Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Star Trek by George Lucas, Lucas an immoral man?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

LIBERATOR

unread,
May 9, 2009, 10:52:40 PM5/9/09
to
Why would George Lucas use an alias and make a Star Trek?

Is it that he is envious and jealous of the origination by Adolf
Hitler that William Shatner traveled with Adolf Hitler in a huge
flying saucer and thus the last dying days of Adolf Hitler Shatner
wanted to make a tribute for the public so the public would know that
something extraordinary happened even if they were told it was just
science-fiction it would be on their minds and they could suspect it
as being true.

So Star Trek is by Adolf Hitler, all the crew of Star Trek TOS
actually were involved with Adolf Hitler. George Lucas did not do
anything to progress mankind to space exploration. He has been jealous
of me and my father for a long time, me more so it would seem. The
fact is proven by him trying to infiltrate Star Trek using an alias to
make his own and in his eyes he probably did it better. I have not see
the films with William Shatner, I have seen all the TOS and the latest
Star Trek television series have not been good, thus Lucas has a good
launching pad for appreciation for his film. He did a great job. 4
stars out of 5 from me, but the fact of the matter that he wants to
involve himself that was a rival of his shows animosity and ill
character. If he was to use his original name and not hide behind an
alias his act of animosity could be seen as appreciation and
dedication instead.

It's interesting that Shatner was not involved as I thought he was,
neither as an actor or crafter. Does this mean he is a true enemy of
George Lucas? I know Bill is not a hostile man but George Lucas
knowing that Bill did travel with me as Adolf Hitler and George being
fiercely jealous of the Nazi culture and lifetime of whcih to falsely
say he believes the holocaust when he knows by CIA record it did not
happen, shows he has hostility for William Shatner, so is that what
made Bill not be in the movie? Simply, if there was a real JJ Abrams
and he was the director would Bill have been in the movie?

George Lucas and Steven Spielberg created the contamination named
Virginia Newbon, the actions of her from their social engineering to
her have made her abusive and obsessive and it was all done on
purpose. They took advantage of her inability to think the distance,
they catered to her addictrive personality of which she was graced
wtih overwhelming powers to serve the addictive desire for power over
me, of which she is robbing me, assaulting me, framing me and putting
me in prison - this is because I was Adolf Hitler and they want me to
be at warfare with any potential mate. They short-circuited her
intellect so that she is carrying corrupt ideals to base her relative
state to a man, she believes by what she feels and only her feelings
count, it is the reality the man should abide to. So this is a power
complex that was embedded by them in her, of which to give her NSA
powers she can war me until I am weakened to a collapse and this is
where they having Virginia Newbon puppeted they will achieve puppeting
over me.

So by the fact that Star Trek is by me, from me, about me, Lucas now
does it himself to try to "I outdid you with your own subjectmatter in
and about your own subject matter".

Thus, me, Stron Shatner, Warner Brothers need to retaliate with a
better film. Shatner still looks great he should still be a Commander.
I have an idea for the best Star Trek. Put Kirsten Dunst in there as a
Starship Commander... hehe.. no that's an additional idea.

0 new messages