I can by a used Bach 42B in very good condition for $750, or a new Blessing
B88 for $665.
Your pro/con suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Tom Stroud
Bachs tend to be very varied in their quality, if it is a good horn with
good mechanicals then I would go with it, but in my experience the good
ones are far and few between. I once personally tested eight different
42B horns and mixed and matched the parts to get one that was decent.
Also, IMHO, Bach horns tend to sound very heavy and don't blend well with
other brands of horns, while the Blessing is a copy of the Conn 88H which
is a great all around horn that tends to blend easier withing a section.
I have a student who plays on a B88 and he sounds great both in solo and
sectional playing.
bruce
I have a Bach 42 that was given to me by my father. It is 70's vintage. It is
an outstanding hor.
And remember....The toads march off to war at noon.
I've been playing on a Blessing B-88 for 5 years. I never thought I'd see
the day when they were being compared to Bach's.
The Blessing works well for me, but the quality can also vary, just like on
the Bach.
Play both before you buy. Consider trying a Conn 88H or the Yamaha 681 (?)
as well if you get a chance. They may cost more than you are able to spend,
but will help you decide what works best for you.
Raptor3X wrote in message <19981108121707...@ng119.aol.com>...
compared to my 42, i've found most other large bore horns stuffier-B88
included.
Joe
Brian Dupuis
Undergraduate Trombonist
Louisiana State University