i have a damn good reason to ask this here.
mike.
Steve
=rwa=
dan
=rwa=
OK, here's what I got from the horses mouth. actually it was from pat's
fingers typing. he said that the deal had been done with rock records
based out of japan... he has no word on when it will be released, but
as soon as he knows, he will tell us. weither that be to someone via
e-mail, or on his glorious webpage. as for pat and the royalties. I
dunno about that dude. check with pat. he might be holding out to get a
new pair of speedo's or something...
Steve
=rwa=
just for arguments sake....whats does special g. being cut have to do with
pinkerton? rivers wrote pinkerton...pat wrote special g. (which none of us have
heard)...what if special g. was like a country band? would it be logical for
geffen to cut it because it didn't sound like the sweater song & was
depressing?
dan
I dont claim to be an expert on the decisions of the music industry, but I
think that it may be that DGC wanted to not put much money into promoting
SG and thought that if they released it on the piggyback of a largely
successful PInkerton, they coulda maximized some money there.
Pinkerton was not as much a big selling record, and subsequently took the
air out of the plan for marketing SG. To think that Geffen looked at The
Special Goodness as some sort of totally independent entity would be
naiive, I think. They were hoping it would be a sort of spinoff, you dig?
I think that in some ways that may be why the Rentals have been moved
around, with Maverick hoping to coincide with a successful weezer record
if the Rentals is ever to be relased.
In TV they make spinoffs of shows like "Happy Days," and not "Hello
Larry." Unfortunately for SG, Pinkerton was less of a hype generator than
the blue album.
DOnt get me wrong, I dont think this was a decision that went on in the
minds of anyone other than record company wonks, not in any artist's
minds. And for the record, I really loved "Hello Larry." It took place,
after all, in Portland.
Steve Stadtfeld, =w=#6000