The Romney Smirk

[Clave]

Here he is immediately after his press op, confident that the murder of
American diplomats was fantastic news for his Presidential aspirations:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/58195883@N03/7981679000/in/photostream

[Clave]

"AlleyCat" <al...@aohell.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2abb2d0f8...@news.eternal-september.org...
> In article <I4e4s.227$vo4...@newsfe05.iad>,
> ChrisC...@TheMonastery.com says...

>>
>> Here he is immediately after his press op, confident that the murder of
>> American diplomats was fantastic news for his Presidential aspirations:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/58195883@N03/7981679000/in/photostream

<...empty post...>

Put your comments in the post, moron.

Jim

[Joe from Kokomo]

The Romney smirk? I can show you dozens of pictures of the George W.
Bush smirk.

Maybe it's contagious.

[D. Peter Maus]

I think we're all getting that you don't exactly have G. W. Bush on
your Christmas list.

The question is...why do you keep looking into the past for your
arguments? Bush has been out of office, and the public eye for nearly 4
years, now.

You might blame him for his hand in things when he was in office, but
someone else has been in the big chair for a term, now. He deserves the
blame for what's failed under his watch.

[Ernie]

How can you make a distinction? Bush...Romney...Obama...they're all the
same. Do you
really believe there's any difference between any of them?

[Kevin Alfred Strom]

No. Except that having Fetchit, as an nearly-open opponent of
everything the Old America stood for, as front man for the oligarchs
is a tiny smidgen more honest and upfront.


With all good wishes,



Kevin Alfred Strom.

--
http://nationalvanguard.org/
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/

[Sid9]

"D. Peter Maus" <dpete...@att.net> wrote in message
news:k2slns$t19$1...@dont-email.me...

The stink bush,jr left lingers on.
The cleanup is difficult because the mess was so great

[Christopher Helms]

Bush never got blamed for anything that happened on his watch. It was
always Clinton's fault.** Obama gets all the blame for the inherited
costs of Bush's giveaways, Bush's tax cuts, Bush's corporate welfare
and Bush's wars and not only is no one is ever allowed to blame Bush
for anything, but no one is allowed to so much as suggest that Mittens
intends to go back to the exact same failed policies.


** The one exception to the rule is the 2008 global economic meltdown,
which cost untold trillions, turned the banking and financial sectors
into wards of the state, crashed the housing market, led to massive
corporate bailouts, wrecked the bond market, froze the loan market,
nearly destroyed the economies of Spain, Iceland and Greece and still
reverberates to this day. That wasn't blamed on Clinton. That was all
Barney Frank's fault.

[Christopher Helms]

"Oooohh, goodie goodie. The US ambassador got killed. I'll jump this
trampoline all the way to Washington DC."

--The thought bubble behind the smirk

[D. Peter Maus]

Thanks. That was the best laugh I've had all day.

You should do standup.

[Joe from Kokomo]

On 9/13/2012 10:05 AM, Ernie wrote:

Sure, just to give one LARGE example:

Bush started a phony war in Iraq.

Obama ended it.

I would say that shows a "difference between any of them".

[Kevin Alfred Strom]

Boy George Bush started it when the oligarchs decided to start it.
And Fetchit ended it when the oligarchs decided to end it --
meanwhile starting or escalating a couple more wars, exactly as his
masters ordered him to do.

And Rob-me would be no different. He's already trying to impress the
real powers in this now-evil country by expressing his enthusiasm
for slaughtering innocent Iranians and others.


Esse quam videre,

[Clave]

"Joe from Kokomo" <j...@indy.net> wrote in message
news:k2v7si$71a$2...@dont-email.me...

Sheldon Adelson and the Koch brothers seem to think there's a few hundred
million dollars' worth of difference.

Jim

[Not Sure]

On Sep 14, 5:28 am, Joe from Kokomo <j...@indy.net> wrote:
> On 9/13/2012 10:05 AM, Ernie wrote:
>
> > How can you make a distinction? Bush...Romney...Obama...they're all the
> > same. Do you
> > really believe there's any difference between any of them?
>
> Sure, just to give one LARGE example:
>
> Bush started a phony war in Iraq.

