Bill
"Bill" <WRBL...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:dUn19.55023$qn5.2...@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
I'm glad you mentions the style of music, because those horns you listed
are all over the map. For big bans, small combo, the bach would not be
on my short list, although it would be on everybody's short list for
symphony work. The Conn 112H could be a very good one for what you're
doing. Try to take one out on approval. I have a friend who sounds
just right on a Reynolds contempra. He plays in a quirky combo that has
rhythm section, tenor sax and trombone quartet. Go figure. The band
leader has written 100 superb arrangements for this instrumentation and
that Contempra is just the sound you want for that.
If you find a King Duo Gravis (is that a 5B?) you might give that a
play.
>
>If you find a King Duo Gravis (is that a 5B?) you might give that a
>play.
No, the Duo Gravis is a true base trombone while the 5B is a very
large tenor.
kent
-----------== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----= Over 100,000 Newsgroups - Unlimited Fast Downloads - 19 Servers =-----
If you're lucky and find one an Olds P24G double independent is not too hard
work but still makes a good sound. (my one makes me sound like a good bass
trombone, nearly a miracle, me that is)
You should also look for a suitable mouthpiece, again not too big - Bach 2G
, Schilke 58.
Main advice - take an experienced friend or teacher/professional if possible
and take your time.
Chris.
"Kent" <not.an....@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ai0dkuc3oqkd1v2i9...@4ax.com...
Duo Gravis = 6B
The 5B was a .547" bore horn; essentially a 4BF with a larger bell.
Come to think of it, a 5B isn't a bad choice for a dual-purpose
combo/big band horn. Sort of an "almost bass".
John Lowe
> If you're stepping up from a medium large bore tenor don't try to fill a big
> bass trombone.
Why not? I've had many students make the adgustment quite well
with no adverse side effects.
>
> If you're lucky and find one an Olds P24G double independent is not too hard
> work but still makes a good sound.
So does a Bach 50.
>
> You should also look for a suitable mouthpiece, again not too big - Bach 2G
> , Schilke 58.
Agreed. A Bach 2G is a good starting point for the bass trombonist.
>
> Main advice - take an experienced friend or teacher/professional if possible
> and take your time.
Agreed.
--
Don Patterson
DCP Music Printing
Professional Music Copy
and Arrangements
don...@olg.com
"Sometimes I wonder. We are told that the little things
in life are what make life worth living. Then we are
told, "Don't sweat the small stuff". Does this mean that
if the little things in life don't happen, and we don't
'sweat it', life is not worth living?"
> Actikid wrote:
>>
> SNIP
>>
>> If you find a King Duo Gravis (is that a 5B?) you might give that a
>> play.
>
> Duo Gravis = 6B
Are you sure of this? I had a student that had his own 6B and
it wasn't a Duo Gravis. It's actually bigger than a Duo Gravis.
>
> The 5B was a .547" bore horn; essentially a 4BF with a larger bell.
>
> Come to think of it, a 5B isn't a bad choice for a dual-purpose
> combo/big band horn. Sort of an "almost bass".
Agreed. I almost bought one in college before I came to my
senses and bought a true orchestral horn. It's a good horn
and makes a good sound, but not quite the same color sought
after by most professional orchestral sections.
Still using the DG a lot! It's a great big band horn.
I would be interested if anyone knows when the DG was discontinued. The last
bass that King marketed was an in-line independent.
--
Keith in Bb/F/D
I always thought the 7B was the "duo gravis."
cd
--
Death to all Absolutists!
The 2107 (7B) was (is?) an in-line design (B flat/F/G flat/D), with a
.562" bore and a 9.625" bell. Dillon's still lists it on their site.
King also made an 8B for a while, but I cannot find any info on it. If
memory serves, the 8B was retooled and is now sold as the Benge 290. The
290 is also an in-line horn (B flat/F/G flat/D) with a .562" bore, but
it has a 10" bell.
King has been known to play a bit fast and loose with model
designations, though. The 2B has gone through a lot of variations over
the years. It may well be that there was an earlier model called a
Duo-Gravis that had a smaller bore, but I can't find any info on it.
I did find one site that referred to the 2107/7B as a Duo-Gravis; I
think some people just generically refer to any double-rotor King by
that name.
John Lowe
--
Keith in Bb/F/D
"John Lowe" <jlo...@pacbell.com> wrote in message
news:3D49ED85...@pacbell.com...
A buddy of mine bought a King 8B in the early '80s. IIRC, it was also a .562
bore, but it had independent rotors and a 10.5" bell. Didn't stick with it,
though -- he soon went to a Bach 50 with a gold brass 10.5" bell,
lightweight slide and independent rotors. I still am amazed that he played
that with a Schilke 60E1e!
James
--
That ain't workin'.
That's the way ya do it.
Ya play the trambone with a Bach 4G...
-- with apologies to Mark Knopfler
"Keith Marr" <ma...@gothicway.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aidvrr$8fc$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...