It's the album's catalog number, nothing else. Interestingly the album
was to be 80102, but it was changed (anyone know why?)
--Jeremy
> Always wondered what 90125 means. It jus ocurred to me it might be a zip code
> in the LA area, given YesWest's area of residence.
It's the zipcode of a special waste-disposal area purchased by the members of
Yes to bury this disgrace. If you just drop it in your mailbox it will be
delivered, free of charge, never to punish unsuspecting ears again.
Guy
NP Tony Williams Lifetime, _Emergency_
Look on the spine of the CD case. The CD label is 7 90125-2. I'm guessing
the vinyl catalog number is something similar.
--
Frank Swarbrick
home: inf...@sprynet.com
work: frank.s...@1stbank.com
>Always wondered what 90125 means. It jus ocurred to me it might be a zip code
>
>in the LA area, given YesWest's area of residence.
>
>Does anyone know if this is true or what the name really means?
>
It's actually the cataog number of the LP
Eddie
Yep, "90125" is the catalog number of the original album release by
ATCO, also known as Atlantic Corporation Records or Atlantic Records.
--
DOMINIC "VERZON" VILLENEUVE
Opérateur du canal
#Pink_Floyd_Domine sur Undernet
http://www.1967.cjb.net
Channel Operator
#PinkFloyd&Co. on Undernet
http://www.satexas.com/~blackstar/
> Always wondered what 90125 means. It jus ocurred to me it might be a zip code
> in the LA area, given YesWest's area of residence.
>
> Does anyone know if this is true or what the name really means?
You have the answer by now. The back of the European edition of the cd
for this album actually explains this. Interestingly enough, the us
release of "ABW&H" has 90126 as its catalog number, even though that was
on Arista. ;-)
Mårten
> Diego T. Parra wrote:
>
> > Always wondered what 90125 means. It jus ocurred to me it might be a
> > zip code in the LA area, given YesWest's area of residence.
> > Does anyone know if this is true or what the name really means?
>
> Look on the spine of the CD case. The CD label is 7 90125-2. I'm
> guessing the vinyl catalog number is something similar.
Yes, that'd be 7 90125-1 and the tape version would be 7 90125-4, with
suffixes reserved for other formats as well. Most labels used this
suffix system, even though I'm not sure where it came from or why it was
implemented.
Mårten
> Yep, "90125" is the catalog number of the original album release by
> ATCO, also known as Atlantic Corporation Records or Atlantic Records.
ATCO was actually a _label_ and as such not the same as _Atlantic_ even
though it was a trademark of Atlantic Recording Corporation. Atco has
since been dropped or actually merged into the EastWest label.
Mårten
Guy Berger wrote in message <36439FE2...@ucsd.edu>...
>"Diego T. Parra" wrote:
>
>> Always wondered what 90125 means. It jus ocurred to me it might be a zip
code
>> in the LA area, given YesWest's area of residence.
>
Changes is godawful. Cinema is too short.
--
____
"No donut for you today my friend?"
I believe it was originally to be released on Atlantic, where the catalog #
would have been 80102, but was moved to ATCO at the last minute.
> I believe it was originally to be released on Atlantic, where the catalog #
> would have been 80102, but was moved to ATCO at the last minute.
Why was it moved?
Mårten
>Changes is awful. Cinema is too short.
Disagree..."Changes" is cool. The acapella version "Leave it" is killer! I
got this album when it first came out. Didn't like it-gave it to my brother.
My brother turned around and bought me a ticket to see the 90125 tour. That
show impressed me enough tobuy the album again and give it another try. It's
actually a decent album.
the story goes that they wanted to call it "Yes", but having another record
with the same name would cause catalog confusion, so they went with the catalog
number instead.
I do. No ideas left as reflected in the music as well. :)
b
*We love when we play*
>
>What, you can honestly say Changes or Cinema are bad songs? You can hate
>the rest if you like, but those two are fine songs.
For me, it's "Hearts" and "Hold On." The intro to "Changes" is OK, but to me
the rest of the song sounds like Foreigner. "Cinema" is nice, but I would
rather hear the 20-minute song it came from. The acapella version of "Leave It"
is great, although of course it's not on the album. And "OoaLH" will always
have sentimental value for me--as the song that started all this madness for
me...
Adrian
You know my name...look up the number
Record business politics, most likely.
Me too. That's how I know even more surely that Changes is godawful.
>>What, you can honestly say Changes or Cinema are bad songs? You can hate
>>the rest if you like, but those two are fine songs.
>
>
>Changes is godawful. Cinema is too short.
>
Rob MTSD wrote:
> sd1...@aol.com (Sd19461) wrote:
> >
> >90125 was the record labels identification number for that release. Why they
> >used that for the title,I don't know
>
> the story goes that they wanted to call it "Yes", but having another record
> with the same name would cause catalog confusion, so they went with the catalog
> number instead.
