Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

NEW U.S. DISTRICT COURT RULES

0 views
Skip to first unread message

DGVREIMAN

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 12:48:47 AM11/24/09
to

NEW U.S. DISTRICT COURT RULES

Note first that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang
members maintain a web site and a Google Newsgroup designed to defame
me with fraud, serial lying, outright con man fraud, and of course
libel, which forces me to rebut their fraud with these truthful
rebuttals.

I have offered Nigel Brooks (and/or any of his con/hate/smear gang
members) the opportunity to take their fraud and false accusations to
the American Association of Arbitrators, or to any legal department of
any University they select, and if either of those entities agree with
Nigel Brooks in respect to his accusations about me, I will pay for
their services. HOWEVER, if those legal experts agree that my
rebuttals are correct and accurate, then Nigel Brooks and/or his
smear/hate/con gang members pay for the independent legal analysis.

Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
pants, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
legal experts. . . and the reason is obvious - they know they are
lying.

ALSO NOTE THAT I CHALLENGED NIGEL BROOKS TO JUST *NAME* OR PRODUCE ANY
DOCUMENT HE CLAIMS EXISTS IN MY MILITARY RECORDS THAT DISPROVES ANY
STATEMENT OF FACT I HAVE POSTED ABOUT MY MILITARY SERVICE - AND YET
AFTER YEARS OF BROOK'S CLAIMING SUCH A DOCUMENT EXISTS IN MY RECORDS -
HE RUNS, HIDES AND PISSES HIS PANTIES EACH TIME I ISSUE OR POST THIS
CHALLENGE!

Obviously, Nigel Brooks and his other gang members that have
referenced my military records in any manner have been conning, and
using serial lying and fraud about this issue for years - and if you
do not believe Nigel Brooks is a con man and fraud merchant by now
you need to wake up and smell the cons and bullshit burning that comes
from these dregs and clowns.


http://tinyurl.com/lwelno My disclaimer and more information about
Nigel Brooks cons and fraud can be found in the above URL. My
standard disclaimer applies to this post and all of my other USENET
posts, past, present or future.

Rebuttal Begins:


U.S. District Court Rules
Subpoenas
"When documents that exceed 50 pages in length are filed
electronically, a paper copy of
the document shall be delivered to the Clerk's Office for chambers.
The copy for
chambers shall be clearly marked with the words "Courtesy Copy of
Electronic Filing for
Chambers." The copies of all papers must indicate in the upper
right-hand corner of the
first page the name of the district judge or magistrate judge to whom
the copies are to be
delivered."

End excerpt:

Obviously, the United States District Courts receive many Plaintiff
complaints that exceed 50 pages. The total amount of pages of any
complaint are directly related to the amount of causes of actions
contained within the complaint, and the requests for relief.

In the case of Subpoenas, the District Court Rules updated as of today
(I received notice today) now requires for ALL Subpoenas, pro se or
otherwise, clear documentation (evidence) proving the need or basis
for the Subpoena. So the playing field for pro se Plaintiffs has been
finally leveled.

Also, for those that have threatened to file baseless and frivolous
counter suits if I dare to file legal action against them for their
defamation, fraud, false light, harassment and other acts, they should
be advised that if I am forced to defend against such counter suits
then I will be awarded legal fees and costs by the courts to do so.

I am simply defending myself from the hate/con/smear campaign that
Nigel Brooks and his hate gang initiated against me, and has continued
ongoing for the past several years. My rebuttals are exactly that,
rebuttals to their fraud. Countersuits to such rebuttals are
frivolous and baseless and I am told will be treated as such by the
courts.

The hate gang has been told to cease and desist their harassment and
smear campaigns several times, and they are the ones taunting me to
take legal action, not the other way around.

I am sorry this had to go as far as it appears it will need to go to
stop the hate/smear/con gang from attacking me and their other
targeted smear victims. However, their perverse fraud, serial lying,
false light defamation and general con man forgeries and fraud must
stop immediately or further legal action WILL be taken. This includes
those groups and web sites that Nigel Brooks and his gang maintain for
the malicious purpose of spreading their hate and fraud.

Doug Grant (Tm)


0 new messages