On the schedule Bush instituted before he left office. Try not to cry,
liar :)

[Nickname unavailable]

bushs trickle down chicanery blew a hole of $12.8 trillion lost in
estimated actual and avoided GDP/26 million lost Americans jobs/$19
trillion lost in household wealth:"CONSERVATIVES" want you to forget
2008

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bartlett-naylor/lehman-brohers-collapse_b_1885256.html?utm_hp_ref=business



Bartlett Naylor
Expert on corporate governance, financial markets and shareholder
rights



Wall Street and the Cost of Forgetting
Posted: 09/14/2012 5:43 pm


Wall Street wants America to forget September 15, 2008.
That's because outside events of violence, few dates have signified
more calamity than this fateful day. On that black Monday, Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc. declared bankruptcy. This legal action revealed
the rotten core of the world's financial industry. Reckless mortgage
lending motivated by the bonus-driven securitization business left
Americans with $700 billion in collective mortgage debt beyond the
lost market value of their homes. Consumers swamped by this debt cut
other spending, factories were closed and layoffs were forced, leading
to still less consumer spending -- a vicious cycle that became the
Great Recession.
Congressional and White House investigations, books, movies and even
songs have explored the financial crash of 2008 and the resulting
economic mayhem. The latest damage tally comes from Better Markets:
$12.8 trillion lost in estimated actual and avoided GDP, 26 million
lost Americans jobs, $19 trillion lost in household wealth. For
context, if you received $100,000 every second of every hour of every
day, it would take three years to amass $1 trillion.
Less quantifiable are the darkened futures of college graduates,
eviscerated philanthropies less able to fund worthy efforts such as
finding climate change solutions, or the spike in incidences of mental
illness.
Wall Street wants America to forget September 15, 2008, because its
captains and lieutenants earn billions in personal lucre from the
risky, speculative and intentionally complex financial activities that
led to the crash. Brilliant minds have replaced the 3-5-3 bankers (pay
depositors 3 percent, loan at 5 percent and hit the golf course at 3
p.m.) And these Wall Street wizards have made credit more expensive
and dangerous under the misrepresentation of "innovation." Four years
after its Chapter 11 filing, the absurd complexity of Lehman's
dealings, with 150,000 open derivatives transactions at the time of
bankruptcy, laid bare the casino nature of the nation's fourth largest
investment bank.
Wall Street apologists tell another story about the cause of the
crash: Un-creditworthy home buyers lied on their loan applications,
securing funds that both inflated housing prices generally and which
they couldn't pay back except by flipping into an ever escalating
market. Really? Low-wage workers snuck $700 billion by the brightest
minds of Wall Street?
On top of this self-serving fantasy, Wall Street proffers an even
bolder fairy tale about the burden of the critical Wall Street reforms
passed into law in 2010. Industry's congressional friends claim that
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
discourages lenders from loaning to worthy businesses. That means they
can't hire workers, prolonging our economic malaise. Really? What
about those consumers buried in mortgage debt and unable to buy what
business is selling?
Another new report from the International Monetary Fund and co-
authored by Brookings Institute scholar Douglas Elliot drives a stake
through this zombie argument. The new Dodd-Frank law will increase
lending rates by an amount as small as the smallest adjustment made in
Federal Reserve lending rates. Dwell on this: The cost of preventing
another $20 trillion-$40 trillion financial crash can be financed with
the smallest of decreases in Federal Reserve lending rates.
Remember September 15, 2008, and the regulations we need put in place
to protect us from a recurrence. Your job, your retirement savings,
even your psyche may depend on it.

[Mocker]

In article <I4e4s.227$vo4...@newsfe05.iad>,

Ready for this?

> Mormonsm is a cult like Scientology There Is Nothing More Pagan: Mormon
> Teaching

> You will never learn Mormon doctrine from their Articles of Faith.
> Those are written to hide their teachings from "gentile" readers. You
> must look into their secret temple ceremonies and the writings of their
> prophets. Here are some of the surprising results.
>
> Mormon scripture consists of four books. They are: (1) The Book of
> Mormon (2) Doctrine and Covenants (3) Pearl of Great Price and (4) The
> Bible (in that order). The first three books seriously contradict the
> Bible. Mormons often ignore the Bible, claiming it is "mis-translated."

