-C-
Of course not. Nothing I said in this thread can be contradicted by
facts.
Tartarus
--- Give it up. The word "fact" isn't in Clay's vocabulary. At least
not with the definition everybody else understands it has.
Awwwww... "wittle dubyaque" got embarrassed by the big bad man... and
now he's running off to cry.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
--- Stop rubbing that man's leg, Clay! Down, boy, down! Awww, now
look at what you went and did. Bad, Clay, bad boy!
You have some strange homosexual fantasies, Canuck.
Your psychological therapy bills must be massive.
Too fucking funny.
-C-