Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

The Damning Detail, Malica

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Sizzle Flambé

unread,
Jul 30, 2009, 11:34:35 AM7/30/09
to
The *damning* detail, Malica, the one that's been
staring everyone in the face for the past 33 years:

A .32 revolver had to be provided to kill Anna Mae.

Not a .38, not a .45, not a .44 Magnum -- too big.

A small caliber, that a woman could handle easily.

As if any of those big burly men couldn't have just
snapped Anna Mae's neck like a twig and been done.

But it was just their job to bring her there, and later
you two girls "went for a walk"....

No wonder Looking Cloud was surprised she was dead.

Now two men's freedoms hang in the balance.

The truth counts. Now, now above all.

If you protect yourself now, then all your claims of
loyalty to your people are shown lies from the start:
you were always for yourself and no-one else ever.

If you confess and set the record straight, two men
go free, you have their gratitude, their families' and
their friends' and their supporters' and their peoples'
and that of everyone who wanted to know the truth
and see justice done -- for them and for Anna Mae.

But *now*, NOW, is the moment. Don't let it pass!

Dave

unread,
Jul 30, 2009, 2:33:22 PM7/30/09
to

You're an idiot. But keep the vomit coming, the more you spew the more
you make a fool of yourself, with yet another ludicrous scenario like
this one.

Keep it up.

Monica

unread,
Jul 30, 2009, 2:52:27 PM7/30/09
to
> Keep it up.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

He's a perfect partner for the fbi informant richard two elk. Twin
evils. Isn't it amazing the depths to which Richard Two Elk will sink.
He's partnered with seashepherd wiccans. He's worse than a scout. I
guess a word will have to be invented just for his kind of evil.

Sizzle Flambé

unread,
Jul 30, 2009, 8:41:59 PM7/30/09
to
On Jul 30, 1:52 pm, Malica <yanowis @ gmail.com> wrote:

> I guess a word

... Malica...

> will have to be invented

... Malica...

> just for his kind of evil.

... Malica Charrrrrr-nelllll !

<http://tinyurl.com/annie-mae-timeline-iv-2> --

"Monica Charles ... becomes 'a person of interest' and the focus of
some investigators because of information and statements she posts on
the internet that appear to be an intentional attempt to create
confusion in the Aquash and Peltier cases, a commonly used tactic by
AIM leaders or supporters over the years to mislead journalists and
the public."

<http://tinyurl.com/malica-charnel-thread>

Sizzle Flambé

unread,
Jul 30, 2009, 10:17:39 PM7/30/09
to
On Jul 30, 1:33 pm, Dave <sealsor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 30, 8:34 am, Sizzle Flambé <sizzle.fla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > The *damning* detail, Malica, the one that's been
> > staring everyone in the face for the past 33 years:
>
> > A .32 revolver had to be provided to kill Anna Mae.
>
> > Not a .38, not a .45, not a .44 Magnum -- too big.
>
> > A small caliber, that a woman could handle easily.
>
> > As if any of those big burly men couldn't have just
> > snapped Anna Mae's neck like a twig and been done.
>
> > But it was just their job to bring her there, and later
> > you two girls "went for a walk"....
>
> > No wonder Looking Cloud was surprised she was dead.
>
> > Now two men's freedoms hang in the balance.
>
> > The truth counts. Now, now above all.
>
> > If you protect yourself now, then all your claims of
> > loyalty to your people are shown lies from the start:
> > you were always for yourself and no-one else ever.
>
> > If you confess and set the record straight, two men
> > go free, you have their gratitude, their families' and
> > their friends' and their supporters' and their peoples'
> > and that of everyone who wanted to know the truth
> > and see justice done -- for them and for Anna Mae.
>
> > But *now*, NOW, is the moment. Don't let it pass!
>
> You're an idiot.

To suggest that Malica would *ever*, for one second,
put aside her own self-interest and do the right thing?

Perhaps. But the chance *must* be clearly offered.

There must be no doubt later, she had the opportunity.

You would want the same for yourself, wouldn't you?

0 new messages