> Joseph Smith was God's prophet. "No man can come to Christ except
> through Joseph Smith."

> Prophets are better than Scriptures. The words of a Mormon prophet
> supercede those of the written Scriptures.

> God was once a man who progressed to Godhood. Mormons believe we can do
> the same. Their God has a physical body of flesh and bone.
>
> There are many gods in heaven. God the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are
> supposedly separate gods, united only in purpose.
>
> God is having kids. Surrounded by what must be 1,000 or more wives, God
> is having little spirit babies which will inhabit the people born on
> the earth. The number of babies this requires Him to produce daily is
> incredible! No explanation is given why their God of flesh and bone,
> having babies through physical sexual contact with his wives, has only
> spirit babies. They teach that Mary married God to have Jesus (or else
> He would have been illegitimate) and then divorced him to marry Joseph.
>
> Dark skin results from a "curse" placed upon certain spirits,
> presumably for some failure during "pre-existence." This anti-Negro
> doctrine is an embarrassment for Mormon leaders, and they are under
> great pressure to change it.
>
> Women need husbands for resurrection at the end of time. Without a man
> to "lift the veil" over her face on resurrection day she won't make it.
> She is desperate to see her husband remain a true Mormon so she may be
> resurrected. Women's liberation has not made great inroads here.
>
> Jesus had many wives. They say Mary and Martha were among his wives.
> One Mormon authority said Jesus was killed for his polygamy.
>
> The Book of Mormon is infallible. Mormon Articles of Faith say, "We
> believe the Bible to be the Word of God as far as it is translated
> correctly: we also believe The Book of Mormon to be the Word of God."
> They claim anything in the Bible which denies Mormon teaching is
> "incorrectly translated."
>
> Polygamy in heaven will be the rule. While early Mormon leaders taught
> and practiced polygamy, today few practice it due to fear of arrest.
> However, they teach that men (but not women) will be polygamists in
> heaven.
>
> Marriage for eternity is performed in Mormon temples. Perhaps they
> consider Jesus' words to the contrary (Matt. 22:30) are
> "mis-translated."
>
> "Holy underwear" is put on during the Mormon marriage ceremony
> (performed only in the temple). These "garments" must always touch the
> body for the rest of life. This is supposed to keep the "anointing oil"
> of the temple ceremony from escaping. Some irreverently call then
> "angel pants."
>
> Baptism for the dead is done to provide non-Mormon ancestors a place in
> "celestial glory." Mormons spend great sums on genealogical research to
> find relatives who had no Mormon baptism. They say no one can get to
> heaven without baptism, and heaven has no water, so they baptize the
> living for their dead.
>
> Proxy marriage for the dead is performed in Mormon temples. Mormons
> believe that loved ones who died outside Mormonism will live alone in
> the hereafter. Mormons conduct proxy weddings to "seal" these dead ones
> so they can be husband and wife in heaven.
>
> Three heavens (degrees of glory) are taught: "Celestial,"
> "Terrestrial," and "Telestial." All except the worst sinners (doomed to
> perdition) are expected to go to one of these. Only Mormons who marry
> in the Temple, keep the "Word of Wisdom" and wear their "garments" can
> get to the Celestial kingdom. God is supposed to be there. Those whose
> works aren't good enough, are stuck with the lower levels, where they
> are denied the "joys" of a polygamous eternity.
>
> There is no hell according to current Mormon teaching. Even though The
> Book of Mormon teaches about hell, Mormons deny its existence. Much of
> current Mormon teaching contradicts their "infallible" Book of Mormon.
>
> The one true church is the Mormon church. All others are apostate.
>
> Many of their doctrines, taught by Mormon "prophets," are a great
> embarrassment to present Mormon leaders. They are even attempting to
> deny that their great prophets ever taught some of theses things.
>
> But the historical record is clear. The writings of Joseph Smith,
> Brigham Young and others include the above doctrines.

Let us prey!
I knew someone would play the "Mormon" card
Share this. OK
--
Money ; what a concept!

[Mocker]

In article <k2stru$jfs$1...@dont-email.me>, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
wrote:

And he wasn't even the prez. Dick was.
and look what Dick "let happen" to the Pentagon.


http://main.issuevet.com/index.php?title=Vetting_September_11