Gee, the second time that happened they came out with an album called "Open Your
Eyes"....I think I like the 90125 title better; at least it gets your attention.
Christopher oberst
Steven Sullivan <sull...@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu> wrote in article
<725nt4$c...@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu>...
| In article <725irv$3...@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>,
| Thomas Arena <yyzm...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
| >What? I love that intro. The rest is more of a standard rock song, and
a
| >pretty good one at that. Just because the bulk of the song is not prog
does
| >not make it bad. I like plenty of music that is not progressive.
|
| Me too. That's how I know even more surely that Changes is godawful.
It's the fact that you can hear Rabin that ruins it utterly for Sullivan.
gmelin
Yeah, that's it. That explains why I think 'Quartet' and 'Fist of Fire'
and 'Be the One' suck as badly. I'm so glad Rabin is inaudible on CInema
too, it helps explain why I like that one.
Wanna try again, wanker?
CHANGES is probably the best rock tune on the album. So, if *you*, the
SUPERIOR mind we have 'round here, thinks a song is NOT prog than it is
"godawful"?
b
*We love when we play*
(Psst...do you *really* want your dad reading b's posts, or worse, some of
his emails to me? Because I *would* be compelled to offer evidence in my
defense of my heinous line-crossing.)
Let's look at it this way. Just think if Rabin heard Sullivan!
it would seem that thought occurs to them, every time they think they have a
'new' band.
Rob Allen
Doesn't look like anyone's already answered this (if so, I missed
it)....if memory serves, it wasn't a zip code, but the serial number of
the record or some such thing (laura??)....
And 5150 is actually the Los Angeles police code for the criminally
insane....since somebody else asked about that one.... ;)
Ann, always glad to be of help
--
bewtif...@hotmail.com
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/bewtifulfreak
>Doesn't look like anyone's already answered this (if so, I missed
>it)....if memory serves, it wasn't a zip code, but the serial number of
>the record or some such thing (laura??)....
Yep, just look at the bar code.
>Yeah, that's it. That explains why I think 'Quartet' and 'Fist of Fire'
>and 'Be the One' suck as badly. I'm so glad Rabin is inaudible on CInema
>too, it helps explain why I like that one.
>
>Wanna try again, wanker?
He`s right you know - just `cos it`s by Yes doesn`t make it any
good. Changes -is- shit and you all know it (but most of Big
Generator is worse).
Bignose
big...@easynet.co.uk
= $$$$$
Thomas Arena wrote:
> What, you can honestly say Changes or Cinema are bad songs? You can hate
> the rest if you like, but those two are fine songs.
I was making a joke with the zipcode and I wouldn't go so far as saying
that I hate _90125_. I really like the intro to "Changes", and "Cinema" is a
great instrumental. I find most of the album to rather disappointing.
Guy
NP King Crimson, _Thrak_
I'm sure you got the real scoop by now. Anyway, whenever (not often) that
teenage soap opera on Fox was mentioned in a conversation, I would always
refer to it as Beverly Hills 90125. :-)
Of course the person defending the show would correct my error and not
have a clue that it was a pun.
-- Gary
Very good album! It's interesting that their most successful album seems to
get slammed by a lot of Yes fans. This is the album that got me into Yes in
the first place. I think it rocks (pardon).
Believe it of not, i heard this too, a few years back!
Giles Lawrence
Most successful? People forget that _Fragile_, _Close to the Edge_ and
_Relayer_ all charted better than _90125_.
As for total sales, _90125_ has gone three times platinum in the US,
while _Fragile_ has only gone double platinum and _CttE_ only single
platinum, but platinum awards were only introduced in 1976 and multi-
platinum only in 1984 -- I'm not certain about the rules, but I think
earlier sales for the '70s Yes albums thus don't get counted. I know
_90125_ has outsold _Fragile_ by a factor of 2.5 since 1991.
--
Henry
Omicron
Probably an inside joke, with the implied message of "we're better than
Rabin's Yes".
NP: Art Zoyd, _Les Espaces Inquiets/Phase IV/Archives II_
--
Roger Espel Llima, es...@llaic.u-clermont1.fr
http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/espel/index.html
Then again, I could be wrong...
tim gueguen 101867 (ducking for cover and putting on his heavy duty
Moonbase Alpha issue firefighting spacesuit)
> Probably an inside joke, with the implied message of "we're better than
> Rabin's Yes".
Well, my interpretation is that they wanted to say "We're the true Yes"!
Mårten
Again, if you have a copy just look at the bar code and your questions will be answered.
chrisL
____________________________________________________
A lone prog fan in the middle mid midwest.
http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Club/2977/
remove "REMOVE_THIS_NOW" to reply if you see it. . .
It's the catalogue number of the record label.
guy